Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Health Quality Ontario | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Health Quality Ontario (HQO) is the provincial advisor on quality in health care. HQO currently conducts audit and feedback as a key quality improvement strategy. For example, it offers physicians working in long-term care homes with access to practice reports detailing rates of high-risk prescribing in comparison with others in Ontario and suggested change ideas. Research shows that providing this kind of feedback can lead to improvements in care. However, the size of these improvements depends how the feedback is presented. For instance, prior research suggests that how the results are 'framed' and what sort of benchmark the recipient is compared to may each affect how the physician will respond. This factorial trial tests each of these aspects of feedback design in the context of practice reports that nursing home physicians have already signed up to receive quarterly.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm 1, Positive Framing | Experimental | All metrics in the audit and feedback practice reports presented with 'positive' framing, where the proportion of patients safe from risk (i.e., appropriate/desirable prescribing behaviours) is described. |
|
| Arm 2, Negative Framing | Experimental | All metrics in the audit and feedback practice reports presented with 'negative' framing, where the proportion of patients at risk (i.e., due to inappropriate/undesirable prescribing behaviours) is described. |
|
| Arm 3, Top Quartile Comparator | Experimental | All metrics in the audit and feedback practice reports presented and the physician-recipient's performance is compared against the 75th percentile for performance by physicians working in nursing homes in the province for each metric. |
|
| Arm 4, Average Comparator | Experimental | All metrics in the audit and feedback practice reports presented and the physician-recipient's performance is compared against the average performance by physicians working in nursing homes in the province for each metric. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audit and Feedback | Behavioral |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CNS-active medication prescribing | monthly number of CNS-active medications per resident (antipsychotics, opioids, benzodiazepines or antidepressants (including TCAs and trazodone)) | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Benzodiazepine (or z-drug) prescribing | days supplied (continuous) | 6 months |
| Benzodiazepine (or z-drug) rates | monthly proportion | 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Noah M Ivers, MD PhD CCFP | Women's College Hospital - University of Toronto | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women's College Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | M5S1B2 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24438584 | Background | Ivers NM, Sales A, Colquhoun H, Michie S, Foy R, Francis JJ, Grimshaw JM. No more 'business as usual' with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention. Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 17;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-14. | |
| 22696318 | Background | Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, O'Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Health Quality Ontario Long-Term Care Practice Report | View source |
Not provided
Analyses of outcomes use routine administrative database holdings.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Antipsychotic rates | monthly proportion | 6 months |
| Antipsychotic prescribing | days supplied (continuous) | 6 months |
| Mean Antipsychotic dose | Dose equivalent of antipsychotic dispensed (continuous) | 6 months |
| Mean Benzodiazepine dose | Dose equivalent of benzodiazepine dispensed (continuous) | 6 months |
| 3+ CNS-active medications | monthly proportion supplied three or more meds from the following classes: antipsychotics, opioids, benzodiazepines, or antidepressants (including TCAs and trazodone). | 6 months |
| Anti-depressant prescribing | days supplied (continuous) - balance measure | 6 months |
| Anti-acid prescribing | days supplied (continuous) - tracer outcome | 6 months |
| Statin prescribing | days supplied (continuous) - tracer outcome | 6 months |
| 11401608 | Background | Kiefe CI, Allison JJ, Williams OD, Person SD, Weaver MT, Weissman NW. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001 Jun 13;285(22):2871-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.22.2871. |
| 22161408 | Background | Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, Vist GE, Terrenato I, Sperati F, Costiniuk C, Blank D, Schunemann H. Framing of health information messages. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD006777. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006777.pub2. |
| 21091758 | Background | Kluger AN, Van Dijk D. Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Med Educ. 2010 Dec;44(12):1166-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03849.x. |
| 11708039 | Background | Hibbard JH, Peters E, Slovic P, Finucane ML, Tusler M. Making health care quality reports easier to use. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Nov;27(11):591-604. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27051-5. |
| 25070404 | Background | Gould NJ, Lorencatto F, Stanworth SJ, Michie S, Prior ME, Glidewell L, Grimshaw JM, Francis JJ. Application of theory to enhance audit and feedback interventions to increase the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice: an intervention development protocol. Implement Sci. 2014 Jul 29;9:92. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0092-1. |
| 10461579 | Background | Weissman NW, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, Farmer RM, Weaver MT, Williams OD, Child IG, Pemberton JH, Brown KC, Baker CS. Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCs of benchmarking. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Aug;5(3):269-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00203.x. |
| 22456088 | Background | Li AC, Kannry JL, Kushniruk A, Chrimes D, McGinn TG, Edonyabo D, Mann DM. Integrating usability testing and think-aloud protocol analysis with "near-live" clinical simulations in evaluating clinical decision support. Int J Med Inform. 2012 Nov;81(11):761-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 27. |
| 22530986 | Background | Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37. |
| 37165413 | Derived | McCleary N, Desveaux L, Presseau J, Reis C, Witteman HO, Taljaard M, Linklater S, Thavorn K, Dobell G, Mulhall CL, Lam JMC, Grimshaw JM, Ivers NM. Engagement is a necessary condition to test audit and feedback design features: results of a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial with an embedded process evaluation. Implement Sci. 2023 May 10;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01271-6. |
| 28705208 | Derived | Ivers NM, Desveaux L, Presseau J, Reis C, Witteman HO, Taljaard MK, McCleary N, Thavorn K, Grimshaw JM. Testing feedback message framing and comparators to address prescribing of high-risk medications in nursing homes: protocol for a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2017 Jul 14;12(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0615-7. |