Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | OTHER |
| Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust | OTHER |
| Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to use a novel treatment approach, the artificial pancreas, after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) to improve glucose control with the anticipated improvements of residual C-peptide secretion.
This is an open-label, multicentre, single-period, randomised, parallel group design study. It is expected that a total of up to 190 subjects (aiming for 96 randomised subjects) will be recruited within ten working days of diagnosis of type 1 diabetes through paediatric diabetes centres in the UK. Half of the participants aged 10 to 16.9 years will be treated by conventional insulin injections and the other half by the artificial pancreas (closed loop insulin delivery system). Each treatment will last 24 months. All participants completing the 24 month study period will be invited to continue in an optional extension phase with the treatment allocated at randomisation for a further 24 months.
Subjects in the intervention group will receive additional training on components of the artificial pancreas, i.e. insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), prior to starting closed loop insulin delivery. Subjects in the control intervention group will continue with standard therapy, i.e. multiple daily injection therapy. The study includes up to 14 visits and 1 telephone/email contact for subjects completing the study. After run-in and randomisation, visits will be conducted every 3 months in both arms. Beta-cell function will be assessed by serial measurement of C-peptide in response to a standardised mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT). MMTTs will be conducted at baseline, 6-,12- and 24 months post diagnosis.
The primary outcome is the between group difference in the area under the stimulated C-peptide curve (AUC) of the MMTT at 12 month post diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include between group differences in stimulated C-peptide AUC over 24 months, differences in glycaemic control as assessed by HbA1c, time spent in glucose target range, glucose variability, hypo- and hyperglycaemia as recorded by periodically applied CGM, as well as insulin requirements and change in bodyweight. Additionally, cognitive, emotional and behavioural characteristics of participating subjects and parents will be assessed, and a cost utility analysis on the benefits of closed loop insulin delivery will be performed. Safety evaluation comprises assessment of the frequency of severe hypoglycaemic episodes, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and number, nature and severity of other adverse events.
Purpose of the study:
Primary objective:
Secondary Objectives:
Biochemical:
Human Factors: To assess cognitive, emotional, and behavioural characteristics of participating subjects and family members and their response to closed loop insulin delivery and clinical trial
Health economics: To perform cost utility analysis and inform reimbursement decision-making
Study design:
Sample Size:
Maximum duration of study for a subject:
Recruitment:
Consent
Screening and baseline assessment:
Eligible participants will undergo a screening evaluation including the following activities:
During a baseline visit, the following assessments/ interventions will be carried out at the clinical research facility:
Run in period:
Randomisation:
Eligible participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio using central randomisation software to either closed loop or standard therapy i.e. MDI.
Closed loop (interventional arm) Following randomisation, participants in the closed loop group will receive additional training sessions to cover key aspects of insulin pump use and CGM, prior to starting closed loop insulin delivery.
Once competent in the use of the study pump and CGM system, participants will receive training required for safe and effective use of the closed loop system. During a 2-4 hour session participants will operate the system under the supervision of the clinical team. Competency on the use of closed loop system will be evaluated. Thereafter, participants are expected to use closed loop for 24 months without supervision or remote monitoring. The 24 hour support helpline will be available in case of problems.
Multiple daily injections (control arm) Participants in the control group will receive additional training sessions following randomisation including a refresher on carbohydrate counting skills, and insulin dose adjustments.
Standard therapy (i.e. MDI) will be applied for 24 months. Participants will be allowed to switch to insulin pump therapy if clinically indicated.
Follow up assessments (3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, 15-, 18-, 21- months):
End of study assessments (24 months):
Procedures for safety monitoring during trial:
Criteria for withdrawal of patients on safety grounds:
A subject, parent, or guardian may terminate participation in the study at any time without necessarily giving a reason and without any personal disadvantage. An investigator can stop the participation of a subject after consideration of the benefit/risk ratio. Possible reasons are:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24/7 Closed loop delivery | Experimental | Unsupervised home use of day and night automated closed-loop insulin delivery system FlorenceM (Medtronic 640G insulin pump, guardian 3 CGM and Android smartphone) of CamAPS FX (Dana insulin pump, Dexcom G6 CGM and App on Android smartphone) until 24 months after diagnosis |
|
| Multiple Daily Injections | Active Comparator | Participants will apply standard insulin therapy using multiple daily injections via insulin pens during the 24 months control period |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop system (Florence M or CamAPS FX) | Device | The automated closed-loop system (FlorenceM) will consist of:
The automated closed-loop system (CamAPS FX) will consist of:
Rapid acting insulin analogue will be used (insulin aspart, insulin lispro, insulin glulisine or similar or ultra-rapid insulin analogue). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Area under the meal stimulated C-peptide curve (AUC) during a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) | 12 months post diagnosis |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean stimulated C-peptide AUC during a mixed meal tolerance test | Baseline, 6 months and 24 months post diagnosis | |
| HbA1c Levels | Both arms | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Severe hypoglycaemic episodes | Frequency of severe hypoglycaemic episodes | 24 month intervention period |
| Diabetes ketoacidosis | Frequency of severe diabetes ketoacidosis |
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes within previous 21 days. Day 1 will be defined as the day insulin was first administered. Type 1 diabetes will be defined according to WHO criteria using standard diagnostic practice.
[WHO definition: 'The aetiological type named type 1 encompasses the majority of cases with are primarily due to beta-cell destruction, and are prone to ketoacidosis. Type 1 includes those cases attributable to an autoimmune process, as well as those with beta-cell destruction for which neither an aetiology nor a pathogenesis is known (idiopathic). It does not include those forms of beta-cell destruction or failure to which specific causes can be assigned (e.g. cystic fibrosis, mitochondrial defects, etc.).']
The subject is at least 10 years and not older than 16.9 years
The subject/carer is willing to perform regular capillary blood glucose monitoring, with at least 4 blood glucose measurements taken every day
The subject is literate in English
The subject is willing to wear glucose sensor
The subject is willing to wear closed loop system at home
The subject is willing to follow study specific instructions
The subject is willing to upload pump and CGM data at regular intervals
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Roman Hovorka, PhD | Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, UK | Study Director |
| Ajay Thankamony, MD | Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, UK | Principal Investigator |
| Atrayee Ghatak, MD | Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool | Principal Investigator |
| Tabitha Randell, MD | Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, UK | Principal Investigator |
| Rachel Besser, MD | Oxford Children's Hospital, Oxford, UK | Principal Investigator |
| Nicola Trevelyan, MD | Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, UK | Principal Investigator |
| Daniela Elleri, MD | Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK | Principal Investigator |
| Fiona Campbell, MD | Leeds Children's Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southampton Children's Hospital | Southampton | Hampshire | SO16 6YD | United Kingdom | ||
| Nottingham Children's Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25819473 | Background | Hovorka R. Artificial Pancreas Project at Cambridge 2013. Diabet Med. 2015 Aug;32(8):987-92. doi: 10.1111/dme.12766. Epub 2015 Apr 15. | |
| 26379095 | Background | Thabit H, Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Leelarathna L, Hartnell S, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Dellweg S, Benesch C, Heinemann L, Mader JK, Holzer M, Kojzar H, Exall J, Yong J, Pichierri J, Barnard KD, Kollman C, Cheng P, Hindmarsh PC, Campbell FM, Arnolds S, Pieber TR, Evans ML, Dunger DB, Hovorka R; New Collective Author. Home Use of an Artificial Beta Cell in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2129-2140. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509351. Epub 2015 Sep 17. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D003922 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust |
| OTHER |
| University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust | OTHER |
| Jaeb Center for Health Research | OTHER |
| The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust | OTHER |
| University of Edinburgh | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Multiple Daily Injections | Other | Rapid acting insulin analogue and long acting insulin analogue will be subcutaneously administered using CE-marked insulin pen devices in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for their intended purposes. Participants will be given long acting analogue (insulin glargine, insulin detemir or similar) once or twice daily according to their needs and boluses of rapid acting analogue (insulin aspart, insulin lispro, insulin glulisine or similar or ultra-rapid insulin analogue) when carbohydrates are consumed. |
|
| Percentage of patients in each group with HbA1c <7.5% (58mmol/mol) | Both arms | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Percentage of time spent with sensor glucose readings in the target range (3.9 to 10mmol/l) | Both arms | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Mean sensor glucose level | Both arms | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Standard deviation of sensor glucose levels | Both arms | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Coefficient of variation of sensor levels | Both arms | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Percentage of time with sensor glucose levels <3.5 mmol/l and <2.8 mmol/l | Both arms | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Percentage of time spent below target glucose (3.9mmol/l) | Both arms | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| AUC of sensor glucose below 3.5mmol/l | Both arms | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Time spent with sensor glucose above target (10.0 mmol/l) | Both arms | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Time with sensor glucose levels in significant hyperglycaemia (glucose levels > 16.7 mmol/l) | Both arms | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Insulin Requirements | Total, basal and bolus insulin dose (U/kg). Both arms | Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Weight | Change in body mass index (BMI) standard deviation score. Both arms | Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Blood pressure | Both arms | Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Lipid profile | Both arms | Baseline, 12 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| 24 month intervention period |
| Adverse Events | Number, nature and severity of other adverse events. The period during which adverse events will be reported is defined as the period from the beginning of the study (obtaining informed consent) until 3 weeks after the end of the study participation | 24 month intervention period + 3 weeks |
| Serious Adverse Events | Number, nature and severity of serious adverse events. The period during which adverse events will be reported is defined as the period from the beginning of the study (obtaining informed consent) until 3 weeks after the end of the study participation | 24 month intervention period + 3 weeks |
| Assessment of the frequency of use of the closed loop system | Utility evaluation | 24 month intervention period |
| Assessment of the duration of use of the closed loop system. | Utility evaluation | 24 month intervention period |
| Cognitive Assessment | Assessment of cognitive changes using computerized cognitive testing. | Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Health Economic Evaluation | Cost utility analysis using the CORE Diabetes Model (CDM; IMS Health, Basel, Switzerland) on the benefits of closed loop insulin delivery to inform reimbursement decision-making. | 24 month intervention period |
| Quantitative Human Factor Assessment | Questionnaires will be completed by participants and parents/guardians. | Baseline,12 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Qualitative Human Factor Assessment | Interview and focus group with participants and parents/guardians. | 12 and 24 months post diagnosis |
| Nottingham |
| Nottinghamshire |
| NG5 1PB |
| United Kingdom |
| John Radcliffe Hospital | Oxford | Oxfordshire | OX3 9DU | United Kingdom |
| Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust | Liverpool | West Derby | L12 2AP | United Kingdom |
| St James's University Hospital | Leeds | West Yorkshire | LS9 7TF | United Kingdom |
| Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | Cambridge | CB2 0QQ | United Kingdom |
| Royal Hospital for Sick Children | Edinburgh | EH9 1LF | United Kingdom |
| 26740634 | Background | Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Wilinska ME, Thabit H, Stewart Z, Cheng P, Kollman C, Acerini CL, Dunger DB, Hovorka R. Day-and-Night Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Free-Living, Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Jul;39(7):1168-74. doi: 10.2337/dc15-2078. Epub 2016 Jan 6. |
| 36069870 | Derived | Boughton CK, Allen JM, Ware J, Wilinska ME, Hartnell S, Thankamony A, Randell T, Ghatak A, Besser REJ, Elleri D, Trevelyan N, Campbell FM, Sibayan J, Calhoun P, Bailey R, Dunseath G, Hovorka R; CLOuD Consortium. Closed-Loop Therapy and Preservation of C-Peptide Secretion in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 8;387(10):882-893. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2203496. |
| 34261348 | Derived | Rankin D, Kimbell B, Allen JM, Besser REJ, Boughton CK, Campbell F, Elleri D, Fuchs J, Ghatak A, Randell T, Thankamony A, Trevelyan N, Wilinska ME, Hovorka R, Lawton J. Adolescents' Experiences of Using a Smartphone Application Hosting a Closed-loop Algorithm to Manage Type 1 Diabetes in Everyday Life: Qualitative Study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Sep;15(5):1042-1051. doi: 10.1177/1932296821994201. Epub 2021 Jul 14. |
| 33472409 | Derived | Rankin D, Kimbell B, Hovorka R, Lawton J. Adolescents' and their parents' experiences of using a closed-loop system to manage type 1 diabetes in everyday life: qualitative study. Chronic Illn. 2022 Dec;18(4):742-756. doi: 10.1177/1742395320985924. Epub 2021 Jan 20. |
| 32169925 | Derived | Boughton C, Allen JM, Tauschmann M, Hartnell S, Wilinska ME, Musolino G, Acerini CL, Dunger PD, Campbell F, Ghatak A, Randell T, Besser R, Trevelyan N, Elleri D, Northam E, Hood K, Scott E, Lawton J, Roze S, Sibayan J, Kollman C, Cohen N, Todd J, Hovorka R; CLOuD Consortium. Assessing the effect of closed-loop insulin delivery from onset of type 1 diabetes in youth on residual beta-cell function compared to standard insulin therapy (CLOuD study): a randomised parallel study protocol. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 12;10(3):e033500. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033500. |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |