| Primary | Change From Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 29 (Visit 4) in the Subject-reported Dry Eye Symptom Questionnaire. | Dry Eye symptoms were obtained using the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaire. The questionnaire utilizes separate Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for the frequency and the Severity of symptoms. The scores range from 0 to 100 where 0 = Rarely or Very Mild, and 100 = All the Time or Very Severe for the Frequency and Severity of the symptoms, respectively. The Global Score as reported in the Primary Outcome is obtained by taking the square root of the product of the frequency score multiplied by the severity score. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | The modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT) include all randomized subjects who have at least a baseline and one post-baseline symptom questionnaire part 1 assessment. This is the primary population for efficacy analyses and subjects are analyzed based on their randomized treatment. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | | Baseline to Day 29 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo Ophthalmic Solution | Subject received Placebo TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) | | OG001 | 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution | Subjects received 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) |
| | | Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| Baseline | - ParticipantsOG00022
- ParticipantsOG00123
| |
| | Group IDs | Group Description | Statistical Method | Statistical Comment | P-Value | P-Value Comment | Parameter Type | Parameter Value | Dispersion Type | Dispersion Value | Confidence Interval Sides | Confidence Interval % | CI Lower Limit | CI Upper Limit | CI Lower Limit Comment | CI Upper Limit Comment | Estimate Comment | Tested Non-Inferiority | Non-Inferiority Type | Non-Inferiority Comment | Other Analysis Description |
|---|
| Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline to Day 29 in the Subject Reported Dry Eye Questionnaire | Mixed Models Analysis | | 0.749 | | Mean Difference (Net) | -1.88 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | -13.696 | 9.936 | | | | | Superiority | | |
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 29 in Symptom Frequency Scores | Dry Eye symptom frequency was obtained using the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaire. The questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The scores range from 0 to 100 where 0 = Rarely and 100 = All the Time. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | The modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT) include all randomized subjects who have at least a baseline and one post-baseline symptom questionnaire part 1 assessment. This is the primary population for efficacy analyses and subjects are analyzed based on their randomized treatment. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | | Baseline to Day 29 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo Ophthalmic Solution | Subject received Placebo TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) | | OG001 | 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution | Subjects received 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 29 in Symptom Severity Scores | Dry Eye symptom severity was obtained using the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaire. The questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal Visual Analog Scales (VAS). The scores range from 0 to 100 where 0 = Very Mild and 100 = Very Severe. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | The modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT) include all randomized subjects who have at least a baseline and one post-baseline symptom questionnaire part 1 assessment. This is the primary population for efficacy analyses and subjects are analyzed based on their randomized treatment. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | | Baseline to Day 29 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo Ophthalmic Solution | Subject received Placebo TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) | | OG001 | 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution | Subjects received 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Day 29 in Fluorescein Staining of the Cornea. | Corneal staining was performed to grade the corneal epithelial cell injury as measured by fluorescence using slit lamp examination. The staining was graded with the NEI scale. The corneal surface is divided into 5 corneal regions (1, Central; 2, Inferior; 3, Nasal; 4, Temporal; 5, Superior). The scores for each of these 5 regions ranged from 0 to 3 (0=no staining; 1=staining with low density; 2=staining with moderate density; 3=staining with severe density). The total staining score (sum of all regions, maximal score =15) is reported. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | The modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT) include all randomized subjects who have at least a baseline and one post-baseline symptom questionnaire part 1 assessment. This is the primary population for efficacy analyses and subjects are analyzed based on their randomized treatment. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | | Baseline to Day 29 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo Ophthalmic Solution | Subject received Placebo TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) | | OG001 | 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution | Subjects received 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) |
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Day 29 in Lissamine Green Staining of the Conjunctiva. | Conjunctival staining was performed to grade the conjunctival epithelial cell injury as measured by Lissamine Green using slit-lamp examination. The staining was graded with the NEI scale. The bulbar conjunctival surface is divided into 6 regions (1, Temporal; 2 Temporal Superior; 3, Temporal Inferior; 4, Nasal Superior; 5, Nasal Inferior; 6, Nasal). The scores for each of these 6 regions ranged from 0 to 3 (0=no staining; 1=staining with low density; 2=staining with moderate density; 3=staining with severe density). The total staining score (sum of all regions, maximal score =18) is reported. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | The modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT) include all randomized subjects who have at least a baseline and one post-baseline symptom questionnaire part 1 assessment. This is the primary population for efficacy analyses and subjects are analyzed based on their randomized treatment. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | | Baseline to Day 29 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo Ophthalmic Solution | Subject received Placebo TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) | | OG001 | 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution | Subjects received 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) |
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With at Least 20% Improvement in Symptoms From Baseline to Day 29 | Improvement in symptoms was evaluated using the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaire. The questionnaire utilizes separate Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for the frequency and the Severity of symptoms. The scores range from 0 to 100 where 0 = Rarely or Very Mild, and 100 = All the Time or Very Severe for the Frequency and Severity of the symptoms, respectively. The Global Score is obtained by taking the square root of the product of the frequency score multiplied by the severity score. Lower scores indicate improvement in symptoms. | The modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT) include all randomized subjects who have at least a baseline and one post-baseline symptom questionnaire part 1 assessment. For this outcome, only participants that completed the treatment were analyzed | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Baseline to Day 29 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo Ophthalmic Solution | Subject received Placebo TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) | | OG001 | 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution | Subjects received 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 15 (Visit 3) in the Subject-reported Dry Eye Symptom Score. | Dry Eye symptoms were obtained using the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaire. The questionnaire utilizes separate Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for the frequency and the Severity of symptoms. The scores range from 0 to 100 where 0 = Rarely or Very Mild, and 100 = All the Time or Very Severe for the Frequency and Severity of the symptoms, respectively. The Global Score as reported in the Primary Outcome is obtained by taking the square root of the product of the frequency score multiplied by the severity score. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | The modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT) include all randomized subjects who have at least a baseline and one post-baseline symptom questionnaire part 1 assessment. This is the primary population for efficacy analyses and subjects are analyzed based on their randomized treatment. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | | Baseline to Day 15 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo Ophthalmic Solution | Subject received Placebo TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) | | OG001 | 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution | Subjects received 0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution TID administration in both eyes from Visit 2 (Randomization - Treatment Day 1) through the day before Visit 4 (Treatment Day 29) |
|