Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this proposal is to investigate whether a standard rTMS protocol for depression, including multiple sessions applied to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) results in reduction of depressive symptoms for adult patients with ASD and MDD (Aim 1). The secondary goal is to investigate and whether there is any beneficial reduction in the core symptoms of autism (Aim 2).
Aim 1. Determine the safety and therapeutic efficacy of left-sided DLPFC high frequency rTMS on MDD symptoms in patients with ASD: The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving the rTMS will tolerate the treatment course without difficulty and have clinically significant reduction of depressive symptoms after receiving all 25 sessions, as compared with their symptom burden prior to initiating TMS. Depression symptom data will be collected as pre- and post-TMS scores on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Depression scores will also be monitored periodically during course of TMS with Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ-9).
Exploratory sub-aim - Monitoring for durability of response: The investigators hypothesize that subjects receiving rTMS will demonstrate durability of response in their depression symptom reduction, as measured by HAM-D scores at 1 month and 3 months post-TMS.
Aim 2. Determine the effect of left DLPFC rTMS on core symptoms of ASD: The investigators hypothesize that subjects will experience reduction in core symptoms of ASD after completing all 25 sessions, as compared with their symptom burden prior to initiating treatment. For social and communication deficits, informant and/or self-report evaluations will be made pre- and post-TMS with the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), the Ritvo Autism Aspergers Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R) and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC). Repetitive and restricted behavior will be evaluated using the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R), the ABC, and RAADS.
Exploratory sub-aim: Determine if there are changes to functional brain connectivity during face and object processing tasks via functional MRI imaging in patients with Autism who receive rTMS: The study investigators hypothesize that there will be altered brain connectivity evident in patients' baseline fMRI during cognitive processing tasks prior to TMS reflected as both hyper- and hypo-connectivity, and that there will be some level of normalization of these patterns in fMRI after completion of TMS series, particularly in the prefrontal cortex.
Exploratory sub-aim - Monitoring for durability of response: The study investigators hypothesize that subjects receiving rTMS will exhibit durability of response in their ASD symptom reduction, as measured by ABC, SRS, RAADS, AND RBR scores at 1 month and 3 months post-TMS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| rTMS | Experimental | Participants will receive rTMS sessions according to the study protocol. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NeuroStar® TMS device (Neuronetics, Atlanta, GA) | Device | Participants in this study arm will be evaluated before and after receiving rTMS. Outcome measures will include social skills rating scales, depression rating scales and cognitive tasks while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) with 17 questions. Minimum score = 0, maximum 53. Higher scores mean more severe depression. | Baseline through Week 5 |
| Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist | Aberrant Behavior Checklist. Minimum 0, maximum 174. Higher scores indicate worse behaviors. | Baseline, Week 5, Week 9, Week 17 |
| Change From Baseline in Social Responsiveness Scale-2 | Social Responsiveness Scale-2. Minimum 0, maximum 195. Higher indicates worse behaviors | Baseline, Week 5, Week 9, Week 17 |
| Change From Baseline in Ritvo Autism-Aspergers Diagnostic Scale | Ritvo Autism-Aspergers Diagnostic Scale. Minimum 0, maximum 240. Higher indicates worse symptoms. | Baseline, Week 5, Week 9, Week 17 |
| Change From Baseline in Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised | Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised Global Impression. Minimum 0, maximum 100. Higher indicates worse behaviors | Baseline, Week 5, Week 9, Week 17 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Functional MRI Scanning During Cognitive Processing Tasks | Functional MRI data during cognitive processing tasks | Baseline, Week 5 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
List specific contraindicationsUncontrolled and/or untreated seizure disorder as defined by any incidence of seizure within the past 6 months. Patients with diagnosed epilepsy, or prior seizures, will be allowed in the study if they are taking an anticonvulsant medication, or have not had a seizure in the past year off medications.
Moderate to severe intellectual disability (ID) as defined by IQ < 60, determined by prior IQ testing or Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASC-II) if no prior test results available
Other psychiatric or neurodevelopmental illness that is the primary area of clinical focus (including but not limited to primary psychotic disorder, substance abuse disorder, and ASD or ID which are secondary to genetic syndromes)
Active suicidal ideation or suicide attempt in the 90 days prior to initial assessment
Presence of any metal implants or devices in the head or neck (e.g. metal plates or screws)
No participants who are pregnant or who are planning to become pregnant
Exclusion criteria for fMRI scanning:
Inability or unwillingness of participant or legal guardian/representative to give informed consent
There will be no discrimination or exclusions based on race, gender, sexual orientation, or other socioeconomic factors. Of note, while both male and female participants will be actively and equally recruited using the same methods. The natural distribution of autism in the population skews towards significant towards male gender, with male prevalence being 4-5 times that of female prevalence. Our study will therefore likely have more male participants than female due to this trend in prevalence.
Children (age <18) are being excluded from this study for several reasons. While autism is a pediatric neurodevelopmental disorder with symptom onset as young as one year of age, it is also one that is chronic throughout adulthood. Both children with autism and neurotypical children undergo periods of rapid change in brain size, structure, and organization as they age, and the interaction between a full rTMS series and brains that are still involved in periods of very active development and whom may also be at different points along their own developmental timelines may skew or alter the data that is collected. Additionally, due to both brain growth and increases in skull thickness, children of different ages may have significantly different "scalp to cortex" distances, which can result in very different patterns of cortical stimulation despite uniform coil positioning. This will be an added, unnecessary variable which would compromise the attempt at performing a standardized protocol. Finally, while high frequency rTMS is an FDA approved treatment for depression in adults, it has not yet been FDA approved in children and adolescents.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27090022 | Background | Perera T, George MS, Grammer G, Janicak PG, Pascual-Leone A, Wirecki TS. The Clinical TMS Society Consensus Review and Treatment Recommendations for TMS Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder. Brain Stimul. 2016 May-Jun;9(3):336-346. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 16. | |
| 26536383 | Background | Oberman LM, Enticott PG, Casanova MF, Rotenberg A, Pascual-Leone A, McCracken JT; TMS in ASD Consensus Group. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in autism spectrum disorder: Challenges, promise, and roadmap for future research. Autism Res. 2016 Feb;9(2):184-203. doi: 10.1002/aur.1567. Epub 2015 Nov 4. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Home page with information about the Primary Investigator | View source |
Not provided
Individual participant data will not be shared.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | rTMS | Participants will receive rTMS sessions according to the study protocol. NeuroStar® TMS device (Neuronetics, Atlanta, GA): Participants in this study arm will be evaluated before and after receiving rTMS. Outcome measures will include social skills rating scales, depression rating scales and cognitive tasks while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | rTMS | Participants will receive rTMS sessions according to the study protocol. NeuroStar® TMS device (Neuronetics, Atlanta, GA): Participants in this study arm will be evaluated before and after receiving rTMS. Outcome measures will include social skills rating scales, depression rating scales and cognitive tasks while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) with 17 questions. Minimum score = 0, maximum 53. Higher scores mean more severe depression. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline through Week 5 |
|
|
Baseline to 17 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | rTMS | Participants will receive rTMS sessions according to the study protocol. NeuroStar® TMS device (Neuronetics, Atlanta, GA): Participants in this study arm will be evaluated before and after receiving rTMS. Outcome measures will include social skills rating scales, depression rating scales and cognitive tasks while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seizure | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment | Participant was administered brain stimulation outside of the safety range due to operator error. |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLeod F. Gwynette, MD | Medical University of South Carolina | 843-792-9162 | gwynette@musc.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | May 30, 2019 | Aug 6, 2019 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000067877 | Autism Spectrum Disorder |
| D003863 | Depression |
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D003865 | Depressive Disorder, Major |
| D001321 | Autistic Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002659 | Child Development Disorders, Pervasive |
| D065886 | Neurodevelopmental Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 24731434 | Result | George MS, Raman R, Benedek DM, Pelic CG, Grammer GG, Stokes KT, Schmidt M, Spiegel C, Dealmeida N, Beaver KL, Borckardt JJ, Sun X, Jain S, Stein MB. A two-site pilot randomized 3 day trial of high dose left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for suicidal inpatients. Brain Stimul. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):421-31. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 19. |
| 24280031 | Result | Enticott PG, Fitzgibbon BM, Kennedy HA, Arnold SL, Elliot D, Peachey A, Zangen A, Fitzgerald PB. A double-blind, randomized trial of deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for autism spectrum disorder. Brain Stimul. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 27. |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist | Aberrant Behavior Checklist. Minimum 0, maximum 174. Higher scores indicate worse behaviors. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 5, Week 9, Week 17 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Social Responsiveness Scale-2 | Social Responsiveness Scale-2. Minimum 0, maximum 195. Higher indicates worse behaviors | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 5, Week 9, Week 17 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Ritvo Autism-Aspergers Diagnostic Scale | Ritvo Autism-Aspergers Diagnostic Scale. Minimum 0, maximum 240. Higher indicates worse symptoms. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 5, Week 9, Week 17 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised | Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised Global Impression. Minimum 0, maximum 100. Higher indicates worse behaviors | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 5, Week 9, Week 17 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Functional MRI Scanning During Cognitive Processing Tasks | Functional MRI data during cognitive processing tasks | Unable to obtain due to lack of available equipment. | Posted | Baseline, Week 5 |
|
|
| 0 |
| 13 |
| 0 |
| 13 |
| 1 |
| 13 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Week 17 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Week 17 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Week 17 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Week 17 |
|