Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2016-00252 | Registry Identifier | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) | |
| s16-01825 | Other Identifier | Other | |
| EA1141 | Other Identifier | ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group | |
| ECOG-ACRIN-EA1141 | Other Identifier | DCP | |
| EA1141 | Other Identifier | CTEP | |
| UG1CA189828 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized phase II trial studies how well abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital tomosynthesis mammography work in detecting cancer in women with dense breasts. Abbreviated breast MRI is a low cost procedure in which radio waves and a powerful magnet linked to a computer and used to create detailed pictures of the breast in less than 10 minutes. These pictures can show the difference between normal and diseased tissue. Digital tomosynthesis mammography is a procedure that uses multiple x-rays pictures of each breast to produce a 3-dimensional rendering of the entire breast. Combined screening with abbreviated breast MRI and digital tomosynthesis mammography may be a better method to screen women with dense breasts.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the rates of detection of invasive cancers between the initial abbreviated breast (AB)-magnetic resonance (MR) and digital tomosynthesis mammography (DBT).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the positive predictive value (PPV) of biopsies, call back rates, and short-term follow up rates after AB-MR and DBT on both the initial and 1 year follow up studies.
II. To estimate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of AB-MR and DBT, using the 1 year follow up to define a reference standard.
III. To compare patient-reported short-term quality of life related to diagnostic testing with AB-MR and DBT using the Testing Morbidities Index.
IV. To compare willingness to return for testing with AB-MRI versus (vs) DBT within the recommended screening interval and explore factors associated with willingness to return for screening.
V. To compare the tumor biologies of invasive cancers and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detected on AB-MR and DBT.
VI. To estimate the incident cancer rate during 3 years following the year-1 AB-MR/DBT when patients return to standard screening.
OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A (DBT, AB-MR): Participants undergo DBT followed by AB-MR for under 10 minutes on the same day or within 24 hours at baseline and then after 1 year.
ARM B (AB-MR, DBT): Participants undergo AB-MR for under 10 minutes followed by DBT on the same day or within 24 hours at baseline and then after 1 year.
After completion of study, patients are followed up at every 6 months for 3 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A (DBT, AB-MR) | Experimental | Participants undergo DBT followed by AB-MR for under 10 minutes on the same day or within 24 hours at baseline and then after 1 year. |
|
| Arm B (AB-MR, DBT) | Experimental | Participants undergo AB-MR for under 10 minutes followed by DBT on the same day or within 24 hours at baseline and then after 1year. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Diagnostic Test | Undergo AB-MR |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Screen-detected Invasive Cancer Verified by Pathology | For each modality, the detection rate of invasive cancers is defined as the proportion of participants who had an invasive cancer detected by the modality at baseline and verified by pathology versus the total number of participants. In the out come measures table below, these proportions will be automatically calculated, multiplied by 100, and be presented as percentages (%). | Up to 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of Biopsies | Test Positive (T+): Biopsy recommended by imaging, defined as patients with at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 4 or 5 on image interpretation. Reference Standard Positive (RS+): Pathologically confirmed DCIS or invasive disease resultant from a positive test. The 95% confidence interval for PPV of biopsy for each modality were derived from the GEE model using the appropriate estimable contrasts with robust standard errors |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patents must be scheduled for routine screening DBT
Women must not be pregnant or breast-feeding; all females of childbearing potential who are uncertain if they could be pregnant or may be pregnant or as per local site standard of practice in women undergoing DBT and MRI must have a blood test or urine study within 2 weeks prior to randomization to rule out pregnancy; a female of childbearing potential is any woman, regardless of sexual orientation or whether they have undergone tubal ligation, who meets the following criteria: 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or 2) has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months)
Women of childbearing potential must be strongly advised to use an accepted and effective method of contraception or to abstain from sexual intercourse for the following year until the year 1 AB-MR and DBT studies are performed
Patient?s breast density must be known; patients must have mammographically dense breasts, American College of Radiology [ACR] Breast Imaging [BI]- Reporting and Data System Atlas (RADS) lexicon categories c or d (heterogeneous or extreme fibroglandular tissue) on their most-recent prior screening
Patient must be asymptomatic for breast disease and undergoing routine screening
Patient must have no known breast cancer (DCIS or invasive cancer), not currently undergoing treatment for breast cancer, or planning surgery for a high risk lesion (atypical ductal breast hyperplasia [ADH], atypical lobular breast hyperplasia [ALH], lobular breast carcinoma in situ [LCIS], papilloma, radial scar)
Patient must not be taking chemoprevention for breast cancer
Patient must not have undergone breast ultrasound within 12 months prior to randomization
Patient must not have previously had a breast MRI
Patient must not have previously had molecular breast imaging (MBI, multiplexed ion beam imaging [MIBI])
Patient must agree to not undergo screening ultrasound (of breast) for the duration of the 1 year study period
Patient must not be suspected of being at high-risk for breast cancer, as defined by the American Cancer Society (ACS) breast MR screening recommendations (lifetime risk of >= 20-25%)
Patient must be able to undergo breast MRI with contrast enhancement; patients unable to undergo breast MRI with contrast enhancement for any reason are ineligible
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Christopher Comstock | ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center | Gilbert | Arizona | 85234 | United States | ||
| Huntington Memorial Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32096852 | Result | Comstock CE, Gatsonis C, Newstead GM, Snyder BS, Gareen IF, Bergin JT, Rahbar H, Sung JS, Jacobs C, Harvey JA, Nicholson MH, Ward RC, Holt J, Prather A, Miller KD, Schnall MD, Kuhl CK. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening. JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):746-756. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0572. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Primary Manuscript | View source |
Not provided
Safe harbor de-identified data corresponding to publications will be shared upon request
With publication
All requests will require a statistical plan and justification. Approved requests will require a DUA.
Not provided
Women with dense breasts scheduled for routine screening with DBT were enrolled to receive DBT and AB-MR, with scan order determined by randomization. The first subject was accrued on December 27, 2016, and accrual ended on November 10, 2017. A total of 48 institutions participated.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Arm A (DBT, AB-MR) | Participants undergo DBT followed by AB-MR, for under 10 minutes, on the same day or within 24 hours at baseline and then after 1 year. AB-MR: Contrast-enhanced Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) DBT: Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography |
| FG001 | Arm B (AB-MR, DBT) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 10, 2019 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography | Diagnostic Test | Undergo DBT |
|
|
| Quality-of-Life Assessment | Other | Ancillary studies |
|
|
| Questionnaire Administration | Other | Ancillary studies |
|
| Baseline to up to 1 year |
| Call Back/Additional Imaging/Short-term Follow Rates for DBT and AB-MR | For DBT: DBT: Call back is defined as having additional views or targeted ultrasound to evaluate DBT findings DBT: short term follow up (STFU) is defined as having at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 3 on DBT DBT: Additional imaging recommendation is defined as having either call back or STFU For AB-MR: Ab-MR: Call back does not apply to AB-MR and will not be evaluated Ab-MR: Short Term Follow-up (STFU) is defined as having at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 3 on AB-MR Ab-MR: Additional imaging recommendation is defined as having a STFU | Baseline |
| Prediction of Breast Cancer (Sensitivity and Specificity) | Reference standard positive (RS+): breast cancer (invasive or DCIS) detected on the year 0 screening or reported at any time from the year 0 to the year 1 screening. Reference standard negative (RS-): No breast cancer reported at any time from the year 0 to the year 1 screen. Incomplete: No Year 1 imaging, and <11 months of patient follow-up (<330 days) after year 0 screen Positive Test (T+) is defined as the imaging modality result is positive (BI-RADS 3-5), and the location of the finding is matches the location of the cancer indicated by the reference standard. Negative Test (T-) will be estimated as the fraction of reference standard negative subjects for whom the imaging modality result was negative (BI-RADS 1-2). 95% confidence intervals for the sensitivity and specificity of each modality calculated using the Wilson method. | Baseline to up to 1 year |
| Change in Patient-reported Short-term Quality of Life Related to Diagnostic Testing | Testing Morbidities Index (TMI) scores [0 (worst) to 100 (best) scale] will be computed for abbreviated breast-magnetic resonance (MR) and digital tomosynthesis mammography (DBT) after the baseline screen. | Baseline to up to 1 year |
| Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT) | The proportions of participants willing to return for screening with either test, AB-MRI only, DBT only, or not willing to return for either test will be estimated. | Up to 1 year |
| Factors Associated With Willingness to Return for Screening | Polytomous logistic regression will be used to examine factors associated with willingness to return, including screen result, cancer status, and demographic characteristics. | Up to 1 year |
| Oncotype-DCIS Scores by Modality | Descriptive Analyses presenting the the distributions of Oncotype-DCIS scores by modality: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detected on abbreviated breast-magnetic resonance (MR) and digital tomosynthesis mammography (DBT) A low risk score is less than 39, and a high risk score is 55 or higher. A score of 39 to 54 is intermediate risk. | Up to 1 year |
| Incident Cancer Rate | Breast cancer incidence will be estimated. Person-years will be measured. | Up to 3 years |
| NanoString Tumor Biologies of Invasive Cancers and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) Detected on AB-MR and DBT | For all invasive cancers detected during the study period, the NanoString PAM50 will be performed. The frequencies of cancer types determined by the NanoString analysis will be tabulated and compared. For DCIS, if the Oncotype-DCIS score was performed, the distributions of scores will be tabulated and compared. All efforts to obtain NanoString data have been exhausted, therefore we have no data available to report. | end of study |
| Pasadena |
| California |
| 91105 |
| United States |
| The Women's Imaging Center | Denver | Colorado | 80209 | United States |
| Radiology Imaging Associates | Englewood | Colorado | 80112 | United States |
| Norwalk Hospital | Norwalk | Connecticut | 06856 | United States |
| Helen F Graham Cancer Center | Newark | Delaware | 19713 | United States |
| Boca Raton Regional Hospital | Boca Raton | Florida | 33486 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic in Florida | Jacksonville | Florida | 32224-9980 | United States |
| Diagnostic Center for Women LLC | Miami | Florida | 33173 | United States |
| Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Queen's Medical Center | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96813 | United States |
| Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center | Chicago | Illinois | 60637 | United States |
| NorthShore University HealthSystem-Evanston Hospital | Evanston | Illinois | 60201 | United States |
| Clinical Radiologists SC | Springfield | Illinois | 62781 | United States |
| Indiana University/Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| The Community Hospital | Munster | Indiana | 46321 | United States |
| Oncology Associates at Mercy Medical Center | Cedar Rapids | Iowa | 52403 | United States |
| University of Kansas Cancer Center | Kansas City | Kansas | 66160 | United States |
| University of Kansas Hospital-Westwood Cancer Center | Westwood | Kansas | 66205 | United States |
| Ochsner Medical Center Jefferson | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70121 | United States |
| Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
| Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
| Lahey Hospital and Medical Center | Burlington | Massachusetts | 01805 | United States |
| Mercy Health Saint Mary's | Grand Rapids | Michigan | 49503 | United States |
| West Michigan Cancer Center | Kalamazoo | Michigan | 49007 | United States |
| Essentia Health Cancer Center | Duluth | Minnesota | 55805 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Washington University School of Medicine | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Riverview Medical Center/Booker Cancer Center | Red Bank | New Jersey | 07701 | United States |
| Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Buffalo | New York | 14263 | United States |
| Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
| Montefiore Medical Center-Einstein Campus | The Bronx | New York | 10461 | United States |
| Montefiore Medical Center - Moses Campus | The Bronx | New York | 10467-2490 | United States |
| Carolinas Medical Center/Levine Cancer Institute | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28203 | United States |
| Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Aultman Health Foundation | Canton | Ohio | 44710 | United States |
| Case Western Reserve University | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| UHHS-Westlake Medical Center | Westlake | Ohio | 44145 | United States |
| University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73104 | United States |
| Geisinger Medical Center | Danville | Pennsylvania | 17822 | United States |
| Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033-0850 | United States |
| ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19103 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Rhode Island Hospital | Providence | Rhode Island | 02903 | United States |
| Spartanburg Medical Center | Spartanburg | South Carolina | 29303 | United States |
| Vanderbilt Breast Center at One Hundred Oaks | Nashville | Tennessee | 37204 | United States |
| Vanderbilt University/Ingram Cancer Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37232 | United States |
| Baylor University Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75246 | United States |
| Farmington Health Center | Farmington | Utah | 84025 | United States |
| Huntsman Cancer Institute/University of Utah | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84112 | United States |
| South Jordan Health Center | South Jordan | Utah | 84009 | United States |
| Sentara Martha Jefferson Hospital | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22901 | United States |
| University of Virginia Cancer Center | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22908 | United States |
| Sentara Leigh Hospital | Norfolk | Virginia | 23502 | United States |
| Sentara Norfolk General Hospital | Norfolk | Virginia | 23507 | United States |
| Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center | Seattle | Washington | 98109 | United States |
| Seattle Cancer Care Alliance | Seattle | Washington | 98109 | United States |
| University of Washington Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | 98195 | United States |
| ThedaCare Regional Cancer Center | Appleton | Wisconsin | 54911 | United States |
| Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center | La Crosse | Wisconsin | 54601 | United States |
| University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics | Madison | Wisconsin | 53792 | United States |
| ProHealth D N Greenwald Center | Mukwonago | Wisconsin | 53149 | United States |
| ProHealth Oconomowoc Memorial Hospital | Oconomowoc | Wisconsin | 53066 | United States |
| ProHealth Waukesha Memorial Hospital | Waukesha | Wisconsin | 53188 | United States |
| UW Cancer Center at ProHealth Care | Waukesha | Wisconsin | 53188 | United States |
| Rwth Klinikum Aachen | Aachen | 52074 | Germany |
Participants undergo AB-MR, for under 10 minutes, followed by DBT on the same day or within 24 hours at baseline and then after 1 year. AB-MR: Contrast-enhanced Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) DBT: Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography |
| DBTperformed |
|
| AB MR Performed |
|
| DCIS Detected |
|
| PAM50 NanoString |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Arm A (DBT, AB-MR) | Participants undergo DBT followed by AB-MR, for under 10 minutes, on the same day or within 24 hours at baseline and then after 1 year. AB-MR: Contrast-enhanced Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) DBT: Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography |
| BG001 | Arm B (AB-MR, DBT) | Participants undergo AB-MR, for under 10 minutes, followed by DBT on the same day or within 24 hours at baseline and then after 1 year. AB-MR: Contrast-enhanced Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) DBT: Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Menopausal Status | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Breast density (baseline DBT) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Prior personal history of breast cancer | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Screen-detected Invasive Cancer Verified by Pathology | For each modality, the detection rate of invasive cancers is defined as the proportion of participants who had an invasive cancer detected by the modality at baseline and verified by pathology versus the total number of participants. In the out come measures table below, these proportions will be automatically calculated, multiplied by 100, and be presented as percentages (%). | Subjects with both DBT and AB-MR | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 1 year |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of Biopsies | Test Positive (T+): Biopsy recommended by imaging, defined as patients with at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 4 or 5 on image interpretation. Reference Standard Positive (RS+): Pathologically confirmed DCIS or invasive disease resultant from a positive test. The 95% confidence interval for PPV of biopsy for each modality were derived from the GEE model using the appropriate estimable contrasts with robust standard errors | Positive predictive value is calculated on patients with at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 4 or 5 on image interpretation (I.e., Biopsy recommended) and is the percentage of biopsy recommended by imaging test versus patients with cancer P(D+|T+) | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of Biopsy Recommended | Baseline to up to 1 year | Cases recommended for biopsy by imaging | Cases recommended for biopsy by imaging |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Call Back/Additional Imaging/Short-term Follow Rates for DBT and AB-MR | For DBT: DBT: Call back is defined as having additional views or targeted ultrasound to evaluate DBT findings DBT: short term follow up (STFU) is defined as having at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 3 on DBT DBT: Additional imaging recommendation is defined as having either call back or STFU For AB-MR: Ab-MR: Call back does not apply to AB-MR and will not be evaluated Ab-MR: Short Term Follow-up (STFU) is defined as having at least one lesion rated BI-RADS 3 on AB-MR Ab-MR: Additional imaging recommendation is defined as having a STFU | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Prediction of Breast Cancer (Sensitivity and Specificity) | Reference standard positive (RS+): breast cancer (invasive or DCIS) detected on the year 0 screening or reported at any time from the year 0 to the year 1 screening. Reference standard negative (RS-): No breast cancer reported at any time from the year 0 to the year 1 screen. Incomplete: No Year 1 imaging, and <11 months of patient follow-up (<330 days) after year 0 screen Positive Test (T+) is defined as the imaging modality result is positive (BI-RADS 3-5), and the location of the finding is matches the location of the cancer indicated by the reference standard. Negative Test (T-) will be estimated as the fraction of reference standard negative subjects for whom the imaging modality result was negative (BI-RADS 1-2). 95% confidence intervals for the sensitivity and specificity of each modality calculated using the Wilson method. | of the 1444 women available for analysis 14 were missing reference standard information. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of correct classifications | Baseline to up to 1 year |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Patient-reported Short-term Quality of Life Related to Diagnostic Testing | Testing Morbidities Index (TMI) scores [0 (worst) to 100 (best) scale] will be computed for abbreviated breast-magnetic resonance (MR) and digital tomosynthesis mammography (DBT) after the baseline screen. | Participants with both DBT and MRI performed and completed PRO surveys | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on 0-100 scale | Baseline to up to 1 year |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Willingness to Return for Testing With Abbreviated Breast-magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT) | The proportions of participants willing to return for screening with either test, AB-MRI only, DBT only, or not willing to return for either test will be estimated. | Subjects with AB-MR, DBT and completed surveys | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 1 year |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Factors Associated With Willingness to Return for Screening | Polytomous logistic regression will be used to examine factors associated with willingness to return, including screen result, cancer status, and demographic characteristics. | Not Posted | Dec 2026 | Up to 1 year | Participants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Oncotype-DCIS Scores by Modality | Descriptive Analyses presenting the the distributions of Oncotype-DCIS scores by modality: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detected on abbreviated breast-magnetic resonance (MR) and digital tomosynthesis mammography (DBT) A low risk score is less than 39, and a high risk score is 55 or higher. A score of 39 to 54 is intermediate risk. | All subjects with DCIS detected either by AbMRI or DBT received Oncotype DX assessment | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 1 year |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Incident Cancer Rate | Breast cancer incidence will be estimated. Person-years will be measured. | All eligible subjects who received both Ab-MR and DBT at year 0 and year 1 | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | cancers per 1,000 person-years | Up to 3 years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | NanoString Tumor Biologies of Invasive Cancers and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) Detected on AB-MR and DBT | For all invasive cancers detected during the study period, the NanoString PAM50 will be performed. The frequencies of cancer types determined by the NanoString analysis will be tabulated and compared. For DCIS, if the Oncotype-DCIS score was performed, the distributions of scores will be tabulated and compared. All efforts to obtain NanoString data have been exhausted, therefore we have no data available to report. | NanoString data were not collected | Posted | end of study |
|
1 year for Adverse Events and All deaths while on-study
Serious Adverse Events (SAE), in addition to the standard definition include:
All Grade 5 events occurring within 30 days of imaging, regardless of attribution or unexpectedness All Grade 4 events occurring within 30 days of imaging that are unexpected and have an attribution of "Possible, Probable, Definite" All Grade 4 kidney adverse events All occurrences of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) or Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy (NFD) All Grade 5 events while on study
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | All Participants | All participants scheduled for both DBT and AB-MR Note, because of the temporal proximity (generally the same day), it is not possible to attribute the adverse events either by arm or by an individual modality. | 6 | 1,444 | 6 | 1,444 | 25 | 1,444 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Death NOS | General disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Death not otherwise specified [NOS] occurring more than 461 days after the year 0 screening intervention. |
|
| Disease progression | General disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Disease progression [Death] This death occurred 395 days after the year 0 screening intervention and after hospital admission for neurosurgery for metastatic disease to the brain. |
|
| Malignant neoplasm of the right lung | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Malignant neoplasm of the right lung [Death] occurring 136 days after the year 0 screening intervention. |
|
| Intracranial hemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Intracranial hemorrhage [Death] occurring 106 days after the year 0 screening intervention. |
|
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Respiratory failure [Death] This death occurred 395 days after the year 0 screening intervention and after hospital admission for neurosurgery for metastatic disease to the brain. |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Vertigo [Mild symptoms] |
|
| Bilateral Eye swelling | Eye disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Bilateral Eye swelling [Asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; no change in vision] |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Nausea [Loss of appetite without alteration in eating habits] |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Vomiting [3 - 5 episodes (separated by 5 minutes) in 24 hrs] |
|
| Facial rash | General disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Facial rash [Asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated] |
|
| Infusion site extravasation | General disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Infusion site extravasation [Painless edema] |
|
| Localized edema | General disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Localized edema [Moderate localized edema and intervention indicated; limiting instrumental ADL] |
|
| Pain | General disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Pain [Mild pain] |
|
| Allergic reaction | Immune system disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Allergic reaction [Intervention or infusion interruption indicated; responds promptly to symptomatic treatment (e.g., antihistamines, NSAIDS, narcotics); prophylactic medications indicated for <=24 hrs] |
|
| Allergic reaction | Immune system disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Allergic reaction [Transient flushing or rash, drug fever <38 degrees C (<100.4 degrees F); intervention not indicated] |
|
| Bruising | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Bruising [Localized or in a dependent area] |
|
| Vascular access complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Vascular access complication [Device dislodgement, blockage, leak, or malposition; device replacement indicated] |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Back pain [Mild pain] |
|
| Vasovagal reaction | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Vasovagal reaction [Present] |
|
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Anxiety [Mild symptoms; intervention not indicated] |
|
| Breast pain | Reproductive system and breast disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Breast pain [Moderate pain; limiting Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)](streamdown:incomplete-link) |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Cough [Mild symptoms; nonprescription intervention indicated] |
|
| Flushing | Vascular disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Flushing [Asymptomatic; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated] |
|
| Hematoma | Vascular disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Hematoma [Mild symptoms; intervention not indicated] |
|
| Hematoma | Vascular disorders | CTCAE v5.0 | Non-systematic Assessment | Hematoma [Minimally invasive evacuation or aspiration indicated] |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director Clinical Research Administration | ECOG-ACRIN | 800-227-5463 | 4765 | dhartfeil@acr.org |
| Feb 10, 2020 |
| Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Feb 26, 2018 | Feb 10, 2020 | ICF_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000098543 | Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
| D008327 | Mammography |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008279 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
| D014054 | Tomography |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D011859 | Radiography |
Not provided
Not provided
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Peri-menopausal |
|
| Naturally post-menopausal |
|
| Surgically post-menopausal |
|
| Unknown (data not available) |
|
| Scattered fibroglandular densities |
|
| Heterogeneously dense |
|
| Extremely dense |
|
| Scan not performed |
|
| Yes |
|
| Unknown |
|
| Participants |
|
| Cases recommended for biopsy by imaging |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| DBT Future Screen if DBT Detects More Cancer Than Mammography or Ultrasound |
Subjects with DBT and completed PRO surveys and their willingness to be screened in the future if DBTDetects More Cancer than Mammography or Ultrasound |
|
|
|
|
| Title | Denominators | Categories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 Screen to 12 mo post screening |
| |||||
| 12 months to 24 months post study screening |
| |||||
| 24 months to 36 months study screening |
|
|