Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-004704-29 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main purpose of the study was to compare rheumatoid arthritis symptom improvement in participants who were given ABP 710 to those who were given infliximab, 22 weeks after starting treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABP 710 | Experimental | Participants randomized to receive a 3 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion of ABP 710 on day 1, at weeks 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 22. At week 22 participants continued receiving 3 mg/kg ABP 710 every 8 weeks through week 46. |
|
| Infliximab | Active Comparator | Participants randomized to receive a 3 mg/kg IV infusion of infliximab on day 1, at weeks 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 22. At week 22 participants were re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either continue receiving 3 mg/kg infliximab every 8 weeks or transition to receive 3 mg/kg ABP 710 every 8 weeks through week 46. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABP 710 | Biological | Administered by intravenous infusion |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 22 | The primary efficacy endpoint was the response difference (RD) of 20% improvement in ACR core set measurements (ACR20) at week 22. A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Baseline and week 22 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response Through Week 14 | A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject (man or woman) is ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old.
Subject is diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as determined by meeting the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for RA.
Subject has RA duration of at least 3 months.
Subject has active RA defined as ≥ 6 swollen joints and ≥ 6 tender joints (based on 66/68 joint count excluding distal interphalangeal joints) at screening and baseline and at least 1 of the following at screening:
Subject has a positive rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide at screening.
Subject has taken methotrexate (MTX) for ≥ 12 consecutive weeks and is on a stable dose of oral or subcutaneous MTX 7.5 to 25 mg/week for ≥ 8 weeks before receiving the investigational product and is willing to remain on a stable dose throughout the study.
For a subject on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or low potency analgesics such as tramadol, Soma Compounds, Fioricet, or Fiorinal, the dose should be stable for ≥ 2 weeks before screening.
For a subject on oral corticosteroids (≤ 10 mg prednisone or equivalent), the dose should be stable for ≥ 4 weeks before screening.
Subject has no known history of active tuberculosis.
Subject has a negative test for tuberculosis during screening defined as either:
Subject with a positive PPD and a history of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination is allowed with a negative Quantiferon test.
Subject with a positive PPD test (without a history of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination) or a subject with a positive or indeterminate Quantiferon test is allowed if they have all of the following:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject has a history of prosthetic or native joint infection.
Subject has an active infection or history of infections as follows:
Subject has a positive blood test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
Subject has a positive hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, or hepatitis C virus antibody result at screening.
Subject has uncontrolled, clinically significant systemic disease such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease including moderate or severe heart failure (New York Heart Association Class III/IV), renal disease, liver disease, or hypertension.
Subject had a malignancy within 5 years EXCEPT for treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma, in situ cervical cancer, OR in situ breast ductal carcinoma.
Subject has a history of neurologic symptoms suggestive of central or peripheral nervous system demyelinating disease.
Subject has a major chronic inflammatory disease or connective tissue disease other than RA, with the exception of secondary Sjögren's syndrome.
Subject has a concurrent medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could cause this study to be detrimental to the subject.
Subject has laboratory abnormalities at screening, including any of the following:
Subject has used commercially available or investigational biologic therapies for RA as follows:
Subject has received live vaccines within 28 days before the first dose of investigational product or plans to receive live vaccines during the course of the study.
Subject has previously received Remicade® (infliximab) or a biosimilar of infliximab.
Woman who is pregnant or breast feeding, or plans to become pregnant while enrolled in the study and for 6 months after the last dose of investigational product.
Women of childbearing potential (ie, neither surgically sterile nor postmenopausal) and do not agree to use adequate contraception (eg, true abstinence, sterilization, birth control pills, Depo-Provera® [medroxyprogesterone] injections, or contraceptive implants) while on study and for 6 months after the last dose of investigational product.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| MD | Amgen | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Huntsville | Alabama | 35801 | United States | ||
| Research Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32216829 | Derived | Genovese MC, Sanchez-Burson J, Oh M, Balazs E, Neal J, Everding A, Hala T, Wojciechowski R, Fanjiang G, Cohen S. Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar ABP 710 with infliximab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Mar 26;22(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-2142-1. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| AmgenTrials clinical trials website | View source |
Not provided
Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ABP 710 or infliximab, stratified by geographic region and prior biologic use.
At week 22 participants initially randomized to infliximab were re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue infliximab or switch to ABP 710. Participants initially randomized to ABP 710 continued receiving ABP 710.
This study was conducted at 75 centers in Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Spain, and the United States.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | ABP 710 | Participants randomized to receive a 3 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion of ABP 710 on day 1, at weeks 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 22. |
| FG001 | Infliximab |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 to Week 22 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 17, 2017 | Aug 8, 2019 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Infliximab |
| Biological |
Administered by intravenous infusion |
|
|
| Baseline and weeks 2, 6, and 14 |
| Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response After Week 22 | A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Baseline and weeks 30, 34, 38, 46, and 50 |
| Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response Through Week 22 | A positive ACR50 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Baseline and weeks 2, 6, 14, and 22 |
| Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response After Week 22 | A positive ACR50 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Baseline and weeks 30, 34, 38, 46, and 50 |
| Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response Through Week 22 | A positive ACR70 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Baseline and weeks 2, 6, 14, and 22 |
| Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response After Week 22 | A positive ACR70 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Baseline and weeks 30, 34, 38, 46, and 50 |
| Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Through Week 22 | The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:
DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. | Baseline and weeks 2, 6, 14, and 22 |
| Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) After Week 22 | The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:
DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. | Baseline and weeks 30, 34, 38, 46, and 50 |
| Tuscaloosa |
| Alabama |
| 35406 |
| United States |
| Research Site | Peoria | Arizona | 85381 | United States |
| Research Site | Covina | California | 91722 | United States |
| Research Site | Hemet | California | 92543-4403 | United States |
| Research Site | Upland | California | 91786 | United States |
| Research Site | Van Nuys | California | 91405 | United States |
| Research Site | Aventura | Florida | 33180 | United States |
| Research Site | Miami Lakes | Florida | 33014 | United States |
| Research Site | Orlando | Florida | 32804 | United States |
| Research Site | Sarasota | Florida | 34239 | United States |
| Research Site | Vero Beach | Florida | 32960 | United States |
| Research Site | Lexington | Kentucky | 40504 | United States |
| Research Site | Grand Blanc | Michigan | 48439 | United States |
| Research Site | Flowood | Mississippi | 39232 | United States |
| Research Site | St Louis | Missouri | 63141 | United States |
| Research Site | Omaha | Nebraska | 68114 | United States |
| Research Site | Voorhees Township | New Jersey | 08043 | United States |
| Research Site | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28210 | United States |
| Research Site | Charleston | South Carolina | 29406-9333 | United States |
| Research Site | Memphis | Tennessee | 38119 | United States |
| Research Site | Carrollton | Texas | 75007-1601 | United States |
| Research Site | Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
| Research Site | Houston | Texas | 77429-5890 | United States |
| Research Site | League City | Texas | 77573 | United States |
| Research Site | Plano | Texas | 75024 | United States |
| Research Site | Woodville | South Australia | 5011 | Australia |
| Research Site | Fitzroy | Victoria | 3065 | Australia |
| Research Site | Sofia | Sofia | 1606 | Bulgaria |
| Research Site | Pleven | 5800 | Bulgaria |
| Research Site | Plovdiv | 4002 | Bulgaria |
| Research Site | Plovdiv | 4003 | Bulgaria |
| Research Site | Sliven | 8800 | Bulgaria |
| Research Site | Varna | 9005 | Bulgaria |
| Research Site | Victoria | British Columbia | V8V 3M9 | Canada |
| Research Site | Saint Johns | Newfoundland and Labrador | A1A 5E8 | Canada |
| Research Site | Brno | Jihormoravsky KRAJ | 602 00 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Hlučín | Moravian-Silesian Region | 748 01 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Prague | Prague | 128 50 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Prague | Prague | 130 00 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Liberec | Severocesky KRAJ | 460 01 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Ostrava | Severomoravsky KRAJ | 702 00 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Zlín | Severomoravsky KRAJ | 760 01 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Pardubice | Vychodocesky KRAJ | 530 02 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Hildesheim | Lower Saxony | 31134 | Germany |
| Research Site | Bad Doberan | Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 18209 | Germany |
| Research Site | Magdeburg | Saxony-Anhalt | 39120 | Germany |
| Research Site | Hamburg | 20095 | Germany |
| Research Site | Gyula | Bekes County | 5700 | Hungary |
| Research Site | Szentes | Csongrád megye | 6600 | Hungary |
| Research Site | Győr | Győr-Moson-Sopron | 9024 | Hungary |
| Research Site | Veszprém | Veszprém megye | 8200 | Hungary |
| Research Site | Poznan | Greater Poland Voivodeship | 60-218 | Poland |
| Research Site | Poznan | Greater Poland Voivodeship | 60-529 | Poland |
| Research Site | Poznan | Greater Poland Voivodeship | 60-693 | Poland |
| Research Site | Poznan | Greater Poland Voivodeship | 61-113 | Poland |
| Research Site | Poznan | Greater Poland Voivodeship | 61-397 | Poland |
| Research Site | Bydgoszcz | Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship | 85-168 | Poland |
| Research Site | Torun | Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship | 87-100 | Poland |
| Research Site | Krakow | Lesser Poland Voivodeship | 30-033 | Poland |
| Research Site | Wroclaw | Lower Silesian Voivodeship | 50-381 | Poland |
| Research Site | Lublin | Lublin Voivodeship | 20-582 | Poland |
| Research Site | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | 01-192 | Poland |
| Research Site | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | 02-691 | Poland |
| Research Site | Stalowa Wola | Podkarpackie Voivodeship | 37-450 | Poland |
| Research Site | Bialystok | Podlaskie Voivodeship | 15-099 | Poland |
| Research Site | Gdansk | Pomeranian Voivodeship | 80-382 | Poland |
| Research Site | Katowice | Silesian Voivodeship | 40-282 | Poland |
| Research Site | Elblag | Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship | 82-300 | Poland |
| Research Site | Lodz | Łódź Voivodeship | 91-363 | Poland |
| Research Site | Barcelona | 08028 | Spain |
| Research Site | Madrid | 28041 | Spain |
| Research Site | Seville | 41010 | Spain |
Participants randomized to receive 3 mg/kg IV infusion of infliximab on day 1, at weeks 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 22.
| FG002 | ABP 710 / ABP 710 | At week 22 participants initially randomized to ABP 710 continued receiving 3 mg/kg ABP 710 every 8 weeks through week 46. |
| FG003 | Infliximab / Infliximab | At week 22 participants initially randomized to infliximab were re-randomized to continue receiving 3 mg/kg infliximab every 8 weeks through week 46. |
| FG004 | Infliximab / ABP 710 | At week 22 participants initially randomized to infliximab were re-randomized to receive 3 mg/kg ABP 710 every 8 weeks through week 46. |
| Received Treatment |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Week 22 to Week 50 |
|
|
The intent-to-treat analysis set included all randomized participants
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | ABP 710 | Participants randomized to receive a 3 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion of ABP 710 on day 1, at weeks 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 22. |
| BG001 | Infliximab | Participants randomized to receive 3 mg/kg IV infusion of infliximab on day 1, at weeks 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 22. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Geographic Region | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Prior Biologic Use for Rheumatoid Arthritis | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Swollen joint Count | A total of 66 joints were scored for presence or absence of swelling. | Mean | Standard Deviation | joints |
| ||||||||||||||
| Tender Joint Count | A total of 68 joints were scored for presence or absence of tenderness. | Mean | Standard Deviation | joints |
| ||||||||||||||
| Patient Global Health Assessment | The participant's overall assessment of their disease activity in the past week assessed on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = No RA activity at all and 100 mm = Worst RA activity imaginable. | Participants with available data | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm |
| |||||||||||||
| Investigator's Global Health Assessment | The investigator's assessment of the participant's current disease activity assessed on a 100 mm VAS where 0 mm = no activity at all (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and 100 mm = worst activity imaginable (maximum arthritis disease activity). | Participants with available data | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm |
| |||||||||||||
| Patient's Assessment of Disease-related Pain | The participant's assessment of their current level of pain assessed on a 100 mm horizontal VAS, where 0 mm = no pain at all and 100 mm = worst pain imaginable. | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm |
| ||||||||||||||
| Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) | The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions in eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. | Participants with available data | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| |||||||||||||
| C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration | C-reactive protein (CRP) is a protein found in blood. CRP levels rise in response to inflammation. | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/L |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 22 | The primary efficacy endpoint was the response difference (RD) of 20% improvement in ACR core set measurements (ACR20) at week 22. A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Intent-to-treat population; Participants with missing data at week 22 were counted as non-responders | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline and week 22 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response Through Week 14 | A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Intent-to-treat population; participants with missing data at a given visit were counted as non-responders. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline and weeks 2, 6, and 14 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response After Week 22 | A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Participants re-randomized at week 22 (includes participants initially randomized to ABP 710 who continued treatment with ABP 710 at week 22); participants with missing data at a given visit were counted as non-responders. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline and weeks 30, 34, 38, 46, and 50 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response Through Week 22 | A positive ACR50 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Intent-to-treat population; participants with missing data at a given visit were counted as non-responders. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline and weeks 2, 6, 14, and 22 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response After Week 22 | A positive ACR50 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Participants re-randomized at week 22 (includes participants initially randomized to ABP 710 who continued treatment with ABP 710 at week 22); participants with missing data at a given visit were counted as non-responders. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline and weeks 30, 34, 38, 46, and 50 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response Through Week 22 | A positive ACR70 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Intent-to-treat population; participants with missing data at a given visit were counted as non-responders. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline and weeks 2, 6, 14, and 22 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response After Week 22 | A positive ACR70 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
| Participants re-randomized at week 22 (includes participants initially randomized to ABP 710 who continued treatment with ABP 710 at week 22); participants with missing data at a given visit were counted as non-responders. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline and weeks 30, 34, 38, 46, and 50 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Through Week 22 | The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:
DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. | Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and weeks 2, 6, 14, and 22 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) After Week 22 | The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:
DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. | Participants re-randomized at week 22 (includes participants initially randomized to ABP 710 who continued treatment with ABP 710 at week 22) and with available data at each time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and weeks 30, 34, 38, 46, and 50 |
|
From first dose to week 22 (initial ABP 710 and infliximab treatment groups) and from week 22 to week 50 for participants re-randomized at week 22, or up to 28 days after last dose for participants who discontinued early.
Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of adverse events that exceed the indicated frequency threshold.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | ABP 710 | Participants received 3 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion of ABP 710 on day 1, at weeks 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 22. | 1 | 278 | 9 | 278 | 48 | 278 |
| EG001 | Infliximab | Participants received 3 mg/kg IV infusion of infliximab on day 1, at weeks 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 22. | 1 | 278 | 14 | 278 | 32 | 278 |
| EG002 | ABP 710 / ABP 710 | At week 22 participants initially randomized to ABP 710 continued receiving 3 mg/kg ABP 710 every 8 weeks through week 46. | 0 | 241 | 15 | 241 | 52 | 241 |
| EG003 | Infliximab / Infliximab | At week 22 participants initially randomized to infliximab were re-randomized to continue receiving 3 mg/kg infliximab every 8 weeks through week 46. | 0 | 121 | 4 | 121 | 28 | 121 |
| EG004 | Infliximab / ABP 710 | At week 22 participants initially randomized to infliximab were re-randomized to receive 3 mg/kg ABP 710 every 8 weeks through week 46. | 0 | 119 | 1 | 119 | 30 | 119 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iron deficiency anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Microcytic anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure congestive | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiovascular insufficiency | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ventricular extrasystoles | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis acute | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest discomfort | General disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice cholestatic | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthritis bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Febrile infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia legionella | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia pneumococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Femoral neck fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Laceration | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Multiple injuries | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tibia fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transaminases increased | Investigations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Foot deformity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscular weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Endometrial adenocarcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malignant melanoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ovarian low malignant potential tumour | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transitional cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sciatica | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transient ischaemic attack | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal failure | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ureterolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis atopic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Orthostatic hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral ischaemia | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results after completion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Amgen Inc. | 866-572-6436 | medinfo@amgen.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 6, 2018 | Aug 8, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069285 | Infliximab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
Not provided
Not provided
| Dissatisfied with Treatment Efficacy |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
| Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A sensitivity analysis with the RD estimate and CIs for RD of ACR20 estimated using a generalized linear model with geographic region and prior biologic use for RA as covariates was also conducted. | Response Difference | 9.30 | 2-Sided | 90 | 2.67 | 15.92 | Response Difference is based on a generalized linear model with actual stratification variables (geographic region and prior biologic use for RA) as covariates in the model. | Equivalence | Clinical equivalence for the primary endpoint was to be evaluated sequentially by first comparing the 2-sided 90% CI for RD of ACR20 at week 22 between ABP 710 and infliximab with an equivalence margin of (-15%, 15%). If the first test was successful, RD of ACR20 at week 22 was to be further evaluated by comparing the 2-sided 90% CI between ABP 710 and infliximab with an equivalence margin of (-12%, 15%). |
| A post-hoc analysis was conducted to adjust for the impact of random imbalance in baseline demographic and disease characteristics between the 2 treatment groups. The MH estimate of RD and corresponding CIs were estimated using a nonparametric analysis of covariance method with stratification factors geographic region and prior biologic use, and adjustment for baseline covariates (ACR core set, age, use of oral corticosteroid, use of NSAID, body mass index categories, and methotrexate dose). | Response Difference | 7.184 | 2-Sided | 90 | 0.748 | 13.620 | The ACR core set includes tender joint count, swollen joint count, subject's global health assessment, investigator's global health assessment, subject's assessment of disease related pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. | Equivalence | Clinical equivalence for the primary endpoint was to be evaluated sequentially by first comparing the 2-sided 90% CI for RD of ACR20 at week 22 between ABP 710 and infliximab with an equivalence margin of (-15%, 15%). If the first test was successful, RD of ACR20 at week 22 was to be further evaluated by comparing the 2-sided 90% CI between ABP 710 and infliximab with an equivalence margin of (-12%, 15%). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| OG002 | Infliximab / ABP 710 | At week 22 participants initially randomized to infliximab were re-randomized to receive 3 mg/kg ABP 710 every 8 weeks through week 46. |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| OG002 | Infliximab / ABP 710 | At week 22 participants initially randomized to infliximab were re-randomized to receive 3 mg/kg ABP 710 every 8 weeks through week 46. |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| OG002 | Infliximab / ABP 710 | At week 22 participants initially randomized to infliximab were re-randomized to receive 3 mg/kg ABP 710 every 8 weeks through week 46. |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Infliximab / ABP 710 |
At week 22 participants initially randomized to infliximab were re-randomized to receive 3 mg/kg ABP 710 every 8 weeks through week 46. |
|
|
|