Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) remains a challenging topic for clinicians, researchers and policy makers, and a central question is how to improve the performance of screening during pregnancy in order to provide appropriate care. The recent recommendations and reporting of French results have raised awareness of the need to improve growth screening in France. Based on the existing literature, the hypothesis is that a greater investment in growth monitoring based on a more rigorous interpretation of information available from routinely implemented clinical assessment and ultrasound will allow for significant gains in detection. The current context provides the opportunity to evaluate the application of a training program for serial plotting of Symphysis Fundal Height (SFH) and Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW) on customised charts. This intervention is consistent with French guidelines which support the monthly measurement of SFH, the use of Customised Fetal Weight Reference (CFWR), in particular for referral US (Ultrasound) examinations, and the longitudinal interpretation of growth. These guidelines were recently restated in the clinical practice recommendations issued by the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
The intervention tested in the trial will include training of professionals for standardization of SFH measurement, introduction of software, and recommendations for growth interpretation and referral examinations. Expected benefits are an increase in antenatal identification of growth restricted fetuses without an increase in the FP rate. Such a program will allow identified Small for Gestational Age (SGA) fetuses to receive appropriate antenatal care. This intervention could double the detection rate of SGA births from 20 to 40%, corresponding to 32 000 infants nationwide annually for whom antenatal care could be improved.
Main objective: To test the effectiveness of the serial plotting of SFH and EFW measures on customised percentile charts supported by provider training, versus standard antenatal care, to improve the detection of FGR. The aim of the investigators is to double rates of antenatal detection from 20 to 40% among SGA infants, defined as a birthweight under the 10th percentile for GA.
Type of study Randomized cluster trial
Study objectives:
Main objective : To test the effectiveness of the serial plotting of SFH and EFW measures on customised percentile charts supported by provider training, versus standard antenatal care, to improve the detection of FGR. Our aim is to double rates of antenatal detection from 20 to 40% among SGA infants, defined as a birthweight under the 10th percentile for GA.
Secondary objectives: To measure the impact of screening program on:
Primary endpoint
Detection of FGR during pregnancy, defined as:
Secondary endpoints
Inclusion criteria : Singleton pregnancy, Booking before or at 30 weeks GA in the maternity units , Delivery in the participating units Exclusion criteria : Terminations of pregnancy, Known fibroid uterus or uterine congenital malformations, Refusal to participate, Minor patient
HPAG is a cluster randomized trial involving 16 geographically dispersed French maternity units. In the maternity units randomized to the intervention group, a protocol of growth monitoring supported by prior training of healthcare professionals will be implemented for all pregnant women receiving antenatal care in the unit, whatever the GA or medical or obstetrical risk.
The intervention consists only in the standardization of current practices. Clinicians in the intervention maternity units will follow a standardized protocol, and will be asked to measure SFH at each antenatal appointment, collect EFW from the 3rd trimester US, report these values on the chart, and monitor fetal growth according to the protocol guidelines. Practices will remain unchanged in the control group.
After delivery, inclusion and exclusion criteria will be assessed by independent clinical research investigators, probably midwives. All SGA births and non-SGA births according to the French CFWR will be included to answer the main and secondary objectives.
Data collection will be carried out by the referent midwife. Recorded information will include the antenatal care provided, suspicion of FGR, labor and delivery modes, and neonatal outcomes until discharge home. The use of the intervention will also be assessed in the intervention maternity units by recording information on the presence and completeness of customised charts in the medical records.
Sites : 16 French maternity units
Duration : 24 months, including 6 months of inclusions
Number of participants : 10 000 births (625 per maternity unit)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | The intervention consists in the standardization of current practices. Clinicians in the intervention maternity units will follow a standardized protocol, and will be asked to measure SFH at each antenatal appointment, collect EFW from the 3rd trimester US, report these values on the chart, and monitor fetal growth according to the protocol guidelines |
|
| Control group | No Intervention | In the control arm women will benefit from the current routine screening practice for growth failure. The management of pregnancies will remain unchanged. Consultants will be free to monitor growth according to their usual practice. In each maternity unit in the control arm, an information session will be organized on site but its content will be limited to the rational, the objectives of the trial and the study logistics. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| intervention group | Other | The intervention will include
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate detection of FGR | The primary outcome will be the detection rate of FGR among SGA births, measured in each arm, defined as:
| at birth |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants presenting the following perinatal outcomes | Perinatal outcomes:
| at birth |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Mothers will be recruited after delivery if they fulfill the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric VERSPYCK, PhD | Contact | Eric.Verspyck@chu-rouen.fr | ||
| astrid Picolet | Contact | 0476767409 | apicolet@chu-grenoble.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Anne Ego, PhD | University Hospital, Grenoble | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux | Recruiting | Bordeaux | 33076 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26422365 | Background | Ego A, Prunet C, Lebreton E, Blondel B, Kaminski M, Goffinet F, Zeitlin J. [Customized and non-customized French intrauterine growth curves. I - Methodology]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Feb;45(2):155-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Sep 28. French. | |
| 26431620 | Background | Ego A, Prunet C, Blondel B, Kaminski M, Goffinet F, Zeitlin J. [Customized and non-customized French intrauterine growth curves. II - Comparison with existing curves and benefits of customization]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Feb;45(2):165-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Oct 1. French. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Performances of screening policies |
| at birth |
| Modes of onset of labor and of delivery | Modes of onset of labor and of delivery: labor induction and indications, caesarean section and indications (including pre-labor caesarean and caesarean section after onset of labor), provider indicated delivery before 37 and before 39 GA | at birth |
| Resource use and costs | Impact of screening program on resource use and costs is characterized by :
| at birth |
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Caen University Hospital, Caen | Recruiting | Caen | 14003 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louis Mourier Hospital, Assistance Publique-Paris Hospitals (APHP) | Recruiting | Colombes | 92700 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Grenoble University Hospital | Recruiting | Grenoble | 38000 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Neonatal Care, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, University of Lille | Not yet recruiting | Lille | 59037 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Hospital, Assistance Publique-Marseille Hospitals (APHM), Marseille | Not yet recruiting | Marseille | 13915 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Paris Hospitals (APHP), Port Royal | Recruiting | Paris | 75014 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique-Paris Hospitals (APHP) | Recruiting | Paris | 75014 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Robert Debré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Paris Hospitals (APHP), Paris | Recruiting | Paris | 75019 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Assistance Publique-Paris Hospitals (APHP), Kremlin-Bicêtre | Recruiting | Paris | 94270 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics, Hôpital Poissy-Saint Germain, Versailles-St Quentin University | Recruiting | Poissy | 78300 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rouen University Hospital | Not yet recruiting | Rouen | 76031 | France |
|
| Department of Perinatality, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Civil hospice Lyon | Recruiting | Saint-Etienne | 42055 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg | Recruiting | Strasbourg | 67200 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paule de Viguier Hospital, Toulouse University Hospital | Recruiting | Toulouse | 31059 | France |
|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, | Recruiting | Tours | 37044 | France |
|
| 25346493 | Background | Monier I, Blondel B, Ego A, Kaminiski M, Goffinet F, Zeitlin J. Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study. BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):518-27. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13148. Epub 2014 Oct 27. |
| 24210714 | Background | Ego A. [Definitions: small for gestational age and intrauterine growth retardation]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Dec;42(8):872-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.09.012. Epub 2013 Nov 7. French. |
| 16580294 | Background | Ego A, Subtil D, Grange G, Thiebaugeorges O, Senat MV, Vayssiere C, Zeitlin J. Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: a French multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;194(4):1042-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.816. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005317 | Fetal Growth Retardation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005315 | Fetal Diseases |
| D011248 | Pregnancy Complications |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D006130 | Growth Disorders |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided