Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-001932-38 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Seventh Framework Programme | OTHER |
| University of Groningen | OTHER |
| University Medical Center Groningen | OTHER |
| Robert Koch Institut |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
FLU-v is a vaccine that aims to protect against a wide range of flu viruses. The purpose of this study is to measure the immune responses induced by FLU-v vaccine. This study will look at how safe FLU-v is when administered and how successful it is in preventing flu or reducing the severity of the flu symptoms.
The study requires 222 healthy volunteers 18-60 years old. Participation in the study will take a maximum of 7 months and consists of 5 visits. During visit 1, subjects will be examined by a doctor to make sure they are eligible to enter the study. A 15ml blood sample (a tablespoon) will be taken to check general health followed by a general physical exam. Medical history and some personal information will be collected. Subjects that have received the traditional flu vaccine in the past 6 months, and those females who are pregnant or breastfeeding will not be allowed in the study. Subjects of childbearing age must agree to use effective contraceptive methods.
At visit 2, subjects will be randomly allocated to one of the four treatment groups summarised below:
Subjects will be asked to complete a diary card to write down any side effects that they may experience after vaccination. Subjects will also be asked to complete another diary card to document any flu-like symptoms experienced between December 2016 and March 2017, this time is officially considered as the flu season. During this period, if the subject experiences flu-like symptoms, a collection of a nose and tonsil swab will be arranged by the study site to confirm whether they have the flu or not.
Rationale: Current seasonal influenza vaccines mainly induce immune responses against viral membrane glycoproteins. These proteins, however, undergo continuous mutations by a process called antigenic drift. To prevent immune escape, annual vaccination with the latest predicted viral strains is adopted. Such vaccination strategy not only poses inconvenience and cost-inefficiency, but also results in poor protective effectiveness when the vaccinated strains are mismatched with the actual circulating strains. The latter point is especially of concern during a pandemic outbreak, when a large geographical area is affected and the general population is naïve to the newly re-assorted viral strain due to antigenic shift.
Objective: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the influenza vaccine (FLU-v, as a suspension or adjuvanted as emulsion) targeting conserved immunogenic regions of influenza A and B viruses in healthy adults, in particular to show that the TH1 cytokine response at 42 and 180 days after the first injection is greater in the adjuvanted FLU-v and unadjuvanted FLU-v than in the placebo.
Study design: A total of 222 study participants will be recruited. The study follows a factorial design where the two factors are treatment (FLU-v / placebo) and formulation (unadjuvanted / suspension, adjuvanted / emulsion). Subjects will be randomised in two strata (age 18 to 40, age 41 to 60) to one of the following treatment regimens:
Each administration will be given subcutaneously. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) will be collected by AE questionnaire/diary card until day 42. Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will be collected for the entire study period. The treatments will be administered starting in third quarter of 2016 in order to provide protection for the subsequent influenza season starting in December 2016. Blood samples will be taken from all subjects on day 0 (before FLU-v vaccination), 42 (21 days after the second dosing) and 180 (159 days after the second dosing) for the evaluation of FLU-v-specific cellular and humoral immune responses. Clinical symptom scores to ascertain severity and the incidence of RT-PCR-confirmed influenza A and/or B infection will be recorded during the subsequent influenza season (December 2016 to March 2017) to decide clinical efficacy of the tested vaccines.
Study population: Healthy volunteers aged 18-60 years. Intervention: FLU-v investigational influenza vaccine lyophilised product containing 500 micrograms of total peptides reconstituted in either 0.01M HCl (0.25ml) and 0.01M NaOH (0.25ml) to achieve a volume of 0.5ml, or emulsified in WFI (water for injection, 0.25ml) and ISA-51 (0.25ml) to achieve a volume of 0.5ml.
Primary study parameters/endpoints: For immunogenicity: To compare the change from baseline (Day 0) between treatments in cellular immune responses, specifically TH1 cytokines, in all groups 42 and 180 days following FLU-v vaccination. For safety: (1) To evaluate the solicited AEs in all subjects until 21 days after the last dosing of the study vaccine (FLU-v); (2) To evaluate the unsolicited AEs and SAEs in all subjects for the entire study period after the first dosing of FLU-v.
Secondary study parameters/endpoints: To evaluate the humoral immune responses specific to FLU-v and TH2 cytokines from baseline in all groups 42 and 180 days following FLU-v vaccination.
Exploratory study parameters/endpoints: For immunogenicity: To evaluate the change from baseline in cellular immune responses based on additional CMI assays such as ELISPOT (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot) in all groups at 42 and 180 days following FLU-v vaccination, in a subset of subjects chosen at random.
Clinical efficacy: (1) To evaluate the efficacy of FLU-v vaccine in reducing the incidence of RT-PCR confirmed influenza A and/or B infections in all subjects during the influenza season 2016-2017. (2) To evaluate the efficacy of FLU-v vaccine in the reduction of symptom score among RT-PCR confirmed influenza A and/or B infection cases during the influenza season 2016-2017. The relationship between efficacy and cellular and humoral response will be explored if possible.
The effect of previous influenza vaccination on the immunogenicity of FLU-v will be assessed in a post-hoc exploratory analysis after stratification of the data based on exposure to the influenza vaccine in the previous 24 months or over.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
The intended application of the IMP is as a prophylactic vaccine to prevent influenza virus infection by inducing an enhanced influenza-specific immune response. The FLU-v vaccine is designed to be delivered either as a naturally particulate suspension (i.e. no adjuvant) or emulsified in adjuvant. Particulate and emulsified protein preparations are preferentially taken up by phagocytic cells (e.g. dendritic cells) responsible for inducing primary immune responses.
Treatment with FLU-v of up to four doses of 263 μg/occasion or up to two doses of 553 μg/occasion, with or without adjuvant, was well tolerated in animals with no signs of systemic toxicity. In pre-clinical studies, subcutaneous administration of ISA 51 resulted in no systemic toxicity. At the injection sites and occasionally in adjacent tissue the injected material remained surrounded by a mild chronic inflammatory response. As the IMP is provided in one presentation (500 μg of the combined peptide) in lyophilized form for suspension in a sealed single-use vial, overdose is highly unlikely.
In a single centre, randomised, double blind phase I study of the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of FLU-v no safety or tolerability concerns were identified at the doses administered (250 μg and 500 μg FLU-v) to the subjects in this clinical study and no safety or tolerability concerns were identified following administration of the adjuvant to the subjects (1). FLU-v vaccine candidate was demonstrated to be immunogenic in humans, as measured by ex vivo γ-interferon production (1).
Clinical experience with Montanide ISA 51 dates back to the 1990s and most trials were related to cancer and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Currently, cancer trials in melanoma, colorectal, prostate, cervical, brain cancer and leukemia are ongoing. Frequency of vaccination is often between 2 and 4 weeks, and the number of injections can reach up to 40. Route of immunization is most often subcutaneous and volume of injection can reach up to 3mL. Most common local reactions are local pain, tenderness, erythema and granuloma at the injection site. Less frequently, mild to moderate transient indurations and swelling are described. General reactions are mainly 'flu-like symptoms such as chills, fever and headaches. Lethargy and nausea are also observed. The intensity is usually mild or moderate. No biological changes are generally observed. As the Placebo vaccine is provided in a sealed single-use vial, overdose is highly unlikely (Influenza virus (FLU-v) vaccine Investigator's Brochure, Edition 2.0, 07 September 2015).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | (n=74): FLU-v on Day 0 and Day 21 |
|
| Group 2 | Experimental | (n=74): adjuvanted FLU-v on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 |
|
| Group 3 | Placebo Comparator | (n=37): saline solution (0.5ml) on Day 0 and Day 21 |
|
| Group 4 | Placebo Comparator | (n=37): Adjuvanted placebo on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLU-v | Biological | Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500 ug of FLU-v as 0.5ml suspension in 0.01M HCl and 0.01M NaOH |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CD4+ and CD8+ Th1 Cellular Immunogenicity on Day 42 | Comparison of the TH1 response in the treatment arms compared to placebo from baseline to day 42 following vaccination, calculated as the median fold change in the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells positive for IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-2 and CD107a. Fold change is calculated as the number of cells on day 42 divided by number of cells on day 0. | day 0 to day 42 |
| CD4+ and CD8+ Th1 Cellular Immunogenicity on Day 180 | Comparison of the TH1 response in the treatment arms compared to placebo from baseline to day 180 following vaccination, calculated as the median fold change in the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells positive for IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-2 and CD107a. Fold change is calculated as the number of cells on day 180 divided by number of cells on day 0. | Day 0 to day 180 |
| Percentage of TH1 Cytokine Responders (Responders Defined as Those With >2 Fold Median Increase From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells Positive for Particular Cytokine) | To compare the number of subjects that showed at least a two-fold increase on day 42 and day 180 following vaccination in the number of CD4+and CD8+ T-cells secreting TH1 cytokines in all groups. | prevaccination, day 42 (21 days after last vaccination) and day 180. |
| Percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ TH1 Cytokine Responders Determined by Mixture Models for Single-cell Assays (MIMOSA) | To compare the number of subjects identified as responders for cytokine markers as determined by MIMOSA analysis (Responders based on a false discovery rate derived P-value <0.05). | day 0 to day 42 and day 180 |
| IFN-gamma Responses Measured by ELISA | Median fold change in IFN-gamma secretion from PBMCs stimulated in vitro with FLU-v antigens. IFN-gamma secretion was measured by ELISA.Fold change was measured as secretion on day 42 divided by secretion on day 0, and secretion on day 180 divided by secretion on day 0. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Antibody Responses to FLU-v | To evaluate the IgG levels as a measure of antibody responses to FLU-v on day 0 (baseline) and on days 42 and 180 following FLU-v vaccination. IgG antibodies were measured by ELISA. The geometric mean for each treatment group was provided. | prevaccination, day 42 (21 days after last vaccination) and day 180. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Unsolicited AEs and SAEs | To evaluate unsolicited AEs and SAEs in all subjects | From the start of the vacciantion until study completion for each subject, approximately no more than 7 months |
| Percentage of Participants Who Tested Positive for Influenza Strains |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Has a known allergy to any of the components of the vaccine.
Has a history of severe reaction following immunization.
Persons with immune deficiency/disorder, whether due to genetic defect, immunodeficiency disease, or immunosuppressive therapy.
Women who have a positive pregnancy test during the screening visit or who are breastfeeding.
Has a history of any of the following (reported by subjects):
Receipt of medicines/treatments that may affect evaluation of immunogenicity such as:
Has received any influenza vaccine within 6 months of vaccination in this study.
Has influenza-like illness (a sudden onset of symptoms and at least one of the four systemic symptoms-fever or feverishness, malaise, headache, myalgia and at least one of the three respiratory symptoms-cough, sore throat, shortness of breath) or acute respiratory infection (a sudden onset of symptoms and at least one of the four respiratory symptoms-cough, sore throat, shortness of breath, coryza (Rhinitis) and a clinician's judgement that the illness is due to an infection) within 6 months prior to vaccination in this study. These symptoms must have stopped the subject from carrying out their normal daily activities such as attending work or school for a period of at least 3 days.
Has an acute illness, including an oral temperature greater than 38 degrees Celsius, within 1 week of vaccination.
Has a history of alcohol or drug abuse within the last 2 years deemed unsuitable for inclusion by the investigator.
Any abnormal haematology values and/or serum chemistries judged by the Investigator as clinically significant.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Paul Groeneveld, PhD | Isala | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isala | Zwolle | 8025 AB | Netherlands |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26084515 | Background | Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Fernandez A, Stoloff GA, Caparros-Wanderley W. Meta-Analysis and Potential Role of Preexisting Heterosubtypic Cellular Immunity Based on Variations in Disease Severity Outcomes for Influenza Live Viral Challenges in Humans. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Aug;22(8):949-56. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00101-15. Epub 2015 Jun 17. | |
| 25994549 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| End of project reporting for the UNISEC Consortium | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
195 subjects were screened. Of those, N=20 subjects were removed from the study prior randomisation due to:
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | 2x Non-adjuvanted FLU-v | FLU-v on Day 0 and Day 21 FLU-v: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500 ug of FLU-v as 0.5ml suspension in 0.01M HCl and 0.01M NaOH |
| FG001 | 1x Adjuvanted FLU-v | adjuvanted FLU-v on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 adjuvanted FLU-v: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500ug of FLU-v emulsified in 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection Saline: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline |
| FG002 | Non-adjuvanted Placebo | saline solution (0.5ml) on Day 0 and Day 21 Saline: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline |
| FG003 | Adjuvanted Placebo | Adjuvanted placebo on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 Saline: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline Adjuvanted placebo: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with an emulsion made with 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
A subject in 1x FLU-v adjuvanted group received 1x non-adjuvanted FLU-v. Subject completed the study but with this treatment, the subject could not be assigned to any group for analysis. This is the reason why 58 subjects were randomised to this group but only 57 were analysed, making the total subject number 174 rather than 175.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | 2x Non-adjuvanted FLU-v | FLU-v on Day 0 and Day 21 FLU-v: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500 ug of FLU-v as 0.5ml suspension in 0.01M HCl and 0.01M NaOH |
| BG001 | 1x Adjuvanted FLU-v |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | CD4+ and CD8+ Th1 Cellular Immunogenicity on Day 42 | Comparison of the TH1 response in the treatment arms compared to placebo from baseline to day 42 following vaccination, calculated as the median fold change in the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells positive for IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-2 and CD107a. Fold change is calculated as the number of cells on day 42 divided by number of cells on day 0. | FAS population: Full Analysis Set corresponds to subjects that completed the vaccination successfully and provided samples for immunogenicity analysis for baseline (pre-vaccination) and at least one time point post-vaccination. Only samples with acceptable positive and negative controls were used in the analysis. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | fold change | day 0 to day 42 |
|
From vaccination to study completion (approx. 7 months)
Solicited Adverse Events were collected for 21 days after each vaccination. Subjects had to fill in the AEs diary card daily and return to the clinic on the next scheduled visit.
Unsolicited Adverse Events and Severe Adverse Events were collected at any time during the study directly to the PI or study doctor.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | 2x Non-adjuvanted FLU-v | FLU-v on Day 0 and Day 21 FLU-v: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500 ug of FLU-v as 0.5ml suspension in 0.01M HCl and 0.01M NaOH |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal hernia repair | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lymphadenopathy | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
Recruitment stopped early at 175 subjects instead of 222. Dropout rate was lower than anticipated (4% vs 20%). The number of participants recruited was considered to be sufficient to provide statistically significant data in the primary endpoints.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Olga Pleguezuelos, Chief Scientific Officer | PepTcell Ltd (trading as SEEK) | +44 020 7153 6601 | olga.pleguezuelos@seekacure.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jul 6, 2016 | Mar 20, 2018 | ICF_000.pdf |
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 28, 2017 | Mar 20, 2018 | Prot_001.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 16, 2018 | Mar 20, 2018 | SAP_002.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007251 | Influenza, Human |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D009976 | Orthomyxoviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012965 | Sodium Chloride |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002712 | Chlorides |
| D006851 | Hydrochloric Acid |
| D017606 | Chlorine Compounds |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER_GOV |
| Norwegian Institute of Public Health | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| adjuvanted FLU-v | Biological | Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500ug of FLU-v emulsified in 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection |
|
| Saline | Biological | Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline |
|
|
| Adjuvanted placebo | Biological | Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with an emulsion made with 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection |
|
| day 0 to day 42, day 0 to day 180 |
| Percentage of Responders on Day 42 and Day 180 for IFNgamma Secretion by PBMCs | Responders were defined as subjects having at least a two-fold increase in the amount of IFNg secreted on day 42 and day 180 compared the amount secreted on day 0. IFNg was measured by ELISA | prevaccination (day 0) to postvaccination (day 42 and day 180) |
| Solicited AEs | To evaluate the solicited AEs in all subjects | until 21 days after the last dosing of the study vaccine |
| Th2 Cytokine Responses (IL-4) |
To evaluate the level of TH2 cytokines (IL-4) from baseline in all groups 42 and 180 days following FLU-v vaccination. |
| prevaccination, day 42 (21 days after last vaccination) and day 180. |
During the influenza season (Dec 2016 to March 2017), fully vaccinated subjects will contact the trial center immediately if they feel unwell for 24h, with a sudden onset of flu-like symptoms. The medical staff will arrange for a nasopharyngeal swab to be performed if the subject has at least one respiratory (cough, sore throat, shortness of breath, runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing and earache) and one systemic symptom (fever, malaise, headache and myalgia (muscle and joint pain). Swabs should be taken from the reported subjects within 3 days from the trial center being contacted or within 4 days of the onset of symptoms, whatever time is shorter. |
| For up to 4 months during the influenza season |
| Severity of Symptoms in RT-PCR Influenza-confirmed Subjects. | Subjects recorded daily influenza symptoms from December 2016 up to March 2017. Subjects with a sudden onset of at least one respiratory and one systemic symptom were swabbed. If the results were positive for influenza then the symptoms were included in the analysis. The duration of symptoms was recorded as the number of symptomatic days during the influenza episode. Fever (≥38oC), malaise, headache, myalgia (muscle and joint pain), cough, sore throat, shortness of breath, runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing and earache were scored on a severity scale of 0 to 3 (0: no symptom, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe). The daily severity score was the sum of the severity score for all symptoms listed above on a single day. The total score was the sum of all daily scores during the influenza episode. The peak score was the highest daily score during the influenza episode. The average score was the total score divided by the number of days the influenza episode lasted. | Symptoms experienced during an influenza infection episode, approximately 7-10 days. |
| Duration of Influenza Symptoms in RT-PCR Confirmed Infected Subjects. | Subjects recorded daily influenza symptoms from December 2016 up to March 2017. Subjects with a sudden onset of at least one respiratory and one systemic symptom were swabbed. If the results were positive for influenza then the symptoms were included in the analysis. The duration of symptoms was recorded as the number of symptomatic days during the influenza episode. The following symptoms were recorded: fever (≥38oC), malaise, headache, myalgia (muscle and joint pain), cough, sore throat, shortness of breath, runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing and earache. | During an influenza episode |
| Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Fernandez A, Stoloff GA, Mann A, Gilbert A, Balaratnam G, Wilkinson T, Lambkin-Williams R, Oxford J, Caparros-Wanderley W. A Synthetic Influenza Virus Vaccine Induces a Cellular Immune Response That Correlates with Reduction in Symptomatology and Virus Shedding in a Randomized Phase Ib Live-Virus Challenge in Humans. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Jul;22(7):828-35. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00098-15. Epub 2015 May 20. |
| 22575166 | Background | Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Stoloff GA, Caparros-Wanderley W. Synthetic Influenza vaccine (FLU-v) stimulates cell mediated immunity in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled Phase I trial. Vaccine. 2012 Jun 29;30(31):4655-60. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.089. Epub 2012 May 8. |
| 17668898 | Background | Stoloff GA, Caparros-Wanderley W. Synthetic multi-epitope peptides identified in silico induce protective immunity against multiple influenza serotypes. Eur J Immunol. 2007 Sep;37(9):2441-9. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737254. |
| 28376743 | Background | van Doorn E, Pleguezuelos O, Liu H, Fernandez A, Bannister R, Stoloff G, Oftung F, Norley S, Huckriede A, Frijlink HW, Hak E. Evaluation of the immunogenicity and safety of different doses and formulations of a broad spectrum influenza vaccine (FLU-v) developed by SEEK: study protocol for a single-center, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical phase IIb trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 4;17(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2341-9. |
| 32150750 | Result | Pleguezuelos O, Dille J, de Groen S, Oftung F, Niesters HGM, Islam MA, Naess LM, Hungnes O, Aldarij N, Idema DL, Perez AF, James E, Frijlink HW, Stoloff G, Groeneveld P, Hak E. Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of a Standalone Universal Influenza Vaccine, FLU-v, in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Apr 7;172(7):453-462. doi: 10.7326/M19-0735. Epub 2020 Mar 10. |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
adjuvanted FLU-v on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21
adjuvanted FLU-v: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500ug of FLU-v emulsified in 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection
Saline: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline
| BG002 | Non-adjuvanted Placebo | saline solution (0.5ml) on Day 0 and Day 21 Saline: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline |
| BG003 | Adjuvanted Placebo | Adjuvanted placebo on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 Saline: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline Adjuvanted placebo: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with an emulsion made with 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| previous influenza vaccination | Subjects were asked whether they had received previous influenza vaccinations and whether it was within 2 years or more from joining the trial. | This baseline measure was only analysed in the FAS population, that is the Full Analysis Set which includes all those subjects that completed vaccination and had at least pre-vaccination immunogenicity data and at least one post-vaccination time point. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| HAI titer at screening | Serum samples were collected at screening (summer-autumn 2016) and later analysed for pre-existing neutralising antibodies against the main influenza strains that circulated in the Netherlands during the influenza season of 2016-2017 (B/Phuket/3073/2013, B/Brisbane/60/2008, A/Hong Kong/5738/2014 (H3N2) and A/Michigan/45/15 (H1N1)). The number of subjects with a HA titer for A strains ≥ 40 and with HA ≥ 80 for B strains was recorded in each group. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | 1x Adjuvanted FLU-v | adjuvanted FLU-v on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 adjuvanted FLU-v: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500ug of FLU-v emulsified in 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection Saline: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline |
| OG002 | Non-adjuvanted Placebo | saline solution (0.5ml) on Day 0 and Day 21 Saline: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline |
| OG003 | Adjuvanted Placebo | Adjuvanted placebo on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 Saline: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline Adjuvanted placebo: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with an emulsion made with 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection |
|
|
|
| Primary | CD4+ and CD8+ Th1 Cellular Immunogenicity on Day 180 | Comparison of the TH1 response in the treatment arms compared to placebo from baseline to day 180 following vaccination, calculated as the median fold change in the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells positive for IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-2 and CD107a. Fold change is calculated as the number of cells on day 180 divided by number of cells on day 0. | FAS population: Full Analysis Set corresponds to subjects that completed the vaccination successfully and provided samples for immunogenicity analysis for baseline (pre-vaccination) and at least one time point post-vaccination. Only samples with acceptable positive and negative controls were used in the analysis. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | fold change | Day 0 to day 180 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of TH1 Cytokine Responders (Responders Defined as Those With >2 Fold Median Increase From Baseline in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells Positive for Particular Cytokine) | To compare the number of subjects that showed at least a two-fold increase on day 42 and day 180 following vaccination in the number of CD4+and CD8+ T-cells secreting TH1 cytokines in all groups. | FAS population: Full Analysis Set corresponds to subjects that completed the vaccination successfully and provided samples for immunogenicity analysis for baseline (pre-vaccination) and at least one time point post-vaccination. Only samples with acceptable positive and negative controls were used in the analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | prevaccination, day 42 (21 days after last vaccination) and day 180. |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ TH1 Cytokine Responders Determined by Mixture Models for Single-cell Assays (MIMOSA) | To compare the number of subjects identified as responders for cytokine markers as determined by MIMOSA analysis (Responders based on a false discovery rate derived P-value <0.05). | FAS: Full Analysis Set corresponds to subjects that completed the vaccination successfully and provided samples for immunogenicity analysis for baseline (pre-vaccination) and at least one time point post-vaccination. Only samples with acceptable positive and negative controls were used in the analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | day 0 to day 42 and day 180 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | IFN-gamma Responses Measured by ELISA | Median fold change in IFN-gamma secretion from PBMCs stimulated in vitro with FLU-v antigens. IFN-gamma secretion was measured by ELISA.Fold change was measured as secretion on day 42 divided by secretion on day 0, and secretion on day 180 divided by secretion on day 0. | FAS: Full Analysis Set corresponds to subjects that completed the vaccination successfully and provided samples for immunogenicity analysis for baseline (pre-vaccination) and at least one time point post-vaccination. Only samples with acceptable positive and negative controls were used in the analysis. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | fold change | day 0 to day 42, day 0 to day 180 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Responders on Day 42 and Day 180 for IFNgamma Secretion by PBMCs | Responders were defined as subjects having at least a two-fold increase in the amount of IFNg secreted on day 42 and day 180 compared the amount secreted on day 0. IFNg was measured by ELISA | FAS: Full Analysis Set including subjects that completed vaccination and provided immunogenicity samples for prevaccination and at least one post-vaccination time point (day 42 or day 180). Only samples that meet the acceptance criteria based on the positive and negative controls were used in the analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | prevaccination (day 0) to postvaccination (day 42 and day 180) |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Solicited AEs | To evaluate the solicited AEs in all subjects | Safety Population: All subjects that received at least one vaccination | Posted | Number | Events | until 21 days after the last dosing of the study vaccine |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Antibody Responses to FLU-v | To evaluate the IgG levels as a measure of antibody responses to FLU-v on day 0 (baseline) and on days 42 and 180 following FLU-v vaccination. IgG antibodies were measured by ELISA. The geometric mean for each treatment group was provided. | FAS: Full Analysis Set includes all subjects that completed the vaccination successfully and provided samples for immunogenicity analysis at baseline (Pre-vaccination) and at least one time point post-vaccination. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Standard Error | IgG ng/ml | prevaccination, day 42 (21 days after last vaccination) and day 180. |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Th2 Cytokine Responses (IL-4) | To evaluate the level of TH2 cytokines (IL-4) from baseline in all groups 42 and 180 days following FLU-v vaccination. | FAS: Full Analysis Set includes all subjects that completed the vaccination successfully and provided samples for immunogenicity analysis at baseline (Pre-vaccination) and at least one time point post-vaccination. Only samples that met the acceptance criteria based on positive and negative controls were used in the analysis | Posted | Number | percentage of responders | prevaccination, day 42 (21 days after last vaccination) and day 180. |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Unsolicited AEs and SAEs | To evaluate unsolicited AEs and SAEs in all subjects | Safety Population: all subjects that received at least one vaccination | Posted | Number | events | From the start of the vacciantion until study completion for each subject, approximately no more than 7 months |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Percentage of Participants Who Tested Positive for Influenza Strains | During the influenza season (Dec 2016 to March 2017), fully vaccinated subjects will contact the trial center immediately if they feel unwell for 24h, with a sudden onset of flu-like symptoms. The medical staff will arrange for a nasopharyngeal swab to be performed if the subject has at least one respiratory (cough, sore throat, shortness of breath, runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing and earache) and one systemic symptom (fever, malaise, headache and myalgia (muscle and joint pain). Swabs should be taken from the reported subjects within 3 days from the trial center being contacted or within 4 days of the onset of symptoms, whatever time is shorter. | FAS: Full Analysis Set includes subjects that completed vaccination and provided samples to measure immunogenicity data prevaccination (day 0) and at least one time point post vaccination (day 42 or day 180) | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | For up to 4 months during the influenza season |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Severity of Symptoms in RT-PCR Influenza-confirmed Subjects. | Subjects recorded daily influenza symptoms from December 2016 up to March 2017. Subjects with a sudden onset of at least one respiratory and one systemic symptom were swabbed. If the results were positive for influenza then the symptoms were included in the analysis. The duration of symptoms was recorded as the number of symptomatic days during the influenza episode. Fever (≥38oC), malaise, headache, myalgia (muscle and joint pain), cough, sore throat, shortness of breath, runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing and earache were scored on a severity scale of 0 to 3 (0: no symptom, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe). The daily severity score was the sum of the severity score for all symptoms listed above on a single day. The total score was the sum of all daily scores during the influenza episode. The peak score was the highest daily score during the influenza episode. The average score was the total score divided by the number of days the influenza episode lasted. | FAS: Full Analysis Set includes subjects that completed vaccination and provided samples to assess immunogenicity at pre-vaccination (day 0) and at least one post-vaccination time point (day 42 or day 180). | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Symptoms experienced during an influenza infection episode, approximately 7-10 days. |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Duration of Influenza Symptoms in RT-PCR Confirmed Infected Subjects. | Subjects recorded daily influenza symptoms from December 2016 up to March 2017. Subjects with a sudden onset of at least one respiratory and one systemic symptom were swabbed. If the results were positive for influenza then the symptoms were included in the analysis. The duration of symptoms was recorded as the number of symptomatic days during the influenza episode. The following symptoms were recorded: fever (≥38oC), malaise, headache, myalgia (muscle and joint pain), cough, sore throat, shortness of breath, runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing and earache. | FAS population: subjects that completed the vaccination and had immunogenicity data at pre-vaccination and at least one time point post-vaccination. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | days | During an influenza episode |
|
|
|
|
| Post-Hoc | Effect of Influenza Vaccination in Previous 2 Years on Immunogenicity | Antigen specific responders in FLU-v vaccinated arms compared to combined placebo group, grouped into those who had recieved an influenza vaccination within the previous 2 years and those who had not ever received a previous influenza vaccination. Responders were defined as those having a ≥2-fold increase in response in IFN-gamma secretion by peripheral blood mononuclear cells from day 0 to day 42 or day 180, as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The combined placebo group includes participants randomly assigned to adjuvanted placebo and those assigned to nonadjuvanted placebo. | FAS | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | day 0 to day 42, day 0 to day 180 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 58 |
| 2 |
| 58 |
| 41 |
| 58 |
| EG001 | 1x Adjuvanted FLU-v | adjuvanted FLU-v on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 adjuvanted FLU-v: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500ug of FLU-v emulsified in 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection Saline: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline | 0 | 57 | 2 | 57 | 50 | 57 |
| EG002 | Non-adjuvanted Placebo | saline solution (0.5ml) on Day 0 and Day 21 Saline: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline | 0 | 32 | 0 | 32 | 27 | 32 |
| EG003 | Adjuvanted Placebo | Adjuvanted placebo on Day 0, saline (0.5mL) on Day 21 Saline: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml of saline Adjuvanted placebo: Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with an emulsion made with 0.25ml of Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic, France) and 0.25ml of water for injection | 0 | 27 | 0 | 27 | 24 | 27 |
| Myocardial Infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| upper limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Alcohol problem | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza like illness | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Decreased apetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pharyngitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rhinorrhea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site erythema | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site pain | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site swelling | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site warmth | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site pruritus | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site induration | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haematoma at Injection Site | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes simplex | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Presyncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D017670 |
| Sodium Compounds |
| TNF-alpha CD4+ |
|
| IL-2 CD4+ |
|
| CD107a CD4+ |
|
| IFN-gamma CD8+ |
|
| TNF-alpha CD8+ |
|
| IL-2 CD8+ |
|
| CD107a CD8+ |
|
| Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| 0.030 |
| Other |
inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD4+ T cells positive for TNF-alpha from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.87 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD4+ T cells positive for TNF-alpha from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.075 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD4+ T cells positive for IL-2 from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.076 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD4+ T cells positive for IL-2 from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | <0.001 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD4+ T cells positive for CD107a from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.91 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD4+ T cells positive for CD107a from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.91 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD8+ T cells positive for IFN-gamma from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.55 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD8+ T cells positive for IFN-gamma from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.55 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD8+ T cells positive for TNF-alpha from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.91 | Other | inequality |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD8+ T cells positive for TNF-alpha from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.91 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD8+ T cells positive for IL2 from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.21 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD8+ T cells positive for IL2 from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.48 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD8+ T cells positive for CD107a from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.62 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of the difference in median fold increase in number of CD8+ T cells positive for CD107a from day 0 to day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.23 | Other | inequality |
|
| TNFalpha+ CD4+ day 42 |
|
|
| IL2+ CD4+ day 42 |
|
|
| CD107a+ CD4+ day 42 |
|
|
| IFNg+ CD4+ day 180 |
|
|
| TNFa+ CD4+ day 180 |
|
|
| IL-2+ CD4+ day 180 |
|
|
| CD107a+ CD4+ day 180 |
|
|
| IFN-gamma day 42 CD8+ |
|
|
| TNF-alpha day 42 CD8+ |
|
|
| IL2 day 42 CD8+ |
|
|
| CD107a day 42 CD8+ |
|
|
| IFN-gamma day 180 CD8+ |
|
|
| TNF-alpha day 180 CD8+ |
|
|
| IL2 day 180 CD8+ |
|
|
| CD107a day 180 CD8+ |
|
|
| Fisher Exact |
| <0.001 |
| Other |
inequality test |
| Comparison of CD4+ TNF alpha responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi-squared | 0.23 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD4+ TNF alpha responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi-squared | 0.056 | Other |
| Comparison of CD4+ IL-2 responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi-squared | 0.74 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD4+ IL-2 responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi-squared | <0.001 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD4+ CD107a responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Fisher Exact | 0.34 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD4+ CD107a responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Fisher Exact | 0.010 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD4+ IFNgamma responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi-squared | 0.096 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD4+ IFNgamma responders on day 180.Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Fisher Exact | 0.049 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD4+ TNF alpha responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi-squared | 0.91 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD4+ TNF alpha responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi-squared | 0.39 | Other |
| Comparison of CD4+ IL-2 responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi-squared | 0.94 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD4+ IL-2 responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Fisher Exact | <0.001 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD4+ CD107a responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Fisher Exact | 0.044 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD4+ CD107a responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Fisher Exact | 0.98 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ IFN-gamma responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.48 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ IFN-gamma responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.28 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ TNF-alpha responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.70 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ TNF-alpha responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.175 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ IL2 responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.24 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ IL2 responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.80 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ CD107a responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.023 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ CD107a responders on day 42. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.015 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ IFN-gamma responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.81 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ IFN-gamma responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.34 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ TNF-alpha responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.30 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ TNF-alpha responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.105 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ IL2 responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.38 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ IL2 responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.44 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ CD107a responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.58 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of CD8+ CD107a responders on day 180. Differences considered significant if p-value <0.05. | Chi squared or Fisher's exact test | 0.43 | Other | inequality test |
|
| TNF-alpha day 42 CD4+ |
|
|
| IL-2 day 42 CD4+ |
|
|
| CD107a day 42 CD4+ |
|
|
| IFN-gamma day 180 CD4+ |
|
|
| TNF-alpha day 180 CD4+ |
|
|
| IL-2 day 180 CD4+ |
|
|
| CD107a day 180 CD4+ |
|
|
| IFN-gamma day 42 CD8+ |
|
|
| TNF-alpha day 42 CD8+ |
|
|
| IL2 day 42 CD8+ |
|
|
| CD107a day 42 CD8+ |
|
|
| IFN-gamma day 180 CD8+ |
|
|
| TNF-alpha day 180 CD8+ |
|
|
| IL2 day 180 CD8+ |
|
|
| CD107a day 180 CD8+ |
|
|
| Fisher Exact |
| 1.0 |
| Other |
inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing IL-2 at day 42 | Fisher Exact | 1.00 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing CD107a at day 42 | Fisher Exact | 1.00 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing IFN-gamma at day 42 | Chi-squared | <0.001 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing TNF-alpha at day 42 | Chi-squared | <0.001 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing IL2 at day 42 | Chi-squared | <0.001 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing CD107a at day 42 | Fisher Exact | 0.31 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing IFN-gamma at day 180 | Fisher Exact | 0.48 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing TNF-alpha at day 180 | Fisher Exact | 1.00 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing IL2 at day 180 | Fisher Exact | 1.00 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing CD107a at day 180 | Fisher Exact | 0.59 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing IFN-gamma at day 180 | Chi-squared | <0.001 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing TNF-alpha at day 180 | Fisher Exact | 0.013 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing IL2 at day 180 | Chi-squared | <0.001 | Other | inequality |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD4+ T-cell producing CD107a at day 180 | Fisher Exact | 1.00 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD8+ T-cell producing IFN-gamma at day 42 | Fisher Exact | 0.55 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD8+ T-cell producing IFN-gamma at day 42 | Fisher Exact | 0.55 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD8+ T-cell producing TNF-alpha at day 42 | Fisher Exact | 1.00 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD8+ T-cell producing IFN-gamma at day 180 | Fisher Exact | 0.29 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD8+ T-cell producing TNF-alpha at day 180 | Fisher Exact | 1.00 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD8+ T-cell producing IFN-gamma at day 180 | Fisher Exact | 1.00 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD8+ T-cell producing TNF-alpha at day 180 | Fisher Exact | 1.00 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of responders determined by MIMOSA analysis of CD8+ T-cell producing CD107a at day 180 | Fisher Exact | 1.00 | Other | inequality test |
|
| Day 180 |
|
|
| Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| 0.001 |
| Other |
inequality test |
| Comparison of median fold-increase in IFN-gamma secretion as measured by ELISA on day 180. p<0.05 considered statistically significant. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.61 | Other | inequality test |
| Comparison of median fold-increase in IFN-gamma secretion as measured by ELISA on day 180. p<0.05 considered statistically significant. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | <0.001 | Other | inequality test |
|
| day 180 |
|
|
| Fisher Exact |
| <0.001 |
| Other |
| Comparison of number of responders on day 180. A subject was considered a "responder" if an increase of secreted IFNgamma of at least two fold was observed from day 0 to day 180. | Chi-squared | 0.399 | Other |
| Comparison of number of responders on day 180. A subject was considered a "responder" if an increase of secreted IFNgamma of at least two fold was observed from day 0 to day 180. | Fisher Exact | <0.001 | Other |
| Solicited AEs unrelated to vaccination |
|
| Solicited AEs unlikely related to vaccination |
|
| Solicited AEs possibly related to vaccination |
|
| Solicited AEs probably related to vaccination |
|
| Solicited AEs definately related to vaccination |
|
| Mild solicited AEs |
|
| Moderate solicited AEs |
|
| Severe solicited AEs |
|
| day 42 |
|
| day 180 |
|
| Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| <0.001 |
| Other |
| Comparison of geometric mean IgG titers specific to FLU-v antigens on day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | <0.001 | Other |
| Comparison of geometric mean IgG titers specific to FLU-v antigens on day 180. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | <0.001 | Other |
| IL-4+ CD8+ cells day 42 |
|
| IL-4+ CD4+ cells day 180 |
|
| IL-4+ CD8+ cells day 180 |
|
| Unsolicited AEs unrelated to the vaccine |
|
| Unsolicited AEs unlikely related to the vacccine |
|
| Unsolicited AEs possibly related to the vacccine |
|
| Unsolicited AEs probably related to the vaccine |
|
| Unsolicited AEs definately related to the vaccine |
|
| Mild unsolicited AEs |
|
| Moderate unsolicited AEs |
|
| Severe unsolicited AEs |
|
| Severe Adverse Events |
|
| positive for influenza B strains |
|
| positive for influenza H1 strains |
|
| positive for influenza H3 strains |
|
| positive for any influenza strain |
|
| Fisher Exact |
| 0.168 |
| Other |
| total symptom peak |
|
| average severity symptom score |
|
| >0.05 |
| Other |
Study not powered to detect statistically significant differences |
| Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| 0.578 |
| Other |
| Comparison of total symptom score between treatment group and corresponding placebo. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.513 | Other |
| Comparison of the total symptom score between treatment group and corresponding placebo. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.200 | Other |
| Comparison of the symptom peak between treatment group and corresponding placebo. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.658 | Other |
| Comparison of the symptom peak between treatment group and corresponding placebo. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.640 | Other |
| Comparison of the average symptom score between treatment group and corresponding placebo. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.127 | Other |
| Comparison of the average symptom score between treatment group and corresponding placebo. | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | 0.201 | Other |
|
| Responders on day 180 |
|
|
| 0.042 |
| Other |
inequality test |
| comparison between groups on day 180 | Fisher Exact | 0.69 | Other | inequality test |
| comparison between groups on day 180 | Fisher Exact | 0.198 | Other | inequality test |
| comparison between groups on day 42 | Chi-squared | 0.092 | Other | inequality test |
| comparison of groups on day 42 | Chi-squared | <0.001 | Other | inequality test |
| comparison of groups on day 180 | Chi-squared | 0.27 | Other | inequality test |
| comparisons between groups on day 180 | Chi-squared | <0.001 | Other | inequality test |