GAS is a tool to measure progress each participant has towards achieving their individualized goals. The standardized scoring was applied for statistical analysis. A semi-structured interview was conducted with each participant to conduct goal-setting at the outset of study. Another evaluation took place at end of study (EOS) visit to determine the level of progress at that time. The score for each goal ranged from -2 (much worse) to +2 (much better). GAS yielded a norm-based score standardized to a mean of 50 with a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Higher score indicates composite of 3 goals (50 or above) as response.

Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who were enrolled in the treatment period and received at least one dose of the study drug and completed at least one GAS assessment postbaseline. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.

GAS is a tool to measure progress each participant has towards achieving their individualized goals. The standardized scoring was applied for statistical analysis. A semi-structured interview was conducted with each participant to conduct goal-setting at outset of study. Another evaluation took place at EOS visit to determine level of progress at that time. The score for each goal ranged from -2 (much worse) to +2 (much better). GAS yielded a norm-based score standardized to a mean of 50 with SD of 10. The total score ranges between 22.6 and 77.4. A positive change from baseline in the composite of 3 goals (50 or above) indicates response.

FAS included all participants who were enrolled in the treatment period and received at least one dose of the study drug and completed at least one GAS assessment postbaseline. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.

PHQ-9 is a well-established participant reported outcome tool for assessment of change in depressive symptoms and is a sensitive measure of depression severity. The PHQ-9 consists of a 9-item scale originally developed for primary care settings, with 1 item corresponding to each of the 9 made symptom criteria for depression in diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM), asking if they have bothered the participant over the last 2 weeks. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). If any problems are answered 1 or higher, a final question on how difficult those problems made it to do work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people is completed, rated from not difficult at all to extremely difficult. The 9 questions are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 27 with higher scores reflecting greater severity. A positive change from baseline indicates severe condition.

FAS included all participants who were enrolled in the treatment period and received at least one dose of the study drug and completed at least one GAS assessment postbaseline. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.

The PDQ-D is a 20-item, patient-reported questionnaire with a 7-day recall period. Scores for four subscales. All 20 items use the same 5-point ordinal categorical response scale to reflect the frequency of experiencing a specific cognitive problem in the past 7 days. Scores for each of the four measured subscales are calculated by assigning a value of 0 ("never in the past 7 days"), 1 ("rarely - once or twice"), 2 ("sometimes - 3-5 times"), 3 ("often - about once a day"), or 4 ("very often - more than once a day") to each item, then summing the five items of that subscale, to produce a score ranging from 0 to 20. A total global score for overall cognitive dysfunction (range 0-80) is calculated by summing the four subscale scores. Higher scores for each subscale and for the total score indicate greater perceived cognitive dysfunction. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

FAS included all participants who were enrolled in the treatment period and received at least one dose of the study drug and completed at least one GAS assessment postbaseline. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.

Q-LES-Q is a scale designed to allow researchers to assess the degree of a participant's quality of life in various areas of daily living. There is not a "Total Score" per se for the Q-LES-Q. The scale is divided into domains. Ninety-one of the 93 items are assembled into 8 categories: physical health/activities, feelings, work, household duties, school/course work, leisure time activities, social relations, and general activities. Items are scored on a 5 point scale, from 1 (not at all or never) to 5 (frequently or all the time), to indicate the degree of enjoyment or satisfaction experienced by domain. Raw summary scores are expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score within a given domain to facilitate comparisons across areas of functioning. The total score is based on the Overall Life Satisfaction question in General Activities and ranges from 1 to 5. A positive change from baseline indicates greater enjoyment/satisfaction.

FAS included all participants who were enrolled in the treatment period and received at least one dose of the study drug and completed at least one GAS assessment postbaseline. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.

WHO-5 is a short, self-administered questionnaire covering 5 positively worded items, related to positive mood (good spirits, relaxation), vitality (being active and waking up fresh and rested), and general interests (being interested in things). Each of the five items is rated from 0 (= not present) to 5 (= constantly present). Scores are summated, with raw score ranging from 0 to 25, with higher score meaning better well-being. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

FAS included all participants who were enrolled in the treatment period and received at least one dose of the study drug and completed at least one GAS assessment postbaseline. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.

CGI-S is a clinician rated scale designed to assess global severity of illness and change in the clinical condition over time. The CGI-S provides the clinician's impression of the participant's state of mental illness. The clinician uses his or her clinical experience of this participant population to rate the severity of the participant's mental illness on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal-not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Higher scores indicate greater severity of illness. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

FAS included all participants who were enrolled in the treatment period and received at least one dose of the study drug and completed at least one GAS assessment postbaseline. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.

CGI-I assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening). The clinician assessed participant's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Higher scores indicated greater severity of illness.

FAS included all participants who were enrolled in the treatment period and received at least one dose of the study drug and completed at least one GAS assessment postbaseline. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.