Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A planned interim analysis led to the trial being stopped early based on the observed size effect and power analysis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Delirium within the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with poor outcomes such as increased mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and time on mechanical ventilation. Benzodiazepine (BZD) exposure is an independent risk factor for development of delirium. Reversal of hypoactive delirium represents a potential opportunity for reducing duration of delirium and subsequent complications.
This is a single-center randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of critically ill adult patients with benzodiazepine-associated hypoactive delirium. The hypothesis is that flumazenil continuous infusion may reverse hypoactive delirium associated with BZD exposure and thereby reduce duration of delirium and ICU LOS.
Benzodiazepines are commonly used for discomfort, anxiety, agitation, and alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in the ICU. End organ dysfunction and extended exposure can increase the risk of complications associated with BZDs, which include increased ICU LOS, time on mechanical ventilation, and mortality.
Flumazenil as a 1, 4-imidazobenzodiazepine is a competitive antagonist for the benzodiazepine binding site with weak intrinsic or partial agonistic activity on the GABA receptor. Multiple studies have confirmed the safety and effectiveness of flumazenil for the reversal of sedation. Pilot studies have demonstrated safe reversal of over-sedation and statistically significant improvements in patient cooperation and time to extubation. The current standard for suspected BZD-associated hypoactive delirium is cessation of benzodiazepine administration and supportive care.
The role of continuous infusion flumazenil for rapid and sustained reversal of hypoactive delirium in the ICU has not been evaluated prospectively and therefore remains poorly defined.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flumazenil Infusion | Active Comparator | The flumazenil continuous infusion is started at an initial dose of 0.1 mg/hr., and can be titrated up to a maximum of 0.3 mg/hr. Dose titrations may occur every 60 minutes to maintain RASS scores of 0 to +1. The maximum rate is 0.3 mg/hr. |
|
| Placebo Infusion | Placebo Comparator | The placebo continuous infusion is started at an initial dose of 0.1 mg/hr (2 ml/hr)., and can be titrated up to a maximum of 0.3 mg/hr. Dose titrations may occur every 60 minutes to maintain RASS scores of 0 to +1. The maximum rate is 0.3 mg/hr. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flumazenil | Drug |
|
| |
| Placebo |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Delirium-free Days | Defined by the number of days in the 14-day period after randomization that the patient was alive and not delirious (i.e. CAM-ICU negative). Zero delirium-free days will be observed for patients that die within the 14-day period. | up to 14 days after randomization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Delirium Resolution | defined by the proportion of patients who were delirium free at 14 days after randomization | up to 14 days after randomization |
| Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kendra J Schomer, PharmD | University of California, Davis | Principal Investigator |
| Jeremiah J Duby, PharmD, BCPS | University of California, Davis | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Davis Medical Center | Sacramento | California | 95817 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16394685 | Background | Pandharipande P, Shintani A, Peterson J, Pun BT, Wilkinson GR, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW. Lorazepam is an independent risk factor for transitioning to delirium in intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jan;104(1):21-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200601000-00005. | |
| 26404392 | Background | Zaal IJ, Devlin JW, Hazelbag M, Klein Klouwenberg PM, van der Kooi AW, Ong DS, Cremer OL, Groenwold RH, Slooter AJ. Benzodiazepine-associated delirium in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Dec;41(12):2130-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4063-z. Epub 2015 Sep 24. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Flumazenil Group | The flumazenil continuous infusion is started at an initial dose of 0.1 mg/hr., and can be titrated up to a maximum of 0.3 mg/hr. Dose titrations may occur every 60 minutes to maintain RASS scores of 0 to +1. The maximum rate is 0.3 mg/hr. Flumazenil |
| FG001 | Placebo Group | The placebo continuous infusion is started at an initial dose of 0.1 mg/hr (2 ml/hr)., and can be titrated up to a maximum of 0.3 mg/hr. Dose titrations may occur every 60 minutes to maintain RASS scores of 0 to +1. The maximum rate is 0.3 mg/hr. Placebo: 0.9% normal saline |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Flumazenil Infusion | The flumazenil continuous infusion is started at an initial dose of 0.1 mg/hr., and can be titrated up to a maximum of 0.3 mg/hr. Dose titrations may occur every 60 minutes to maintain RASS scores of 0 to +1. The maximum rate is 0.3 mg/hr. Flumazenil |
| BG001 | Placebo Infusion |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Delirium-free Days | Defined by the number of days in the 14-day period after randomization that the patient was alive and not delirious (i.e. CAM-ICU negative). Zero delirium-free days will be observed for patients that die within the 14-day period. | One patient randomized to the flumazenil and one randomized to the placebo never received the study infusion. The patient in the flumazenil group died from a massive hemorrhage within 1 hour of infusion initiation, and it was deemed nonattributable to study infusion. Twenty patients were included in the final analysis. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | days | up to 14 days after randomization |
|
72 hours while on study infusion
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Flumazenil Group | The flumazenil continuous infusion is started at an initial dose of 0.1 mg/hr., and can be titrated up to a maximum of 0.3 mg/hr. Dose titrations may occur every 60 minutes to maintain RASS scores of 0 to +1. The maximum rate is 0.3 mg/hr. Flumazenil |
Not provided
Not provided
A planned interim analysis led to the trial being stopped early based on the observed size effect and power analysis.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kendra Schomer, PharmD | University of California Davis Medical Center | 916-734-2243 | kjschomer@ucdavis.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 25, 2017 | Jun 5, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003693 | Delirium |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003221 | Confusion |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005442 | Flumazenil |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001570 | Benzodiazepinones |
| D001569 | Benzodiazepines |
| D001552 | Benzazepines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
0.9% normal saline |
|
length of time that the patient was admitted to an intensive care unit service during the hospital stay
| duration of admission to the intensive care unit |
| Number of Mechanical Ventilator Free Days | number of days within the first 28 days after enrollment that the patient was free from needing mechanical ventilation | up to 28 days after randomization |
| Occurrence of Agitation Requiring Use of Rescue Sedatives While on Study Infusion | number of times that a RASS score of + 2 to +4 occurred that did not resolve with decreasing study infusion | up to 72 hours after the start of the infusion |
| Average Duration of Study Infusion | average duration of time patient was randomized to each infusion up to 72 hours | up to 72 hours after the start of the infusion |
| Average Maximum Rate of Study Infusion | average maximum rate (ml/hr) during the 72 hours after study infusion | up to 72 hours after the start of the infusion |
| 22859526 | Background | Shehabi Y, Bellomo R, Reade MC, Bailey M, Bass F, Howe B, McArthur C, Seppelt IM, Webb S, Weisbrodt L; Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation (SPICE) Study Investigators; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Early intensive care sedation predicts long-term mortality in ventilated critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Oct 15;186(8):724-31. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0522OC. Epub 2012 Aug 2. |
| 15082703 | Background | Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, Speroff T, Gordon SM, Harrell FE Jr, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Dittus RS. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1753-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1753. |
| 24423152 | Background | Patel SB, Poston JT, Pohlman A, Hall JB, Kress JP. Rapidly reversible, sedation-related delirium versus persistent delirium in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar 15;189(6):658-65. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201310-1815OC. |
| 1724638 | Background | Brogden RN, Goa KL. Flumazenil. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy as a benzodiazepine antagonist. Drugs. 1991 Dec;42(6):1061-89. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199142060-00010. |
| 1597024 | Background | Breheny FX. Reversal of midazolam sedation with flumazenil. Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):736-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199206000-00006. |
| 2110788 | Background | Pepperman ML. Double-blind study of the reversal of midazolam-induced sedation in the intensive care unit with flumazenil (Ro 15-1788): effect on weaning from ventilation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1990 Feb;18(1):38-44. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9001800107. |
| 26096314 | Background | Penninga EI, Graudal N, Ladekarl MB, Jurgens G. Adverse Events Associated with Flumazenil Treatment for the Management of Suspected Benzodiazepine Intoxication--A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses of Randomised Trials. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2016 Jan;118(1):37-44. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12434. Epub 2015 Jul 28. |
| 22766408 | Background | Kreshak AA, Cantrell FL, Clark RF, Tomaszewski CA. A poison center's ten-year experience with flumazenil administration to acutely poisoned adults. J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;43(4):677-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.01.059. Epub 2012 Jul 4. |
| 24619543 | Background | Moore PW, Donovan JW, Burkhart KK, Waskin JA, Hieger MA, Adkins AR, Wert Y, Haggerty DA, Rasimas JJ. Safety and efficacy of flumazenil for reversal of iatrogenic benzodiazepine-associated delirium toxicity during treatment of alcohol withdrawal, a retrospective review at one center. J Med Toxicol. 2014 Jun;10(2):126-32. doi: 10.1007/s13181-014-0391-6. |
| 2505628 | Background | Bodenham A, Park GR. Reversal of prolonged sedation using flumazenil in critically ill patients. Anaesthesia. 1989 Jul;44(7):603-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11455.x. |
| 8239101 | Background | Spivey WH, Roberts JR, Derlet RW. A clinical trial of escalating doses of flumazenil for reversal of suspected benzodiazepine overdose in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Dec;22(12):1813-21. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80407-x. |
| 26041151 | Background | Salluh JI, Wang H, Schneider EB, Nagaraja N, Yenokyan G, Damluji A, Serafim RB, Stevens RD. Outcome of delirium in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015 Jun 3;350:h2538. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2538. |
| 11797025 | Background | Ely EW, Gautam S, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Speroff T, Truman B, Dittus R, Bernard R, Inouye SK. The impact of delirium in the intensive care unit on hospital length of stay. Intensive Care Med. 2001 Dec;27(12):1892-900. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1132-2. Epub 2001 Nov 8. |
| 30234569 | Background | Krewulak KD, Stelfox HT, Leigh JP, Ely EW, Fiest KM. Incidence and Prevalence of Delirium Subtypes in an Adult ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):2029-2035. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003402. |
| 29381733 | Background | Avelino-Silva TJ, Campora F, Curiati JAE, Jacob-Filho W. Prognostic effects of delirium motor subtypes in hospitalized older adults: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 30;13(1):e0191092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191092. eCollection 2018. |
| 30346242 | Background | Girard TD, Exline MC, Carson SS, Hough CL, Rock P, Gong MN, Douglas IS, Malhotra A, Owens RL, Feinstein DJ, Khan B, Pisani MA, Hyzy RC, Schmidt GA, Schweickert WD, Hite RD, Bowton DL, Masica AL, Thompson JL, Chandrasekhar R, Pun BT, Strength C, Boehm LM, Jackson JC, Pandharipande PP, Brummel NE, Hughes CG, Patel MB, Stollings JL, Bernard GR, Dittus RS, Ely EW; MIND-USA Investigators. Haloperidol and Ziprasidone for Treatment of Delirium in Critical Illness. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 27;379(26):2506-2516. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808217. Epub 2018 Oct 22. |
| 28098628 | Background | Ely EW. The ABCDEF Bundle: Science and Philosophy of How ICU Liberation Serves Patients and Families. Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):321-330. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002175. |
| 25976892 | Background | Bassett R, Adams KM, Danesh V, Groat PM, Haugen A, Kiewel A, Small C, Van-Leuven M, Venus S, Ely EW. Rethinking critical care: decreasing sedation, increasing delirium monitoring, and increasing patient mobility. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Feb;41(2):62-74. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41010-4. |
| 24394627 | Background | Balas MC, Vasilevskis EE, Olsen KM, Schmid KK, Shostrom V, Cohen MZ, Peitz G, Gannon DE, Sisson J, Sullivan J, Stothert JC, Lazure J, Nuss SL, Jawa RS, Freihaut F, Ely EW, Burke WJ. Effectiveness and safety of the awakening and breathing coordination, delirium monitoring/management, and early exercise/mobility bundle. Crit Care Med. 2014 May;42(5):1024-36. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000129. |
| 27861180 | Background | Barnes-Daly MA, Phillips G, Ely EW. Improving Hospital Survival and Reducing Brain Dysfunction at Seven California Community Hospitals: Implementing PAD Guidelines Via the ABCDEF Bundle in 6,064 Patients. Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):171-178. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002149. |
| 30608279 | Background | Trogrlic Z, van der Jagt M, Lingsma H, Gommers D, Ponssen HH, Schoonderbeek JFJ, Schreiner F, Verbrugge SJ, Duran S, Bakker J, Ista E. Improved Guideline Adherence and Reduced Brain Dysfunction After a Multicenter Multifaceted Implementation of ICU Delirium Guidelines in 3,930 Patients. Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):419-427. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003596. |
| 11730446 | Background | Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Gordon S, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, Hart RP, Dittus R. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA. 2001 Dec 5;286(21):2703-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.21.2703. |
| 12421743 | Background | Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138. |
| 12799407 | Background | Ely EW, Truman B, Shintani A, Thomason JW, Wheeler AP, Gordon S, Francis J, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, Sessler CN, Dittus RS, Bernard GR. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). JAMA. 2003 Jun 11;289(22):2983-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.22.2983. |
| 1686131 | Background | Hojer J, Baehrendtz S, Magnusson A, Gustafsson LL. A placebo-controlled trial of flumazenil given by continuous infusion in severe benzodiazepine overdosage. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991 Oct;35(7):584-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1991.tb03353.x. |
| 8605789 | Background | Weinbroum A, Rudick V, Sorkine P, Nevo Y, Halpern P, Geller E, Niv D. Use of flumazenil in the treatment of drug overdose: a double-blind and open clinical study in 110 patients. Crit Care Med. 1996 Feb;24(2):199-206. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199602000-00004. |
| 9596422 | Background | Chern CH, Chern TL, Wang LM, Hu SC, Deng JF, Lee CH. Continuous flumazenil infusion in preventing complications arising from severe benzodiazepine intoxication. Am J Emerg Med. 1998 May;16(3):238-41. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(98)90091-2. |
| Background | Flumazenil [package insert]. San Francisco, CA, Genentech Inc, 2010 |
| 19915454 | Background | Devlin JW, Roberts RJ, Fong JJ, Skrobik Y, Riker RR, Hill NS, Robbins T, Garpestad E. Efficacy and safety of quetiapine in critically ill patients with delirium: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):419-27. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b9e302. |
The placebo continuous infusion is started at an initial dose of 0.1 mg/hr (2 ml/hr)., and can be titrated up to a maximum of 0.3 mg/hr. Dose titrations may occur every 60 minutes to maintain RASS scores of 0 to +1. The maximum rate is 0.3 mg/hr. Placebo: 0.9% normal saline |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Days in Hospital Prior to Enrollment | Mean | Standard Deviation | days |
|
| Time Since Last Benzodiazepine | Mean | Standard Deviation | hours |
|
| Lorazepam Equivalents | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | milligrams |
|
| OG001 | Placebo Group | The placebo continuous infusion is started at an initial dose of 0.1 mg/hr (2 ml/hr)., and can be titrated up to a maximum of 0.3 mg/hr. Dose titrations may occur every 60 minutes to maintain RASS scores of 0 to +1. The maximum rate is 0.3 mg/hr. Placebo: 0.9% normal saline |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Delirium Resolution | defined by the proportion of patients who were delirium free at 14 days after randomization | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | up to 14 days after randomization |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay | length of time that the patient was admitted to an intensive care unit service during the hospital stay | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days | duration of admission to the intensive care unit |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Mechanical Ventilator Free Days | number of days within the first 28 days after enrollment that the patient was free from needing mechanical ventilation | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days | up to 28 days after randomization |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Occurrence of Agitation Requiring Use of Rescue Sedatives While on Study Infusion | number of times that a RASS score of + 2 to +4 occurred that did not resolve with decreasing study infusion | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | up to 72 hours after the start of the infusion |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Average Duration of Study Infusion | average duration of time patient was randomized to each infusion up to 72 hours | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | hours | up to 72 hours after the start of the infusion |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Average Maximum Rate of Study Infusion | average maximum rate (ml/hr) during the 72 hours after study infusion | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | milliliters per hour | up to 72 hours after the start of the infusion |
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 11 |
| 0 |
| 11 |
| 0 |
| 11 |
| EG001 | Placebo Group | The placebo continuous infusion is started at an initial dose of 0.1 mg/hr (2 ml/hr)., and can be titrated up to a maximum of 0.3 mg/hr. Dose titrations may occur every 60 minutes to maintain RASS scores of 0 to +1. The maximum rate is 0.3 mg/hr. Placebo: 0.9% normal saline | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D000072471 |
| Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |