Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective case series study aiming to evaluate the effect of post-menopausal osteoporosis on the jaw bone around dental implants with a modified titanium surface. The study consists of 8 visits that will be performed within a minimum period of 15 months. Participants will be recruited from the Rheumatology Department and Radiology Department at Barts Health National Health Service (NHS) Trust.
Participants will include 20 post-menopausal osteoporotic women with a requirement of a tooth to be replaced. The main objective of this study is to radiographically compare alveolar (jaw) bone changes in width and height after the placement of a dental implant with a hydrophilic (SLActive) surface and 12 months after loading (placement of the crown) it in post-menopausal osteoporotic women.
This is a prospective case series study aiming to radiographically assess the changes in alveolar bone width and height after the placement of a SLActive implant (implant with a modified surface that should stimulate bone formation) and 12 months after loading it in post-menopausal osteoporotic women. The null hypothesis is: in post-menopausal osteoporotic women there are no significant changes in the peri-implant alveolar bone after the placement of a SLActive implant and 12 months after loading it in terms of width and height assessed by the use of CBCT images. The aim is to include 20 post-menopausal osteoporotic women with a requirement of a tooth to be replaced. However, considering a potential drop-out rate of 10%, the investigators have planned to increase the recruitment for this trial to 22 postmenopausal women. They will be recruited from the Rheumatology Department and Radiology Department at Barts Health NHS Trust, amongst those patients attending for a consultation with the osteoporosis specialist or for taking a Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. Before starting the visit, post-menopausal women meeting the inclusion criteria will be asked by a study examiner if they agree to be quickly screened for the presence of an intercalate edentulous area (edentulous area in between the teeth)and if they may be interested in taking part into the study. If they agree, a quick dental examination will be performed by a study examiner (a qualified dentist) after the visit. The patients who would qualify for enrolment will receive information on the study, the patient information sheet and consent form, together with a letter to give to their General Dental Practitioner (GDP) in order to be referred to the Centre for Oral Clinical Research. The patients that do not qualify for enrolment will receive a report of the oral screening in case they require dental treatments.
Once the referral letter arrives at the Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Barts Health, the patient will be contacted to answer any further question and to book an appointment to attend the enrolment visit, should they wish.
The study consists of 8 visits that will be performed over a minimum period of 15 months at the Centre for Oral Clinical Research at the School of Dentistry of Queen Mary University of London (QMUL):
Enrollment visit:
If the patient agrees, a letter will be sent to the General Practitioner (GP) to inform about the participation in the study.
Full-mouth debridement(within 90 days from enrolment):
In case a participant requires further periodontal treatment, this will be arranged outside the study protocol. No implant will be placed until a condition of periodontal health (no pockets ≥5 mm) will be reached.
• In order to plan the implant placement and according to the clinician's judgment and the complexity of the case, either a Cone Bean Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan or a peri-apical intra-oral x-ray, limited at the area of the implant placement, will be taken.
Implant placement (within 120 days from visit 2):
Suture removal (7 days + 3 days from Visit 3):
Implant impression (6 weeks ± 7 days from Visit 3):
Implant loading (8 weeks ± 7 days from Visit 3):
6-months follow-up (6 months ± 14 days from Visit 6):
12-months follow-up (12 months ± 14 days from Visit 6):
At study completion, a letter will be sent to the patient's GDP to inform about the treatments provided and highlight any need for further treatments.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| osteoporotic women with a missing tooth | Other | Post-menopausal osteoporotic women with a missing tooth and willing to replace it with a dental implant |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dental implant placement (Straumann® Bone Level Tapered, BLT, Roxolid® SLActive®) | Device | A tapered bone level implant (Straumann® BLT Roxolid® SLActive®, Basel, Switzerland) will be placed according to the manufactures guidelines trying to achieve primary stability in the correct prosthetic position |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in peri-implant horizontal and vertical alveolar bone | The peri-implant alveolar bone changes in height and width (in mm) will be assessed with the use of a CBCT scan after the implant placement (+10 days) and 12 months post loading (± 14 days). A single calibrated examiner will take all the measurements 3 times and the average value will be recorded. All measurements will be calculated with a 0.1 mm precision level. | After implant placement (+10 days) and 12 months after implant loading (± 14 days) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| changes in implant stability measured with resonance frequency analysis | Resonance frequency analysis will be used to evaluate implant stability. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) will be recorded after implant placement, suture removal (7 days + 3 days after implant placement), implant impression (6 weeks ± 7 days after implant placement), implant loading (8 weeks ± 7 days after implant placement), at 6 months- (± 14 days) and 12 months- follow ups. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nikolaos Donos, Prof | Queen Mary University of London | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Institute of Dentistry, Barts Health, QMUL | London | E1 2AD | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15218041 | Background | Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res. 2004 Jul;83(7):529-33. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300704. | |
| 25864584 | Background | Calciolari E, Donos N, Park JC, Petrie A, Mardas N. A systematic review on the correlation between skeletal and jawbone mineral density in osteoporotic subjects. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Apr;27(4):433-42. doi: 10.1111/clr.12597. Epub 2015 Apr 12. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015663 | Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010024 | Osteoporosis |
| D001851 | Bone Diseases, Metabolic |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| at implant placement, suture removal (7 days + 3 days after implant placement), implant impression (6 weeks ± 7 days after implant placement), implant loading (8 weeks ± 7 days after implant placement), at 6 months- (± 14 days) and 12 months- follow ups. |
| Implant success | Buser et al (1990) criteria will be used to evaluate implant success 12 months after loading (± 14 days) | 12 months after loading (± 14 days) |
| 8359868 | Background | Dao TT, Anderson JD, Zarb GA. Is osteoporosis a risk factor for osseointegration of dental implants? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(2):137-44. |
| 21561478 | Background | Donos N, Hamlet S, Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Bosshardt DD, Ivanovski S. Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):365-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02113.x. |
| 21561476 | Background | Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Bosshardt DD. Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):349-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02172.x. |
| 21303420 | Background | Mardas N, Schwarz F, Petrie A, Hakimi AR, Donos N. The effect of SLActive surface in guided bone formation in osteoporotic-like conditions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):406-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02094.x. Epub 2011 Feb 8. |
| 40625220 | Derived | Elena C, Nikos M, Iro P, Sara T, Nikolaos D. Radiographic Peri-Implant Bone Changes in Osteoporotic Women Treated With a Ti-Zr, Bone Level Tapered Implant With a Hydrophilic Surface: A 12-Month Prospective Case-Series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Oct;36(10):1234-1247. doi: 10.1111/clr.14469. Epub 2025 Jul 8. |
| D008659 |
| Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |