Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ohio State University | OTHER |
| Federal University of São Paulo | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common type of degenerative joint disease. Furthermore, despite its incidence being amongst the highest in chronic diseases, effective biomarkers, diagnostic aids and imaging technology are not available to assist in the management of OA. Mounting evidence suggests that non-pharmacological treatment such as exercise/physical therapy may lower the risk for onset or progression of OA by mitigating inflammation. However, the mechanical unloading and overloading, as seen in disuse and overuse, lead to upregulation of several proinflammatory molecules and enhance tissue degradation, whereas, dynamic moderate mechanical loading exerts anti-inflammatory and anti-catabolic effects on articular cartilage by suppressing mediators of inflammation. However, the lack of robust biomarkers to measure the effectiveness of physical therapies, represent a critical gap in biotechnology, obliterating the progress in the optimal application of these therapies. Our central hypothesis is that the circulating levels of specific molecules could serve as robust biomarkers for quantitative measures of OA burden, prognosis, progression or treatment efficacy. The objective of this project is to identify and evaluate mediators that serve as biomarkers of OA progression and treatment. Recently, high mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 (HMGB-1) has been suggested to be markedly upregulated in OA. However, presently there are no inhibitors of HMGB1 that could be used therapeutically. Previous results showed that that gentle exercise is the only tool that can mitigate HMGB1 production by local and systemic macrophages, and thus inflammation. Serum concentration of HMGB1 will be evaluate as a biomarker in OA patients and relate it to the functional capacity of knee joints in OA patients after rehabilitation protocol (RP). The RP will consist of three rehabilitation session/week during eight weeks. The efficacy of a RP will be evaluated by functional scale Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC), Scale for the measurement of health related quality of life using EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EuroQOL), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and physical function tests. Besides all clinical assessment, serum levels of classical pro-inflammatory cytokines, hyaluronan and HMGB1 will be evaluated. A correlation of physical improvement after RP and serum biomarkers will be performed.
Detailed Description:
Methods/Design
2.1. Rehabilitation protocol (RP) The RP will consist of 3 exercise session/week for 8 weeks. Each session will begin with the evaluation of pain by the participants. If the pain is higher than four, an analgesic protocol (AP) containing ultra-sound, laser or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) will be applied. After the AP, the participant will just execute the rehabilitation protocol if the pain decreased to or lower than four. Starting with a warm up exercise in a cycle ergometer (CEE), for 5 minutes at free cadence, then the intensity will be set at 90% of the intensity obtained during the incremental test (see item 2.2a) and maintained for 10 min. Afterward, four sets (8-12 repetitions) of three different resistance exercises (RE) (leg press, knee extension and knee flexion) will be performed at 70% of the load correspondent to 1RM test (see item 2.2b) with one minute interval between sets and exercises. During CEE Borg scale will be taken every two minutes and during RE the omnibus (OMNI) scale taken at the end of every set to monitor the intensity. At the end of the session, cool down global stretching exercises for inferior members will be performed and the VAS evaluated again. Ten seconds of tension for each stretching position targeting the hamstrings, quadriceps, gluteus maxim ums, gastrocnemius, thigh adductors and abductors.
2.2. Rehabilitation intensity parameters.
Sample size calculation The estimation of sample size was determined on the basis of a greater improvement of subscale physical function of the WOMAC score, using G.Power 3.15 software. Based on 10% expected difference between baseline measure and after RP and a standard deviation of 30 on physical function of WOMAC, 65 participants are needed with significance level of 0.05, and power of 80%.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation | Other | The rehabilitation protocol will consist of three exercise session/week for eight weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation | Other | Protocol will consist of three exercise/week for eight weeks. Each session will begin with the evaluation of pain by the volunteer. Starting with a warm up exercise in a cycle ergometer (CEE), for 5 minutes at free cadence, then the intensity will be set at 90% of the intensity obtained during the incremental test and maintained for 10 min. Afterward, four sets of three different resistance exercises (RE) will be performed at 70% of the load correspondent to 1RM test with one minute interval between sets and exercises. During CEE Borg scale will be taken every two minutes and during RE the OMNI scale taken at the end of every set to monitor the intensity. At the end of the session, cool down global stretching exercises for inferior members will be performed and the VAS evaluated. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline to month 2 in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index score | Participants will answer the questionnaire WOMAC for the assessment of lower extremity pain, stiffness and physical function during daily activities. The WOMAC measures five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). For each item, the possible range of scores is therefore 0-100. Items are summed for each subscale, resulting in possible ranges as follows: pain=0-500, stiffness=0-200, physical function=0-1700. Most commonly, a total WOMAC score is created by summing the items for all three subscales. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. The collected data will be present through study completion, an average of 1 year. | Baseline and 2 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline to month 2 in TUG test | The purpose of TUG is to test basic mobility skills of frail elderly persons. The test consists of the time measurement in seconds for a participant to rise from sitting from a standard arm chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The unity of measure is time in seconds. It will also be performed on day 0 (baseline) and day 60 (2 months after RP). The collected data will be present through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mario Ferretti, PhD | Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo | São Paulo | São Paulo | 04022-001 | Brazil | ||
| Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16760456 | Background | Weinstein SL, Jacobs JJ, Goldberg MJ. Osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 8;354(23):2508-9; author reply 2508-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc060815. No abstract available. | |
| 21119608 | Background | Kapoor M, Martel-Pelletier J, Lajeunesse D, Pelletier JP, Fahmi H. Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011 Jan;7(1):33-42. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.196. Epub 2010 Nov 30. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Baseline and 2 month |
| Change from baseline to month 2 in VAS analysis. | The pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, which has been widely used in diverse adult populations, including those with rheumatic diseases. The unity of measures is in points. It will also be performed on day 0 (baseline) and day 60 (2 months after RP). The collected data will be present through study completion, an average of 1 year. | Baseline and 2 month |
| Change from baseline in proinflammatory cytokines and biomarkers of cartilage breakdown in blood | Serum samples will be obtained by venous blood collection (3 vacutainer tubes, each containing 6 mL). The venous blood will be collected from the antecubital vein on day 0 (baseline), day 30 (1 month after RP) and day 60 (2 months after RP). After being centrifuged at 1800 g for 10 minutes, samples will be stored at -80 degrees Celsius in 1 mL aliquots. Serum concentrations of cytokines (Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha) will be simultaneously evaluated. Serum HMGB1 and serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), will be analyzed by specific kits. The unity of measure is ng/mL. The collected data will be present through study completion, an average of 1 year. | Baseline, 1 month and 2 month after RP |
| Change from baseline to month 2 in Health-related quality of life (EuroQOL-5D, EQ-5D) | Health-related QOL will be assessed by the EQ-5D. The unity of measure is in points. Also, day 0 (pre-RP) and day 60 (after 2 months of RP) will be evaluated for assessment. The collected data will be present through study completion, an average of 1 year. | Baseline and 2 month |
| Change from baseline to month 2 in Radiographic knee osteoarthritis progression (joint space and KL score) | Radiological examination of conventional radiographic procedure will be performed at baseline and at day 60 after RP (2 month) for assessment. The degree of osteoarthritis can vary 0 to 5. The collected data will be present through study completion, an average of 1 year. | Baseline and 2 month |
| Change from baseline to month 2 in Isometric strength testing | Isometric strength will be measured by the peak torque (PT) obtained during knee extension (PTE) and flexion (PTF) maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) using an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex, Shirley, NY). During test the participants was seated and securely strapped the dynamometer chair. For knee extension MVC the thigh and leg angle will be 75° (0° = total extension) and for knee flexion MVC thigh-leg angle will be 40° (0° = total extension). Two attempts of five seconds MVC will be performed for each joint movement, with 3 minutes of interval between them. The unity of measure is Newtons per meter (N.m). The isometric PTE and PTF will be determined as the highest PT values between attempts. It will also be performed on day 0 (pre-RP) and day 60 (after 2 months of RP) for assessment. The data will be present through study completion, an average of 1 year. | Baseline and 2 month |
| São Paulo |
| São Paulo |
| 05652-000 |
| Brazil |
| 24553908 | Background | Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, Bridgett L, Williams S, Guillemin F, Hill CL, Laslett LL, Jones G, Cicuttini F, Osborne R, Vos T, Buchbinder R, Woolf A, March L. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1323-30. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763. Epub 2014 Feb 19. |
| 24462672 | Background | McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Arden NK, Berenbaum F, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Hawker GA, Henrotin Y, Hunter DJ, Kawaguchi H, Kwoh K, Lohmander S, Rannou F, Roos EM, Underwood M. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Mar;22(3):363-88. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 24. |
| 18279766 | Background | Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Feb;16(2):137-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013. |
| 3741515 | Background | Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald R, Hochberg M, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Aug;29(8):1039-49. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816. |
| 25179675 | Background | Hsueh MF, Onnerfjord P, Kraus VB. Biomarkers and proteomic analysis of osteoarthritis. Matrix Biol. 2014 Oct;39:56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Aug 30. |
| 25952342 | Background | Kraus VB, Blanco FJ, Englund M, Henrotin Y, Lohmander LS, Losina E, Onnerfjord P, Persiani S. OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Soluble biomarker assessments in clinical trials in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 May;23(5):686-97. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.002. |
| 22189477 | Background | Terada C, Yoshida A, Nasu Y, Mori S, Tomono Y, Tanaka M, Takahashi HK, Nishibori M, Ozaki T, Nishida K. Gene expression and localization of high-mobility group box chromosomal protein-1 (HMGB-1)in human osteoarthritic cartilage. Acta Med Okayama. 2011 Dec;65(6):369-77. doi: 10.18926/AMO/47262. |
| 23530976 | Background | Hunt MA, Pollock CL, Kraus VB, Saxne T, Peters S, Huebner JL, Sayre EC, Cibere J. Relationships amongst osteoarthritis biomarkers, dynamic knee joint load, and exercise: results from a randomized controlled pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Mar 27;14:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-115. |
| 20123076 | Background | Andersson U, Harris HE. The role of HMGB1 in the pathogenesis of rheumatic disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Jan-Feb;1799(1-2):141-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.11.003. |
| 25821631 | Background | Imamura M, Ezquerro F, Marcon Alfieri F, Vilas Boas L, Tozetto-Mendoza TR, Chen J, Ozcakar L, Arendt-Nielsen L, Rizzo Battistella L. Serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines in painful knee osteoarthritis and sensitization. Int J Inflam. 2015;2015:329792. doi: 10.1155/2015/329792. Epub 2015 Mar 2. |
| 21968272 | Background | Li ZC, Cheng GQ, Hu KZ, Li MQ, Zang WP, Dong YQ, Wang WL, Liu ZD. Correlation of synovial fluid HMGB-1 levels with radiographic severity of knee osteoarthritis. Clin Invest Med. 2011 Oct 1;34(5):E298. doi: 10.25011/cim.v34i5.15673. |
| 41379149 | Derived | Campedelli RR, Jardim MRS, Antonioli E, de Oliveira FBD, Agarwal S, Ferretti M. Effect of simplified exercise program on quality of life, biomarkers, pain and muscle strength of individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 Dec 1;23:eAO1192. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1192. eCollection 2025. |
| D006296 |
| Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |