Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Optical Enhancement Technology might be superior to the conventional HD-WL in detecting colorectal adenomas
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world.Colonoscopy is the gold standard screening test for colorectal cancer.There are also emerging data to support that screening by colonoscopy reduces both the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer.However,Colonoscopy could still miss colorectal adenomas and even cancer.The miss rate for colonic adenomas was reported to be ranging from 15 to 32% in tandem colonoscopy studies.The reasons for the miss rate may be technical(insufficient during excessively fast instrument withdrawal),but may also be the imaging method.Smaller lesions ,particularly flat ones ,may be missed as a result of their subtle appearance and limited contrast in relation to the surrounding mucosa.
Some image-enhanced modules were developed with an aim to improve colorectal polyp or adenoma detection.The widely available modules is the narrow band imaging(NBI).However,most studies failed to demonstrate any superiority of NBI system over white light colonoscopy in detecting colonic polyps.NBI provides dimmer images of the colonic mucosa ,which may limit its performance on polyp and adenoma detection.
Like NBI,OE technology is image-enhanced module,providing a more intense look at the vascular pattern morphology.Besides,OE technology provides an much brighter image compared to NBI.This may possibly increase polyp detection by enhancing visibility of the colonic mucosa with brighter image.The current study aims to tested whether OE technology would improve adenoma detection when compared with high-definition colonoscopy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Active Comparator | white light was used for both insertion and withdrawal of the colonoscope |
|
| Group B | Experimental | Insertion to cecum was performed under white light and once the cecum was reached,the OE mode was swithed on during withdrawal of endoscope for complete colonic examination |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| white light was used for colonoscopy withdrawal | Procedure |
| ||
| OE mode was used for colonoscopy withdrawal |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| adenoma detection rate | 6 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yanqing Li, MD, PhD | Contact | 86-531-82169236 | liyanqing@sdu.edu.cn |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yanqing Li, MD, PhD | Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University | Jinan | Shandong | 250012 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17681999 | Background | Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS, Abou-Rebyeh H, Schachschal G, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Khalifa AC, Setka E, Koch M, Wiedenmann B, Rosch T. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut. 2008 Jan;57(1):59-64. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.123539. Epub 2007 Aug 6. | |
| 20628363 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003111 | Colonic Polyps |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007417 | Intestinal Polyps |
| D011127 | Polyps |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Procedure |
|
| Background |
| Aminalai A, Rosch T, Aschenbeck J, Mayr M, Drossel R, Schroder A, Scheel M, Treytnar D, Gauger U, Stange G, Simon F, Adler A. Live image processing does not increase adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison between FICE and conventional imaging (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 5, BECOP-5). Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;105(11):2383-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.273. Epub 2010 Jul 13. |