Bivalirudin vs Heparin During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Bivalirudin vs Heparin During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomised Controlled Trial
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in AMI patients with DES.
This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, active drug controlled multicenter clinical research and the study would enrolled a total of 380 AMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to one of two antithrombotic regimens: bivalirudin alone, or unfractionated heparin alone. All enrolled patients would be followed-up to 30 days.
This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, active drug controlled multicenter clinical research and the study would enrolled a total of 380 AMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to one of two antithrombotic regimens: bivalirudin alone, or unfractionated heparin alone. All enrolled patients would be followed-up to 30 days. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in AMI patients with DES.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
longjianjing@salubris.cn86-10-58696282 ext. 840
houyan@salubris.cn86-10-58696282 ext. 821
Shanyang, Liaoning 110016, China
doctorliangzi@sina.com86-13332457575
doctorliyi@126.com