Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Vanderbilt University | OTHER |
| Indiana University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is designed to evaluate the use of lung ultrasound compared to chest x-ray to diagnose pneumonia in Nepal. Given the ease, portability, and relative ease of teaching ultrasound, this would be potential technology available for many clinicians throughout Nepal to use for adult and pediatric patients presenting with suspected pneumonia. This would be especially useful in remote areas where clinicians have limited access to x-rays. Despite its utility, use of ultrasound to diagnose pneumonia in resource-limited settings like Nepal has not yet been studied. Therefore, this study is designed as a prospective, clinical diagnostic study to evaluate patients presenting with suspected pneumonia using diagnostic imaging of beside ultrasound compared with chest x-ray using computed tomography as the gold standard for diagnosis of pneumonia.
Study Design: A prospective, convenience sample of participants presenting with suspected pneumonia when trained ultrasound investigator is present in the Patan Hospital Emergency Department will be performed in Patan, Nepal. This study will be done in partnership with Patan Hospital Emergency Department and with the approval of Nepal Health Research Council and Patan Hospital's ethical review committee.
Study Setting: Located in the Kathmandu valley, Patan Hospital is a large urban hospital with 35-bed Emergency Department that sees approximately 32,000 patients per year.
Study Protocol:
Prior to the enrolling patients, investigators in the Emergency Department will save lung ultrasound exams and interpret the exams. These exams will then be independently reviewed by an ultrasonographer to ensure adequate skill in lung ultrasonography. A kappa analysis of these scans will be performed. If kappa <0.6, we will review lung ultrasound with these investigators and repeat above evaluation until kappa of 0.6 is achieved.
For participants meeting inclusion criteria, consent will be obtained from the participant. Consent will include explanation of use of bedside ultrasound and chest CT scan for diagnosis of their condition. This consent will also include explanation of risks and benefits in Nepali. These examinations will be provided free of charge to the participant.
The investigator will record patient demographics, symptoms, lung exam findings, and pre-test probability of pneumonia (low, intermediate, high) on the data form.
After initial clinical evaluation, a bedside lung ultrasound will be performed. A Sonosite M Turbo (Fujifilm Sonosite, Inc.) ultrasound machine will be used. The ultrasound examination will include ten views, two anterior views, two lateral views (one including the costophrenic angle), and one posterior view on both chest walls. The investigator will then record findings and diagnosis on the data entry form along with their post-test probability of pneumonia (low, intermediate, high).
Participants will get a chest x-ray as a part of the standard evaluation. These readings will be recorded on the data sheet. Participants will then undergo a chest computed tomography (CT), as the diagnostic standard to evaluate for pneumonia. The chest x-ray and chest CT will be read by a radiologist. The radiologist will be blinded to the results of the previous studies. The reading and diagnosis according to CT will be recorded on the data form.
Statistical Analysis
The performance of ultrasound for diagnosis of pneumonia will be expressed as sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. Since the sensitivity of ultrasound is estimated around 90%, in order to detect a 20% difference based on a CXR sensitivity of 70%, 62 patients will be needed. McNemar's test will be used to evaluate any statistical difference in sensitivity between CXR and US.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound | Experimental | All patients will initially get an ultrasound (interpreted by emergency department physician) followed by chest x-ray (read by independent radiologist) and computed tomography (read by radiologist) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lung Ultrasound | Device | All patients will receive lung ultrasound, chest x-ray and computed tomography |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis of Pneumonia | Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound compared to chest x-ray for the diagnosis of pneumonia using Chest CT as the gold standard for diagnosis. | 9 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bharat Yadav, MD | Chair of Department of Emergency Medicine | Study Chair |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21030550 | Result | Cortellaro F, Colombo S, Coen D, Duca PG. Lung ultrasound is an accurate diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of pneumonia in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2012 Jan;29(1):19-23. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.101584. Epub 2010 Oct 28. | |
| 18046031 | Result | Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All patients eligible for the study were included and received all three imaging modalities.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | All Participants | All patients will initially get an ultrasound (interpreted by emergency department physician) followed by chest x-ray (read by independent radiologist) and computed tomography (read by radiologist) Lung Ultrasound: All patients will receive lung ultrasound, chest x-ray and computed tomography. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Ultrasound | All patients will initially get an ultrasound (interpreted by emergency department physician) followed by chest x-ray (read by independent radiologist) and computed tomography (read by radiologist) Lung Ultrasound: All patients will receive lung ultrasound, chest x-ray and computed tomography. No adverse events were recorded. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Diagnosis of Pneumonia | Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound compared to chest x-ray for the diagnosis of pneumonia using Chest CT as the gold standard for diagnosis. | 62 | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 9 months |
|
Adverse event data were collected during hospital stay.
No adverse events
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Ultrasound | Lung Ultrasound evaluation for pneumonia. All patients will receive lung ultrasound, chest x-ray and computed tomography. No adverse events were recorded. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darlene R House, MD | Patan Academy of Health Science | +977 9810339799 | dhouse@iupui.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | May 16, 2016 | Aug 19, 2017 | Prot_SAP_002.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | May 16, 2016 | Aug 19, 2017 | ICF_003.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011014 | Pneumonia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Chest X-ray | Device | All patients will receive chest x-ray as per usual care for evaluation for pneumonia |
|
| Chest Computed Tomography (CT) | Device | All enrolled patients will receive a CT scan as the gold standard for diagnosing pneumonia |
|
| 24184011 | Result | Bourcier JE, Paquet J, Seinger M, Gallard E, Redonnet JP, Cheddadi F, Garnier D, Bourgeois JM, Geeraerts T. Performance comparison of lung ultrasound and chest x-ray for the diagnosis of pneumonia in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;32(2):115-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Oct 9. |
| 19365166 | Result | Hagaman JT, Rouan GW, Shipley RT, Panos RJ. Admission chest radiograph lacks sensitivity in the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med Sci. 2009 Apr;337(4):236-40. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31818ad805. |
| 25142033 | Result | Liu XL, Lian R, Tao YK, Gu CD, Zhang GQ. Lung ultrasonography: an effective way to diagnose community-acquired pneumonia. Emerg Med J. 2015 Jun;32(6):433-8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203039. Epub 2014 Aug 20. |
| 22700780 | Result | Reissig A, Copetti R, Mathis G, Mempel C, Schuler A, Zechner P, Aliberti S, Neumann R, Kroegel C, Hoyer H. Lung ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective, multicenter, diagnostic accuracy study. Chest. 2012 Oct;142(4):965-972. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0364. |
| 22726366 | Result | Reissig A, Gramegna A, Aliberti S. The role of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of community-acquired pneumonia. Eur J Intern Med. 2012 Jul;23(5):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Feb 21. |
| 9709887 | Result | Syrjala H, Broas M, Suramo I, Ojala A, Lahde S. High-resolution computed tomography for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Aug;27(2):358-63. doi: 10.1086/514675. |
| 29527652 | Derived | Amatya Y, Rupp J, Russell FM, Saunders J, Bales B, House DR. Diagnostic use of lung ultrasound compared to chest radiograph for suspected pneumonia in a resource-limited setting. Int J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar 12;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12245-018-0170-2. |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| 0 |
| 62 |
| 0 |
| 62 |
| 0 |
| 62 |
| EG001 | Chest X-ray | Chest x-ray for evaluation of pneumonia. | 0 | 62 | 0 | 62 | 0 | 62 |
| EG002 | Chest Ct | Following US and CXR, all patients received a Chest CT as the gold standard for diagnosis of pneumonia. | 0 | 62 | 0 | 62 | 0 | 62 |
Not provided
Not provided