Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a single-centre research study in patients seen within an NHS Improving Access to Psychological Interventions (IAPT) service with suspected generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). The study will involve 120 patients from the Leicestershire and Rutland area in England, United Kingdom.
Participants will use the Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) medical device, which is approved for use and proven to be safe and work for the treatment for anxiety, depression and insomnia.
Participants will use the Alpha-Stim AID for 60 minutes every day for 6 or 12 weeks, either whilst on the waiting list for standard care treatment from IAPT, or in conjunction with standard care treatment from IAPT.
The study will involve 6 study visits - one face-to-face at visit 1, followed by 5 visits via telephone at week 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24. At each visit, participants will be asked to complete questionnaires to assess anxiety, depression, sleep difficulty, quality of life and work and social functioning.
The purpose of the study is to gather evidence for the clinical benefits and cost effectiveness of the Alpha-Stim AID when used in an NHS setting - how well does it work, and does it's use result in cost savings for the NHS.
The study may show that the Alpha-Stim AID should be available on the NHS for patients with suspected GAD.
Participants will have a baseline visit (day 1, visit 1) following identification as potentially eligible. The baseline visit will be face-to-face with a member of the research team, held at routine facilities used by the IAPT service. At the baseline visit, the participant will be consented for participation, have a urine pregnancy test first (if a female of child bearing potential) and the research team will administer the GAD-7 secondly, followed by EQ-5D-5L, WASA, PHQ-9, Athens, and CSRI surveys. Participants will then be instructed on how to use the Alpha-Stim AID device, and will have their first 60 minute, self-directed treatment session at home.
All further visits will be facilitated via telephone, scheduled between the research team and participant, within a 5 calendar day window of each time point.
At visit 2 (week 4), visit 3 (week 6), visit 4 (week 8), visit 5 (week 12) and visit 6 (week 24), the research team will administer the GAD-7, EQ-5D-5L, WASA, PHQ-9 and Athens. The CSRI will be repeated only at visit 5 and 6. Compliance with the 60 minute daily treatment session will also be assessed during the 6 or 12 week treatment window, in addition to any adverse events.
The 60-minute self-directed Alpha-Stim AID treatment sessions are undertaken at participant's home, on a daily basis for 6 weeks for all participants. During this 6-week period, participants will be on the waiting list for high intensity psychological therapy interventions.
Following 6 weeks of Alpha-Stim AID CES treatment, participants have the option to receive a further 6 weeks of treatment, which is likely to coincide with start of high intensity psychological therapy interventions as clinically indicated.
Following a maximum of 12 weeks' treatment with Alpha-Stim AID CES, all participants will cease to receive treatment on study.
All participants will continue to receive standard care assessment, as undertaken by the NHS IAPT service, standard care high intensity psychological therapy interventions as clinically indicated and provided by the NHS IAPT service, and standard care pharmacological treatments as prescribed by the participant's GP. Participation in this study will not influence nor compromise standard care treatment - all study procedures are additional to standard care. Participation in the study will have no impact upon the duration of the waiting time for high intensity psychological therapy interventions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cranial electrotherapy stimulation | Experimental | Alpha Stim AID cranial electrotherapy stimulation, Pregnancy test, Anxiety questionnaire, Quality of life questionnaire, Work and social questionnaire, Sleep questionnaire, Depression questionnaire, Quality of life and financial questionnaire |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Stim AID cranial electrotherapy stimulation | Device | - 60 minutes of cranial electrotherapy stimulation via Alpha Stim AID once per day, for a minimum of 6 and maximum of 12 weeks. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Effectiveness in Generalised Anxiety Disorder Measured by at Least a 5 Point Reduction in Scores on the GAD-7 | The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), as defined by the NHS IAPT service in terms of reliable improvement (at least a 5 point improvement on the GAD-7),or recovery (total score of less than 7 and at least a 5 point improvement on the GAD-7), from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention. | 24 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Effectiveness in Generalised Anxiety Disorder Compared to Current Treatment Approaches | The secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), in terms of health and social care service cost, and patient cost, from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention. The health and social care service cost and patient cost will be aggregated to determine the QALY (quality adjusted life year) value of the intervention. QALYs are used by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom to determine the cost effectiveness of a treatment, and to determine whether it should be made available free at point of use in the National Health Service (NHS). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Richard Morris, Professor | University of Nottingham | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leicestershire and Rutland Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Service | Nottingham | Nottinghamshire | NG3 6AA | United Kingdom |
Anonymised data will form part of the final study report which will be used for submission to the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All 161 participants who enrolled in the study began the treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation | Alpha Stim AID cranial electrotherapy stimulation, Pregnancy test, Anxiety questionnaire, Quality of life questionnaire, Work and social questionnaire, Sleep questionnaire, Depression questionnaire, Quality of life and financial questionnaire Alpha Stim AID cranial electrotherapy stimulation: - 60 minutes of cranial electrotherapy stimulation via Alpha Stim AID once per day, for 6 to 12 weeks. Pregnancy test: - Pregnancy test (day 1) Anxiety questionnaire: - GAD-7 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Quality of life questionnaire: - EQ-5D-5L (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Work and social questionnaire: - WASA (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Sleep questionnaire: - Athens (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Depression questionnaire: - PHQ-9 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Quality of life and financial questionnaire: - CSRI (day 1, week 12 and week 24) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 28, 2016 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Pregnancy test | Behavioral | - Pregnancy test x 1 (day 1) |
|
| Anxiety questionnaire | Other | - GAD-7 questionnaire x 6 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) |
|
| Quality of life questionnaire | Other | - EQ-5D-5L questionnaire x 6 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) |
|
| Work and social questionnaire | Other | - WASA questionnaire x 6 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) |
|
| Sleep questionnaire | Other | - Athens questionnaire x 6 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) |
|
| Depression questionnaire | Other | - PHQ-9 questionnaire x 6 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) |
|
| Quality of life and financial questionnaire | Other | - CSRI questionnaire x 3 (day 1, week 12 and week 24) |
|
| 24 weeks |
| Clinical Effectiveness in Depression as Measured by Reduction of at Least 6 Points in Scores on the Personal Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) | The third objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for depression in participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), in terms of reliable improvement (a 6 point reduction in scores on the PHQ-9) or recovery (a score of 9 or less and at least a 6 point drop on the PHQ-9), from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention. | 24 weeks |
| Clinical Effectiveness in Insomnia as Measured by at Least a 50% Reduction in Score on the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) | The fourth objective of the tertiary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for insomnia in participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), in terms of reliable improvement (at least a 50% reduction in scores on the AIS), and recovery (a score of less than 4 and a reduction of at least 50% in AIS score), from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention. | 24 weeks |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation | Alpha Stim AID cranial electrotherapy stimulation, Pregnancy test, Anxiety questionnaire, Quality of life questionnaire, Work and social questionnaire, Sleep questionnaire, Depression questionnaire, Quality of life and financial questionnaire Alpha Stim AID cranial electrotherapy stimulation: - 60 minutes of cranial electrotherapy stimulation via Alpha Stim AID once per day, for a minimum of 6 and maximum of 12 weeks. Pregnancy test: - Pregnancy test (day 1) Anxiety questionnaire: - GAD-7 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Quality of life questionnaire: - EQ-5D-5L (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Work and social questionnaire: - WASA (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Sleep questionnaire: - Athens (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Depression questionnaire: - PHQ-9 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, wee |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Clinical Effectiveness in Generalised Anxiety Disorder Measured by at Least a 5 Point Reduction in Scores on the GAD-7 | The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), as defined by the NHS IAPT service in terms of reliable improvement (at least a 5 point improvement on the GAD-7),or recovery (total score of less than 7 and at least a 5 point improvement on the GAD-7), from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention. | Number of participants achieving at least 50% improvement on the GAD-7 from CES treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 weeks |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Cost Effectiveness in Generalised Anxiety Disorder Compared to Current Treatment Approaches | The secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), in terms of health and social care service cost, and patient cost, from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention. The health and social care service cost and patient cost will be aggregated to determine the QALY (quality adjusted life year) value of the intervention. QALYs are used by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom to determine the cost effectiveness of a treatment, and to determine whether it should be made available free at point of use in the National Health Service (NHS). | Cost savings per patient of treatment with Alpha-Stim versus treatment as usual | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Pound sterling | 24 weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Effectiveness in Depression as Measured by Reduction of at Least 6 Points in Scores on the Personal Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) | The third objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for depression in participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), in terms of reliable improvement (a 6 point reduction in scores on the PHQ-9) or recovery (a score of 9 or less and at least a 6 point drop on the PHQ-9), from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention. | Number of participants with at least reliable improvement in depression symptoms | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Effectiveness in Insomnia as Measured by at Least a 50% Reduction in Score on the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) | The fourth objective of the tertiary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for insomnia in participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), in terms of reliable improvement (at least a 50% reduction in scores on the AIS), and recovery (a score of less than 4 and a reduction of at least 50% in AIS score), from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention. | Number of participants experiencing at least reliable improvement in sleep | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 weeks |
|
24 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation | Alpha Stim AID cranial electrotherapy stimulation, Pregnancy test, Anxiety questionnaire, Quality of life questionnaire, Work and social questionnaire, Sleep questionnaire, Depression questionnaire, Quality of life and financial questionnaire Alpha Stim AID cranial electrotherapy stimulation: - 60 minutes of cranial electrotherapy stimulation via Alpha Stim AID once per day, for 6 to 12 weeks. Pregnancy test: - Pregnancy test (day 1) Anxiety questionnaire: - GAD-7 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Quality of life questionnaire: - EQ-5D-5L (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Work and social questionnaire: - WASA (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Sleep questionnaire: - Athens (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Depression questionnaire: - PHQ-9 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24) Quality of life and financial questionnaire: - CSRI (day 1, week 12 and week 24) | 0 | 161 | 0 | 161 | 4 | 161 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache and insomnia | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment | Headache and insomnia are known possibilities of CES if the current is set too high for the participant to used too close to bedtime. |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Nausea is a known possibility of CES treatment if the current is set too high for the participants |
| |
| Strange feeling after use | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Participant was nonspecific regarding the event. |
|
Sample was not an RCT and did not have a placebo control group. Lack of ethnic diversity in the sample.
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Science and Education Director | Electromedical Products International, Inc. | 8174583295 | josh@epii.com |
| Jun 8, 2020 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | May 19, 2016 | Jun 8, 2020 | ICF_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011258 | Pregnancy Tests |
| D000073222 | Patient Health Questionnaire |
| D011788 | Quality of Life |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D003944 | Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D011795 | Surveys and Questionnaires |
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D011581 | Psychological Tests |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| D017531 | Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
| D011634 | Public Health |
| D004778 | Environment and Public Health |
| D006304 | Health Status |
| D003710 | Demography |
| D015991 | Epidemiologic Measurements |
Not provided
Not provided
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|