Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFU-GETUG 25 | Other Identifier | Unicancer | |
| 2014-004678-41 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute, France | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis is a rare tumor in Europe, whose prognosis and survival are influenced by metastatic lymph node involvement. Its frequency in France is estimated at less than 1% of human cancers. This spread follows a sequential process via the superficial and deep inguinal lymph nodes and then to the pelvic lymph nodes before metastatic dissemination.
The management of inguinal areas is the cornerstone of penile cancer. It is curative in about 80% of patients with 1 or 2 inguinal metastases. 5-years overall survival was on average 85% for pN0 patients and 40% for pN+ patients. For pN+ patients, 5-year overall survival was 70 to 80% for pN1 (only 1 lymph node invasion), 30 to 40% for pN2, and 0 to 10% for pN3.
The risk of local recurrence is 5-10% for pN0 and 20-30% for pN+ after local treatment by lymphadenectomy alone without chemotherapy. The average time to recurrence was 10 months. Disease-free survival at 5 years is 75-85% for pN0 and 30-45% for pN+. Its indication depends on clinical examination (presence or absence of lymph nodes palpated) and the risk of nodal disease (≥pT1bG2).
Currently, a fine needle biopsy is the best clinical diagnosis method because it is a simple, low risk, and possible in consultation. When the result is positive, it allows an early dissection. Single or double fine needle biopsy will be used in cN+ patients. For patients at risk of lymp nodes involvement (cN0 and ≥pT1B or G2), the sentinel node diagnosis may be followed by modified or bilateral lymphadenectomy.
Although lymphadenectomy alone has a curator action, it sometimes remains insufficient in patients with metastatic lymph node involvement. Therefore it seems important to develop a multimodal approach in the management of these patients in order to increase the response rate to treatment and survival.
From a Phase II trial conducted on 30 patients, the combination TIP (paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin) appears to have an efficacy / toxicity acceptable.
The TIP protocol has therefore been chosen for this trial as adjuvant or neo-adjuvant treatment in patients with high risk of lymph nodes involvement (cN0 and ≥pT1B or G2), and with inguinal mobile palpated lymph nodes (cN+) respectively, after lymph nodes involvement proven (pN+).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| A-Adjuvant Chemotherapy TIP | Experimental | Lymphadenectomy (+/- sentinel node) + adjuvant chemotherapy TIP modified bilateral lymphadenectomy 4 cycles every 21 days |
|
| B-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy TIP | Experimental | fine needle biopsy or sentinel node + neoadjuvant chemotherapy TIP followed by a lymphadenectomy modified bilateral lymphadenectomy 4 cycles every 21 days |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemotherapy TIP | Drug | Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| survival without locoregional lymph node recurrence | checked by inguinal ultrasound | 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Complete response rate for patients in neoadjuvant chemotherapy | lack of residual tumor post surgical histopathology | 6 months |
| Survival without locoregional lymph node recurrence | time between inclusion and locoregional recurrence or last evaluation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jérôme Rigaud, Professor | Nantes University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICO-Paul Papin | Angers | 49055 | France | |||
| Chr Besancon |
Individual Participant Data will not be shared at an individual level. Those data will be part of the study database including all enrolled patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 3 years |
| Survival without metastasis | time between inclusion and the date of occurrence of metastases | 3 years |
| Specific survival | time between inclusion and date of death from penile cancer or treatment-related complication | 3 years |
| Overall survival | time between inclusion and the death regardless of cause | 3 years |
| Acute and late toxicity during the study | The National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03) is widely accepted in the community of oncology research as the leading rating scale for adverse events. This scale, divided into 5 grades (1 = "mild", 2 = "moderate", 3 = "severe", 4 = "life-threatening", and 5 = "death") determined by the investigator, will make it possible to assess the severity of the disorders. | Throughout study completion, up to 3 years |
| Quality of life questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30) | Developed by the EORTC, this self-reported questionnaire assesses the health-related quality of life of cancer patients in clinical trials. The questionnaire includes five functional scales (physical, everyday activity, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), a health/quality of life overall scale, and a number of additional elements assessing common symptoms (including dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea), as well as, the perceived financial impact of the disease. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. | baseline, during treatment (C3J42), 6 month, 1 year |
| Besançon |
| 25000 |
| France |
| Hôpital SAINT ANDRE | Bordeaux | 33075 | France |
| Centre FRANCOIS BACLESSE | Caen | 14076 | France |
| Chru Gabriel Montpied | Clermont-Ferrand | 63000 | France |
| Ch de Limoges | Limoges | 87042 | France |
| Centre Leon Berard | Lyon | 69008 | France |
| Chu Lyon Sud | Lyon | 69310 | France |
| Institut Paoli-Calmettes | Marseille | 13273 | France |
| Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine | Nancy | 54519 | France |
| Clinique Urologique- Chu Hotel Dieu | Nantes | 44093 | France |
| Institut de Cancerologie Du Gard - Centre Oncogard | Nîmes | 300029 | France |
| Hopital Saint Louis | Paris | 75010 | France |
| Chu de Rouen | Rouen | 76031 | France |
| ICO-René Gauducheau | Saint-Herblain | 44805 | France |
| Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg | Strasbourg | 67091 | France |
| Institut Claudius Regaud | Toulouse | 31059 | France |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010412 | Penile Neoplasms |
| D002294 | Carcinoma, Squamous Cell |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D010409 | Penile Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D018307 | Neoplasms, Squamous Cell |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017239 | Paclitaxel |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D043823 | Taxoids |
| D043822 | Cyclodecanes |
| D003516 | Cycloparaffins |
| D006840 | Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D004224 | Diterpenes |
| D013729 | Terpenes |
Not provided
Not provided