Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Transgene | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The success of anti-CTLA4 therapy has inaugurated a paradigm shift in oncology where drugs target the immune system rather than cancer cells in order to stimulate the anti-tumor immune response. In situ immunization is a strategy where immunomodulatory products such as pathogens are injected into one tumor site in order to trigger a systemic anti-tumor immune response. Of importance, pre-clinical rationale has demonstrated that combination of anti-CTLA4 therapy together with intra-tumoral (IT) oncolytic virus can overcome primary resistance to systemic anti-CTLA4 therapy. Pexastimogene Devacirepvec (Pexa-Vec) is one of the new vaccinia oncolytic viruses genetically modified to express GM-CSF. This new and innovative oncolytic virotherapy should therefore synergize with anti-CTLA4 therapy via virus-induced tumor cell death & tumor-antigen release, GM-CSF-induced recruitment/maturation/activation of antigen presenting cells, and anti-CTLA4-induced Treg blockade/depletion. Intra-tumoral delivery of immunostimulating agents should, therefore, provide lower toxicity of mAb targeting immune checkpoints. Of note, IT injections of GM-CSF-encoding oncolytic viruses have already been shown to induce immune-mediated tumor responses on local (injected) and distant (not injected) tumor sites. In solid injectable refractory/relapsing metastatic tumors, we make the hypothesis that the addition of Pexa-Vec to IT ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4 Ab) will overcome primary/secondary resistance to standard therapy and/or immunotherapy with a better in situ tumor antigen specific T-cell priming. Our proposal is to conduct a 2-part Phase I clinical trial in order to define the feasibility, the safety and the anti-tumor effects of intra-tumoral injections of ipilimumab in combination with the oncolytic virus Pexa-Vec. Dose escalation step will define the MTD and RP2D of that in situ immunization strategy. Expansion part will assess the anti-tumor effect of the combination.
The study is a proof of concept, open label, multicentric, 2-parts, Phase I dose escalation trial. In dose selection part (any histological types except HCC), patients will be treated with an IT boost injection with Pexa-Vec (fixed dose of 1x109 pfu / injection ) alone at Week 1 followed by IT injections of Pexa-Vec + ipilimumab (up to 4 dose levels) at Weeks 3, 5 and 9. The dose escalation part will follow a classical 3+3 design. 3 to 6 patients will be enrolled at each DL (Dose Level) depending of the number of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) observed. At the end of each DL cohort, a teleconference (Dose escalation meeting) will be organized with the sponsor, in order to select the dose for the next cohort. In Expansion cohorts ( up to 3 cohorts) patients will be treated with an IT boost injection with Pexa-Vec alone (fixed dose of 1x109 pfu / injection) at Week 1 followed by IT injections of Pexa-Vec + ipilimumab (RP2D) at Weeks 3, 5 and 9. In both parts, the treatment with both IMPs should be continued as per protocol until Withdrawal of consent, Disease progression as per irRC (immune related response criteria), General or specific changes in the patient's condition that render the patient unacceptable for further treatment in the judgment of the investigator, Pregnancy or Unacceptable adverse events(s) including DLTs.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination PexaVec + Ipilimumab | Experimental |
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pexa-Vec | Biological | IT Injections will be performed by a radiologist using imaging-guidance, ultrasound or computed tomography (CT). The dose to be injected could be divided between 1 to 5 tumor lesions. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Part A (dose selection part): Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | DLT is defined as the occurrence of any of the following events evaluated as related to study drugs and occurring during the first 5 weeks (Part A) of investigative treatment(s): any Grade ≥ 4 treatment related toxicity, any Grade≥ 3 treatment related toxicity lasting more than 7 days (except for flu-like symptoms that respond to standard therapies.), any Grade ≥ 3 treatment related acute immune related AE involving major end organs, Grade ≥ 3 injection site reaction, Any other study drug related toxicity considered significant enough to be qualified as DLT in the opinion of the investigators after discussion with the sponsor. Indeed, as a principle in this Phase I study, any toxicity that the investigator or the sponsor determines to be dose-limiting, regardless of the grade, may be considered as a DLT. | during the DLT assessment window (i.e. during the first 5 weeks of treatment) |
| Part B (expansion cohort): The 3-month objective response rate (ORR) | The 3-month objective response rate is defined by the percentage of patients having complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to immune related Response Criteria (irRC). | 3 months of treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 3-month objective response rate (ORR) | defined by the percentage of patients having complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to irRC (immune related Response Criteria) and to RECIST 1.1 criteria. | 3 months of treatment |
| Best objective response rate |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
NotaBene: for the DL5 and DL6, depending of the size of the injectable lesions, patients should present more than 1 injectable lesion (See Appendix 3). Of note, patients with only one injectable lesion with a diameter = 2 cm are not eligible for theses 2 DLs.
PS ECOG 0 or 1
Minimal wash-out period for prior anti-cancer regimens (i.e. chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiation therapy) > 3 weeks before Week 1 day 1.
Resolution (i.e. ≤ Grade 1) of all toxicity related to prior anti-cancer treatment with exceptions of alopecia Grade 2, neuropathy Grade 2 and according to biological values presented in Criteria I8.
No major surgery within 4 weeks prior Week 1 day 1
Laboratory requirements:
Life expectancy > 3 months
Negative pregnancy test for women of child-bearing potential within 72 hours before Week 1 Day 1
Men and women of reproductive potential must be willing to double barrier methods of contraception during the treatment period and for up to 6 weeks after last Pexa Vec administration.
Patient should understand, sign, and date the written voluntary informed consent form prior to any protocol-specific procedures performed. Patient should be able and willing to comply with study visits and procedures as per protocol.
Patients must be covered by a medical insurance.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Aurélien MARABELLE, MD, PhD | Centre Leon Berard | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institut Bergonie | Bordeaux | 33076 | France | |||
| Centre Léon Bérard |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000074324 | Ipilimumab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Ipilimumab | Drug | IT Injections will be performed by a radiologist using imaging-guidance, ultrasound or computed tomography (CT). The dose to be injected could be divided between 1 to 5 tumor lesions. |
|
|
defined by the percentage of patients having complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as best response at any time point according to irRC and to RECIST 1.1 criteria. |
| from the date of inclusion up to 12 months |
| Disease Control Rate | defined by the rate of patients having complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) according to irRC and to RECIST 1.1 criteria. | from the date of inclusion up to 12 months |
| Duration of response | from the time of first documented objective response (PR or CR according to irRC and to RECIST 1.1 criteria) until the first documented disease progression or death due to underlying cancer, assessed up to 12 months |
| ORR of injected and non injected lesions | OR defined as at least 50% decrease of tumor size | from the date of inclusion up to 12 months |
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | PFS will be estimated using Kaplan Meier method. | from the date of inclusion until the date of first documented event (progression, according to irRC and to RECIST 1.1 criteria, or death due to any cause),up to 12 months |
| Time To progression (TTP) | TTP does not include deaths | from the date of inclusion until the date of first documented radiographic tumor progression, according to irRC and to RECIST 1.1 criteria, up to 12 months |
| Overall Survival (OS) | from the time of inclusion, until the date of death due to any cause, up to 12 months |
| Adverse Events reporting | All AEs will be graded according to NCI-CTCAE, Version 4 | from the treatment start (Week1 Day 1), up to 12 months |
| Lyon |
| 69008 |
| France |
| Hopital Saint Louis | Paris | 75475 | France |
| Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud | Pierre-Bénite | 69310 | France |
| Institut Gustave Roussy | Villejuif | France |
| D007162 |
| Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |