Change in the clinical practices

The objective of this study is to compare two methods of pelvic floor muscle training: reference method versus CMP ® method ( (Connaissance et Maîtrise de Périnée : Knowledge and Control of Perineum)

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients more than 18 years old and less than 75 years
• Patients presenting an urinary incontinence of effort or mixed symptomatic associated with a pelvic statics disorder
• Patients with a perineale reeducation prescription
• Patients affiliated to a national insurance scheme or benefiting from such a program
• Patients having given her written consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

• Nulliparous woman
• Patients already operated for their incontinence
• Patients with a prolapse of higher level at the stage II of the classification POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification)
• Pregnant women
• Patients presenting an associated anal incontinence,
• Patients presenting a cancellation (section of marrow, syringomyelia for example) or an inversion of perineum control
• Patients having given birth less than 6 months before the care
• Patients having benefited from a pelvi-périnéale reeducation in the previous 12 months,
• Patients presenting psychiatric disease
• Patients presenting a vaginismus,
• Patients presenting a contraindication to the practice of the electrostimulation.