Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| PG thesis 003421 | Other Identifier | Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the feasibility, success and safety of Transradial approach (TRA) verses Transfemoral approach (TFA) for diagnostic and therapeutic coronary angiography and coronary interventions, in terms of procedural time, access time, fluoroscopy time, procedural failure, , length of hospital stay in terms of days in hospital, Complications in terms of thrombophlebitis, hematoma, ecchymosis, infections thrombosis of vessel, MACE, Stroke and others.
Background: PCI has been done traditionally through transfemoral route. But now transradial and transbrachial routes are also coming up in practice. We compared transradial versus transfemoral routes for ease of operability, time for procedure, complications, and failure rates through a prospective study. Methods: 400 Patients admitted in department of cardiology for percutaneous interventions were enrolled in the study. 200 patients were assigned to each group randomly. A single team did all the procedures. Pre procedure, intra procedure and post procedure data of all the patients was collected, tabulated and analysed properly.
The variables studied include Access time ,Fluoroscopy time and overall procedure time, post procedure complications( ecchymosis ,Thrombophelibites, Hematoma, procedure access bleed), Failure rates,post procedure myocardial infarction, stroke, acute renal failure and infections.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transfemoral | Active Comparator | in case of transfemoral approach our preference was to use right femoral route. The groin was prepared and draped and the site was punctured for femoral access after anesthetizing the skin with 2-4 ml of 1% lignocaine. Once the femoral puncture was done 6F sheath of Cordis variety was introduced and 6F Judkins, catheter was introduced and it was guided under fluoroscopic guidance through the aortic route. |
|
| Transradial | Active Comparator | Our preference was to use the right radial and right femoral routes as they are nearest to operator while facing cardiac monitors, in our hospital. For the radial approach, the wrist was sterilized and draped in usual fashion. Hyperextension over an arm board was done and skin over the puncture site was anesthetized with 2 - 3 ml of 1% lignocaine. A small scaled incision was performed 1 cm proximal to styloid process of radius where arterial pulse was best felt. The radial artery was punctured with a 21 G needle and 6 F sheath (Cardis, Terumo) were introduced into the artery, using Seldinger technique. All patients received verapamil (5mg) to reduce radial artery spasm. Heparin (weight adjusted) was used only in PCIs to prevent artery occlusion and not in elective diagnostic coronary studies. Long 0.038 Terumo guide wire was used under fluoroscopic guidance. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| transradial | Procedure | transradial route for coronary angiography and PCI |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Access time | Access time for the procedures | 4 years |
| Fluoroscopy time | measure of radiation exposure | 4 years |
| Procedure time | time taken to do the full procedure | 4 years |
| hospital stay | time period the patient stayed in the hospital | 4 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| hematoma | hematoma development at the site of puncture | 4 years |
| pseudoaneurysm | local complication at the access site | 4 years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with impaired renal function tests.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Fayaz Bhat, MBBS, MD | Ministry of Health, Jammu and Kashmir, India. | Study Chair |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28077091 | Derived | Bhat FA, Changal KH, Raina H, Tramboo NA, Rather HA. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty - A prospective, randomized comparison. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 11;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0457-2. |
Not provided
Not provided
can be shared by email
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Transfemoral | Procedure | transfemoral route for coronary angiography and PCI |
|
| bleeding | at the access site | 4 years |
| Access site failure | failure to gain access for the procedure | 4 years |
| D001161 |
| Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |