Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The procedure is supposed to ablate the sacral lateral branches that form the medial cluneal nerves (MCN). The anatomy of the sacral lateral branches is such that, in addition to innervating the SIJ, distal branches of these nerves also innervate the skin over the buttock through MCN (12,13). SLB blocks (usually with 0.5 ml of 1% Lidocaine or 0.5% Bupivacaine) are performed proximal to the origin of both the nerves to the SIJ and the cutaneous branches. Therefore, a technically accurate block should anesthetize not only the SIJ but also the skin of the buttock regardless of the patient symptoms. Hypoesthesia of the buttock would, therefore, be a quality-assurance sign that the block has been performed in a technically correct fashion. Similarly, if the target nerves have been accurately ablated by RFA hypoesthesia of the buttock should ensue, as an expected effect of the procedure.
Typical standard of care for these patients is initial visit followed by two diagnostic blocks ((0.5 ml) of 1 % Lidocaine per level). They are asked to complete the pain diary and if they experience a 75% or more decrease in the NRS, they are scheduled for Cooled RFA of the lateral branches of S1, S2, and S3 dorsal rami nerves and of the dorsal ramus of L5 nerve.
If patients do not experience adequate pain relief after either of these injections, it is determined that the cooled RFA procedure will not work for them. Therefore, if they fail to receive adequate pain relief after either of these two injections, they will exit the study and other alternatives will be explored. The patient will also exit the study if they fail to achieve success 1 month after RFA treatment. The treatment of the study patients will not deviate from the standard of care.
All study Patients
Data to be collected The following data will be collected for each patient: Name, MRN, date of visit, NRS scores, ODI information, concomitant meds, pain diary, treatment satisfaction, and sensory exam info.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation | Other | This is a single arm, prospective observational study. All subjects enrolled are patients that meet the inclusion criteria, as deemed by a physician. Typical standard of care for these patients is an initial visit followed by two diagnostic blocks ((0.5ml) of 1% Lidocaine per level). Subjects are asked to complete the pain diary and if they experience a 75% or more decrease in the NRS, they are scheduled for Cooled RFA of the lateral branches of S1, S2, and S3 dorsal rami nerves and of the dorsal ramus of L5 nerve. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooled RFA of sacral lateral branches | Procedure | A single target will be identified at the junction of the sacral ala and S1 superior articular process, corresponding to the location of the L5 dorsal ramus. Then, utilizing a stainless steel Epsilon Ruler (Kimberly Clark, Irving, TX, USA), three targets will be localized 8-10 mm lateral to the S1 and S2 posterior sacral foramen at the 2:30, 4:00, and 5:30 positions. Two targets will be localized at the S3 level. Local infiltration with 1% lidocaine and minimal sedation with IV midazolam will be utilized. Once suitable sensory and motor stimulation are verified and impedance is acceptable, each target will be anesthetized with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine prior to each lesion being created at 60 degrees centigrade for 2 minutes and 30 seconds. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Absence/ presence of post-procedural buttock hypoesthesia | 6 months postprocedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Numeric pain rating scale (0-10) | 6-month postprocedure | |
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) | 6-month postprocedure | |
| Analgesic consumption |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yakov Vorobeychik | Hershey Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penn State Hershey Medical Center | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | 1.Patel, Gross, Brown, et al. A randomized,placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of lateral branch neurotomy for chronic sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Med 2012;13:383-98. 3.Tubbs, Levin, Loukas, et al. Anatomy and landmarks for the superior and middle cluneal nerves: Application to posterior iliac crest harvest and entrapment syndromes. J Neurosurg Spine 2010;13:356-569. 4 Roberts S, Burnham R, Ravichandiran K, et al. Cadaveric study of sacroiliac joint innervation: implications for diagnostic blocks and radiofrequency ablation. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Madicine 2014; 39:1-9 5. Bogduk N. (ed). Practice Guidelines for Spinal Diagnostic and Treatment Procedures, 2nd edn. International Spine Intervention Society, San Francisco, 2013 6. Kapural, Stojanovic, Bensitel. et al. Cooled Radiofrequency (RF) of L5 dorsal ramus for RF denervation of the sacroiliac joint: technical report. Pain Med. 2010; 11:53-7 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 6-month postprocedure |
| Patient satisfaction with the treatment? | Binary "Yes" or "No" answer. | 6-month postprocedure |