Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Givinostat in Ambulant Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Givinostat in Ambulant Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Primary Objective
The primary objective of the study was to establish the effects of givinostat versus placebo administered chronically over 18 months to slow disease progression in ambulant DMD subjects.
Secondary Objectives
The secondary objectives of this study were:
This was a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of givinostat in ambulant subjects with DMD. This study included ambulant male paediatric subjects aged ≥ 6 years at baseline affected by DMD.
A total of 179 male ambulant subjects was randomized 2:1 (givinostat: placebo).
Subjects were stratified for their concomitant use of steroids in 4 strata:
Givinostat or placebo oral suspension (10 mg/mL) was administered orally as 2 oral doses daily while the subject were in fed state, according to the child's weight.
Study drug should have been permanently stopped if any of the following occurred:
Study drug should have been temporarily stopped if any of the following occurred:
In case the study drug was temporarily stopped, the study drug could be resumed at a level 20% smaller than the one at which the Adverse Event leading to temporary stop occurred, once platelets and/or white blood cell and/or hemoglobin normalized and/or triglycerides returned to levels below 300 mg/dL (3.42 mmol/L) or diarrhoea was mild.
In addition, in case a subject had a consistent (e.g., at least 2 consecutive evaluations) platelets count ≤150 x 10^9/L and didn't meet the stopping criteria for platelets, the Investigator should have to reduce the dose by 20% of the current dose.
Only one dose reduction was allowed during the treatment period.
This trial design a single planned interim analysis. The interim was governed by an IDMC in order to solely assess futility.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
At the discretion of the Investigator, subjects not meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria may be re-screened twice with an interval of at least 3 months between assessments.
Davis, California 95817, United States
San Diego, California 92123, United States
Hartford, Connecticut 06106, United States
St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
Liège, 04000, Belgium
Calgary, Alberta T3B6A8, Canada
Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3V4, Canada
Nantes, 44093, France
Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Petah Tikva, 4920235, Israel
Genova, 16147, Italy
Milan, 20122, Italy
Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona 08950, Spain
London, EC1N 1EH, United Kingdom
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, United Kingdom