Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of pretreatment with two different ablative laser modalities, a CO2 laser and an Er:YAG laser, and to assess the role of laser density in fractional laser assisted topical anesthesia.
Rationale: In dermatology anesthetics are frequently injected or topically applied to achieve local anesthesia. Injectable anesthetics are effective but uncomfortable during administration, especially for people who are needle phobic. Application of topical anesthesia is painless but time consuming and often only partial aesthesia is achieved due to the barrier function of the stratum corneum. (Manuskiatti, Triwongwaranat et al. 2010) Penetration of local anesthetics could be enhanced by pretreatment of the skin with ablative fractional lasers (AFXL) which locally disrupts the stratum corneum by creating an array of microscopic ablation channels. (Sklar, Burnett et al. 2014) In a previous pilot study, conducted at our institute, we demonstrated that effective anesthesia could be achieved within ten minutes after application of a topical anesthetic on skin pretreated with AFXL at painless settings. (Meesters, Bakker et al. 2015) However, little is still known about the role of the type of fractional laser used (e.g. CO2 or Er:YAG laser), the laser settings, the type of anesthetic and the occlusion time on the efficacy of the anesthesia.
Objective: The objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy of pretreatment with two different ablative laser modalities, a CO2 laser and an Er:YAG laser, and to assess the role of laser density in fractional laser assisted topical anesthesia.
Study design: Prospective, single blinded, randomized, controlled, within subject, pilot study.
Study population: 15 healthy volunteers ≥18 years, who give written informed consent Intervention: In each subject, four test regions on subject's back of 1x1 cm will be randomly allocated to (I) pretreatment with the fractional CO2 laser at 5% density, (II) pretreatment with the fractional CO2 laser at 15% density, (III) pretreatment with the fractional Er:YAG laser at 5% density and (IV) pretreatment with the fractional Er:YAG laser at 15% density. After pretreatment, articaine hydrochloride 40 mg/ml + epinephrine 10 μg/ml 30 solution (AHES) will be applied on the test regions with 15 minutes occlusion time. After 15 minutes a pain stimulus, consisting of a pass with the fractional CO2 laser at 50 mJ and 5% density (scanned area 6x6 mm), will be given at each test region. In addition, a reference pain stimulus with the CO2 laser at the same settings will be given at unanesthetized skin. Subjects will be asked to indicate pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0-10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain) directly after each pain stimulus.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fractional CO2 laser at 5% density | Experimental | This test region will be pretreated with a fractional carbon dioxide laser with a 120 μm spot at 5% density and a pulse energy of 2.5 mJ/microbeam (Fractional CO2 laser, 2.5 mJ, 5% density) in a subject blinded fashion. After pretreament Articaine hydrochloride 40 mg/ml and epinephrine 10 μg/ml solution (AHES) will be applied to this test region. Fifteen minutes after AHES application (incubation time; under occlusion), a pain stimulus will be given at the test region with the Fractional CO2 laser, 50 mJ, 5% density. |
|
| Fractional CO2 laser at 15% density | Experimental | This test region will be pretreated with a fractional carbon dioxide laser with a 120 μm spot at 15% density and a pulse energy of 2.5 mJ/microbeam (Fractional CO2 laser, 2.5 mJ, 15% density) in a subject blinded fashion. After pretreament Articaine hydrochloride 40 mg/ml and epinephrine 10 μg/ml solution (AHES) will be applied at this test region. Fifteen minutes after AHES application (incubation time; under occlusion), a pain stimulus will be given at the test region with the Fractional CO2 laser, 50 mJ, 5% density. |
|
| Fractional Er:YAG laser at 5% density | Experimental | This test region will be pretreated with a Erbium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser with a 225 μm spot at 5% density and a pulse energy of 9 mJ/microbeam (Fractional Er:YAG laser, 9 mJ, 5% density) in a subject blinded fashion. After pretreatment Articaine hydrochloride 40 mg/ml and epinephrine 10 μg/ml solution (AHES) will be applied at this test region. Fifteen minutes after AHES application (incubation time; under occlusion), a pain stimulus will be given at the test region with the Fractional CO2 laser, 50 mJ, 5% density. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fractional CO2 laser, 2.5 mJ, 5% density | Device | Pretreatment at 2.5 mJ/microbeam and 5% density. Pain stimulus at 50 mJ/microbeam and 5% density |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain score | The main study parameter is pain, as scored on a VAS from 0-10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain). | After 15 minutes incubation time of the anesthetics |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain score | The secondary study parameter is pain, as scored on a VAS from 0-10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain) directly after pretreatment | Directly after pretreatment. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Albert Wolkerstorfer, MD, PhD | Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders, Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam | Principal Investigator |
| Menno A. De Rie, MD, PhD | Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders | Amsterdam | 1105 AZ | Netherlands |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26032635 | Background | Meesters AA, Bakker MM, de Rie MA, Wolkerstorfer A. Fractional CO2 laser assisted delivery of topical anesthetics: A randomized controlled pilot study. Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Feb;48(2):208-11. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22376. Epub 2015 May 29. | |
| 24664987 | Background | Sklar LR, Burnett CT, Waibel JS, Moy RL, Ozog DM. Laser assisted drug delivery: a review of an evolving technology. Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):249-62. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22227. Epub 2014 Mar 24. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Fractional Er:YAG laser at 15% density | Experimental | This test region will be pretreated with a Erbium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser with a 225 μm spot at 15% density and a pulse energy of 9 mJ/microbeam (Fractional Er:YAG laser, 9 mJ, 15% density) in a subject blinded fashion. After pretreatment Articaine hydrochloride 40 mg/ml and epinephrine 10 μg/ml solution (AHES) will be applied at this test region. Fifteen minutes after AHES application (incubation time; under occlusion), a pain stimulus will be given at the test region with the Fractional CO2 laser, 50 mJ, 5% density. |
|
|
| Fractional CO2 laser, 2.5 mJ, 15% density | Device | Pretreatment at 2.5 mJ/microbeam and 15% density. Pain stimulus at 50 mJ/microbeam and 5% density |
|
|
| Fractional Er:YAG laser, 9 mJ, 5% density | Device | Pretreatment at 9 mJ and 5% density. |
|
|
| Fractional Er:YAG laser, 9 mJ, 15% density | Device | Pretreatment at 9 mJ and 15% density. |
|
|
| Fractional CO2 laser, 50 mJ, 5% density | Device | Pain stimulus at 50 mJ/microbeam and 5% density |
|
|
| AHES | Drug | Topical application at test region I-IV under occlusion for 15 minutes |
|
|
| 22302761 | Background | Oni G, Brown SA, Kenkel JM. Can fractional lasers enhance transdermal absorption of topical lidocaine in an in vivo animal model? Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Feb;44(2):168-74. doi: 10.1002/lsm.21130. Epub 2012 Feb 2. |
| 23908302 | Background | Oni G, Rasko Y, Kenkel J. Topical lidocaine enhanced by laser pretreatment: a safe and effective method of analgesia for facial rejuvenation. Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Aug 1;33(6):854-61. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13496248. |
| 22296284 | Background | Ong MW, Bashir SJ. Fractional laser resurfacing for acne scars: a review. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jun;166(6):1160-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10870.x. Epub 2012 May 8. |
| 20633798 | Background | Manuskiatti W, Triwongwaranat D, Varothai S, Eimpunth S, Wanitphakdeedecha R. Efficacy and safety of a carbon-dioxide ablative fractional resurfacing device for treatment of atrophic acne scars in Asians. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Aug;63(2):274-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.08.051. |
| 21841477 | Background | Wolfe JW, Butterworth JF. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: update on mechanisms and treatment. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;24(5):561-6. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834a9394. |
| 14751483 | Background | Hahn IH, Hoffman RS, Nelson LS. EMLA-induced methemoglobinemia and systemic topical anesthetic toxicity. J Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;26(1):85-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.03.003. |
| 20166154 | Background | Haedersdal M, Sakamoto FH, Farinelli WA, Doukas AG, Tam J, Anderson RR. Fractional CO(2) laser-assisted drug delivery. Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Feb;42(2):113-22. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20860. |
| 23207321 | Background | Bachhav YG, Heinrich A, Kalia YN. Controlled intra- and transdermal protein delivery using a minimally invasive Erbium:YAG fractional laser ablation technology. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013 Jun;84(2):355-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.11.018. Epub 2012 Nov 30. |
| 23212624 | Background | Haak CS, Farinelli WA, Tam J, Doukas AG, Anderson RR, Haedersdal M. Fractional laser-assisted delivery of methyl aminolevulinate: Impact of laser channel depth and incubation time. Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Dec;44(10):787-95. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22102. Epub 2012 Dec 4. |
| 23000695 | Background | Haak CS, Bhayana B, Farinelli WA, Anderson RR, Haedersdal M. The impact of treatment density and molecular weight for fractional laser-assisted drug delivery. J Control Release. 2012 Nov 10;163(3):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Sep 21. |
| 22988990 | Background | Tierney EP, Hanke CW. Fractionated carbon dioxide laser treatment of photoaging: prospective study in 45 patients and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg. 2011 Sep;37(9):1279-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02082.x. |
| 21158542 | Background | Paasch U, Haedersdal M. Laser systems for ablative fractional resurfacing. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2011 Jan;8(1):67-83. doi: 10.1586/erd.10.74. |
| 20601578 | Background | Farkas JP, Richardson JA, Burrus CF, Hoopman JE, Brown SA, Kenkel JM. In vivo histopathologic comparison of the acute injury following treatment with five fractional ablative laser devices. Aesthet Surg J. 2010 May-Jun;30(3):457-64. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10373060. |
| 17115384 | Background | Hantash BM, Bedi VP, Chan KF, Zachary CB. Ex vivo histological characterization of a novel ablative fractional resurfacing device. Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Feb;39(2):87-95. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20405. |
| 24500855 | Background | Taudorf EH, Haak CS, Erlendsson AM, Philipsen PA, Anderson RR, Paasch U, Haedersdal M. Fractional ablative erbium YAG laser: histological characterization of relationships between laser settings and micropore dimensions. Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):281-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22228. Epub 2014 Feb 5. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002355 | Carticaine |
| D004837 | Epinephrine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013876 | Thiophenes |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D004983 | Ethanolamines |
| D000605 | Amino Alcohols |
| D000438 | Alcohols |
| D000588 | Amines |
| D015306 | Biogenic Monoamines |
| D001679 | Biogenic Amines |
| D002395 | Catecholamines |
| D002396 | Catechols |
| D010636 | Phenols |
| D001555 | Benzene Derivatives |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
Not provided
Not provided