Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A cross-sectional descriptive study, in which the surface electromyographic activity of five shoulder muscles was compared in three populations: older adults, middle-aged adults and young adults. The evaluation of the electromyographic data offers a suitable foundation to understand aging process.
This supports that surface electromyography provide information about the aged shoulder muscles. Loss of functionality is suffered by a high percentage of older adults, which greatly limits their physical activity. In this sense, this paper presents findings that might be related with possible therapeutic approaches in subsequent studies.
The purpose of the present work was to assess neuromotor abnormalities in aging shoulder. Twenty young adults (20-42), 20 middle-aged adults (43-67) and 20older adults (>68) were recruited. A comparative electromyography (EMG) study was performed on the upper and lower trapezius, middle deltoid, infraspinatus and serratus anterior. The EMG measurement (root mean square (RMS)) and onset time of isometric contractions were analyzed. Body mass index and strength were also tested.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I: Older adults | healthy subjects older than 68 years old whose shoulder muscle are measured by surface electromyography | ||
| Group II: Adults | healthy subjects 43 to 67 years old, whose shoulder muscle are measured by surface electromyography | ||
| Group III: Young adults | healthy subjects 20 to 42 years old, whose shoulder muscle are measured by surface electromyography |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The mean Root Mean Square (RMS) value | The electromyographic data were captured simultaneously on a PC by using the LabChart® software. Within the time interval from 2 to 4 seconds after contraction initiation a power spectrum analysis was performed together with the determination of RMS values. The mean RMS values were automatically obtained from the software | 30 minutes |
| onset latency | Start of contraction on the basis of 15% of RMS | 30 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| maximal isometric voluntary contraction | Using hand-held dynamometer | 5 minutes |
| body mass index | 5 minutes |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Participants came from Madrid and Castilla La Mancha (Spain) and voluntarily attended the Unit of the Research Group "Physical Therapy in Women´s Health Processes" in the Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alcalá, and the Ocaña Senior Center.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Maria Tommes Lacomba, PhD | University of Alcalá | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26793036 | Result | Lirio Romero C, Torres Lacomba M, Castilla Montoro Y, Prieto Merino D, Pacheco da Costa S, Velasco Marchante MJ, Bodes Pardo G. Mobilization With Movement for Shoulder Dysfunction in Older Adults: A Pilot Trial. J Chiropr Med. 2015 Dec;14(4):249-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Nov 24. | |
| 20411160 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Phadke V, Camargo P, Ludewig P. Scapular and rotator cuff muscle activity during arm elevation: A review of normal function and alterations with shoulder impingement. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2009 Feb 1;13(1):1-9. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552009005000012. |
| 11018445 | Result | Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Oct;10(5):361-74. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4. |