Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multi-site, randomized, open-label, effectiveness trial comparing three treatment arms for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients with TRD who are currently on ongoing, stable and adequate antidepressant therapy (ADT). Adequate ADT is defined as a therapeutically sufficient dose for a sufficient treatment period, which would be expected to be effective as listed in the MGH Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (ATRQ). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to one of three open-label treatment arms: a) aripiprazole augmentation, b) rTMS augmentation, and c) switching to venlafaxine XR or Duloxetine.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aripiprazole Augmentation | Experimental | Patients randomized to this treatment arm will be instructed to continue all permitted psychotropics at their current dose throughout the 8-week trial and initiate adjunctive aripiprazole. The starting dose will be 5mg daily. The dose may be reduced to as low as 2mg for tolerability issues (this will be the lowest dose permitted for continuation in the trial). The dose may be adjusted in 2 or 5mg increments. The minimum time per increment will be 7 days. The maximum dose will be set at 15mg daily. For patients who are not on potent cytochrome 2D6 inhibitors (such as paroxetine, fluoxetine, duloxetine) or on potent cytochrome 3A4 inhibitors (such as fluvoxamine and nefazodone) and who are able to tolerate 15mg daily, the maximum dose can be raised to 20mg daily for efficacy. |
|
| rTMS Augmentation | Experimental | Patients randomized to this treatment arm will be instructed to continue all permitted psychotropics at their current dose throughout the 8-week trial. We will use clinical TMS stimulators with focal figure-of-eight coils. We will start by measuring the patient´s motor threshold (MT), which is a measure of cortical excitability used to standardize the intensity of stimulation across subjects. |
|
| Switching To Venlafaxine XR | Experimental | Patients randomized to this treatment arm will be instructed to continue all permitted psychotropics throughout the 8-week trial, except for their antidepressant(s). They will be instructed to discontinue all antidepressants and initiate venlafaxine that day, as direct switch to serotonergic antidepressants is well tolerated and avoids loss of precious therapeutic time (Montgomery et al., 2014), including to switching to venlafaxine in STAR*D (Rush et al., 2006b). For patients who do not prefer a direct switch, or when clinically indicated otherwise in the opinion of the site investigator, a gradual tapering during the screening period will be permitted as long as a direct switch to venlafaxine is made on the baseline visit from the final antidepressant dose. The starting dose of venlafaxine will be 75mg daily. The dose may be reduced to as low as 37.5mg for tolerability issues (this will be the lowest dose permitted for continuation in the trial). |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aripiprazole | Drug | Oral adjunctive therapy with aripiprazole, dose adjusted for effectiveness and tolerability. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) | The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the severity of depressive symptoms. The scale consists of 10 items evaluating apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Each item is scored from 0 to 6. Item scores are summed to calculate a total MADRS score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms and a worse outcome. | 8 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life, Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) | The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) is a self-reported assessment tool used to evaluate an individual's degree of enjoyment and satisfaction across various areas of daily functioning. The questionnaire assesses domains such as physical health, mood, work, household activities, social relationships, leisure activities, and overall well-being. The short form consists of 16 items, with respondents rating their level of satisfaction and functioning over the past week. The first 14 items are summed to generate a total raw score ranging from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction and better quality of life. Raw scores may also be converted to a percentage of the maximum possible score, ranging from 0% to 100%, to facilitate interpretation and comparison across studies. The final two items assess overall medication satisfaction and overall life satisfaction and are typically analyzed separately rather than included |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Symptoms Questionnaire (MGH CPFQ) | The Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (MGH CPFQ) is a self-reported assessment tool designed to evaluate cognitive and physical symptoms commonly associated with depression and its treatment. The questionnaire assesses areas such as motivation, wakefulness, energy, focus, memory, mental sharpness, and physical well-being. The instrument consists of 7 items, each rated on a 6-point scale from 1 (greater than normal functioning) to 6 (totally absent or severe impairment). Item scores are summed to generate a total score ranging from 7 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in cognitive and physical functioning. The MGH CPFQ is widely used in clinical research to assess functional deficits associated with depression and to monitor changes in cognitive and physical symptoms during treatment. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The University of Alabama School of Medicine | Birmingham | Alabama | 35294 | United States | ||
| Pacific Institute of Medical Research |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40801757 | Derived | Guidetti C, Chaikali S, Trivedi MH, Shelton RC, Iosifescu DV, Thase ME, Jha MK, Mathew SH, DeBattista C, Dokucu ME, Brawman-Mintzer O, Hernandez Ortiz JM, Currier GW, McCall WV, Modirrousta M, Macaluso M, Bystritsky A, Vila-Rodriguez F, Nelson EB, Yeung AS, MacGregor LC, Carmody T, Fava M, Papakostas GI. Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial for Antidepressant Incomplete and Nonresponders With Treatment Resistant Depression (ASCERTAIN-TRD): Effect of Aripiprazole or Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Augmentation Versus Switching to the Antidepressant Venlafaxine on Quality of Life. J Clin Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 11;86(3):24m15614. doi: 10.4088/JCP.24m15614. | |
| 38454079 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Eligible participants with treatment-resistant depression receiving stable antidepressant therapy were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to aripiprazole augmentation, rTMS augmentation, or switch to venlafaxine XR/duloxetine.
Participants were enrolled across 17 sites in the United States and Canada between July 13, 2017 and December 22, 2021.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Aripiprazole Augmentation | Participants received adjunctive aripiprazole added to their ongoing stable antidepressant treatment for 8 weeks. Aripiprazole was flexibly dosed according to protocol and tolerability, up to a maximum dose of 20 mg/day |
| FG001 | rTMS Augmentation |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 23, 2020 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) | Device | Adjunctive therapy with transcranial magnetic stimulation, dose adjusted for effectiveness and tolerability. |
|
| Venlafaxine XR | Drug | Oral switch therapy with venlafaxine, dose adjusted for effectiveness and tolerability. |
|
|
| 8 weeks |
| 8 weeks |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90095 |
| United States |
| Stanford University | Stanford | California | 94305 | United States |
| University of South Florida | Tampa | Florida | 33613 | United States |
| Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| New York University | New York | New York | 10003 | United States |
| University of Cincinnati | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Roper St. Francis Hospital | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
| Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| University of British Columbia | Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada |
| University of Manitoba St. Boniface Hospital | Winnipeg | Manitoba | R2H 2A6 | Canada |
| Derived |
| Papakostas GI, Trivedi MH, Shelton RC, Iosifescu DV, Thase ME, Jha MK, Mathew SJ, DeBattista C, Dokucu ME, Brawman-Mintzer O, Currier GW, McCall WV, Modirrousta M, Macaluso M, Bystritsky A, Rodriguez FV, Nelson EB, Yeung AS, Feeney A, MacGregor LC, Carmody T, Fava M. Comparative effectiveness research trial for antidepressant incomplete and non-responders with treatment resistant depression (ASCERTAIN-TRD) a randomized clinical trial. Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;29(8):2287-2295. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02468-x. Epub 2024 Mar 7. |
Participants received adjunctive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) while continuing their ongoing stable antidepressant treatment for 8 weeks. rTMS was administered according to the study stimulation protocol at participating sites |
| FG002 | Switch to Venlafaxine/Duloxetine | Participants discontinued current antidepressant treatment and switched to venlafaxine XR or duloxetine for 8 weeks. Duloxetine was used for participants who had previously received venlafaxine during the current major depressive episode. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Baseline characteristics include all randomized participants assigned to treatment arms prior to treatment initiation.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Aripiprazole Augmentation | Participants received adjunctive aripiprazole added to their ongoing stable antidepressant treatment for 8 weeks. Aripiprazole was flexibly dosed according to protocol and tolerability, up to a maximum dose of 20 mg/day |
| BG001 | rTMS Augmentation | Participants received adjunctive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) while continuing their ongoing stable antidepressant treatment for 8 weeks. rTMS was administered according to the study stimulation protocol at participating sites |
| BG002 | Switch to Venlafaxine/Duloxetine | Participants discontinued current antidepressant treatment and switched to venlafaxine XR or duloxetine for 8 weeks. Duloxetine was used for participants who had previously received venlafaxine during the current major depressive episode. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed in all randomized participants. | Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed in all randomized participants | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed in all randomized participants. | Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed in all randomized participants. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||
| Number of failed trials | Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed in all randomized participants. | Mean | Standard Deviation | number of failed trials |
| ||||||||||||||
| The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a clinician-rated scale | The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the severity of depressive symptoms. The scale consists of 10 items evaluating apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Each item is scored from 0 to 6. Item scores are summed to calculate a total MADRS score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms and a worse outcome. | Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed in all randomized participants. | Mean | Standard Deviation | points |
| |||||||||||||
| Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ) total score is a self-report questionnaire | This 44-item, validated, patient-rated instrument measures the severity and breadth of depressive symptoms. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale, and item scores are summed to generate a total score ranging from 44 to 264, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity. The SDQ will be used as an additional outcome measure of depressive symptom severity. | Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed in all randomized participants. | Mean | Standard Deviation | points |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) | The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the severity of depressive symptoms. The scale consists of 10 items evaluating apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Each item is scored from 0 to 6. Item scores are summed to calculate a total MADRS score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms and a worse outcome. | 260 randomized subjects with at least one post-baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating (MADRS) assessment were included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | points | 8 weeks |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Quality of Life, Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) | The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) is a self-reported assessment tool used to evaluate an individual's degree of enjoyment and satisfaction across various areas of daily functioning. The questionnaire assesses domains such as physical health, mood, work, household activities, social relationships, leisure activities, and overall well-being. The short form consists of 16 items, with respondents rating their level of satisfaction and functioning over the past week. The first 14 items are summed to generate a total raw score ranging from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction and better quality of life. Raw scores may also be converted to a percentage of the maximum possible score, ranging from 0% to 100%, to facilitate interpretation and comparison across studies. The final two items assess overall medication satisfaction and overall life satisfaction and are typically analyzed separately rather than included | 260 randomized subjects with at least one post-baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating (MADRS) assessment were included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | points | 8 weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Symptoms Questionnaire (MGH CPFQ) | The Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (MGH CPFQ) is a self-reported assessment tool designed to evaluate cognitive and physical symptoms commonly associated with depression and its treatment. The questionnaire assesses areas such as motivation, wakefulness, energy, focus, memory, mental sharpness, and physical well-being. The instrument consists of 7 items, each rated on a 6-point scale from 1 (greater than normal functioning) to 6 (totally absent or severe impairment). Item scores are summed to generate a total score ranging from 7 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in cognitive and physical functioning. The MGH CPFQ is widely used in clinical research to assess functional deficits associated with depression and to monitor changes in cognitive and physical symptoms during treatment. | 260 randomized subjects with at least one post-baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating (MADRS) assessment were included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | points | 8 weeks |
|
From treatment initiation through completion of the 8-week randomized treatment phase
Adverse events were assessed at scheduled study visits during the 8-week randomized treatment phase. Serious adverse events were defined according to FDA criteria. Safety analyses included participants who received study treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Aripiprazole Augmentation | Participants received adjunctive aripiprazole added to their ongoing stable antidepressant treatment for 8 weeks. Aripiprazole was flexibly dosed according to protocol and tolerability, up to a maximum dose of 20 mg/day | 0 | 92 | 0 | 92 | 0 | 92 |
| EG001 | rTMS Augmentation | Participants received adjunctive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) while continuing their ongoing stable antidepressant treatment for 8 weeks. rTMS was administered according to the study stimulation protocol at participating sites | 0 | 84 | 0 | 84 | 0 | 84 |
| EG002 | Switch to Venlafaxine/Duloxetine | Participants discontinued current antidepressant treatment and switched to venlafaxine XR or duloxetine for 8 weeks. Duloxetine was used for participants who had previously received venlafaxine during the current major depressive episode. | 0 | 102 | 0 | 102 | 0 | 102 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Papakostas | Massachusetts General Hospital | 6172904734 | gpapakostas@mgb.org |
| May 7, 2026 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068180 | Aripiprazole |
| D050781 | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| D000069470 | Venlafaxine Hydrochloride |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010879 | Piperazines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D015363 | Quinolones |
| D011804 | Quinolines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D055909 | Magnetic Field Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D003511 | Cyclohexanols |
| D000441 | Hexanols |
| D005233 | Fatty Alcohols |
| D000438 | Alcohols |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D010627 | Phenethylamines |
| D005021 | Ethylamines |
| D000588 | Amines |
| D003510 | Cyclohexanes |
| D003516 | Cycloparaffins |
| D006840 | Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D008055 | Lipids |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
Participants received adjunctive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) while continuing their ongoing stable antidepressant treatment for 8 weeks. rTMS was administered according to the study stimulation protocol at participating sites |
| OG002 | Switch to Venlafaxine/Duloxetine | Participants discontinued current antidepressant treatment and switched to venlafaxine XR or duloxetine for 8 weeks. Duloxetine was used for participants who had previously received venlafaxine during the current major depressive episode. |
|
|
| OG002 | Switch to Ventalaxine/Duloxetine | Participants discontinued current antidepressant treatment and switched to venlafaxine XR or duloxetine for 8 weeks. Duloxetine was used for participants who had previously received venlafaxine during the current major depressive episode. |
|
|