Single Blinded Randomized Study of Volume Reduction of Uterine Fibroids After Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Computer Tomography or Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Single Blinded Randomized Study of Volume Reduction of Uterine Fibroids After Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Computer Tomography or Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Uterine fibroids are benign tumors that occur most commonly in women of reproductive age. Symptoms of uterine fibroids may be heavy menstrual bleeding which may lead to anemia, pressure symptoms, bowel symptoms or urinary urgency. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the study of minimally invasive methods for treatment. Microwave ablation of myomas and endometrium has been shown to have good effect and acceptability has been high. This study aims to compare the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of percutaneous or per vaginal microwave ablation and uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine myomas in a randomized single blind study.
Primary outcome
1. Volume reduction 6 months post treatment (+/- 15 days) compared to pre treatment measured as mean volume reduction of the 3 largest fibroids evaluated by magnetic
Power calculation
To be able to show a difference between the groups in myoma shrinkage at 6 months of 75% in microwave ablation and 50%[11] in the embolization group with a standard deviation of 25% with a alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80% we would need 16 women in each group and thus need to randomize 32 women.
In order to compensate for loss to follow-up or drop out a total of 36 women will be randomized.
Patients and investigators will not be blinded. The MRI will be performed and evaluated by a blinded radiologist.
After having signed informed consent but before randomization patients will undergo MRI of the uterine fibroids. Patients with a single fibroid measuring more than mean diameter 8cm will be excluded from further participation in the study.
All women included in the study after MRI examination will fill in a PBAC evaluation[7] during the menses preceding treatment. Women will fill a VAS for maximal pain during 1 month prior to treatment.
Microwave ablation will be performed percutaneously or vaginally using a Covidien Emprint microwave ablation system. Embolization will be performed in conscious women with an epidural catheter for pain relief.
At follow up visit 1, 3 months and 6 months post treatment acceptability will be assessed as overall satisfaction of treatment on a scale from 1-7 and if the woman would recommend the treatment to a friend.
A new MRI scan will be performed 6 months post treatment (+/-15 days).
Background
Uterine fibroids are benign tumors that occur most commonly in women of reproductive age. Symptoms of uterine fibroids may be heavy menstrual bleeding which may lead to anemia, pressure symptoms, bowel symptoms or urinary urgency. Hysterectomy remains the reference standard in the treatment of uterine fibroids. However, it may cause long-term side effects such as pain and genitovaginal prolapse. It also carries a substantial risk of short term complications such as infections and organ damage. Myomectomy is another conventional treatment, but it is associated with a recurrence rate as high as 20% according to literature. It carries the same short term risks of complications as hysterectomy but at a lower frequency.
In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the study of minimally invasive or non-invasive therapies with uterine preservation such as uterine arterial embolization (UAE), radiofrequency (RF), microwave treatment and high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). RF ablation often requires the aid of a laparoscopic procedure, which is invasive. HIFU is effective in small myomas, but can be time consuming in large myomas with treatments for several hours. Ultrasound or computer tomography guided percutaneous microwave thermal ablation is minimally invasive, has low time requirements, is easy to perform, and has been broadly used for the treatment of solid tumours in organs other than the uterus with favourable effects.
Microwave ablation of myomas and endometrium has been performed in China and Japan. The effect and acceptability has been high. The research team in this study has been to China to study the treatment. We have visited the clinic and studied the procedure as well as talked to patients pre- and post operatively . The equipment at Danderyd Hospital has the same output effects as the equipment in China. Danderyd Hospital as approved the method for use in uterine myomas. However, no randomized comparative study of other minimally invasive methods has been performed.
This study aims to compare the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of percutaneous CT- or ultrasound guided microwave ablation and uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine myomas in a randomized single blind study.
Power calculation
To be able to show a difference between the groups in myoma shrinkage at 6 months of 75% in microwave ablation and 50% in the embolization group with a standard deviation of 25% with a alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80% we would need 16 women in each group and thus need to randomize 32 women.
In order to compensate for loss to follow-up or drop out a total of 36 women will be randomized.
Recruitment and Randomization
Women fulfilling inclusion criteria and without exclusion criteria will be identified at the outpatient clinic of Danderyds Hospital. Advertisement may be placed in local newspapers or on social media (Facebook and Instagram) and relevant webpages or in gynecological clinics.
Women will be randomized after having been informed orally and in written and after having signed informed consent and after fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria after MRI-examination. Randomization will be in random permuted blocks of 6 at a ratio of 1:1. The randomization will be according to a computer generated randomization sequence. After patients have signed informed consent and fulfill inclusion without exclusion criteria after the initial magnetic resonance imaging they will be allocated to an intervention by consecutive opening of sealed opaque envelopes containing the randomization code.
Blinding
Patients and investigators will not be blinded. The MRI will be performed and evaluated by a blinded radiologist.
Method
Pre randomization evaluation
After having signed informed consent but before randomization patients will undergo MRI of the uterine fibroids. Patients with a single fibroid measuring more than 6cm will be excluded from further participation in the study.
All women included in the study after MRI examination will fill in a PBAC evaluation during the menses preceding treatment. Women will fill a VAS for maximal pain during 1 month prior to treatment. In addition a full blood panel will be evaluated.
As for uterine artery embolization no pathologist report will be performed before any treatment.
Microwave ablation
Microwave ablation will be performed percutaneously using a Covidien Emprint microwave ablation system with a 30-90 Watts effect in 14-16 gauge needle with a ceramic tip using computer tomography with fusion technique or ultrasound for myoma imaging and needle guidance. After identification of the needle path with CT or peroperative ultrasound local anaesthesia (carbocain 1% with 0,05mg/ml adrenaline) will be given along the needle path and a small skin incision using a scalpel will made for the needle entry. Patients will be given intravenous anesthesia with spontaneous breathing or general anesthesia during treatment to minimize movement during ablation.
Uterine artery embolization
Embolization will be performed in conscious women with an epidural catheter for pain relief. A catheter will be inserted in the femoral artery to access the uterine artery during x-ray monitoring and during administration of contrast to visualize the fibroma and its supporting arterial supply. When the supporting arterial branch has been identified polyvinyl alcohol particles are released into the bloodstream. These particles cause a thrombosis in the vessel.
Evaluation post treatment
Women will estimate VAS maximum postoperative pain day of surgery and the following 7 days. In addition they will note how many days passed before all pain subsided, use of pain medication will be noted and period until resuming normal daily activities. The period of hospitalization will be noted. Menstrual blood loss (PBAC) will be noted the first menstruation, menstruation number 3 and 5 post treatment. PBAC is a validated instrument for menstrual blood loss quantification.
Follow-up visits will be after first menstruation at approximately 1 month and at 3 and 6-7 months post-treatment.
At follow up visit 1, 3 months and 6 months post treatment acceptability will be assessed as overall satisfaction of treatment on a scale from 1-7 and if the woman would recommend the treatment to a friend.
A new MRI scan will be performed 6 months post treatment (+/-15 days). Women will then be asked to participate in a long-term follow up with evaluation of fibroma growth using ultrasound and recurrence of symptoms using PBAC yearly until retraction of consent.
Clinicial significance
Uterine myomas are a benign disease but have a significant impact on the lives of women. As many as 70% of women have myomas. However, the self-reported frequency of uterine myomas differs between countries and ranges from 4% to 15% in some countries- probably depending on the use of ultrasound in gynecological practice and the information given to women. Women with self reported uterine myomas are much more likely to report on symptoms which are known to be caused by myomas such as heavy menstrual bleeding, pressure symptoms, urinary urgency and pain (dysmenhorrea and dyspareunia). Myomas remain the leading cause of hysterectomies in most western countries. As hysterectomy is a highly invasive procedure with cost for women in terms of absence from work and short and long term complications, finding new minimally invasive treatments should remain a focus of health care.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: