Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R01MD010290-01 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | NIH |
| National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the current study is to test a systems-level approach to disseminate a multicomponent, multilevel intervention consisting of educational materials about transplantation and the new kidney allocation system targeting dialysis facility medical directors, staff, and patients. Roughly 750 dialysis facilities in up to 18 End Stage Renal Disease Network regions across the United States will be randomized to receive intervention materials. The overall goal of the study is to extend the influence of the national allocation policy in reducing disparities in early steps in kidney transplant access.
The purpose of the Allocation System for Changes in Equity in kidNey Transplantation (ASCENT) study is to test a systems-level approach to disseminate a multi-component intervention consisting of in the era of the new national kidney allocation policy and educational materials targeting dialysis facility medical directors, staff, and patients. The investigators will randomize ~750 dialysis facilities in up to 18 End Stage Renal Disease Network regions across the United States, where approximately half of facilities will receive the intervention materials and half will receive an informational brochure. This pragmatic, clinical effectiveness-implementation study will test the effectiveness of the multicomponent, multilevel interventions consisting of a tailored, facility-specific transplant and disparity performance report, educational videos for staff and dialysis patients, and an educational webinar for dialysis facility medical directors and staff.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-Component Intervention | Experimental | End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) facilities will receive feedback reports containing facility specific data, an educational webinar for dialysis facility medical directors and staff, and an educational video for patients and staff. |
|
| Standard Care + Pamphlet | Active Comparator | End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) facilities will conduct usual care and receive United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) educational pamphlets for staff. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Feedback Reports | Other | Medical directors will be provided performance feedback reports that are a summary of clinical performance of transplant and racial disparity performance over a period of time aimed at providing information to allow them to assess and adjust their transplant performance. The report will emphasize tailored facility-specific information on the mean time on dialysis for patients in that facility and transplant access performance measures, such as wait listing and transplantation, including the magnitude of racial disparity, detailing when a facility is performing below the national or regional average. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Incident Patients Waitlisted | The adjusted mean proportions of incident (new) patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation at study dialysis facilities, at the baseline and post-intervention time periods, were calculated. Incident patients are those who initiated dialysis treatment at study facilities during one of the study time periods. Mean proportions were adjusted for time and facility-level random effects. | Baseline (the twelve month period prior to the intervention), Post-intervention (the twelve month period after the intervention) |
| Proportion of Black and White Incident Patients Waitlisted | The adjusted mean proportions of Black versus White incident patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation at study dialysis facilities, at the baseline and post-intervention follow-up assessments, were calculated. Mean proportions were adjusted for time and facility-level random effects. | Baseline (the twelve month period prior to the intervention), Post-intervention (the twelve month period after the intervention) |
| Proportion of Prevalent Patients Waitlisted During the Baseline Period | The adjusted mean proportions of prevalent patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation at study dialysis facilities during the baseline time period were calculated. Mean proportions were adjusted for time and facility-level random effects. | Baseline (the twelve month period prior to the intervention) |
| Proportion of Prevalent Patients Waitlisted During the Post-Intervention Time Period | The adjusted mean proportions of prevalent patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation at study dialysis facilities during the post-intervention period were calculated. Mean proportions were adjusted for time and facility-level random effects. | Post-intervention (the twelve month period after the intervention) |
| Proportion of Black and White Prevalent Patients Waitlisted During the Baseline Period |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge About the Kidney Allocation System | Knowledge about the kidney allocation system was assessed using a survey among dialysis facility medical directors or nurse managers. The survey measured provider knowledge of Kidney Allocation System (KAS) and transplantation using a cumulative knowledge score ranging from 0 to 5, where 0 = least knowledge and 5 = highest level of knowledge (higher scores are preferable, indicating greater knowledge). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rachel Patzer, PhD, MPH | Emory University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emory Clinic | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States | ||
| Emory University Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38344743 | Background | Urbanski M, Lee YH, Escoffery C, Buford J, Plantinga L, Pastan SO, Hamoda R, Blythe E, Patzer RE. Implementation of the ASCENT Trial to Improve Transplant Waitlisting Access. Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Nov 2;9(2):225-238. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.10.028. eCollection 2024 Feb. | |
| 28845470 | Background | Patzer RE, Smith K, Basu M, Gander J, Mohan S, Escoffery C, Plantinga L, Melanson T, Kalloo S, Green G, Berlin A, Renville G, Browne T, Turgeon N, Caponi S, Zhang R, Pastan S. The ASCENT (Allocation System Changes for Equity in Kidney Transplantation) Study: a Randomized Effectiveness-Implementation Study to Improve Kidney Transplant Waitlisting and Reduce Racial Disparity. Kidney Int Rep. 2017 May;2(3):433-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Information on patients seen during the study periods was obtained via surveillance data from study dialysis facilities. Only minimal information was collected about dialysis facility patients, thus, the total number of discrete patients is unknown as individuals could have been a patient of a dialysis facility during both study periods.
Recruitment of dialysis facilities began in September 2016. Data collection via surveillance data from patients of the dialysis facilities occurred retroactively for both study periods. The baseline period includes patients seen at dialysis facilities during January 2016 to December 2016, while the follow-up period includes patients seen at dialysis facilities during April 2017 to March 2018. Data collection from surveillance data concluded on August 2, 2019.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Allocation System Changes for Equity in Kidney Transplantation (ASCENT) Intervention | ASCENT is a multi-component educational intervention delivered to dialysis facilities. End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) facilities received performance feedback reports containing facility specific data, an educational webinar for dialysis facility medical directors and staff, an educational video for patients and staff; and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) pamphlet for dialysis facility staff detailing the changes in the new kidney allocation policy. The study intervention period occurred January 2017 through March 2017. |
| FG001 | Standard Care Plus Educational Pamphlet | Dialysis facilities randomized to the control study arm delivered standard or usual care and education regarding transplantation. Dialysis facility staff were provided the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) educational pamphlet detailing the changes in the new kidney allocation policy. The study intervention period occurred January 2017 through March 2017. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline/Pre-intervention Period |
| |||||||||||||
| Post-intervention Follow-up Period |
|
The Baseline Analysis Population includes demographics for patients of the study dialysis centers during the baseline/pre-intervention time period.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | ASCENT Intervention | ASCENT is a multi-component educational intervention delivered to dialysis facilities. End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) facilities received performance feedback reports containing facility specific data, an educational webinar for dialysis facility medical directors and staff, an educational video for patients and staff; and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) pamphlet for dialysis facility staff detailing the changes in the new kidney allocation policy. The study intervention period occurred January 2017 through March 2017. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Proportion of Incident Patients Waitlisted | The adjusted mean proportions of incident (new) patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation at study dialysis facilities, at the baseline and post-intervention time periods, were calculated. Incident patients are those who initiated dialysis treatment at study facilities during one of the study time periods. Mean proportions were adjusted for time and facility-level random effects. | This analysis included incident patients among the facilities included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Incident patients participated in either the baseline or post-intervention assessment. The overall number of participants analyzed is the sum of incident patients in facilities randomized to each study arm at the baseline and post-intervention periods. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | adjusted mean proportion of patients | Baseline (the twelve month period prior to the intervention), Post-intervention (the twelve month period after the intervention) | Facilities | Facilities |
|
Information about adverse events was not collected during this study.
Health information was not collected from patients receiving dialysis at the study dialysis centers at any time during the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | ASCENT Intervention | ASCENT is a multi-component educational intervention delivered to dialysis facilities. End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) facilities received performance feedback reports containing facility specific data, an educational webinar for dialysis facility medical directors and staff, an educational video for patients and staff; and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) pamphlet for dialysis facility staff detailing the changes in the new kidney allocation policy. The study intervention period occurred January 2017 through March 2017. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Rachel Patzer | Emory University | 404-727-6047 | rpatzer@emory.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 25, 2017 | Jul 27, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Sep 27, 2016 | May 17, 2024 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007674 | Kidney Diseases |
| D007676 | Kidney Failure, Chronic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059039 | Standard of Care |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019984 | Quality Indicators, Health Care |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Educational Video for Staff | Other | Dialysis facility staff will watch a ~10 minute educational video that describes the role of dialysis staff in improving transplant access, the new kidney allocation policy, and how the new policy impacts minority patients and those on dialysis for a substantial period of time. |
|
| Educational Video for Patients | Other | Dialysis facilities will receive a ~10 minute educational video targeted to dialysis patients to explain the transplant process and allocation policy. |
|
| Educational Webinar | Other | Education for medical directors and facility staff about the kidney allocation policy will be discussed in a webinar and information will be hosted on a website for participants to access. The seminar will be roughly 45 minutes, and continuing medical education (CME) credits will be offered. |
|
| Standard Care | Other | Dialysis facilities will conduct standard or usual care and education regarding transplantation. |
|
| United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Pamphlet | Other | Dialysis facility staff will be provided an educational pamphlet detailing the changes in the new kidney allocation policy . |
|
Waitlisting disparity is assessed as the adjusted mean proportion of Black versus White prevalent patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation at study dialysis facilities during the baseline time period. Mean proportions were adjusted for time and facility-level random effects. |
| Baseline (the twelve month period prior to the intervention) |
| Proportion of Black and White Prevalent Patients Waitlisted During the Post-Intervention Time Period | Waitlisting disparity is assessed as the adjusted mean proportion of Black versus White prevalent patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation at study dialysis facilities during the post-intervention period. Mean proportions were adjusted for time and facility-level random effects. | Post-intervention (the twelve month period after the intervention) |
| Baseline, Immediately Post-intervention (3 months after the start of the intervention) |
| Percentage of Facilities With Increases or No Change/Decreases in Staff Training | Staff training about kidney transplant and the allocation system was assessed among dialysis facility medical directors or nurse managers by asking "what proportion of staff have you trained regarding the new kidney allocations system?" The staff training score was based on facility-level average percent and used a scale of 0 = 0% of staff trained, 1 = 1-20% of staff trained, 2 = 21-40% of staff trained, 3 = 41-60% of staff trained, 4 = 61-80% of staff trained, and 5 = 81-100% of staff trained. Facilities were grouped as either having an increase in the percentage of staff who were trained about KAS, or had no change or a decrease in the percentage of staff trained between the baseline and post-intervention follow-up at 3 months. | Baseline, Immediately Post-intervention (3 months after the start of the intervention) |
| Percentage of Facilities With Increases or No Change/Decreases in Patient Education | Patient education about kidney transplant and the allocation system was assessed among dialysis facility medical directors or nurse managers by asking "what proportion of patients in this specific facility have you or your staff educated about kidney transplantation?" The patient education score was based on facility-level average percent and recorded as ordinal responses scored on a scale of 0 = 0% of patients educated, 1 = 1-20% of patients educated, 2 = 21-40% of patients educated, 3 = 41-60% of patients educated, 4 = 61-80% of patients educated, and 5 = 81-100% of patients educated. Facilities were grouped as either having an increase in the percentage of patients educated about KAS, or had no change or a decrease in the percentage of patients educated between the baseline and post-intervention follow-up at 3 months. | Baseline, Immediately Post-intervention (3 months after the start of the intervention) |
| Percentage of Facilities With Increases or No Change/Decreases in Intent to Refer Patients for Kidney Transplantation | Change in referral practices were measured by asking dialysis facility medical directors or nurse managers about the estimated number of patients where were referred for kidney transplantation in that facility. The medical director or nurse manager was asked "since the beginning of the ASCENT quality improvement project (about 3 months ago), have you been referring more or fewer patients?" Possible responses were: more, same, fewer, or unsure. Facilities were grouped as either having an increase in the number of patients referred for transplant, or had no change or a decrease in the proportion of patients referred for transplant. | Immediately Post-intervention (3 months after the start of the intervention) |
| Atlanta |
| Georgia |
| 30322 |
| United States |
| Emory University | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| 36764664 | Result | Patzer RE, Zhang R, Buford J, McPherson L, Lee YH, Urbanski M, Li D, Wilk A, Paul S, Plantinga L, Escoffery C, Pastan SO. The ASCENT Intervention to Improve Access and Reduce Racial Inequalities in Kidney Waitlisting: A Randomized, Effectiveness-Implementation Trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Mar 1;18(3):374-382. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000071. Epub 2023 Feb 8. |
| 32954067 | Result | Magua W, Basu M, Pastan SO, Kim JJ, Smith K, Gander J, Mohan S, Escoffery C, Plantinga LC, Melanson T, Garber MD, Patzer RE. Effect of the ASCENT Intervention to Increase Knowledge of Kidney Allocation Policy Changes Among Dialysis Providers. Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Jul 2;5(9):1422-1431. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.06.027. eCollection 2020 Sep. |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| BG001 | Standard Care Plus Educational Pamphlet | Dialysis facilities randomized to the control study arm delivered standard or usual care and education regarding transplantation. Dialysis facility staff were provided the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) educational pamphlet detailing the changes in the new kidney allocation policy. The study intervention period occurred January 2017 through March 2017. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Facilities |
|
| years |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants | Participants |
|
| ASCENT Intervention |
ASCENT is a multi-component educational intervention delivered to dialysis facilities. End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) facilities received performance feedback reports containing facility specific data, an educational webinar for dialysis facility medical directors and staff, an educational video for patients and staff; and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) pamphlet for dialysis facility staff detailing the changes in the new kidney allocation policy. The study intervention period occurred January 2017 through March 2017. |
| OG001 | Standard Care Plus Educational Pamphlet | Dialysis facilities randomized to the control study arm delivered standard or usual care and education regarding transplantation. Dialysis facility staff were provided the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) educational pamphlet detailing the changes in the new kidney allocation policy. The study intervention period occurred January 2017 through March 2017. |
|
|
| Primary | Proportion of Black and White Incident Patients Waitlisted | The adjusted mean proportions of Black versus White incident patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation at study dialysis facilities, at the baseline and post-intervention follow-up assessments, were calculated. Mean proportions were adjusted for time and facility-level random effects. | This analysis included incident patients among the facilities included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Incident patients participated in either the baseline or post-intervention time periods. The overall number of participants analyzed is the sum of incident patients in facilities randomized to each study arm at the baseline and post-intervention assessment periods. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | adjusted mean proportion of patients | Baseline (the twelve month period prior to the intervention), Post-intervention (the twelve month period after the intervention) | Facilities | Facilities |
|
|
|
| Primary | Proportion of Prevalent Patients Waitlisted During the Baseline Period | The adjusted mean proportions of prevalent patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation at study dialysis facilities during the baseline time period were calculated. Mean proportions were adjusted for time and facility-level random effects. | This analysis includes patients of the study facilities during the baseline (pre-intervention) time period. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | adjusted mean proportion of patients | Baseline (the twelve month period prior to the intervention) | Facilities | Facilities |
|
|
|
| Primary | Proportion of Prevalent Patients Waitlisted During the Post-Intervention Time Period | The adjusted mean proportions of prevalent patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation at study dialysis facilities during the post-intervention period were calculated. Mean proportions were adjusted for time and facility-level random effects. | This analysis includes patients of study facilities during the post-intervention time period. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | adjusted mean proportion of patients | Post-intervention (the twelve month period after the intervention) | Facilities | Facilities |
|
|
|
| Primary | Proportion of Black and White Prevalent Patients Waitlisted During the Baseline Period | Waitlisting disparity is assessed as the adjusted mean proportion of Black versus White prevalent patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation at study dialysis facilities during the baseline time period. Mean proportions were adjusted for time and facility-level random effects. | This analysis includes Black and White patients of study facilities during the baseline (pre-intervention) time period. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | adjusted mean percentage of patients | Baseline (the twelve month period prior to the intervention) | Facilities | Facilities |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Knowledge About the Kidney Allocation System | Knowledge about the kidney allocation system was assessed using a survey among dialysis facility medical directors or nurse managers. The survey measured provider knowledge of Kidney Allocation System (KAS) and transplantation using a cumulative knowledge score ranging from 0 to 5, where 0 = least knowledge and 5 = highest level of knowledge (higher scores are preferable, indicating greater knowledge). | This analysis includes dialysis facility staff who completed this question at the baseline and post-intervention time points. One staff member per facility completed the facility surveys at each study time point. During the course of the study some facilities were lost to follow-up and some staff members did not respond to all questions at the baseline and post-intervention assessments. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Immediately Post-intervention (3 months after the start of the intervention) | Facilities | Facilities |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Facilities With Increases or No Change/Decreases in Staff Training | Staff training about kidney transplant and the allocation system was assessed among dialysis facility medical directors or nurse managers by asking "what proportion of staff have you trained regarding the new kidney allocations system?" The staff training score was based on facility-level average percent and used a scale of 0 = 0% of staff trained, 1 = 1-20% of staff trained, 2 = 21-40% of staff trained, 3 = 41-60% of staff trained, 4 = 61-80% of staff trained, and 5 = 81-100% of staff trained. Facilities were grouped as either having an increase in the percentage of staff who were trained about KAS, or had no change or a decrease in the percentage of staff trained between the baseline and post-intervention follow-up at 3 months. | This analysis includes dialysis facility staff who completed this question at the baseline and post-intervention time points. One staff member per facility completed the facility surveys at each study time point. During the course of the study some facilities were lost to follow-up and some staff members did not respond to all questions at the baseline and post-intervention assessments. | Posted | Number | Percentage of facilities | Baseline, Immediately Post-intervention (3 months after the start of the intervention) | Facilities | Facilities |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Facilities With Increases or No Change/Decreases in Patient Education | Patient education about kidney transplant and the allocation system was assessed among dialysis facility medical directors or nurse managers by asking "what proportion of patients in this specific facility have you or your staff educated about kidney transplantation?" The patient education score was based on facility-level average percent and recorded as ordinal responses scored on a scale of 0 = 0% of patients educated, 1 = 1-20% of patients educated, 2 = 21-40% of patients educated, 3 = 41-60% of patients educated, 4 = 61-80% of patients educated, and 5 = 81-100% of patients educated. Facilities were grouped as either having an increase in the percentage of patients educated about KAS, or had no change or a decrease in the percentage of patients educated between the baseline and post-intervention follow-up at 3 months. | This analysis includes dialysis facility staff who completed this question at the baseline and post-intervention time points. One staff member per facility completed the facility surveys at each study time point. During the course of the study some facilities were lost to follow-up and some staff members did not respond to all questions at the baseline and post-intervention assessments. | Posted | Number | Percentage of facilities | Baseline, Immediately Post-intervention (3 months after the start of the intervention) | Facilities | Facilities |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Facilities With Increases or No Change/Decreases in Intent to Refer Patients for Kidney Transplantation | Change in referral practices were measured by asking dialysis facility medical directors or nurse managers about the estimated number of patients where were referred for kidney transplantation in that facility. The medical director or nurse manager was asked "since the beginning of the ASCENT quality improvement project (about 3 months ago), have you been referring more or fewer patients?" Possible responses were: more, same, fewer, or unsure. Facilities were grouped as either having an increase in the number of patients referred for transplant, or had no change or a decrease in the proportion of patients referred for transplant. | This analysis includes dialysis facility staff who completed this question at the baseline and post-intervention time points. One staff member per facility completed the facility surveys at each study time point. During the course of the study some facilities were lost to follow-up and some staff members did not respond to all questions at the baseline and post-intervention assessments. | Posted | Number | Percentage of facilities | Immediately Post-intervention (3 months after the start of the intervention) | Facilities | Facilities |
|
|
|
| Primary | Proportion of Black and White Prevalent Patients Waitlisted During the Post-Intervention Time Period | Waitlisting disparity is assessed as the adjusted mean proportion of Black versus White prevalent patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation at study dialysis facilities during the post-intervention period. Mean proportions were adjusted for time and facility-level random effects. | This analysis includes Black and White patients of study facilities during the post-intervention time period. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | adjusted mean percentage of patients | Post-intervention (the twelve month period after the intervention) | Facilities | Facilities |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| EG001 | Standard Care Plus Educational Pamphlet | Dialysis facilities randomized to the control study arm delivered standard or usual care and education regarding transplantation. Dialysis facility staff were provided the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) educational pamphlet detailing the changes in the new kidney allocation policy. The study intervention period occurred January 2017 through March 2017. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D051436 | Renal Insufficiency, Chronic |
| D051437 | Renal Insufficiency |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
|
|
| Black patients on the waitlist during the post-intervention time period |
|
|
| White patients on the waitlist during the baseline time period |
|
|
| White patients on the waitlist during the post-intervention time period |
|
|
|
| White patients on the waitlist during the baseline time period |
|
|
|
| White patients on the waitlist during the post-intervention time period |
|
|