Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Focal dystonia is a neurological movement disorder characterized by excessive involuntary muscle contractions of any body part. Spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is a type of focal dystonia characterized by excessive contraction of intrinsic muscles in the larynx, leading to difficulty in speaking and affecting effective communication. The cause of SD is unknown and there are no treatments that produce long-term benefits. Previous studies have suggested that SD and other focal dystonias are associated with decreased inhibition in sensorimotor areas in the brain. However, no studies have investigated the effects of modulating excitability of the laryngeal motor cortex in healthy individuals or SD. The goal of this pilot project is to determine if brain excitability of the laryngeal motor cortex can be changed with low-frequency inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in individuals with SD and healthy controls. Considering that rTMS at low frequencies (≤1 Hz) produces lasting inhibition in the brain, and that SD is associated with decreased cortical inhibition, the purpose of this pilot study is to determine safety, feasibility and response to 1Hz rTMS to the laryngeal motor cortex in individuals with SD and healthy people. The results will help understand changes associated with the disorder, as well as contribute to the development of future clinical interventions for SD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spasmodic Dysphonia | Experimental | 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) |
|
| Healthy control | Active Comparator | Healthy adults 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) | Device | 1 session of low-frequency rTMS (1Hz, 1200 pulses, 20 minutes) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adverse Response to rTMS | Count of participants who experience and adverse response to rTMS treatment. | 2.5 hours |
| Change in Duration of Cortical Silent Period (CSP) | The change from baseline in CSP duration will be reported. The CSP is an interruption of voluntary muscle contraction after single pulse transcranial stimulation. The duration of the period of silent muscle activity will be measured to test the effects of rTMS intervention. There is no known clinical relevance for this outcome measure. | baseline and 2.5 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Number of Voice Breaks | Changes from baseline in the number of voice breaks during speech will be reported. Voice breaks will be measured by asking subjects to repeat 10 sentences. The frequency of voice breaks in the recorded 10 sentences will be counted. | baseline and 2.5 hours |
| Change in Voice Quality (Overall Severity) With the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Primary inclusion for spasmodic dysphonia:
Primary inclusion for healthy participants (controls):
Exclusion Criteria:
Primary exclusion for participants with spasmodic dysphonia:
Primary exclusion for healthy participants (controls):
TMS contraindications:
The only absolute contraindication to TMS/rTMS is the presence of metallic hardware in close contact to the discharging coil (such as cochlear implants, deep brain stimulator, or medication pumps). In such instances there is a risk of inducing malfunctioning of the implanted devices.
Conditions classified as of increased or uncertain risk are listed below (Rossi et al., 2009; Rossini et al., 2015). Persons under those circumstances will be excluded from the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mo Chen, PhD | University of Minnesota | Principal Investigator |
| Teresa J Kimberley, PhD, PT | Massachusetts General Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninvasive Neuromodulation Laboratory | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55455 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19833552 | Background | Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14. | |
| 25797650 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Spasmodic Dysphonia | 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): 1 session of low-frequency rTMS (1Hz, 1200 pulses, 20 minutes) |
| FG001 | Healthy Control | Healthy adults 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): 1 session of low-frequency rTMS (1Hz, 1200 pulses, 20 minutes) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Spasmodic Dysphonia | 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): 1 session of low-frequency rTMS (1Hz, 1200 pulses, 20 minutes) |
| BG001 | Healthy Control |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Adverse Response to rTMS | Count of participants who experience and adverse response to rTMS treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 2.5 hours |
|
1 day
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Spasmodic Dysphonia | 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): 1 session of low-frequency rTMS (1Hz, 1200 pulses, 20 minutes) |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Throat Pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mo Chen | University of Minnesota | 612-624-5220 | mchen@umn.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 2, 2017 | Jan 27, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055154 | Dysphonia |
| D004421 | Dystonia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014832 | Voice Disorders |
| D007818 | Laryngeal Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
CAPE-V (overall severity) testing before and after rTMS consisted of the repetition of six sentences and two sustained vowels (/a/;/i/). A short sample of spontaneous speech (approximately 60s) was also collected for qualitative analysis of voice. The CAPE-V ratings were completed by three assessors who were blinded to group and pre/post-test. The assessors listened to the voice recordings for each participant and rated them for all six parameters listed above from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating worse severity. Ratings for each voice parameter were then averaged across the three assessors. We chose to analyze the change in the CAPE-V parameter for "Overall Severity" to represent an overall assessment of voice quality from pre- to post-rTMS (Post Score - Pre Score) as it had the greatest likelihood of detecting any small changes that may be perceived. |
| baseline and 2.5 hours |
| Change in Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed (CPPS) | Quantitative assessment of voice quality was completed with acoustic analysis of each participant's production of the ten sentences from the Spasmodic Dysphonia Attribute Inventory (SDAI). A custom script in Praat (Boersma & Weenink, 2018) was used to calculate cepstral peak prominence smoothed (CPPS) for each sentence production. CPPS is a relatively new measure that reflects vocal fold periodicity and noise components in the vocal spectrum. CPPS has been found to be correlated with perceived severity of voice symptoms and higher CPPS values represent a more normal vocal quality. CPPS values (in dB) were averaged across the ten sentences of the SDAI to derive an average CPPS for each participant before and after rTMS. Change for each participant was calculated as the average CPPS at post-rTMS minus average CPPS at pre-rTMS. The values for each group were then averaged to report the average change in CPPS for Controls and Spasmodic Dysphonia. | baseline and 2.5 hours |
| Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, Di Lazzaro V, Ferreri F, Fitzgerald PB, George MS, Hallett M, Lefaucheur JP, Langguth B, Matsumoto H, Miniussi C, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rothwell JC, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Walsh V, Ziemann U. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10. |
| 28231250 | Background | Summers RL, Chen M, Kimberley TJ. Corticospinal excitability measurements using transcranial magnetic stimulation are valid with intramuscular electromyography. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0172152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172152. eCollection 2017. |
| 26217209 | Background | Kimberley TJ, Schmidt RL, Chen M, Dykstra DD, Buetefisch CM. Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jul 9;9:385. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00385. eCollection 2015. |
| 28326007 | Background | Chen M, Summers RL, Goding GS, Samargia S, Ludlow CL, Prudente CN, Kimberley TJ. Evaluation of the Cortical Silent Period of the Laryngeal Motor Cortex in Healthy Individuals. Front Neurosci. 2017 Mar 7;11:88. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00088. eCollection 2017. |
| 34859288 | Derived | Prudente CN, Chen M, Stipancic KL, Marks KL, Samargia-Grivette S, Goding GS, Green JR, Kimberley TJ. Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in adductor laryngeal dystonia: a safety, feasibility, and pilot study. Exp Brain Res. 2022 Feb;240(2):561-574. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06277-4. Epub 2021 Dec 2. |
Healthy adults 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): 1 session of low-frequency rTMS (1Hz, 1200 pulses, 20 minutes)
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Change in Duration of Cortical Silent Period (CSP) | The change from baseline in CSP duration will be reported. The CSP is an interruption of voluntary muscle contraction after single pulse transcranial stimulation. The duration of the period of silent muscle activity will be measured to test the effects of rTMS intervention. There is no known clinical relevance for this outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | milliseconds | baseline and 2.5 hours |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Number of Voice Breaks | Changes from baseline in the number of voice breaks during speech will be reported. Voice breaks will be measured by asking subjects to repeat 10 sentences. The frequency of voice breaks in the recorded 10 sentences will be counted. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | total voice breaks | baseline and 2.5 hours |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Voice Quality (Overall Severity) With the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) | CAPE-V (overall severity) testing before and after rTMS consisted of the repetition of six sentences and two sustained vowels (/a/;/i/). A short sample of spontaneous speech (approximately 60s) was also collected for qualitative analysis of voice. The CAPE-V ratings were completed by three assessors who were blinded to group and pre/post-test. The assessors listened to the voice recordings for each participant and rated them for all six parameters listed above from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating worse severity. Ratings for each voice parameter were then averaged across the three assessors. We chose to analyze the change in the CAPE-V parameter for "Overall Severity" to represent an overall assessment of voice quality from pre- to post-rTMS (Post Score - Pre Score) as it had the greatest likelihood of detecting any small changes that may be perceived. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline and 2.5 hours |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed (CPPS) | Quantitative assessment of voice quality was completed with acoustic analysis of each participant's production of the ten sentences from the Spasmodic Dysphonia Attribute Inventory (SDAI). A custom script in Praat (Boersma & Weenink, 2018) was used to calculate cepstral peak prominence smoothed (CPPS) for each sentence production. CPPS is a relatively new measure that reflects vocal fold periodicity and noise components in the vocal spectrum. CPPS has been found to be correlated with perceived severity of voice symptoms and higher CPPS values represent a more normal vocal quality. CPPS values (in dB) were averaged across the ten sentences of the SDAI to derive an average CPPS for each participant before and after rTMS. Change for each participant was calculated as the average CPPS at post-rTMS minus average CPPS at pre-rTMS. The values for each group were then averaged to report the average change in CPPS for Controls and Spasmodic Dysphonia. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | dB | baseline and 2.5 hours |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 7 |
| 0 |
| 7 |
| 7 |
| 7 |
| EG001 | Healthy Control | Healthy adults 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): 1 session of low-frequency rTMS (1Hz, 1200 pulses, 20 minutes) | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Tenderness on Skin Area of Insertion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neck Pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dental Pain/Discomfort | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other(fatigue) | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D020820 | Dyskinesias |