Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Due to inadequate enrollment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study evaluates whether use of intraoperative ultrasound during laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy impacts quality of life. Half of participants will undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy with use of the intraoperative ultrasound and half will undergo traditional laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy.
In full acknowledgement of the correlation between complete leiomyoma exeresis and symptom relief, the investigators hypothesize that use of contact ultrasonography at the time of laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will enable improved identification and extraction of uterine fibroids which will, in turn, lead to a greater improvement in quality of life among those women who receive intraoperative ultrasound compared to those who do not. In this blinded randomized controlled trial, the investigators will augment traditional laparoscopic and robotic myomectomy with intraoperative ultrasound in half the symptomatic patients enrolled in the study. The other half will be randomized to undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy without use of intra-operative ultrasound. Both groups will complete Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS- QOL) questionnaires before and after surgery (6 months post procedure) to determine whether use of laparoscopic contact ultrasonography has a positive impact on patients' quality of life.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Without Ultrasound | No Intervention | Laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will be performed without aid of intraoperative contact ultrasonography | |
| With Ultrasound | Experimental | Laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will be performed with aid of intraoperative contact ultrasonography |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative contact ultrasonography | Procedure | In patients randomized to myomectomy with contact ultrasonography, the laparoscopic or robotic ultrasound probe will be advanced through an existing port site into the pelvis after traditional myomectomy has been performed. The face of the ultrasound transducer will be guided over the uterus (including open hysterotomy sites) in systematic strokes, taking special care to note locations of myomas that may have been missed by the preceding excision. Additional hysterotomy sites will be made as necessary in order to remove persistent myomas. Any number of additional ultrasound passes and excisions may be performed in order to achieve the most comprehensive removal of myomas. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Quality of Life | Symptom and health-related quality of life will be measured by The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL) questionnaire administered to all study participants before myomectomy and 6 months post-myomectomy. | Measured at baseline (before surgery) and 6 months post-surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Time | Operating time is defined as the total period of time from when the procedure starts until the procedure is deemed complete. | Measured at surgery |
| Blood Loss | Blood loss (in mL) will be estimated for all procedures by the primary surgeon and gleaned from the anesthesia operative flowsheet. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen E Zimberg, MD | Cleveland Clinic Florida | Principal Investigator |
| Katherine A Smith, MD | Cleveland Clinic Florida | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland Clinic Florida | Weston | Florida | 33331 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17039695 | Background | Shimanuki H, Takeuchi H, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Kinoshita K. Effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasound in reducing recurrent fibroids during laparoscopic myomectomy. J Reprod Med. 2006 Sep;51(9):683-8. | |
| 9668143 | Background | Nezhat FR, Roemisch M, Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Nezhat CR. Recurrence rate after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998 Aug;5(3):237-40. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(98)80025-x. |
Not provided
Not provided
Selected de-identified ultrasound images and surgical data will be shared with BK Ultrasound, the manufacturer of the ultrasound device.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007889 | Leiomyoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009379 | Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue |
| D018204 | Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Measured at surgery |
| Weight of Excised Myomas | After extraction, all myomas will be submitted to pathology. Their cumulative weight will be measured by the Pathologist and gleaned by the research team from the final pathology report. | Measured at the time of Pathology evaluation. |
| 8623802 | Background | Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;174(2):654-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70445-3. |
| 25016181 | Background | Radosa MP, Owsianowski Z, Mothes A, Weisheit A, Vorwergk J, Asskaryar FA, Camara O, Bernardi TS, Runnebaum IB. Long-term risk of fibroid recurrence after laparoscopic myomectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Sep;180:35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 2. |
| 8582982 | Background | Fedele L, Parazzini F, Luchini L, Mezzopane R, Tozzi L, Villa L. Recurrence of fibroids after myomectomy: a transvaginal ultrasonographic study. Hum Reprod. 1995 Jul;10(7):1795-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136176. |
| 15802421 | Background | Hanafi M. Predictors of leiomyoma recurrence after myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):877-81. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000156298.74317.62. |
| 11129693 | Background | Fauconnier A, Chapron C, Babaki-Fard K, Dubuisson JB. Recurrence of leiomyomata after myomectomy. Hum Reprod Update. 2000 Nov-Dec;6(6):595-602. doi: 10.1093/humupd/6.6.595. |
| 11677326 | Background | Doridot V, Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Babaki-Fard K. Recurrence of leiomyomata after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001 Nov;8(4):495-500. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60610-x. |
| 25827662 | Background | Piccolboni P, Settembre A, Angelini P, Esposito F, Palladino S, Corcione F. Laparoscopic ultrasound: a surgical "must" for second line intra-operative evaluation of pancreatic cancer resectability. G Chir. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):5-8. |
| 11814511 | Background | Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1. |
| 21773858 | Background | Manyonda IT, Bratby M, Horst JS, Banu N, Gorti M, Belli AM. Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: impact on quality of life--results of the FUME (Fibroids of the Uterus: Myomectomy versus Embolization) Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Jun;35(3):530-6. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0228-5. Epub 2011 Jul 20. |
| 12719681 | Background | Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C. |