Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of an experimental dentifrice containing stannous fluoride, an established dentine tubule occlusion technology, at reducing dentine hypersensitivity (DH) compared to a negative control dentifrice. The test and control dentifrices will be administered for a total of 8 weeks, with assessments (via evaporative air and tactile stimuli) at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks twice-daily use.
This single centre, randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, 2 treatment arm, parallel group design study, stratified by maximum baseline Schiff sensitivity score (of the two selected teeth), with a treatment period of 8 weeks will investigate the clinical effectiveness of an experimental stannous fluoride dentifrice in the reduction of DH. DH will be assessed at Baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks treatment to monitor clinical efficacy and safety.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test Dentifrice: Stannous fluoride (SnF2) | Experimental | Participants were instructed to apply a strip of dentifrice containing 0.454% stannous fluoride (SnF2) and 0.072% sodium fluoride (NaF) (1450 parts per million [ppm] fluoride in total) to cover the head of the toothbrush and brush their teeth for 1 timed minute, twice daily (morning and evening), following their normal routine. Participants were also permitted to rinse with tap water. |
|
| Negative Control Dentifrice: Sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP) | Active Comparator | Participants were instructed to apply a strip of dentifrice containing 1400ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP) to cover the head of the toothbrush and brush their teeth for 1 timed minute, twice daily (morning and evening), following their normal routine. Participants were also permitted to rinse with tap water. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stannous fluoride (SnF2) | Other | Dentifrice containing 0.454% weight by weight (w/w) SnF2 and 0.072% w/w NaF |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8 | The examiner assessed the participant's response to the evaporative air stimulus, after the stimulation of each individual tooth, using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale as follows: 0 Participant does not respond to air stimulation, 1 Participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus, 3 Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity. | At Baseline and Week 8 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4 | The examiner assessed the participant's response to the evaporative air stimulus, after the stimulation of each individual tooth, using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale as follows: 0 Participant does not respond to air stimulation, 1 Participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus, 3 Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Wuhan | 430079 | China |
A total of 273 participants were screened, out of which 135 participants were randomized to the study. 138 participants were not randomized because out of these, 135 participants did not meet the study criteria and 3 participants withdrew consent.
All participants were recruited at a single center in China.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Test Dentifrice: Stannous Fluoride (SnF2) | Participants were instructed to apply a strip of dentifrice containing 0.454% stannous fluoride (SnF2) and 0.072% sodium fluoride (NaF) (1450 parts per million [ppm] fluoride in total) to cover the head of the toothbrush and brush their teeth for 1 timed minute, twice daily (morning and evening), following their normal routine. Participants were also permitted to rinse with tap water. |
| FG001 | Negative Control Dentifrice: Sodium Monofluorophosphate (SMFP) | Participants were instructed to apply a strip of dentifrice containing 1400ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP) to cover the head of the toothbrush and brush their teeth for 1 timed minute, twice daily (morning and evening), following their normal routine. Participants were also permitted to rinse with tap water. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all the participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of the study treatment and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Test Dentifrice: Stannous Fluoride (SnF2) | Participants were instructed to apply a strip of dentifrice containing 0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF (1450 ppm fluoride in total) to cover the head of the toothbrush and brush their teeth for 1 timed minute, twice daily (morning and evening), following their normal routine. Participants were also permitted to rinse with tap water. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8 | The examiner assessed the participant's response to the evaporative air stimulus, after the stimulation of each individual tooth, using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale as follows: 0 Participant does not respond to air stimulation, 1 Participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus, 3 Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity. | ITT population included all participants who were randomized, received the study treatment at least once and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At Baseline and Week 8 |
|
Approximately 64 days
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Test Dentifrice: Stannous Fluoride (SnF2) | Participants were instructed to apply a strip of dentifrice containing 0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF (1450 ppm fluoride in total) to cover the head of the toothbrush and brush their teeth for 1 timed minute, twice daily (morning and evening), following their normal routine. Participants were also permitted to rinse with tap water. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 | GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003807 | Dentin Sensitivity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014002 | Tin Fluorides |
| C012980 | fluorophosphate |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005459 | Fluorides |
| D006858 | Hydrofluoric Acid |
| D017611 | Fluorine Compounds |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP) | Other | Dentifrice containing 1400 ppm fluoride as SMFP |
|
| At Baseline and Week 4 |
| Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold at Week 4 and 8 | The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force has reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g. | At Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 |
| BG001 | Negative Control Dentifrice: Sodium Monofluorophosphate (SMFP) | Participants were instructed to apply a strip of dentifrice containing 1400ppm fluoride SMFP to cover the head of the toothbrush and brush their teeth for 1 timed minute, twice daily (morning and evening), following their normal routine. Participants were also permitted to rinse with tap water. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Schiff Sensitivity Score at Baseline | The examiner assessed the participant's response to evaporative air stimulus, after the stimulation of each individual tooth, using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale as follows: 0 Participant does not respond to air stimulation, 1 Participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus, 3 Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity. | This baseline measurement was performed on ITT population, defined as all participants who were randomized, received study treatment at least once & provided at least one post-baseline (post treatment) assessment of efficacy. | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| Tactile Threshold at Baseline | The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force has reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g. | This baseline measurement was performed on ITT population, defined as all participants who were randomized, received study treatment at least once & provided at least one post-baseline (post treatment) assessment of efficacy. | Mean | Standard Deviation | gram (g) |
|
Participants were instructed to apply a strip of dentifrice containing 0.454% SnF2 and 0.072% NaF (1450 ppm fluoride in total) to cover the head of the toothbrush and brush their teeth for 1 timed minute, twice daily (morning and evening), following their normal routine. Participants were also permitted to rinse with tap water. |
| OG001 | Negative Control Dentifrice: Sodium Monofluorophosphate (SMFP) | Participants were instructed to apply a strip of dentifrice containing 1400ppm fluoride SMFP to cover the head of the toothbrush and brush their teeth for 1 timed minute, twice daily (morning and evening), following their normal routine. Participants were also permitted to rinse with tap water. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4 | The examiner assessed the participant's response to the evaporative air stimulus, after the stimulation of each individual tooth, using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale as follows: 0 Participant does not respond to air stimulation, 1 Participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus, 3 Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity. | ITT population included all participants who were randomized, received the study treatment at least once and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants analyzed is number of participants from ITT population evaluated at Week 4. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At Baseline and Week 4 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold at Week 4 and 8 | The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force has reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g. | ITT population included all participants who were randomized, received the study treatment at least once and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants analyzed is the number of participants from ITT population evaluated at specific time point for each treatment arm respectively. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | g | At Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 67 |
| 0 |
| 67 |
| 0 |
| 67 |
| EG001 | Negative Control Dentifrice: Sodium Monofluorophosphate (SMFP) | Participants were instructed to apply a strip of dentifrice containing 1400ppm fluoride as SMFP to cover the head of the toothbrush and brush with assigned dentifrice twice daily (morning and evening) for 1 timed minute. Participants were permitted to rinse with tap water. | 0 | 68 | 0 | 68 | 0 | 68 |
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| D017971 |
| Tin Compounds |
| D002327 | Cariostatic Agents |
| D001697 | Biomedical and Dental Materials |
| D008420 | Manufactured Materials |
| D013676 | Technology, Industry, and Agriculture |
| Change from baseline at Week 8 |
|
|