Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Intensive Care Evaluation Foundation | UNKNOWN |
This study evaluates the addition of a quality improvement toolbox to an online audit and feedback intervention in Dutch intensive care units. The toolbox comprises for each quality indicator (e.g., percentage of patients per shift whose pain is measured) a list of potential bottlenecks in the care process (e.g., staff is unaware of the prevailing guidelines for measuring pain every shift), associated recommendations for actions to solve mentioned bottlenecks (e.g., organize an educational training session), and supporting materials to facilitate implementation of the actions (e.g., a slide show presentation discussing the importance and relevance of measuring pain every shift). Half of the participating intensive care units will only receive online feedback, while the other half will additionally gain access to the integrated toolbox to facilitate planning and executing actions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audit and Feedback with toolbox | Experimental | Access to an online dashboard that provides insight into clinical performance on quality indicators for pain management; including a quality improvement toolbox to facilitate planning and executing actions. Participating ICUs will receive one educational outreach visit and brief monthly telephone calls. |
|
| Audit and Feedback without toolbox | Active Comparator | Same intervention, but without access to the quality improvement toolbox. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audit and Feedback | Behavioral | An online dashboard that provides insight into clinical performance on pain management quality indicators. It also incorporates an empty action plan, in which participating intensive care units can define potential bottlenecks in the care process and what actions they intend to undertake to improve. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from proportion of patient shifts during which pain has been adequately managed | "Adequately managed" is defined: pain measured AND (acceptable pain score OR (unacceptable pain score AND normalized within 1 hour)). The primary outcome measure is a composite score of four quality indicators (= secondary outcome measures).The measure is limited to only patients' first 12 shifts to prevent bias from patients with a long stay. There are 3 shifts in 1 day. | 9 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from proportion of patient shifts during which pain was measured at least once | 9 months | |
| Change from proportion of patient shifts during which pain was measured and no unacceptable pain scores were observed | 9 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nicolette F de Keizer, PhD | Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Intensive Care Evaluation foundation | Amsterdam | North Holland | 1100 EC | Netherlands |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31533841 | Derived | Gude WT, Roos-Blom MJ, van der Veer SN, Dongelmans DA, de Jonge E, Peek N, de Keizer NF. Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care. Implement Sci. 2019 Sep 18;14(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0937-8. | |
| 31263017 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
The National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) foundation has a policy for sharing data among its participating ICUs.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Toolbox | Behavioral | A quality improvement toolbox, incorporated within the action plan, that comprises for each pain management quality indicator (e.g., percentage of patients per shift whose pain is measured) a list of potential bottlenecks in the care process (e.g., staff is unaware of the prevailing guidelines for measuring pain every shift), associated recommendations for actions to solve mentioned bottlenecks (e.g., organize an educational training session), and supporting materials to facilitate implementation of the actions (e.g., a slide show presentation discussing the importance and relevance of measuring pain every shift). |
|
|
| Change from proportion of patient shifts during which an unacceptable pain score was measured, and pain was timely re-measured | 9 months |
| Change from proportion of patient shifts during which an unacceptable pain score was measured, and pain was timely re-measured indicating that the pain score was normalized | 9 months |
| Roos-Blom MJ, Gude WT, de Jonge E, Spijkstra JJ, van der Veer SN, Peek N, Dongelmans DA, de Keizer NF. Impact of audit and feedback with action implementation toolbox on improving ICU pain management: cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Dec;28(12):1007-1015. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009588. Epub 2019 Jul 1. |
| 29454393 | Derived | Gude WT, Roos-Blom MJ, van der Veer SN, Dongelmans DA, de Jonge E, Francis JJ, Peek N, de Keizer NF. Health professionals' perceptions about their clinical performance and the influence of audit and feedback on their intentions to improve practice: a theory-based study in Dutch intensive care units. Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 17;13(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0727-8. |
| 28545535 | Derived | Gude WT, Roos-Blom MJ, van der Veer SN, de Jonge E, Peek N, Dongelmans DA, de Keizer NF. Electronic audit and feedback intervention with action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care: protocol for a laboratory experiment and cluster randomised trial. Implement Sci. 2017 May 25;12(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0594-8. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000377 | Agnosia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010468 | Perceptual Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided