Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The utility of conventional imaging in the development of new treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) is hindered by:
Novel magnetic resonance (MR) imaging acquisition and analysis techniques have the potential to solve these problems. However, their reliability needs to be fully established and knowledge of likely effect sizes is required to inform sample size considerations for further longitudinal/interventional studies.
This study aims to help address these issues by:
The investigators will examine a single knee of an initial 15 participants with MR. Participants will be drawn from two groups: (1) 10 participants aged 40-60 years old with clinical and x-ray features of OA and (2) 5 control subjects (matched to cases for age, sex and body mass index in a 1:2 ratio) who do not have clinical features of OA.
Participants will undergo an initial (baseline) MR examination, followed by repeat MR examinations at approximately 1 month and 1 year following the baseline examination.
This will allow us to assess both the reliability of our MR measurements and the expected progression in our MR measurements in OA subjects in the absence of any disease-modifying intervention.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy volunteers | |||
| Osteoarthritis patients |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean cartilage T1rho relaxation time (milliseconds) | 1 year | |
| Mean cartilage T2 relaxation time (milliseconds) | 1 year | |
| Mean cartilage T1 relaxation time post gadolinium (milliseconds) | Derived from delayed gadolinium enhanced MR of cartilage (dGEMRIC) | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Modified Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) (arbitrary units) | Semiquantitative scoring system | 1 year |
| Cartilage thickness values (millimeters) | Surface-based comparison using statistical parametric mapping |
Not provided
Group 1 Inclusion Criteria:
Group 2 Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria (both groups):
Not provided
Not provided
Group 1 will consist of 10 patients aged 40-60 who have presented to the Orthopaedic clinic with a painful knee, and have mild/moderate OA on plain radiographs (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3).
Group 2 will consist of 5 healthy volunteer controls, matched (1:2 ratio) to cases for age, sex and body mass index who do not have knee pain.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addenbrooke's Hospital | Cambridge | Cambridgeshire | CB2 0QQ | United Kingdom |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Serum samples for cartilage turnover marker measurement
| 1 year |
| Subchondral bone area (millimeters squared) | 1 year |
| Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) quantitation of parameters | Multiple DCE parameters calculated allowing description of enhancement rate and pattern of synovium | 1 year |
| Subchondral bone texture index (arbitrary units) | 1 year |
| Osteochondral junction integrity (semiquantitative grading, arbitrary units) | 1 year |