Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This prospective, clinical, observational trial compares the measured value with quantitative ultrasonic (preoperatively) Elastic modulus E (kPA) with the measured value with quantitative ultrasonic Elastic modulus E (kPA) in vitro (postoperatively) and with the experimental measurement done in vitro (postoperatively) of lower uterine segment of women who underwent second cesarean section.
In 1991, 126.297 (15.3%) women delivered by caesarean section in Germany. Since then, the rate of caesarean section increased steadily over the next 20 years, reaching up to 32.2% in 2011. The absolute risk of uterine rupture in vaginal birth after Caesarean section is 1 in 100 deliveries. The risk of perinatal death or the outcome of extremely neurological impairment is 1 in 1000 deliveries.
Statistically more than 300 pregnant women with a prior caesarean delivery visit daily ultrasound departments of german hospitals to investigate the C-section scar before delivery. They have one important question: Is it possible to predict successful trial of labor after cesarean delivery? The information for the risk of uterine rupture remains insufficient based only on ultrasonography assessment.
What are the possibilities of additional parameters to examine the stability of uterine scar tissue? Currently, there is no defined cut-off value of scar thickness for the prediction of uterine rupture. It remains questionable whether the thickness of the lower uterine segment is the determinant factor for the stability of the scar and the probability of rupture. However, another important factor is the functional elasticity or the structure of the connective tissue. It has not been further investigated until now (both quantitatively and qualitatively).
Objective of this project: Multimodalities of assessments, including ultrasonography and elastography, validate the accuracy of uterine scar stability in women with previous history of Caesarean section in vitro and in vivo.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| In vitro Ultrasonic Elastic Modulus versus in vitro tensile property measurements of LUS | The measured value of lower uterine segment with quantitative ultrasonic Elastic modulus E (kPA) in vitro versus the experimental tensile property measurements of lower uterine segment done in vitro. (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient) | within 1 hour after Cesarean Section |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference - In vivo Ultrasonic Elastic Modulus versus in vitro tensile property measurements of LUS | The measured value of lower uterine segment with quantitative ultrasonic (preoperatively) Elastic modulus E (kPA) in vivo versus the experimental tensile property measurements of lower uterine segment done in vitro (postoperatively). (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient) | within 1 hour after Cesarean Section |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Women with pregnancies after previous cesarean section who referre to the tertiary referral care center.
Pregnant women have been scheduled for a consecutive Caesarean section.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gregor Seliger, MD | Maternity Clinic/Perinatal Treatment Center, Halle university hospital, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg | Principal Investigator |
| Michael Tchirikov, MD | Maternity Clinic/Perinatal Treatment Center, Halle university hospital, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternity Clinic/Perinatal Treatment Center, Halle university hospital, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg | Halle | Saxony-Anhalt | 06120 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23090468 | Background | Varner M. Cesarean scar imaging and prediction of subsequent obstetric complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;55(4):988-96. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318263c699. | |
| 16458657 | Background | Pollio F, Staibano S, Mascolo M, Salvatore G, Persico F, De Falco M, Di Lieto A. Uterine dehiscence in term pregnant patients with one previous cesarean delivery: growth factor immunoexpression and collagen content in the scarred lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;194(2):527-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.048. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Citations | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Scar tissue is placed in formalin and embedded in paraffin.
| Citations | View source |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002921 | Cicatrix |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005355 | Fibrosis |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided