| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Anti-diphtheria (Anti-D) and Anti-tetanus (Anti-T) Antibody Concentrations Greater Than or Equal to (≥) the Cut-off Value | Percentage of subjects with anti-D and anti-T antibody concentrations ≥ 0.1 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). | Analysis was performed on According-to-Protocol (ATP) cohort which included all subjects who complied with vaccination schedules of DPT-IPV and HRV vaccines, complied with the blood sampling schedule and for whom immunogenicity data was available for at least for one antigen of the DPT-IPV vaccine at Visit 7 (Month 5) sampling time point. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of subjects | | One month post third dose of DTP-IPV vaccine (At Month 5) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
| | | Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| Anti-D antibody ≥ 0.1 IU/mL | - ParticipantsOG000141
- ParticipantsOG001137
| |
| | Group IDs | Group Description | Statistical Method | Statistical Comment | P-Value | P-Value Comment | Parameter Type | Parameter Value | Dispersion Type | Dispersion Value | Confidence Interval Sides | Confidence Interval % | CI Lower Limit | CI Upper Limit | CI Lower Limit Comment | CI Upper Limit Comment | Estimate Comment | Tested Non-Inferiority | Non-Inferiority Type | Non-Inferiority Comment | Other Analysis Description |
|---|
| Difference between Co-administration Group minus Staggered Group in terms of percentage of subjects with anti-D antibody concentration ≥ 0.1 IU/mL. | | | | | Difference-Seroprotective concentration | 0 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.66 | 2.74 | | | The 2-sided asymptotic standardised 95% CIs for the difference between groups in terms of percentage of subjects with antibody concentration ≥ to the pre-defined cut-off. | | Non-Inferiority | Criteria for non-inferiority: The Lower Limit (LL) of the standardised asymptotic 95% Confidence Interval (CI) on the difference (Co-administration Group minus Staggered Group) in the percentage of subjects with seroprotective concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL for anti-D antibodies should be ≥ -10%. |
|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Anti-pertussis Toxoid (Anti-PT) and Anti-filamentous Haemagglutinin (Anti-FHA) Antibody Concentrations ≥ the Cut-off Value | Percentage of subjects with anti-PT and anti-FHA antibody concentrations ≥ 10 IU/mL. | Analysis was performed on ATP cohort which included all subjects who complied with vaccination schedules of DPT-IPV and HRV vaccines, complied with the blood sampling schedule and for whom immunogenicity data was available for at least for one antigen of the DPT-IPV vaccine at Visit 7 (Month 5) sampling time point. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of subjects | | One month post third dose of DTP-IPV vaccine (At Month 5) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
| |
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Anti-poliovirus Serotypes 1, 2 and 3 (Anti-polio 1, 2 and 3) Antibody Titers ≥ the Cut-off Value | Percentage of subjects with anti-polio 1, 2 and 3 antibody titers ≥ 8 estimated doses 50% (ED50). | Analysis was performed on ATP cohort which included all subjects who complied with vaccination schedules of DPT-IPV and HRV vaccines, complied with the blood sampling schedule and for whom immunogenicity data was available for at least for one antigen of the DPT-IPV vaccine at Visit 7 (Month 5) sampling time point. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of subjects | | One month post third dose of DTP-IPV vaccine (At Month 5) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Seropositive Subjects for Serum Anti-rotavirus (Anti-RV) Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Antibodies in a Sub-cohort of Subjects | A seropositive subject for serum anti-RV IgA antibodies was defined as a subject with anti-RV IgA antibody concentration ≥ the seropositivity cut-off value of 20 units per milliliter (U/mL). Immunogenicity of the liquid HRV vaccine in terms of serum anti-RV IgA antibody seropositivity was assessed in a sub-cohort of subjects (HRV immunogenicity sub-cohort) which included the first 73 subjects enrolled into each of the 2 study groups. | Analysis was performed on HRV immunogenicity sub-cohort of ATP cohort which included all subjects who complied with vaccination schedules of DPT-IPV and HRV vaccines, complied with the blood sampling schedule and for whom immunogenicity data was available for at least for one antigen of the DPT-IPV vaccine at Visit 7 (Month 5) sampling time point. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of subjects | | One month post second dose of liquid HRV vaccine (At Month 2 for the Co-administration Group and at Month 2.5 for the Staggered Group) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | |
|
| Secondary | Serum Anti-RV IgA Antibody Concentration to Evaluate Immunogenicity in a Sub-cohort of Subjects | Concentration of serum anti-RV IgA antibody was assessed by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and expressed as geometric mean concentration (GMC) in U/mL. The assay cut-off was 20 U/mL. Immunogenicity of the liquid HRV vaccine in terms of serum anti-RV IgA antibody GMC was assessed in a sub-cohort of subjects (HRV immunogenicity sub-cohort) which included the first 73 subjects enrolled into each of the 2 study groups. | Analysis was performed on HRV immunogenicity sub-cohort of ATP cohort which included all subjects who complied with vaccination schedules of DPT-IPV and HRV vaccines, complied with the blood sampling schedule and for whom immunogenicity data was available for at least for one antigen of the DPT-IPV vaccine at Visit 7 (Month 5) sampling time point. | Posted | | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | U/mL | | One month post second dose of liquid HRV vaccine (At Month 2 for the Co-administration Group and at Month 2.5 for the Staggered Group) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
|
| Secondary | Anti-D and Anti-T Antibody Concentrations to Evaluate Immunogenicity | Concentrations of anti-D and anti-T antibodies were assessed by ELISA, presented as GMCs and expressed in IU/mL. The assay cut-off for anti-D and anti-T antibody concentrations was 0.1 IU/mL. | Analysis was performed on ATP cohort which included all subjects who complied with vaccination schedules of DPT-IPV and HRV vaccines, complied with the blood sampling schedule and for whom immunogenicity data was available for at least for one antigen of the DPT-IPV vaccine at Visit 7 (Month 5) sampling time point. | Posted | | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | IU/mL | | One month post third dose of DTP-IPV vaccine (At Month 5) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
| |
| Secondary | Anti-polio 1, 2 and 3 Antibodies Titers to Evaluate Immunogenicity | Titers of anti-polio 1, 2 and 3 were assessed by Neutralisation Assay (NEU) and presented as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs). The assay cut-off was 8 ED50. | Analysis was performed on ATP cohort which included all subjects who complied with vaccination schedules of DPT-IPV and HRV vaccines, complied with the blood sampling schedule and for whom immunogenicity data was available for at least for one antigen of the DPT-IPV vaccine at Visit 7 (Month 5) sampling time point. | Posted | | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titer | | One month post third dose of DTP-IPV vaccine (At Month 5) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
| |
| Secondary | Anti-PT and Anti-FHA Antibody Concentrations to Evaluate Immunogenicity | Concentrations of anti-PT and anti-FHA antibodies were assessed by ELISA, presented as GMCs and expressed in IU/mL. The assay cut-offs for anti-PT and anti-FHA antibody concentrations were 2.693 IU/mL and 2.046 IU/mL respectively. | Analysis was performed on ATP cohort which included all subjects who complied with vaccination schedules of DPT-IPV and HRV vaccines, complied with the blood sampling schedule and for whom immunogenicity data was available for at least for one antigen of the DPT-IPV vaccine at Visit 7 (Month 5) sampling time point. | Posted | | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | IU/mL | | One month post third dose of DTP-IPV vaccine (At Month 5) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
|
| Secondary | Number of Subjects With Any Solicited General Adverse Events (AEs) After Each Dose of Liquid HRV Vaccine | Assessed solicited general AEs were fever (defined as axillary temperature ≥ 37.5 degrees Celsius [°C]), irritability/fussiness, diarrhoea (defined as passage of three or more looser than normal stools within a day), vomiting (defined as one or more episodes of forceful emptying of partially digested stomach contents ≥ 1 hour after feeding within a day), loss of appetite and cough/runny nose. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination. | Analysis was performed on the Total Vaccinated cohort (TVC) which included all subjects with at least one dose of the study vaccines administration documented. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | During the 8-day (Days 0-7) follow-up period after each dose of liquid HRV vaccine | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
|
| Secondary | Number of Subjects With Any Solicited Local AEs After First Dose of DTP-IPV Vaccine | Assessed solicited local AEs were pain, redness and swelling at injection site. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination. | Analysis was performed on the TVC which included all subjects with at least one dose of the study vaccines administration documented. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | During the 8-day (Days 0-7) follow-up period after first dose of DTP-IPV vaccine | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
| |
| Secondary | Number of Subjects With Any Solicited General AEs After First Dose of DTP-IPV Vaccine | Assessed solicited general AEs were drowsiness, fever (defined as axillary temperature ≥ 37.5 °C), irritability/fussiness and loss of appetite. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination. | Analysis was performed on the TVC which included all subjects with at least one dose of the study vaccines administration documented. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | During the 8-day (Days 0-7) follow-up period after first dose of DTP-IPV vaccine | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
| |
| Secondary | Number of Subjects With Any Unsolicited AEs After Each Dose of Liquid HRV Vaccine | Unsolicited AEs were defined as any AE reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited AE with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited AEs. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination. | Analysis was performed on the TVC which included all subjects with at least one dose of the study vaccines administration documented. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | During the 31-day (Days 0-30) follow-up period after each dose of liquid HRV vaccine | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
| |
| Secondary | Number of Subjects With Any Unsolicited AE After First Dose of DTP-IPV Vaccine | Unsolicited AEs were defined as any AE reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited AE with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited AEs. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination. | Analysis was performed on the TVC which included all subjects with at least one dose of the study vaccines administration documented. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | During the 31-day (Days 0-30) follow-up period after first dose of DTP-IPV vaccine | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
| |
| Secondary | Number of Subjects With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Assessed SAEs included any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was life threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or resulted in disability/incapacity. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination. | Analysis was performed on the TVC which included all subjects with at least one dose of the study vaccines administration documented. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | During the entire study period (from Day 0 to Month 5) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Co-administration Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. | | OG001 | Staggered Group | Subjects aged 6 to 12 weeks who received the DPT-IPV vaccine according to a 3, 4.5, 6 month schedule and the liquid HRV vaccine according to a 2, 3.5 month schedule. The HRV vaccine was administered orally while the DTP-IPV vaccine was administered subcutaneously in the upper arm or upper thigh. |
| |