Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study schedule consists of a Screening Period (up to 14 days), a blinded 4- week Titration-to-Effect Period with weekly visits, a blinded 4-week Maintenance Treatment Period at the optimal dose level determined for each patient, and a 1-week Follow-up Period.
Eligible patients will be randomized to receive either CR845 or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. Every patient will be started on a 1-mg dose of CR845 or matching placebo. During the post-randomization Titration-to-Effect period, the dose of study drug may be increased to 2.5 mg or 5 mg in a double-blind fashion. Patients may know their dose is being changed but will not know whether they were randomization to active study drug or placebo. Approximately 330 patients will be enrolled in this study.
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, titration-to-effect study of orally administered CR845 in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
The study schedule consists of a Screening Period (up to 14 days), a blinded 4- week Titration-to-Effect Period with weekly visits, a blinded 4-week Maintenance Treatment Period at the optimal dose level determined for each patient, and a 1-week Follow-up Period.
Eligible patients will be randomized to receive either CR845 or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. Randomization will be stratified based on a patient's primary OA joint (knee vs. hip). Every patient will be started on a 1-mg dose of CR845 or matching placebo. During the post-randomization Titration-to-Effect period, the dose of study drug may be increased to 2.5 mg or 5 mg in a double-blind fashion.
Patients may know their dose is being changed but will not know whether they were randomized to active study drug or placebo. Approximately 330 patients will be enrolled in this study.
During the Screening, Titration-to-Effect and Follow-up Period, pain intensity scores will be obtained at specified time points. Blood sampling and safety assessments will be conducted during this period as well.
The use of rescue medication for the treatment of any pain (including but not limited to headache, menstrual cramps, or non-target joint pain) during the study will be discussed with the patients at the Screening Visit. Acetaminophen is the only allowable rescue medication for pain beginning from Day -5 until the end of the Maintenance Treatment Period. Starting at the Screening Visit Acetaminophen will be provided as 325-mg tablets and its use (number of tablets taken in the previous 24 hours) will be reported each evening in the patient diary.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CR845 tablet 1 mg | Active Comparator | Dosing twice a day (BID) for a total of 8 weeks, with each dose administered at least 2 hours prior to or after a meal. |
|
| CR845 tablet 2.5 mg | Active Comparator | Dosing twice a day (BID) for a total of 8 weeks, with each dose administered at least 2 hours prior to or after a meal. |
|
| CR845 tablet 5 mg | Active Comparator | Dosing twice a day (BID) for a total of 8 weeks, with each dose administered at least 2 hours prior to or after a meal. |
|
| Placebo tablet | Placebo Comparator | Dosing twice a day (BID) for a total of 8 weeks, with each dose administered at least 2 hours prior to or after a meal. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR845 tablet 1 mg | Drug | CR845 tablets will be provided as 1 mg enteric-coated tablets. All tablets are white in color with no markings and are identical in appearance, regardless of dose and treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline at Week 8 With Respect to the Weekly Mean of the Daily 24-hour Pain Intensity for the Index Joint as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). | 11-point NRS scale where 0 = no pain, and 10= pain as bad as you can imagine | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario & McMaster Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index Total Score at Week 8 | The WOMAC Index is a self-administered assessment used to measure pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC Index contains 24 questions across 3 different sub-scales (pain, stiffness, and function) all with scoring 0-10 (0 = No Pain/Stiffness/Difficulty, 10 = Extreme Pain/Stiffness/Difficulty). Each WOMAC Index Subscale score (Pain/Stiffness/Function) is calculated as the sum of all scores within that subscale. The pain subscale consists of five scores from 0-10, 0 is no pain 10 is extreme pain possible for a range of 0 - 50 points. The stiffness subscale consists of two scores from 0-10, 0 is no stiffness 10 is extreme stiffness possible for a range of 0 - 20 points. The function subscale consists of 17 scores from 0-10, 0 is no difficulty and 10 is extreme difficulty, for a range of 0 - 170 points. The WOMAC Index Total Score is calculated as the sum of all 24 scores (range of 0-240). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Voluntarily provides written informed consent to participate in the study prior to any study procedures.
Is able to speak, read, and communicate clearly in English or Spanish; is able to understand the study procedures.
Male or female ≥ 25 years of age.
Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 40 kg/m2.
Has OA of the hip or knee according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria.
Reports an average pain intensity level ≥ 5 in the index joint at Screening on a 0-10 NRS scale.
Is either opioid-naïve (defined as taking < 10 mg a day of morphine equivalent 14 days prior to screening) or opioid-experienced. If receiving opioid analgesic medication for OA, patients must be on a stable dose ≤ 40 mg of morphine equivalents for 14 days prior to screening.
Willing to discontinue currently used pain medications beginning 5 days prior to the Baseline Visit and throughout the study. Acetaminophen use is allowed. (Section 8.8)
If female:
If male, the patient must be surgically or biologically sterile. If not sterile, the patient must agree to use an acceptable form of birth control with a heterosexual partner (as described in inclusion criterion #9) or abstain from sexual relations during the treatment period and for 3 days following the last dose of study drug.
Is free of other physical, mental, or medical conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make study participation inadvisable.
Reports a daily pain intensity score in the index joint ≥ 5 (on a 0-10 NRS scale) during 4 or more of the last 7 days prior to randomization, with 2 consecutive days ≥ 5 occurring just prior to randomization
Exclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
A patient will be eligible for enrollment if the following criteria are met:
Voluntarily provides written informed consent to participate in the study prior to any study procedures.
Is able to speak, read, and communicate clearly in English or Spanish; is able to understand the study procedures.
Male or female ≥ 25 years of age.
Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 40 kg/m2.
Has OA of the hip or knee according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria.
Reports an average pain intensity level ≥ 5 in the index joint at Screening on a 0-10 NRS scale.
Is either opioid-naïve (defined as taking < 10 mg a day of morphine equivalent 14 days prior to screening) or opioid-experienced. If receiving opioid analgesic medication for OA, patients must be on a stable dose ≤ 40 mg of morphine equivalents for 14 days prior to screening.
Willing to discontinue currently used pain medications beginning 5 days prior to the Baseline Visit and throughout the study. Acetaminophen use is allowed. (Section 8.8)
If female:
If male, the patient must be surgically or biologically sterile. If not sterile, the patient must agree to use an acceptable form of birth control with a heterosexual partner (as described in inclusion criterion #9) or abstain from sexual relations during the treatment period and for 3 days following the last dose of study drug.
Is free of other physical, mental, or medical conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make study participation inadvisable.
Reports a daily pain intensity score in the index joint ≥ 5 (on a 0-10 NRS scale) during 4 or more of the last 7 days prior to randomization, with 2 consecutive days ≥ 5 occurring just prior to randomization
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joseph Stauffer, DO, MBA | Cara Therapeutics | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Birmingham | Alabama | 35216 | United States | ||
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | CR845 Tablet | Every patient was started on a twice daily (BID) 1 mg dose of CR845. During the post-randomization Titration-to-Effect Period, the dose of study drug may have been increased to 2.5 mg BID or 5 mg BID in a double-blind fashion. |
| FG001 | Placebo Tablet |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 4, 2016 | Jul 15, 2020 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| CR845 tablet 2.5 mg | Drug | CR845 tablets will be provided as 2.5 mg enteric-coated tablets. All tablets are white in color with no markings and are identical in appearance, regardless of dose and treatment. |
|
| CR845 tablet 5 mg | Drug | CR845 tablets will be provided as 5 mg enteric-coated tablets. All tablets are white in color with no markings and are identical in appearance, regardless of dose and treatment. |
|
| Placebo tablet | Drug | Placebo tablets will be provided as enteric-coated tablets. All tablets are white in color with no markings and are identical in appearance, regardless of dose and treatment. |
|
| Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Pain Intensity Sub-scale Score at Week 8 | The pain subscale consists of five scores from 0-10, 0 is no pain 10 is extreme pain possible for a range of 0 - 50 points. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Stiffness Sub-scale Score at Week 8 | The stiffness subscale consists of two scores from 0-10, 0 is no stiffness 10 is extreme stiffness possible for a range of 0 - 20 points. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Function Sub-scale Score at Week 8 | The function subscale consists of 17 scores from 0-10, 0 is no difficulty and 10 is extreme difficulty, for a range of 0 - 170 points. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Proportion of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement From Baseline in the Weekly Mean Pain Intensity at Week 8 | A patient's pain response to treatment is defined as the percent improvement from baseline with respect to the weekly mean of "average pain in the last 24 hours" pain score during the last week of the Maintenance Treatment Period (Week 8) . If a patient's mean weekly pain score during the last week of the Maintenance Treatment Period is greater than the baseline score (i.e., the patient has an increase in pain compared to baseline), his/her response to treatment will be assigned a value of 0 (i.e. the patient will be considered a non-responder). Patients who discontinue study drug early will be considered non-responders to treatment and will be assigned a pain response of 0. The percentage of subjects achieving levels of treatment response 10% to 100% by 10% increments as defined above will be calculated with 30% of key interest as it has been shown to represent a clinically important improvement in pain. | Week 8 |
| Proportion of Patients With at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Weekly Mean Pain Intensity at Week 8 | A patient's pain response to treatment is defined as the percent improvement from baseline with respect to the weekly mean of "average pain in the last 24 hours" pain score during the last week of the Maintenance Treatment Period (Week 8) . If a patient's mean weekly pain score during the last week of the Maintenance Treatment Period is greater than the baseline score (i.e., the patient has an increase in pain compared to baseline), his/her response to treatment will be assigned a value of 0 (i.e. the patient will be considered a non-responder). Patients who discontinue study drug early will be considered non-responders to treatment and will be assigned a pain response of 0. The percentage of subjects achieving levels of treatment response 10% to 100% by 10% increments as defined above will be calculated with 30% of key interest as it has been shown to represent a clinically important improvement in pain. | Week 8 |
| Proportion of Patients Whose OA Pain Was "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" as Indicated by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 8 | The PGIC is a self-administered instrument that measures the patient's overall impression of his/her OA on a 7-point scale where 1 = "Very much improved" and 7 = "Very much worse". | Week 8 |
| Average Daily Number of Acetaminophen Tablets Used During Entire Study | The average daily number of acetaminophen tablets used during the study will be calculated using data recorded in the patient diary as the sum of the total number of tablets used divided by the length of exposure (in days). The supplemental pain medication for OA will be grouped categorically into the following classes: (1) no supplemental acetaminophen tablets, (2) 0 to ≤ 0.5 tablets, (3) > 0.5 to ≤ 1.0 tablets, (4) > 1.0 to ≤ 2.0 tablets, and (5) > 2.0 tablets. | Week 8 |
| Proportion of Patients Withdrawing From Treatment Due to Lack of Analgesic Efficacy | Week 8 |
| Peoria |
| Arizona |
| 85351 |
| United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Phoenix | Arizona | 85023 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Carmichael | California | 95608 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | San Diego | California | 92123 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Tustin | California | 92780 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Homestead | Florida | 33030 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Jupiter | Florida | 33458 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Lake Worth | Florida | 33462 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Miami | Florida | 33183 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Oldsmar | Florida | 34677 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Orlando | Florida | 32806 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Plantation | Florida | 33317 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | South Miami | Florida | 33143 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Tampa | Florida | 33634 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Savannah | Georgia | 31406 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Hazelwood | Missouri | 63042 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Omaha | Nebraska | 68134 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89144 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Berlin | New Jersey | 08009 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Binghamton | New York | 13901 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Rochester | New York | 14609 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45242 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45246 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73119 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | 16635 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Charleston | South Carolina | 29406 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Charleston | South Carolina | 29407 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Greenville | South Carolina | 29601 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Austin | Texas | 78731 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Dallas | Texas | 75234 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Plano | Texas | 75024 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Plano | Texas | 75075 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | San Antonio | Texas | 78209 | United States |
| Cara Therapeutics Study Site | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22911 | United States |
Twice daily dosing (BID) |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | CR845 Tablet | Every patient was started on a twice daily (BID) 1 mg dose of CR845. During the post-randomization Titration-to-Effect Period, the dose of study drug may have been increased to 2.5 mg BID or 5 mg BID in a double-blind fashion. |
| BG001 | Placebo Tablet | Twice daily dosing (BID) |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline at Week 8 With Respect to the Weekly Mean of the Daily 24-hour Pain Intensity for the Index Joint as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). | 11-point NRS scale where 0 = no pain, and 10= pain as bad as you can imagine | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario & McMaster Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index Total Score at Week 8 | The WOMAC Index is a self-administered assessment used to measure pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC Index contains 24 questions across 3 different sub-scales (pain, stiffness, and function) all with scoring 0-10 (0 = No Pain/Stiffness/Difficulty, 10 = Extreme Pain/Stiffness/Difficulty). Each WOMAC Index Subscale score (Pain/Stiffness/Function) is calculated as the sum of all scores within that subscale. The pain subscale consists of five scores from 0-10, 0 is no pain 10 is extreme pain possible for a range of 0 - 50 points. The stiffness subscale consists of two scores from 0-10, 0 is no stiffness 10 is extreme stiffness possible for a range of 0 - 20 points. The function subscale consists of 17 scores from 0-10, 0 is no difficulty and 10 is extreme difficulty, for a range of 0 - 170 points. The WOMAC Index Total Score is calculated as the sum of all 24 scores (range of 0-240). | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Pain Intensity Sub-scale Score at Week 8 | The pain subscale consists of five scores from 0-10, 0 is no pain 10 is extreme pain possible for a range of 0 - 50 points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Stiffness Sub-scale Score at Week 8 | The stiffness subscale consists of two scores from 0-10, 0 is no stiffness 10 is extreme stiffness possible for a range of 0 - 20 points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Function Sub-scale Score at Week 8 | The function subscale consists of 17 scores from 0-10, 0 is no difficulty and 10 is extreme difficulty, for a range of 0 - 170 points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement From Baseline in the Weekly Mean Pain Intensity at Week 8 | A patient's pain response to treatment is defined as the percent improvement from baseline with respect to the weekly mean of "average pain in the last 24 hours" pain score during the last week of the Maintenance Treatment Period (Week 8) . If a patient's mean weekly pain score during the last week of the Maintenance Treatment Period is greater than the baseline score (i.e., the patient has an increase in pain compared to baseline), his/her response to treatment will be assigned a value of 0 (i.e. the patient will be considered a non-responder). Patients who discontinue study drug early will be considered non-responders to treatment and will be assigned a pain response of 0. The percentage of subjects achieving levels of treatment response 10% to 100% by 10% increments as defined above will be calculated with 30% of key interest as it has been shown to represent a clinically important improvement in pain. | Posted | Number | percentage of patients | Week 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients With at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Weekly Mean Pain Intensity at Week 8 | A patient's pain response to treatment is defined as the percent improvement from baseline with respect to the weekly mean of "average pain in the last 24 hours" pain score during the last week of the Maintenance Treatment Period (Week 8) . If a patient's mean weekly pain score during the last week of the Maintenance Treatment Period is greater than the baseline score (i.e., the patient has an increase in pain compared to baseline), his/her response to treatment will be assigned a value of 0 (i.e. the patient will be considered a non-responder). Patients who discontinue study drug early will be considered non-responders to treatment and will be assigned a pain response of 0. The percentage of subjects achieving levels of treatment response 10% to 100% by 10% increments as defined above will be calculated with 30% of key interest as it has been shown to represent a clinically important improvement in pain. | Posted | Number | percentage of patients | Week 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Whose OA Pain Was "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" as Indicated by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 8 | The PGIC is a self-administered instrument that measures the patient's overall impression of his/her OA on a 7-point scale where 1 = "Very much improved" and 7 = "Very much worse". | Posted | Number | percentage of patients | Week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Average Daily Number of Acetaminophen Tablets Used During Entire Study | The average daily number of acetaminophen tablets used during the study will be calculated using data recorded in the patient diary as the sum of the total number of tablets used divided by the length of exposure (in days). The supplemental pain medication for OA will be grouped categorically into the following classes: (1) no supplemental acetaminophen tablets, (2) 0 to ≤ 0.5 tablets, (3) > 0.5 to ≤ 1.0 tablets, (4) > 1.0 to ≤ 2.0 tablets, and (5) > 2.0 tablets. | Posted | Median | Standard Deviation | Tablets | Week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Withdrawing From Treatment Due to Lack of Analgesic Efficacy | Posted | Number | percentage of patients | Week 8 |
|
|
59 Days
Treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs) will be defined as AEs where onset occurs from the day of first dose of study medication up to and including the 2nd day following the day of last dose of study medication.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | CR845 Tablet | Every patient was started on a twice daily (BID) 1 mg dose of CR845. During the post-randomization Titration-to-Effect Period, the dose of study drug may have been increased to 2.5 mg BID or 5 mg BID in a double-blind fashion. | 0 | 316 | 9 | 316 | 82 | 316 |
| EG001 | Placebo Tablet | Dosing twice a day (BID) for a total of 8 weeks, with each dose administered at least 2 hours prior to or after a meal. Placebo tablet: Placebo tablets will be provided as enteric-coated tablets. All tablets are white in color with no markings and are identical in appearance, regardless of dose and treatment. | 0 | 160 | 1 | 160 | 17 | 160 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 5.0 mg |
|
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 2.5 mg |
|
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 1.0 mg |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alcohol poisoning | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Head injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 5.0 mg; One patient experienced the serious adverse events of head injury, lumbar vertebral fracture, rib fracture, thoracic vertebral fracture, subdural haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorhage. |
|
| Lumbar vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 5.0 mg; One patient experienced the serious adverse events of head injury, lumbar vertebral fracture, rib fracture, thoracic vertebral fracture, subdural haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorhage. |
|
| Rib fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 5.0 mg; One patient experienced the serious adverse events of head injury, lumbar vertebral fracture, rib fracture, thoracic vertebral fracture, subdural haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorhage. |
|
| Subdural haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 5.0 mg; One patient experienced the serious adverse events of head injury, lumbar vertebral fracture, rib fracture, thoracic vertebral fracture, subdural haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorhage. |
|
| Thoracic vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 5.0 mg; One patient experienced the serious adverse events of head injury, lumbar vertebral fracture, rib fracture, thoracic vertebral fracture, subdural haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorhage. |
|
| Arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 2.5 mg |
|
| Encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 5.0 mg |
|
| Metabolic encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 5.0 mg |
|
| Subarachnoid haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 5.0 mg; One patient experienced the serious adverse events of head injury, lumbar vertebral fracture, rib fracture, thoracic vertebral fracture, subdural haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorhage. |
|
| Mental Status Changes | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 5.0 mg |
|
| Pleuritic pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment | Last Treatment Patient Received: CR845 5.0 mg |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frédérique Menzaghi, PhD | Cara Therapeutics | 203-406-3700 | clinicaltrials.gov@caratherapeutics.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 18, 2017 | Jul 15, 2020 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015207 | Osteoarthritis, Hip |
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|