Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A randomized, multicenter, double blind, split-face study in subjects seeking NLF correction. Subjects were treated with Revanesse Ultra in the NLF on one side of the face and Restylane in the NLF on the other side of the face. The side of the face for each product was randomly assigned. The investigator performing the evaluations and the subject were blinded to the treatment; injections of the study product were performed by an unblinded injecting investigator.
The study was a randomized, double-blind prospective, comparative study of the efficacy and safety of Revanesse Ultra versus the approved product Restylane in the cutaneous correction of NLFs. Randomization followed a 1:1 within-subject control model of augmentation correction of NLFs. Given that the implants have been shown to not migrate, the within-subject model was ideal and had already been shown in previous studies to detect differences. Subjects with signs of NLFs who met the entry criteria were enrolled. All subjects were followed for efficacy and safety for 6 months. Subjects could have open-label retreatment as needed with Revanesse Ultra at 6 months if their baseline WSRS scores had returned to baseline, or as needed to achieve optimal correction if their baseline WSRS scores had not returned to baseline and were followed for a total of 12 months. The study design was appropriate for the indication studied.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revanesse Ultra | Experimental | Revanesse Ultra in the NLF on one side of the face |
|
| Restylane | Active Comparator | Restylane injection in the NLF on the other side of the face to optimal correction |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revanesse Ultra | Device | NLF correction |
| |
| Restylane |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Efficacy Variable is Change From Baseline to Visit 6/Week 24 in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) Score | Primary efficacy variable is change from Baseline to Visit 6/Week 24 in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) - Treatment success is defined as at least a 1-grade improvement in WSRS from baseline to Week 24 WSRS Score categories:
| Visit 6/Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary Efficacy Endpoints Are the Responder Rate, Percentage of *Nasolabial Folds* With Treatment Success | Treatment success (defined as at least a 1-grade improvement in WSRS from baseline to Week 24): The WSRS Score is a 5-point scale. The WSRS score was assessed for each NLF at every study visit through Visit 6/Week 24 by a blinded evaluator (blinded to the treatment assignment of each NLF). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Other Efficacy Variables Include Change in WSRS Score | Treatment success is (defined as at least a 1-grade improvement in WSRS from baseline to Week 24) | Visit 2/Week 1, Visit 3/Week 2, Visit 4/Week 4, and Visit 5/Week 12 |
| Other Efficacy Variables Include Change in Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement (pGAI) Score |
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for the study:
Men or women 22 years of age or older.
Two fully visible bilateral nasolabial folds each with a Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale Score of 3 or 4 that may be corrected with an injectable dermal filler.
If female and of childbearing potential, a negative urine pregnancy test and agree to use adequate contraception. Female subjects of childbearing potential (excluding women who are surgically sterilized or postmenopausal for at least 2 years) must have a negative urine pregnancy test and must be willing to use a medically accepted method of contraception during the study. The following are considered acceptable methods of birth control for the purpose of this study: oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches, contraceptive implant, vaginal contraceptive, double barrier methods (e.g., condom and spermicide), contraceptive injection (Depo-Provera®), intrauterine device (IUD), hormonal IUD (Mirena®), and abstinence with a documented second acceptable method of birth control if the subject becomes sexually active. Subjects entering the study who are on hormonal contraceptives must have been on the method for at least 90 days prior to the study and continue the method for the duration of the study. Subjects who had used hormonal contraception and stopped must have stopped no less than 90 days prior to Visit 1/Day 1.
Ability to understand and comply with the requirements of the study.
Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent.
Agree to refrain from seeking other treatment for this condition during the study.
-
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale Score of ≤ 2 on the right or left nasolabial fold.
Women who are pregnant or lactating.
Received prior dermabrasion, facelift, or Botox below the orbital rim within 6 months (180 days) prior to entry into the study.
Previous tissue augmentation (bulking agents) for facial wrinkles and scars within 6 months (180 days) at the proposed injection sites.
Previous tissue augmentation with permanent implants.
Evidence of scar-related disease or delayed healing activity within the past 1 year.
Scars at the intended treatment sites.
History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scars.
Any infection or wound on the face.
Allergic history including anaphylaxis or multiple severe allergies to natural rubber latex or lidocaine.
Aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 1 week (7 days) prior to treatment.
Concomitant anticoagulant therapy, antiplatelet therapy, or history of bleeding disorders or connective tissue disorders.
Over-the-counter (OTC) wrinkle products or prescription wrinkle treatments within 4 weeks (28 days) prior to treatment and throughout the study.
Immunocompromised or immunosuppressed.
Clinically significant organic disease including clinically significant cardiovascular, hepatic, pulmonary, neurologic, or renal disease or other medical condition, serious intercurrent illness, or extenuating circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude participation in the trial.
Received any investigational product within 30 days of signing the Informed Consent Form.
Facial tattoo that may interfere with diagnosis.
Systemic (oral/injectable) corticosteroids or immunosuppressive medications within 30 days prior to treatment and topical steroids on the face within 14 days prior to treatment start and throughout the study.
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael H Gold, MD | Tennessee Clinical Research Center | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Bilateral Treatment With Revanesse Ultra and Restylane | Randomized treatment with Revanesse Ultra in the Nasolabial Fold (NLF) on one side of the face, and Restylane on the opposite side of the face - the study is a randomized, multicenter, double blind, split-face study in subjects seeking NLF correction. Subjects were treated with Revanesse Ultra in the NLF on one side of the face and Restylane in the NLF on the other side of the face. The side of the face for each product was randomly assigned. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
There were 163 participants enrolled and treated, the participants received bilateral NLF injection with Revanesse Ultra in one NLF, and Restylane in the other NLF
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Split Face Study Bilateral Revanesse Ultra vs Restylane in NLF | Split face study - Revanesse Ultra in the NLF on one side of the face and Restylane on the opposite side of the face for NLF correction, treatment is randomized |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Primary Efficacy Variable is Change From Baseline to Visit 6/Week 24 in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) Score | Primary efficacy variable is change from Baseline to Visit 6/Week 24 in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) - Treatment success is defined as at least a 1-grade improvement in WSRS from baseline to Week 24 WSRS Score categories:
| Analysis of effectiveness based on Per Protocol analysis which includes 125 evaluable patients at 24 weeks. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | scores on a scale | Visit 6/Week 24 | Nasolabial Folds | Nasolabial Folds |
24 weeks
Treatment safety was evaluated by frequency and percent of subjects and investigators reporting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) tabulated by treatment group, location, frequency, severity and duration after each treatment (initial treatment, touch up) and throughout the study. TEAEs were assessed by a subject diary after each injection, touch up and follow up visit, and were reported by the Evaluating Investigator at each of the follow-up visits
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Revanesse Ultra | Revanesse Ultra in the NLF on one side of the face Revanesse Ultra: NLF correction |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment emergent Injection site vascular complication | General disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Non-systematic Assessment | Device related serious adverse event of a possible vascular event |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INJECTION SITE HAEMATOMA | General disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Non-systematic Assessment | bruising at the injection site |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ario Khoshbin, President | Prollenium Medical Technologies, Inc. | 866-353-3015 |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Oct 28, 2015 | Dec 12, 2017 | Prot_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
NLF Correction |
|
| Visit 6/Week 24 |
Treatment success is (defined as at least a 1-grade improvement in WSRS from baseline to Week 24) |
| Visit 2/Week 1, Visit 3/Week 2, Visit 4/Week 4, and Visit 5/Week 12 |
| Other Efficacy Variables Include Change in Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement (iGAI) Score | Treatment success is (defined as at least a 1-grade improvement in WSRS from baseline to Week 24) | Visit 2/Week 1, Visit 3/Week 2, Visit 4/Week 4, and Visit 5/Week 12 |
| NLF Treatments |
|
| years |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Fitzpatrick Skin Type (FST) Classification | FST Type I skin always burns, never tans (pale white; blond or red hair; blue, gray eyes; freckles) FST Type II skin usually burns, tans minimally (white; blond, brown or red hair; blue, green, or hazel eyes) FST Type III skin sometimes has a mild burn, tans uniformly (cream white; yellowish; any hair color or brown eyes) FST Type IV skin burns minimally, always tans well (light brown; olive; dark brown to black hair) FST Type V skin very rarely burns, tans very easily (brown) FST Type VI skin never burns, always tans (deeply pigmented dark brown to darkest brown, black in complexion) | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | BMI is the body mass divided by the square of the body height, and is universally expressed in units of kg/m^2 | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Revanesse Ultra | Revanesse Ultra in the NLF on one side of the face Revanesse Ultra: NLF correction |
| OG001 | Restylane | Restylane injection in the NLF on the other side of the face to optimal correction Restylane: NLF Correction |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Secondary Efficacy Endpoints Are the Responder Rate, Percentage of *Nasolabial Folds* With Treatment Success | Treatment success (defined as at least a 1-grade improvement in WSRS from baseline to Week 24): The WSRS Score is a 5-point scale. The WSRS score was assessed for each NLF at every study visit through Visit 6/Week 24 by a blinded evaluator (blinded to the treatment assignment of each NLF). | Per-Protocol (PP) Population | Posted | Count of Units | Nasolabial Folds | Visit 6/Week 24 | Nasolabial Folds | Nasolabial Folds |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Other Efficacy Variables Include Change in WSRS Score | Treatment success is (defined as at least a 1-grade improvement in WSRS from baseline to Week 24) | Not Posted | Visit 2/Week 1, Visit 3/Week 2, Visit 4/Week 4, and Visit 5/Week 12 | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Other Efficacy Variables Include Change in Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement (pGAI) Score | Treatment success is (defined as at least a 1-grade improvement in WSRS from baseline to Week 24) | Not Posted | Visit 2/Week 1, Visit 3/Week 2, Visit 4/Week 4, and Visit 5/Week 12 | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Other Efficacy Variables Include Change in Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement (iGAI) Score | Treatment success is (defined as at least a 1-grade improvement in WSRS from baseline to Week 24) | Not Posted | Visit 2/Week 1, Visit 3/Week 2, Visit 4/Week 4, and Visit 5/Week 12 | Participants |
| 0 |
| 163 |
| 0 |
| 163 |
| 114 |
| 163 |
| EG001 | Restylane | Restylane injection in the NLF on the other side of the face to optimal correction Restylane: NLF Correction | 0 | 163 | 1 | 163 | 137 | 163 |
|
|
| INJECTION SITE SWELLING | General disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Non-systematic Assessment | swelling at the injection site |
|
| INJECTION SITE PAIN | General disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Non-systematic Assessment | pain at the injection site |
|
| INJECTION SITE ERYTHEMA | General disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Non-systematic Assessment | redness at the injection site |
|
There are restrictions within the site contracts that the sites cannot publish any results and also have confidentiality agreements in place separately that restrict any publications by sites regarding results, findings, etc.