Assessment of treatment regimen with respect to ESC guideline adherence at Visit 1 before referral to cardiologist. ESC Criteria for adherence: Drug Types: Treatment with (1) ACEi or (1) ARB in combination with (1) beta-blocker and (1) MRA for patients w/an LVEF ≤ 35% at V1. Treatment w/(1) ACEi or (1) ARB, in combination with (1) beta-blocker+ without treatment with an MRA for patients with an LVEF > 35% at visit 1. Drug type & dose: Guideline adherent with respect to drug types and dosage of all respective guideline drugs ≥ 50% of the recommended target dose.

Enrolled and Follow-up Set included. Due to missing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) values, some patients could not be classified.

Assessment of patients' adherence at Visit 2, for patients who were already adherent at Visit 1, and those who were not adherent at Visit 1, for both drug type and drug type and dose. ESC Criteria for adherence: Drug Types: Treatment with (1) ACEi or (1) ARB in combination with (1) beta-blocker and (1) MRA for patients w/an LVEF ≤ 35% at V1. Treatment w/(1) ACEi or (1) ARB, in combination with (1) beta-blocker+ without treatment with an MRA for patients with an LVEF > 35% at visit 1. Drug type & dose: Guideline adherent with respect to drug types and dosage of all respective guideline drugs ≥ 50% of the recommended target dose.

Follow-Up set

The duration of Heart Failure was collected at Baseline (Visit 1).

Enrolled Set and Follow-Up Set

Use of concomitant compounds were collected at baseline (Visit 1)

Enrolled Set and Follow-Up Set

Use of concomitant compounds were collected at 6 months (Visit 2)

Follow-Up Set

For patients who enter the prospective period of the study the post-referral treatment choice of cardiologists and/or primary care physicians was documented; for patients, for whom the cardiologist and/or primary care physician chose to prescribe a novel Heart Failure treatment, the treatment was assessed, if it fulfills the definition of adherence to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline recommendation. The proportion of patients for whom an ESC guideline adherent treatment was de novo prescribed was assessed stratified according to different parameters.

Follow-Up Set

NT-proBNP levels (pg/ml) was measured at baseline in all consecutive patients who satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Measurements were performed on-site by means of a handheld device provided for the purposes of the study. NT-proBNP level categories could be 600 -799 pg/ml, 800 - 999 pg/ml, 1000 - 1200 pg/ml, > 1200 pg/ml).

Enrolled Set and Follow-Up Set

Clinically stable patients in this study were defined as those patients for whom the primary care physician did not see a necessity (based on signs and symptoms of HF) to change the current pharmacological and/or device treatment of HF and who were on stable pharmacological and/or device treatment for HF for at least 3 months prior to inclusion.

Enrolled Set

The cardiologists' suggestions for pharmacological and/or device therapy for the treatment of clinically stable CHF patients was documented and assessed by means of descriptive statistical measures stratified by country/region 6 months after baseline.

Follow-Up Set

At 10 months after baseline (end of study) NT-proBNP was assessed in clinically stable CHF patients with baseline NT-proBNP levels ≥ 600 pg/ml. Thus, for those patients two NT-proBNP measurements were available: at baseline and 10 months later. The individual change of NT-proBNP between both time points were assessed in accordance to the patients' treatment history during the study, i.e. baseline Heart Failure treatment and therapeutic decision taken 6 months after baseline.

Follow-Up Set

Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by EQ-5D including the dimensions mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. A utility index based on UK value sets was built to summarize the information of these five dimensions into a single scale. The utility index can range between -0.281 and 1.0 where a higher number indicates a better health status. In addition, a visual analog scale (VAS) was applied with a possible range between 0 (=worst imaginable health state) and 100 (=best imaginable health state). Scores collected for all patients at baseline (Visit 1) and at Visit 2 and Visit 3 (only patients who entered the prospective period of the study, i.e. clinically stable patients with a NT-proBNP level ≥ 600 pg/ml) were asked to fill out the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) quality of life (QoL) questionnaire validated for heart failure (HF).

Enrolled Set for Visit 1 (Baseline) and Follow-Up Set (Visit 2 and 3) for those clinically stable patients who entered the prospective period of the study

The KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire. It contains 23 items, covering physical function, clinical symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life, each with different Likert scale wording, including limitations, frequency, bother, change in condition, understanding, levels of enjoyment and satisfaction. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Scores were collected for all patients at baseline and Visit 2 and Visit 3 (only patients who had entered the prospective period of the study (clinically stable patients with a NT-proBNP level ≥ 600 pg/ml) were asked to complete Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) validated for Heart Failure.

Enrolled Set for Visit 1 (Baseline) and Follow-Up Set (Visit 2 and 3) for those clinically stable patients who entered the prospective period of the study

Living conditions were collected at Baseline (Visit 1).

Enrolled Set and Follow-Up Set

Employment status was collected at Baseline (Visit 1).

Enrolled Set and Follow-Up Set

Smoking status was collected at baseline (visit 1).

Enrolled Set and Follow-Up Set

Geographic regions were collected at Baseline (Visit 1).

Enrolled Set

Health insurance status was collected at Baseline (Visit 1).

Enrolled Set and Follow-Up Set

Educational level was collected at Baseline (Visit 1).

Enrolled Set and Follow-Up Set

The primary etiology of Heart Failure was collected at Baseline (Visit 1).

Enrolled Set and Follow-Up Set

HF-related hospitalizations was collected in the previous 12 months prior to baseline at baseline visit, at 6 and 10 months post-baseline.

Enrolled Set and Follow-Up Set

Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular co-morbidities were collected at baseline (Visit 1)

Enrolled Set and Follow-Up Set

Mean Dose of previously taken and current use of concomitant medications was to be collected at Visit 1, 6 months, 10 months post-baseline

Enrolled Set and Follow-Up Set (Mean dose of concomitant medications was not collected/provided and could not be alternately computed based upon the information listed).

The types and number of participants with HF treatment combinations were collected at Baseline (Visit 1).

Follow-Up Set: Patients who were considered clinically stable and had NT-proBNP levels > 600 pg/ml who were referred to a cardiologist at Baseline (Visit 1) for evaluation.

The duration of treatment with device type was collected at baseline (Visit 1)

Follow-Up Set (Data was not collected for this endpoint)

Duration of most common previously taken and current use of most common Non-HF concomitant compounds were collected

Follow-Up Set

For clinically stable CHF patients, the primary care physicians' prescription of pharmacological and device treatment for HF was to be documented prior to baseline and post cardiologist-referral. At the post-referral visit the degree of implementation of cardiologist-recommendations and the medical decision making (e.g. reasons for non-implementation) were to be documented.

Follow-Up Set (Data was not collected for this endpoint.)