Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01AI116787-02 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) | NIH |
| Perinatal HIV Research Unit of the University of the Witswatersrand | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare three strategies for finding TB cases in a rural Sub-Saharan African setting: 1) Screening all attendees of primary care clinics for TB; 2) Conducting household contact investigations of newly diagnosed TB cases; 3) Providing incentives to newly diagnosed TB cases and their contacts to promote contact screening for TB. For each intervention, investigators will measure comparative effectiveness in terms of cases identified as well as the cost-effectiveness and feasibility of implementation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility-based screening | Experimental | This strategy will be implemented at all clinics (n=28) within this arm for 18 months. Study staff will encourage providers at each of the clinics to screen all consenting patients attending the clinic, regardless of the original reason for clinic presentation. Upon presenting for care (e.g., while waiting for their healthcare provider), patients will be informed about the study and screened for cough of any duration, fever, weight loss, or night sweats. Participants who are symptomatic and provide a sputum specimen (according to the clinic standard of care) will be given a study flyer informing them that they may be contacted by study staff, and a brief summary of the study. Per standard of care, all sputum samples will be sent to the local National Health Laboratory Service laboratory for Xpert testing. |
|
| Contact screening | Experimental | This arm is comprised of two sub-arms: In the household contact screening sub-arm, a mobile field team visits the household of each consenting newly diagnosed pulmonary TB index case. Each visit consists of a household census, consent of all eligible household members for TB screening, administration of a brief questionnaire, sputum collection for testing with Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)/rifampin (RIF) and the offer of HIV testing. In the incentive-based contact screening sub-arm, all consenting newly diagnosed active TB cases are provided with 10 coupons for free TB screening to give to close contacts. When a contact presents at clinic with a coupon, they and the index case each receive a small amount of money. If the contact is diagnosed with active TB and starts treatment, the index case receives an additional larger amount of money. Each contact receives a brief questionnaire, TB symptom screen, optional HIV testing, and sputum sample collection for Xpert MTB/RIF. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active TB case finding | Other | Active TB case finding (ACF) refers to any number of strategies used to identify individuals with active TB disease, outside of passive case finding. In passive case finding, individuals with symptoms present at health centers for diagnosis. In active case finding, the health system makes an effort to identify TB cases before they present passively. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Initiation Ratio in Facility Versus Contact Investigation Clinics | The primary analysis was based on the facility- level rate ratio, and we first calculated an unadjusted ratio of the treatment initiation rates between the two arms and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We then adjusted for any residual confounding by district stratification and the historical annual number of people started on TB following a two-stage approach. The first step of this approach fits a Poisson regression to the facility-level counts and the district and historical volume covariates irrespective of study arm. The residuals ratios, calculated as the ratio of the observed over the expected counts, are then used in the second stage to estimate the between-arm rate ratio and the corresponding 95% CI. | 18 months |
| Comparative Treatment Initiation Ratio in the Incentive-based Versus Household-based Contact Investigation Arms | The primary outcome of the study was the comparative number of people with incident TB diagnosed and started on treatment at study clinics in the two contact tracing arms, excluding the six-month washout period. | 36 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparative Number of Secondary TB Cases Identified in Incentive-based Versus Household-based Contact Tracing | The pre-specified secondary study outcome was the number of Xpert-based TB diagnoses made among enrolled contacts ("secondary cases") by arm. | 36 months |
| Total Cost of Household Contact Investigation Strategies |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Facility-based screening arm
Contact tracing arm- Index Case
Contact tracing arm- Household Contact
Contact tracing arm- Non-household Close Contact
Exclusion Criteria (all arms):
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Dowdy, MD, PhD | Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vhembe health subdistrict | Louis Trichardt | Limpopo | South Africa | |||
| Waterberg health subdistrict |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34212181 | Derived | Baik Y, Hanrahan CF, Mmolawa L, Nonyane BAS, Albaugh NW, Lebina L, Siwelana T, Martinson N, Dowdy DW. Conditional Cash Transfers to Incentivize Tuberculosis Screening: Description of a Novel Strategy for Contact Investigation in Rural South Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 23;74(6):957-964. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab601. | |
| 31039165 | Derived | Hanrahan CF, Nonyane BAS, Mmolawa L, West NS, Siwelana T, Lebina L, Martinson N, Dowdy DW. Contact tracing versus facility-based screening for active TB case finding in rural South Africa: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial (Kharitode TB). PLoS Med. 2019 Apr 30;16(4):e1002796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002796. eCollection 2019 Apr. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Facility-based Screening Arm | This strategy will be implemented at all clinics (n=28) within this arm for 18 months. Study staff will encourage providers at each of the clinics to screen all consenting patients attending the clinic, regardless of the original reason for clinic presentation. Upon presenting for care (e.g., while waiting for their healthcare provider), patients will be informed about the study and screened for cough of any duration, fever, weight loss, or night sweats. Participants who are symptomatic and provide a sputum specimen (according to the clinic standard of care) will be given a study flyer informing them that they may be contacted by our study staff, and a brief summary of the study. Per standard of care, all sputum samples will be sent to the local National Health Laboratory Service laboratory for Xpert testing. |
| FG001 | Contact Tracing Household-based Sub-arm | This strategy will be implemented for 18 months at half of the clinics within the contact tracing arm (n=14) and, after a six-month washout period, for 18 months in the other half of the clinics in that arm (n = 14). All adults (and guardians for children) with newly diagnosed pulmonary TB will be approached for enrolment as described above. Consenting patients (estimated as 1,575 subjects) will be asked for a home address (with landmarks), mobile phone number, and convenient time for a household visit. A mobile field team consisting of a nurse and lay health worker (both research staff) will circulate between the 14 primary care clinics, with notifications of all new TB cases made from the clinic to the team by mobile phone. The field team will visit the household of each consenting index case within two weeks of notification; each visit will consist of a household census (including demographic data), consent of all eligible household members for questioning and TB screening, administration of a brief questionnaire (including symptomatology, self-reported HIV and TB history, care-seeking behavior, and acceptability of the intervention), and sputum collection for testing with Xpert MTB/RIF. Each participant will also be offered voluntary HIV counselling and testing. The team will make up to three visits to each household as needed in order to approach all household contacts for study enrolment. |
| FG002 | Contact Tracing Incentive-based Sub-arm | This strategy will be implemented in the opposite half of the clinics randomized to contact investigation. All adults (and guardians of children) with newly diagnosed active TB will be identified and approached for enrolment as described above. However, rather than a household visit, each consenting individual will be provided with a set of 10 coupons to give to household members and close contacts whom the index case believes may be at greatest risk. These coupons will contain instructions on how to come to the clinic for free TB screening (e.g., when the study team will be at each clinic), and will have an expiration date of 2 months from the time of initial TB diagnosis. When a contact presents at the clinic with the coupon, the contact will receive a small amount of money and a transport allowance based on the distance travelled to the clinic. If the contact is diagnosed with active TB and starts treatment, the contact will receive an additional larger amount of money. Study staff will document which index case the contact is linked to, and whether the contact is diagnosed with active TB. At the end of the 2 month period in which the coupons are valid the index will receive a grocery voucher for the total incentive earned (e.g., total amount for contact(s) who presented for screening + total amount for contact(s) diagnosed with active TB and starting treatment). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Facility-based Screening Arm | This strategy will be implemented at all clinics (n=28) within this arm for 18 months. Study staff will encourage providers at each of the clinics to screen all consenting patients attending the clinic, regardless of the original reason for clinic presentation. Upon presenting for care (e.g., while waiting for their healthcare provider), patients will be informed about the study and screened for cough of any duration, fever, weight loss, or night sweats. Participants who are symptomatic and provide a sputum specimen (according to the clinic standard of care) will be given a study flyer informing them that they may be contacted by our study staff, and a brief summary of the study. Per standard of care, all sputum samples will be sent to the local National Health Laboratory Service laboratory for Xpert testing. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Treatment Initiation Ratio in Facility Versus Contact Investigation Clinics | The primary analysis was based on the facility- level rate ratio, and we first calculated an unadjusted ratio of the treatment initiation rates between the two arms and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We then adjusted for any residual confounding by district stratification and the historical annual number of people started on TB following a two-stage approach. The first step of this approach fits a Poisson regression to the facility-level counts and the district and historical volume covariates irrespective of study arm. The residuals ratios, calculated as the ratio of the observed over the expected counts, are then used in the second stage to estimate the between-arm rate ratio and the corresponding 95% CI. | The population for this outcome consists of a sub-group of the total study population (those enrolled during the intervention period of July 18,2015 - January 17, 2018). All participants from the facility-based screening arm are included (n=1929), and the participants of the contact screening arm (n=1726) are included (this is a combination from the household-based and incentive-based screening arms). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 18 months |
36 months of study data collection, lasting from July 2016-January 2020.
As our intervention is the implementation and observation of routine South African standard of care (intensified screening for TB at clinics and contact tracing of newly identified TB cases), we do not anticipate any medical adverse events which may occur as a result of this research study. Therefore, AEs (including SAEs) will not be recorded and reported for this study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Facility-based Screening Arm | This strategy will be implemented at all clinics (n=28) within this arm for 18 months. Study staff will encourage providers at each of the clinics to screen all consenting patients attending the clinic, regardless of the original reason for clinic presentation. Upon presenting for care (e.g., while waiting for their healthcare provider), patients will be informed about the study and screened for cough of any duration, fever, weight loss, or night sweats. Participants who are symptomatic and provide a sputum specimen (according to the clinic standard of care) will be given a study flyer informing them that they may be contacted by our study staff, and a brief summary of the study. Per standard of care, all sputum samples will be sent to the local National Health Laboratory Service laboratory for Xpert testing. |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colleen Hanrahan | Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health | 410-502-9289 | chanrah1@jhu.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 31, 2018 | Jul 31, 2018 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014376 | Tuberculosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009164 | Mycobacterium Infections |
| D000193 | Actinomycetales Infections |
| D016908 | Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections |
| D001424 | Bacterial Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
This measure is the total cost of household contact investigation in both the household-based and incentive-based arms in 2018 United States dollar (USD) collected from the societal perspective (including both health systems and patient-level costs). As these are actual measured (not estimated) costs, no 95% confidence interval is reported. |
| 36 months |
| Estimated Costs Per Contact Person Screened in the Household-based and Incentive-based Contact Investigation Arms | These are estimated costs in 2018 USD for the cost per contact person screened in each arm, collected from the societal perspective including health system and patient-level costs. | 36 months |
| Cost Per Secondary Case of TB Identified Among Contacts, Per Arm | Cost were measured in 2018 US dollars from the societal perspective, including both health systems and patient level costs. Total costs per arm were divided by the number of secondary TB cases identified among contacts in that arm. | 36 months |
| Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio | (Total costs of incentive-based contact investigation-total costs of household-based contact investigation)/(effectiveness of incentive-based contact investigation-effectiveness of household-based contact investigation) | 36 months |
| Mokopane |
| Limpopo |
| South Africa |
| 28558737 | Derived | Kerrigan D, West N, Tudor C, Hanrahan CF, Lebina L, Msandiwa R, Mmolawa L, Martinson N, Dowdy D. Improving active case finding for tuberculosis in South Africa: informing innovative implementation approaches in the context of the Kharitode trial through formative research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 May 30;15(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0206-8. |
| BG001 | Contact Tracing Household-based Sub-arm | This strategy will be implemented for 18 months at half of the clinics within the contact tracing arm (n=14) and, after a six-month washout period, for 18 months in the other half of the clinics in that arm (n = 14). All adults (and guardians for children) with newly diagnosed pulmonary TB will be approached for enrolment as described above. Consenting patients (estimated as 1,575 subjects) will be asked for a home address (with landmarks), mobile phone number, and convenient time for a household visit. A mobile field team consisting of a nurse and lay health worker (both research staff) will circulate between the 14 primary care clinics, with notifications of all new TB cases made from the clinic to the team by mobile phone. The field team will visit the household of each consenting index case within two weeks of notification; each visit will consist of a household census (including demographic data), consent of all eligible household members for questioning and TB screening, administration of a brief questionnaire (including symptomatology, self-reported HIV and TB history, care-seeking behavior, and acceptability of the intervention), and sputum collection for testing with Xpert MTB/RIF. Each participant will also be offered voluntary HIV counselling and testing. The team will make up to three visits to each household as needed in order to approach all household contacts for study enrolment. |
| BG002 | Contact Tracing Incentive-based Sub-arm | This strategy will be implemented in the opposite half of the clinics randomized to contact investigation. All adults (and guardians of children) with newly diagnosed active TB will be identified and approached for enrolment as described above. However, rather than a household visit, each consenting individual will be provided with a set of 10 coupons to give to household members and close contacts whom the index case believes may be at greatest risk. These coupons will contain instructions on how to come to the clinic for free TB screening (e.g., when the study team will be at each clinic), and will have an expiration date of 2 months from the time of initial TB diagnosis. When a contact presents at the clinic with the coupon, the contact will receive a small amount of money and a transport allowance based on the distance travelled to the clinic. If the contact is diagnosed with active TB and starts treatment, the contact will receive an additional larger amount of money. Study staff will document which index case the contact is linked to, and whether the contact is diagnosed with active TB. At the end of the 2 month period in which the coupons are valid the index will receive a grocery voucher for the total incentive earned (e.g., total amount for contact(s) who presented for screening + total amount for contact(s) diagnosed with active TB and starting treatment). |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| HIV status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Facility-based Screening | This strategy will be implemented at all clinics (n=28) within this arm for 18 months. Study staff will encourage providers at each of the clinics to screen all consenting patients attending the clinic, regardless of the original reason for clinic presentation. Upon presenting for care (e.g., while waiting for their healthcare provider), patients will be informed about the study and screened for cough of any duration, fever, weight loss, or night sweats. Participants who are symptomatic and provide a sputum specimen (according to the clinic standard of care) will be given a study flyer informing them that they may be contacted by study staff, and a brief summary of the study. Per standard of care, all sputum samples will be sent to the local National Health Laboratory Service laboratory for Xpert testing. Active TB case finding: Active TB case finding (ACF) refers to any number of strategies used to identify individuals with active TB disease, outside of passive case finding. In passive case finding, individuals with symptoms present at health centers for diagnosis. In active case finding, the health system makes an effort to identify TB cases before they present passively. |
| OG001 | Contact Screening | This arm is comprised of two sub-arms: In the household contact screening sub-arm, a mobile field team visits the household of each consenting newly diagnosed pulmonary TB index case. Each visit consists of a household census, consent of all eligible household members for TB screening, administration of a brief questionnaire, sputum collection for testing with Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)/rifampin (RIF) and the offer of HIV testing. In the incentive-based contact screening sub-arm, all consenting newly diagnosed active TB cases are provided with 10 coupons for free TB screening to give to close contacts. When a contact presents at clinic with a coupon, they and the index case each receive a small amount of money. If the contact is diagnosed with active TB and starts treatment, the index case receives an additional larger amount of money. Each contact receives a brief questionnaire, TB symptom screen, optional HIV testing, and sputum sample collection for Xpert MTB/RIF. Active TB case finding: Active TB case finding (ACF) refers to any number of strategies used to identify individuals with active TB disease, outside of passive case finding. In passive case finding, individuals with symptoms present at health centers for diagnosis. In active case finding, the health system makes an effort to identify TB cases before they present passively. |
|
|
|
| Primary | Comparative Treatment Initiation Ratio in the Incentive-based Versus Household-based Contact Investigation Arms | The primary outcome of the study was the comparative number of people with incident TB diagnosed and started on treatment at study clinics in the two contact tracing arms, excluding the six-month washout period. | This analysis population includes all participants enrolled in the two contact tracing sub-arms during the total study period of 36 months. It excludes participants from the facility-based screening arm. A total of 2,923 patients were started on TB treatment during the study period: 1,413 in clinics allocated to household-based contact investigation and 1,510 in clinics allocated to incentive-based contact investigation. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 36 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Comparative Number of Secondary TB Cases Identified in Incentive-based Versus Household-based Contact Tracing | The pre-specified secondary study outcome was the number of Xpert-based TB diagnoses made among enrolled contacts ("secondary cases") by arm. | The number of TB contacts screened in each contact investigation arm. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 36 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Total Cost of Household Contact Investigation Strategies | This measure is the total cost of household contact investigation in both the household-based and incentive-based arms in 2018 United States dollar (USD) collected from the societal perspective (including both health systems and patient-level costs). As these are actual measured (not estimated) costs, no 95% confidence interval is reported. | This population includes all enrolled index participants with TB and their enrolled contacts, per arm. | Posted | Number | 2018 US dollars | 36 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Estimated Costs Per Contact Person Screened in the Household-based and Incentive-based Contact Investigation Arms | These are estimated costs in 2018 USD for the cost per contact person screened in each arm, collected from the societal perspective including health system and patient-level costs. | These populations include all contact persons enrolled into each arm. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | 2018 US dollars | 36 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cost Per Secondary Case of TB Identified Among Contacts, Per Arm | Cost were measured in 2018 US dollars from the societal perspective, including both health systems and patient level costs. Total costs per arm were divided by the number of secondary TB cases identified among contacts in that arm. | Individuals included in this population were the total number of secondary TB cases identified among contacts enrolled in each arm. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | 2018 US dollars | 36 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio | (Total costs of incentive-based contact investigation-total costs of household-based contact investigation)/(effectiveness of incentive-based contact investigation-effectiveness of household-based contact investigation) | Though the difference in total costs by arm is positive, the difference in effectiveness by arm is zero, therefore we cannot calculate the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as it would require dividing by zero. | Posted | 36 months |
|
|
| 0 |
| 1,929 |
| 0 |
| 1,929 |
| 0 |
| 1,929 |
| EG001 | Contact Tracing Household-based Sub-arm | This strategy will be implemented for 18 months at half of the clinics within the contact tracing arm (n=14) and, after a six-month washout period, for 18 months in the other half of the clinics in that arm (n = 14). All adults (and guardians for children) with newly diagnosed pulmonary TB will be approached for enrolment as described above. Consenting patients (estimated as 1,575 subjects) will be asked for a home address (with landmarks), mobile phone number, and convenient time for a household visit. A mobile field team consisting of a nurse and lay health worker (both research staff) will circulate between the 14 primary care clinics, with notifications of all new TB cases made from the clinic to the team by mobile phone. The field team will visit the household of each consenting index case within two weeks of notification; each visit will consist of a household census (including demographic data), consent of all eligible household members for questioning and TB screening, administration of a brief questionnaire (including symptomatology, self-reported HIV and TB history, care-seeking behavior, and acceptability of the intervention), and sputum collection for testing with Xpert MTB/RIF. Each participant will also be offered voluntary HIV counselling and testing. The team will make up to three visits to each household as needed in order to approach all household contacts for study enrolment. | 0 | 1,413 | 0 | 1,413 | 0 | 1,413 |
| EG002 | Contact Tracing Incentive-based Sub-arm | This strategy will be implemented in the opposite half of the clinics randomized to contact investigation. All adults (and guardians of children) with newly diagnosed active TB will be identified and approached for enrolment as described above. However, rather than a household visit, each consenting individual will be provided with a set of 10 coupons to give to household members and close contacts whom the index case believes may be at greatest risk. These coupons will contain instructions on how to come to the clinic for free TB screening (e.g., when the study team will be at each clinic), and will have an expiration date of 2 months from the time of initial TB diagnosis. When a contact presents at the clinic with the coupon, the contact will receive a small amount of money and a transport allowance based on the distance travelled to the clinic. If the contact is diagnosed with active TB and starts treatment, the contact will receive an additional larger amount of money. Study staff will document which index case the contact is linked to, and whether the contact is diagnosed with active TB. At the end of the 2 month period in which the coupons are valid the index will receive a grocery voucher for the total incentive earned (e.g., total amount for contact(s) who presented for screening + total amount for contact(s) diagnosed with active TB and starting treatment). | 0 | 1,510 | 0 | 1,510 | 0 | 1,510 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D001423 | Bacterial Infections and Mycoses |
| D007239 | Infections |
| Male |
|
| HIV negative |
|
| HIV status unknown |
|
| HIV status missing |
|