Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Portland State University | OTHER |
| Colorado State University | OTHER |
| United States Department of Defense | FED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a randomized controlled trial that assesses the effects of (1) the Family-Supportive Supervisor Behavior (FSSB) and Sleep Leadership training and (2) sleep/cognitive effectiveness feedback intervention on health and well-being among full-time employees in the Oregon National Guard, their supervisors, and their families. The interventions involving both health protection and health promotion are expected to contribute to improvements in employees' and their supervisors' sleep, risk behaviors, mental and physical health, and injury, as well as employees' and their spouse/partners' family experiences, health and well-being, and workplace outcomes.
The overall goal of the Military Employee Sleep and Health (MESH) study is to improve safety, health and well-being of service members in the Oregon National Guard and their families. The MESH Study seeks to do this by training supervisors to support Oregon National Guard service members by focusing on a reduction in work-life stress while increasing sleep health.
The Oregon MESH Study proposes that leadership can influence a fundamental change in the recognition of sleep health and service members' overall well-being and the well-being of their family members. With the support of the Oregon National Guard, the MESH Study will provide family-support and sleep leadership training for supervisors while raising awareness of sleep through daily non-invasive sleep measurements.
The investigators of the Oregon MESH Study expect positive results for study participants, including reduced stress and increased social support. Longer term, these effects are expected to create a more supportive work environment, which has positive effects on safety, health, well-being, family, and organizational outcomes. The investigators also expect that providing service members with individual sleep feedback will reduce sleep problems and improve sleep awareness.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supervisor Intervention | Experimental | Supervisors in the intervention group will go through the FSSB/sleep leadership training and receive actigraphy feedback. |
|
| Employee Intervention | Experimental | Employees in the intervention group will receive actigraphy feedback. |
|
| Waitlist Control | No Intervention | Supervisor training and actigraphy feedback provided AFTER final 9 month data collection. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSSB/Sleep Leadership Training | Behavioral | Supervisors will receive a training addressing family-supportive supervisor behaviors and sleep leadership. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Reported Sleep Duration | Total number of hours calculated from reported bed time and wake time. Minimum 0 hours, Maximum 24 hours. Longer duration indicates longer sleep duration. Ideal range is 7-9 hours of sleep per night. | 4 months |
| Self-Reported Sleep Duration | Total number of hours calculated from reported bed time and wake time. Minimum 0 hours, Maximum 24 hours. Longer duration indicates longer sleep duration. Ideal range is 7-9 hours of sleep per night. | 9 months |
| Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Sleep Disturbance Insomnia Subscale | Four item subscale of the larger 8 item Sleep Disturbance scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much). T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. This is considered the most accurate option. T-Scores estimates were developed using a population of 2,252 participants, 259 of which had clinical sleep disorders, and was intended to be representative of the US population. This is the reference population that the T-score means and SDs were calibrated and centered with. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured (worse). | 4 months |
| Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Sleep Disturbance Insomnia Subscale | Four item subscale of the larger 8 item Sleep Disturbance scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much). T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. This is considered the most accurate option. T-Scores estimates were developed using a population of 2,252 participants, 259 of which had clinical sleep disorders, and was intended to be representative of the US population. This is the reference population that the T-score means and SDs were calibrated and centered with. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviors (FSSB) | Perceived supervisor support for work-family integration as reported by service member, 4 items, with responses on Likert-type scale 1=Strongly disagree to 5= Strongly agree, overall score created by mean score, with possible scores ranging from 1 to 5.. Higher scores indicating higher levels of support (better) Source: Hammer et al., 2013 | 4-months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Leslie Hammer, PhD | Oregon Health and Science University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon Health & Science University | Portland | Oregon | 97239 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Hobfoll, S. E., Vinokur, A. D., Pierce, P. F., & Lewandowski-Romps, L. (2012). The combined stress of family life, work, and war in Air Force men and women: A test of conservation of resources theory. International Journal of Stress Management, 19(3), 217-237. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Sleep Disturbance Scale | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
n=215 were identified as supervisors in the intervention condition and were excluded (i.e., focus is on service members only for analysis)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Intervention Combined: Service Member/Employees | Includes all service members/employees who are in the intervention condition, which includes both treatments: 1) Their supervisor is in the condition for the Sleep Leadership/Family Supportive training and 2) the service member is in the sleep actigraphy feedback condition. |
| FG001 | Waitlist Control | Service members do not receive actigraphy feedback nor do their supervisors receive the sleep leadership/Family Supportive training until AFTER final data collection at 9 months |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employees: 4 Month Completion |
| |||||||||||||
| Employees: 9 Month Completion |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Intervention Combined: Service Member/Employees | Includes all service members/employees who are in the intervention condition, which includes both treatments: 1) Their supervisor is in the condition for the Sleep Leadership/FSSB training and 2) the service member is in the sleep actigraphy feedback condition. |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Self-Reported Sleep Duration | Total number of hours calculated from reported bed time and wake time. Minimum 0 hours, Maximum 24 hours. Longer duration indicates longer sleep duration. Ideal range is 7-9 hours of sleep per night. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Hours | 4 months |
|
9 months
Minimal risk protocol
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Intervention Combined: Service Member/Employees | Includes all service members/employees who are in the intervention condition, which includes both treatments: 1) Their supervisor is in the condition for the Sleep Leadership/FSSB training and 2) the service member is in the sleep actigraphy feedback condition. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Leslie Hammer, PI | Oregon Health & Science University | 503-494-9313 | hammerl@ohsu.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 21, 2023 | Jul 30, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D000092862 | Psychological Well-Being |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D010549 | Personal Satisfaction |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Actigraphy Feedback | Behavioral | Supervisors and employees will receive personalized feedback on their sleep and activity measurements. |
|
| 9 months |
| Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Dissatisfaction With Sleep Subscale | Four item subscale of the larger 8 item Sleep Disturbance scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much. T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. This is considered the most accurate option. T-Scores estimates were developed using a population of 2,252 participants, 259 of which had clinical sleep disorders, and was intended to be representative of the US population. This is the reference population that the T-score means and SDs were calibrated and centered with. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured (worse). | 4 months |
| Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Dissatisfaction With Sleep Subscale | Four item subscale of the larger 8 item Sleep Disturbance scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much). T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. This is considered the most accurate option. T-Scores estimates for Dissatisfaction with Sleep were developed using a population of 2,252 participants, 259 of which had clinical sleep disorders, and was intended to be representative of the US population. This is the reference population that the T-score means and SDs were calibrated and centered with. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured (worse). | 9 months |
| Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Sleep Related Impairment Subscale (SRI) | 8 item scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much). T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. This is considered the most accurate option. T-Scores estimates for SRI were developed using a population of 2,252 participants, 259 of which had clinical sleep disorders, and was intended to be representative of the US population. This is the reference population that the T-score means and SDs were calibrated and centered with. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more sleep impairment (worse). | 4 months |
| Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Sleep Related Impairment Subscale (SRI) | 8 item scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much). T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. This is considered the most accurate option. T-Scores estimates for SRI were developed using a population of 2,252 participants, 259 of which had clinical sleep disorders, and was intended to be representative of the US population. This is the reference population that the T-score means and SDs were calibrated and centered with. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more sleep impairment (worse). | 9 months |
| Actigraphic Sleep Duration: Total Sleep Time (TST) | Actigraphic measurements obtained using Actiwatch2 worn for 3 weeks Average sleep duration in hours Great duration generally better, with target range of 7-9 hours each sleep period. | 9 months |
| Actigraphic Sleep Efficiency: Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) | Actigraphic measurements obtained using Actiwatch2 worn for 3 weeks Average number of minutes spent awake during the sleep period. More minutes indicates worse outcome. | 9-months |
| Overall Job Satisfaction Scale | Service member satisfaction with current job; Likert-type scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree, mean created from the 3 items. Scores could range from 0-5 with higher levels indicating greater satisfaction. Source: Cammann et al., 1983 | 9-months |
| Turnover Intentions | Service member intention to quit current job; Two items with responses on Likert-type scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree. Overall score created with a mean of the two items, with higher levels indicating greater intention to leave one's job. Source: Boroff & Lewin, 1997 | 9-months |
| Perceived Stress Scale | Service member self-reported stress; Likert-type scale 0 = Never to 4 = Very often, combined to a mean score, with a possible range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate greater stress (worse). Source: Cohen & Williamson, 1988 | 9-months |
| Walter Reed Functional Impairment: Occupational Subscale (OFI) | Service member difficulty with completing work tasks and quality; 6 items with Likert-type responses: 1 = No difficulty at all to 5 = Extreme difficulty, mean score created from all items, with possible score range from 1 to 5. Higher levels indicating greater impairment (worse). Source: Subscale of Overall Functional Impairment by Herrell et al., 2014 | 9-months |
| Walter Reed Functional Impairment Scale: Personal Functioning Subscale (PFI) | Service member difficulty with getting personal life skills completed; 2 items with Likert-type responses: 1 = No difficulty at all to 5 = Extreme difficulty, mean score created from all items, with possible score range from 1 to 5. Higher levels indicating greater impairment (worse). Source: Subscale of Overall Functional Impairment by Herrell et al., 2014 | 9-months |
| Walter Reed Functional Impairment Scale: Social Functional Impairment Subscale (SFI) | Service member difficulty functioning in social situations; 4 items with Likert-type responses: 1 = No difficulty at all to 5 = Extreme difficulty, mean score created from all items, with possible score range from 1 to 5. Higher levels indicating greater impairment (worse). Source: Subscale of Overall Functional Impairment by Herrell et al., 2014 | 9-months |
| Sleep Leadership | Perceived supervisor support for sleep health as reported by service member, 8 items, with responses on Likert-type scale 1=Never to 5= Always, overall score created by mean score, with possible scores ranging from 1 to 5.. Higher scores indicating higher levels of support (better) Source: Modified version of Gunia et al., 2015 | 4-months |
| Sleep-Related Impairment Scale | View source |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| Waitlist Control |
Service members do not receive actigraphy feedback NOR do their supervisors receive the sleep leadership/FSSB training until AFTER final data collection at 9 months |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Missing data | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Missing data | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Self-Reported Sleep Duration | Total number of hours calculated from reported bed time and wake time. Source: Buysse et al., 1989 | Mean | Standard Deviation | Hours |
|
| Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Sleep Disturbance Insomnia Subsca | Four item subscale of the larger 8 item Sleep Disturbance scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much). T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured (worse). | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Dissatisfaction With Sleep Subsca | Four item subscale of the larger 8 item Sleep Disturbance scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much. T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured (worse). | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Sleep Related Impairment Subscale | 8 item scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much). T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more sleep impairment (worse). | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Actigraphic Sleep Duration: Total Sleep Time (TST) | Actigraphic measurements obtained using Actiwatch2 worn for 3 weeks Average sleep duration in hours Great duration generally better, with target range of 7-9 hours each sleep period. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Hours |
|
| Actigraphic Sleep Efficiency: Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) | Actigraphic measurements obtained using Actiwatch2 worn for 3 weeks Average number of minutes spent awake during the sleep period. More minutes indicates worse outcome. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Minutes |
|
| Overall Job Satisfaction Scale | Service member satisfaction with current job; Likert-type scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree, mean created from the 3 items. Scores could range from 0-5 with higher levels indicating greater satisfaction. Source: Cammann et al., 1983 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Turnover Intentions | Service member intention to quit current job; Two items with responses on Likert-type scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree. Overall score created with a mean of the two items, with higher levels indicating greater intention to leave one's job. Source: Boroff & Lewin, 1997 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Perceived Stress Scale | Service member self-reported stress; Likert-type scale 0 = Never to 4 = Very often, combined to a mean score, with a possible range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate greater stress (worse). Source: Cohen & Williamson, 1988 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Walter Reed Functional Impairment: Occupational Subscale (OFI) | Service member difficulty with completing work tasks and quality; 6 items with Likert-type responses: 1 = No difficulty at all to 5 = Extreme difficulty, mean score created from all items, with possible score range from 1 to 5. Higher levels indicating greater impairment (worse). Source: Subscale of Overall Functional Impairment by Herrell et al., 2014 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Walter Reed Functional Impairment: Social Functional Impairment (SFI) | Service member difficulty functioning in social situations; 4 items with Likert-type responses: 1 = No difficulty at all to 5 = Extreme difficulty, mean score created from all items, with possible score range from 1 to 5. Higher levels indicating greater impairment (worse). Source: Subscale of Overall Functional Impairment by Herrell et al., 2014 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Walter Reed Functional Impairment: Personal Functional Impairment (PFI) | Service member difficulty with getting personal life skills completed; 2 items with Likert-type responses: 1 = No difficulty at all to 5 = Extreme difficulty, mean score created from all items, with possible score range from 1 to 5. Higher levels indicating greater impairment (worse). Source: Subscale of Overall Functional Impairment by Herrell et al., 2014 | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
|
|
| Primary | Self-Reported Sleep Duration | Total number of hours calculated from reported bed time and wake time. Minimum 0 hours, Maximum 24 hours. Longer duration indicates longer sleep duration. Ideal range is 7-9 hours of sleep per night. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Hours | 9 months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Sleep Disturbance Insomnia Subscale | Four item subscale of the larger 8 item Sleep Disturbance scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much). T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. This is considered the most accurate option. T-Scores estimates were developed using a population of 2,252 participants, 259 of which had clinical sleep disorders, and was intended to be representative of the US population. This is the reference population that the T-score means and SDs were calibrated and centered with. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured (worse). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | t score on a scale | 4 months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Sleep Disturbance Insomnia Subscale | Four item subscale of the larger 8 item Sleep Disturbance scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much). T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. This is considered the most accurate option. T-Scores estimates were developed using a population of 2,252 participants, 259 of which had clinical sleep disorders, and was intended to be representative of the US population. This is the reference population that the T-score means and SDs were calibrated and centered with. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | t score on a scale | 9 months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Dissatisfaction With Sleep Subscale | Four item subscale of the larger 8 item Sleep Disturbance scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much. T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. This is considered the most accurate option. T-Scores estimates were developed using a population of 2,252 participants, 259 of which had clinical sleep disorders, and was intended to be representative of the US population. This is the reference population that the T-score means and SDs were calibrated and centered with. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured (worse). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | t score on a scale | 4 months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Dissatisfaction With Sleep Subscale | Four item subscale of the larger 8 item Sleep Disturbance scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much). T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. This is considered the most accurate option. T-Scores estimates for Dissatisfaction with Sleep were developed using a population of 2,252 participants, 259 of which had clinical sleep disorders, and was intended to be representative of the US population. This is the reference population that the T-score means and SDs were calibrated and centered with. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured (worse). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | t score on a scale | 9 months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Sleep Related Impairment Subscale (SRI) | 8 item scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much). T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. This is considered the most accurate option. T-Scores estimates for SRI were developed using a population of 2,252 participants, 259 of which had clinical sleep disorders, and was intended to be representative of the US population. This is the reference population that the T-score means and SDs were calibrated and centered with. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more sleep impairment (worse). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | t score on a scale | 4 months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Sleep Related Impairment Subscale (SRI) | 8 item scale. Likert-type responses: 1 = Not at all to 5 = Very much). T-Scores were created using HealthMeasures Scoring service, where data are uploaded into the HealthMeasures scoring service website, which generates T-Scores. This is considered the most accurate option. T-Scores estimates for SRI were developed using a population of 2,252 participants, 259 of which had clinical sleep disorders, and was intended to be representative of the US population. This is the reference population that the T-score means and SDs were calibrated and centered with. The T-Scores that HealthMeasures generates are not precisely at a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 because they are based on the unique MESH samples. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more sleep impairment (worse). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | t score on a scale | 9 months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Actigraphic Sleep Duration: Total Sleep Time (TST) | Actigraphic measurements obtained using Actiwatch2 worn for 3 weeks Average sleep duration in hours Great duration generally better, with target range of 7-9 hours each sleep period. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Hours | 9 months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Actigraphic Sleep Efficiency: Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) | Actigraphic measurements obtained using Actiwatch2 worn for 3 weeks Average number of minutes spent awake during the sleep period. More minutes indicates worse outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Minutes | 9-months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Overall Job Satisfaction Scale | Service member satisfaction with current job; Likert-type scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree, mean created from the 3 items. Scores could range from 0-5 with higher levels indicating greater satisfaction. Source: Cammann et al., 1983 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 9-months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Turnover Intentions | Service member intention to quit current job; Two items with responses on Likert-type scale 1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree. Overall score created with a mean of the two items, with higher levels indicating greater intention to leave one's job. Source: Boroff & Lewin, 1997 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 9-months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Perceived Stress Scale | Service member self-reported stress; Likert-type scale 0 = Never to 4 = Very often, combined to a mean score, with a possible range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate greater stress (worse). Source: Cohen & Williamson, 1988 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 9-months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Walter Reed Functional Impairment: Occupational Subscale (OFI) | Service member difficulty with completing work tasks and quality; 6 items with Likert-type responses: 1 = No difficulty at all to 5 = Extreme difficulty, mean score created from all items, with possible score range from 1 to 5. Higher levels indicating greater impairment (worse). Source: Subscale of Overall Functional Impairment by Herrell et al., 2014 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 9-months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Walter Reed Functional Impairment Scale: Personal Functioning Subscale (PFI) | Service member difficulty with getting personal life skills completed; 2 items with Likert-type responses: 1 = No difficulty at all to 5 = Extreme difficulty, mean score created from all items, with possible score range from 1 to 5. Higher levels indicating greater impairment (worse). Source: Subscale of Overall Functional Impairment by Herrell et al., 2014 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 9-months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Walter Reed Functional Impairment Scale: Social Functional Impairment Subscale (SFI) | Service member difficulty functioning in social situations; 4 items with Likert-type responses: 1 = No difficulty at all to 5 = Extreme difficulty, mean score created from all items, with possible score range from 1 to 5. Higher levels indicating greater impairment (worse). Source: Subscale of Overall Functional Impairment by Herrell et al., 2014 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 9-months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviors (FSSB) | Perceived supervisor support for work-family integration as reported by service member, 4 items, with responses on Likert-type scale 1=Strongly disagree to 5= Strongly agree, overall score created by mean score, with possible scores ranging from 1 to 5.. Higher scores indicating higher levels of support (better) Source: Hammer et al., 2013 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 4-months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Sleep Leadership | Perceived supervisor support for sleep health as reported by service member, 8 items, with responses on Likert-type scale 1=Never to 5= Always, overall score created by mean score, with possible scores ranging from 1 to 5.. Higher scores indicating higher levels of support (better) Source: Modified version of Gunia et al., 2015 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 4-months |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 358 |
| 0 |
| 358 |
| 0 |
| 358 |
| EG001 | Waitlist Control | Service members do not receive actigraphy feedback NOR do their supervisors receive the sleep leadership/FSSB training until AFTER final data collection at 9 months | 0 | 346 | 0 | 346 | 0 | 346 |
Not provided
Not provided