Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Kurume University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of a 12-week low-load neuromuscular electrical stimulation with volitional contraction (NMES-VC) training program to improve quadriceps strength and activation, while not adversely affecting knee-related pain, activities of daily living or quality of life in women with knee pain. The primary outcome will be change in maximal isokinetic knee extensor torque.
The investigators will test the following hypotheses. In comparison with low-load (40%) resistance training without electrical stimulation, a 12-week NMES-VC training program will:
Hypothesis 1: Increase maximal isokinetic knee extensor torque
Secondary questions and response variables
Hypothesis 2: Not adversely affect knee pain or quality of life, assessed by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire
Additional hypotheses in women with risk factors for incident symptomatic or progressive KOA:
Arthritis is the most common cause of disability in the United States. Approximately 42.1% of women and 31.2% of men over the age of 60 have knee osteoarthritis (KOA). KOA is associated with pain, quadriceps weakness, swelling, instability, decline of range of motion, physical function, and quality of life (QOL). The presence of KOA significantly decreases QOL, while quadriceps strengthening has the ability to improve QOL. However, one challenge with strengthening is that knee pain influences muscle strength and physical function. Not only quadriceps strengthening but also reduction of knee pain may be necessary to reduce functional limitations from KOA. However, at this time, there is insufficient evidence regarding effective training to not only increase quadriceps strength but also reduce knee pain and improve neural function. Thus, there is a need for interventional studies to build on observational findings to evaluate the relationships of neural function, knee muscle strength, knee pain, and physical function.
The critical barrier to studying whether quadriceps strengthening is protective against worsening physical function is the lack of an effective strengthening program for people at elevated risk for KOA. Factors that place older adults at elevated risk for symptomatic KOA, (e.g. sedentary lifestyle, obesity, knee pain, knee injury or surgery), may also contribute to reduced tolerance of high load quadriceps strengthening programs. If a well-tolerated and effective means of strengthening could be identified, it may also have additional benefits in reducing knee pain, improving physical function and avoiding disability in individuals with or at risk of KOA.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is widely used to strengthen muscles and improve function in people who cannot exercise at medium-high intensity. For KOA, NMES is effective for enhancing quadriceps strength, knee pain, physical function. Therefore, NMES could contribute to decreased neural inhibition from knee pain and promote muscle function (e.g. muscle strength, power, contraction speed, and co-contraction). Recently, it was reported that the combined application of NMES and volitional contractions (NMES-VC) is effective for making up for a limitation of NMES. NMES-VC could help to improve motor recovery. The results of recent studies suggest that a hybrid training system that utilizes both volitional contractions and NMES simultaneously, might be an effective method that can improve physical function by strengthening muscles and relieving knee pain in people at risk for incident or progressive symptomatic KOA.
This line of research could have a significant positive impact on public health, by leading to the introduction of an inexpensive means of well-tolerated and safe exercise that can be completed in community rehabilitative environments. Successful completion of this initial investigation will enable pursuit of research to determine whether NMES-VC is effective in quadriceps strengthening and pain relief while improving neural function in symptomatic and progressive KOA. Reduction of this primary cause of disability through cost-effective preventive exercise has a high potential to reduce the burden of disease and disablement, thereby improving the quality of life for older adults and significantly reducing the costs to individuals and society.
The specific aim of the proposed research is to assess the efficacy of a twelve-week, efficient and tolerable, low-intensity exercise program with NMES-VC for improving quadriceps strength, knee pain and physical function in women with risk factors for incident symptomatic or progressive KOA. This specific aim will be achieved through a randomized, controlled trial, comparing low intensity exercise with and without NMES-VC. This research is novel in that it will be the first to use a low load regimen that will minimize the potential for adverse loading on the knee joint while still having a high likelihood to lead to clinically meaningful strength gains, pain relief and physical function improvement in older adults at elevated risk for symptomatic or progressive KOA.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Training | Experimental | The hybrid training system combines the applications of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) with voluntary contractions (NMES-VC). Training will be performed in a seated position with feet not touching the ground, and will involve each knee flexing and extending alternately. The joint range of motion will be restricted to a 90º arc from approximately 10º to 100º of flexion. Each session will consist of 5 sets of 10 repetitions, 3-second knee flexion and extension contractions on each leg. Sets will be separated by 30-sec rest intervals. Electrodes will be placed on the anterior thigh over the motor points of the bilateral vastus medialis and lateralis, and over the medial and lateral hamstrings on the posterior thigh. Electrical stimulation intensity will be set to approximately 40% of 1 repetition maximum (RM). A joint motion sensor will trigger stimulation of the antagonist once it senses the initiation of volitional contraction of the agonist muscle group. |
|
| Low Intensity Exercise | Active Comparator | 40% 1-repetition maximum isokinetic training with HUMAC NORM in same repetitions/sets as experimental group. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Training using Electrodes and Joint Motion Sensors | Device | Electrodes (Sekisui Plastics Co., Tokyo, Japan) will be placed on the anterior thigh over the motor points of the bilateral vastus medialis and lateralis, and on the posterior thigh over the motor points of the medial and lateral hamstrings. Electrical stimulation intensity will be set to approximately 40% of 1 repetition maximum (RM). A joint motion sensor (Mutoh Engineering Inc., Tokyo, Japan) will trigger stimulation of the antagonist once it senses the initiation of volitional contraction of the agonist muscle group. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Maximal Isokinetic Knee Extensor Torque by Body Mass Assessed by Isokinetic Dynamometer. | Participants will be familiarized with strength testing equipment and counseled on proper lifting technique. They will undergo testing to determine their peak isokinetic knee extensor torque at 60°/sec, using an isokinetic dynamometer. These testing procedures will then be repeated for the other side. | Baseline and 12-week follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Maximal Isokinetic Knee Flexor Torque by Body Mass Assessed by Isokinetic Dynamometer. | Participants will be familiarized with strength testing equipment and counseled on proper lifting technique. They will undergo testing to determine their peak isokinetic knee flexor torque, using an isokinetic dynamometer. | Baseline and 12-week follow-up |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Female
Age 40-85 years
One or more of the following:
BMI less than 45 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Neil A Segal, MD | University of Kansas Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Kansas Medical Center | Kansas City | Kansas | 66160 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19407734 | Background | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults--United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 May 1;58(16):421-6. | |
| 17013996 | Background | Dillon CF, Rasch EK, Gu Q, Hirsch R. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the United States: arthritis data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1991-94. J Rheumatol. 2006 Nov;33(11):2271-9. Epub 2006 Oct 1. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Hybrid Training | The hybrid training system combines the applications of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) with voluntary contractions (NMES-VC). Training will be performed in a seated position with feet not touching the ground, and will involve each knee flexing and extending alternately. The joint range of motion will be restricted to a 90º arc from approximately 10º to 100º of flexion. Each session will consist of 5 sets of 10 repetitions, 3-second knee flexion and extension contractions on each leg. Sets will be separated by 30-sec rest intervals. Electrodes will be placed on the anterior thigh over the motor points of the bilateral vastus medialis and lateralis, and over the medial and lateral hamstrings on the posterior thigh. Electrical stimulation intensity will be set to approximately 40% of 1 repetition maximum (RM). A joint motion sensor will trigger stimulation of the antagonist once it senses the initiation of volitional contraction of the agonist muscle group. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Isokinetic Training with Isokinetic Dynamometer | Device | Low intensity exercises completed using isokinetic dynamometer (HUMAC NORM, Computer Sports Medicine Inc. (CSMi), Stoughton, MA) in isokinetic mode at approximately 40%1 RM. |
|
|
| Change in Knee Pain Assessed by a Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score | The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subscale was used at baseline and follow-up to assess participant outcomes. The pain subscale is made up of 9 questions and was scored from zero to 100, with zero corresponding to extreme knee problems and 100 corresponding to no knee problems. | Baseline and 12-week follow-up |
| Change in 20-meter Walk Time | A timed 20-meter walk was completed as a measure of lower limb physical performance. Participants were instructed to walk along a 20-meters straight, uninterrupted course as quickly as they could. Timing started when the participant initiated foot movement and stopped when both feet crossed the 20-meter mark. Times for two trials were recorded and the averaged. | Baseline and 12-week follow-up |
| Change in 5-chair Stand Time | The chair stand test is a validated measure of physical performance in adults with knee osteoarthritis. Participants were instructed to stand from a chair (seat height 44.45 cm) 5 times as quickly as they could without using their arms. Two trials were timed and averaged. | Baseline and 12-week follow-up |
| 20351594 | Background | Segal NA, Glass NA, Felson DT, Hurley M, Yang M, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Torner JC. Effect of quadriceps strength and proprioception on risk for knee osteoarthritis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Nov;42(11):2081-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181dd902e. |
| 19714608 | Background | Segal NA, Torner JC, Felson D, Niu J, Sharma L, Lewis CE, Nevitt M. Effect of thigh strength on incident radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in a longitudinal cohort. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Sep 15;61(9):1210-7. doi: 10.1002/art.24541. |
| 17013827 | Background | van Dijk GM, Dekker J, Veenhof C, van den Ende CH; Carpa Study Group. Course of functional status and pain in osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of the literature. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct 15;55(5):779-85. doi: 10.1002/art.22244. |
| 8484690 | Background | McAlindon TE, Cooper C, Kirwan JR, Dieppe PA. Determinants of disability in osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993 Apr;52(4):258-62. doi: 10.1136/ard.52.4.258. |
| 15491837 | Background | Palmieri RM, Tom JA, Edwards JE, Weltman A, Saliba EN, Mistry DJ, Ingersoll CD. Arthrogenic muscle response induced by an experimental knee joint effusion is mediated by pre- and post-synaptic spinal mechanisms. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004 Dec;14(6):631-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.06.002. |
| 16502299 | Background | Heroux ME, Tremblay F. Corticomotor excitability associated with unilateral knee dysfunction secondary to anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Sep;14(9):823-33. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0063-4. Epub 2006 Feb 25. |
| 14627927 | Background | Palmieri RM, Ingersoll CD, Edwards JE, Hoffman MA, Stone MB, Babington JP, Cordova ML, Krause BA. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition is not present in the limb contralateral to a simulated knee joint effusion. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Dec;82(12):910-6. doi: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000098045.04883.02. |
| 22135156 | Background | Muraki S, Akune T, Oka H, Ishimoto Y, Nagata K, Yoshida M, Tokimura F, Nakamura K, Kawaguchi H, Yoshimura N. Incidence and risk factors for radiographic knee osteoarthritis and knee pain in Japanese men and women: a longitudinal population-based cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 May;64(5):1447-56. doi: 10.1002/art.33508. |
| 9230035 | Background | Slemenda C, Brandt KD, Heilman DK, Mazzuca S, Braunstein EM, Katz BP, Wolinsky FD. Quadriceps weakness and osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 15;127(2):97-104. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-2-199707150-00001. |
| 25300730 | Background | Aguiar GC, Do Nascimento MR, De Miranda AS, Rocha NP, Teixeira AL, Scalzo PL. Effects of an exercise therapy protocol on inflammatory markers, perception of pain, and physical performance in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2015 Mar;35(3):525-31. doi: 10.1007/s00296-014-3148-2. Epub 2014 Oct 10. |
| 22632702 | Background | Vincent KR, Vincent HK. Resistance exercise for knee osteoarthritis. PM R. 2012 May;4(5 Suppl):S45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.01.019. |
| 23973125 | Background | Glass NA, Torner JC, Frey Law LA, Wang K, Yang T, Nevitt MC, Felson DT, Lewis CE, Segal NA. The relationship between quadriceps muscle weakness and worsening of knee pain in the MOST cohort: a 5-year longitudinal study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Sep;21(9):1154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.016. |
| 22395037 | Background | Sattler M, Dannhauer T, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, Sanger AM, Kwoh CK, Hunter DJ, Eckstein F; OAI investigators. Side differences of thigh muscle cross-sectional areas and maximal isometric muscle force in bilateral knees with the same radiographic disease stage, but unilateral frequent pain - data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Jun;20(6):532-40. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.635. Epub 2012 Mar 3. |
| 15979027 | Background | Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede RD, Zubieta JK. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain. 2005 Aug;9(4):463-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Jan 21. |
| 12436270 | Background | Campos GE, Luecke TJ, Wendeln HK, Toma K, Hagerman FC, Murray TF, Ragg KE, Ratamess NA, Kraemer WJ, Staron RS. Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Nov;88(1-2):50-60. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0681-6. Epub 2002 Aug 15. |
| 9851266 | Background | Hurley MV, Scott DL. Improvements in quadriceps sensorimotor function and disability of patients with knee osteoarthritis following a clinically practicable exercise regime. Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Nov;37(11):1181-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.11.1181. |
| 8379835 | Background | Balogun JA, Onilari OO, Akeju OA, Marzouk DK. High voltage electrical stimulation in the augmentation of muscle strength: effects of pulse frequency. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Sep;74(9):910-6. |
| 3258994 | Background | Delitto A, Rose SJ, McKowen JM, Lehman RC, Thomas JA, Shively RA. Electrical stimulation versus voluntary exercise in strengthening thigh musculature after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Phys Ther. 1988 May;68(5):660-3. doi: 10.1093/ptj/68.5.660. |
| 7668962 | Background | Kagaya H, Shimada Y, Ebata K, Sato M, Sato K, Yukawa T, Obinata G. Restoration and analysis of standing-up in complete paraplegia utilizing functional electrical stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Sep;76(9):876-81. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80556-7. |
| 7642660 | Background | Snyder-Mackler L, Delitto A, Bailey SL, Stralka SW. Strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle and functional recovery after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of electrical stimulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Aug;77(8):1166-73. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199508000-00004. |
| 10213025 | Background | Stein RB, Momose K, Bobet J. Biomechanics of human quadriceps muscles during electrical stimulation. J Biomech. 1999 Apr;32(4):347-57. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00187-0. |
| 22759883 | Background | Bruce-Brand RA, Walls RJ, Ong JC, Emerson BS, O'Byrne JM, Moyna NM. Effects of home-based resistance training and neuromuscular electrical stimulation in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jul 3;13:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-118. |
| 23337561 | Background | de Oliveira Melo M, Aragao FA, Vaz MA. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle strengthening in elderly with knee osteoarthritis - a systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2013 Feb;19(1):27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 18. |
| 23138532 | Background | Vaz MA, Baroni BM, Geremia JM, Lanferdini FJ, Mayer A, Arampatzis A, Herzog W. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) reduces structural and functional losses of quadriceps muscle and improves health status in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 2013 Apr;31(4):511-6. doi: 10.1002/jor.22264. Epub 2012 Nov 8. |
| 22324059 | Background | Giggins O, Fullen B, Coughlan G. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2012 Oct;26(10):867-81. doi: 10.1177/0269215511431902. Epub 2012 Feb 9. |
| 11034768 | Background | Osiri M, Welch V, Brosseau L, Shea B, McGowan J, Tugwell P, Wells G. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(4):CD002823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002823. |
| 21286692 | Background | Mang CS, Clair JM, Collins DF. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation has a global effect on corticospinal excitability for leg muscles and a focused effect for hand muscles. Exp Brain Res. 2011 Mar;209(3):355-63. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2556-8. Epub 2011 Feb 1. |
| 18602713 | Background | Dehail P, Duclos C, Barat M. Electrical stimulation and muscle strengthening. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2008 Jul;51(6):441-51. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Jun 18. English, French. |
| 18201117 | Background | Paillard T. Combined application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary muscular contractions. Sports Med. 2008;38(2):161-77. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200838020-00005. |
| 17233925 | Background | Santos M, Zahner LH, McKiernan BJ, Mahnken JD, Quaney B. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves severe hand dysfunction for individuals with chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006 Dec;30(4):175-83. doi: 10.1097/01.npt.0000281254.33045.e4. |
| 22899312 | Background | Lagerquist O, Mang CS, Collins DF. Changes in spinal but not cortical excitability following combined electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve and voluntary plantar-flexion. Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(1-2):41-53. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3194-5. Epub 2012 Aug 17. |
| Background | Shiba N, inventor. Kurume University, assignee. Apparatus for strengthening muscles. US patent 6,456,885. 2002 Sep 24. |
| 12808536 | Background | Yanagi T, Shiba N, Maeda T, Iwasa K, Umezu Y, Tagawa Y, Matsuo S, Nagata K, Yamamoto T, Basford JR. Agonist contractions against electrically stimulated antagonists. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jun;84(6):843-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(02)04948-1. |
| 24151589 | Background | Mizusaki Imoto A, Peccin S, Gomes da Silva KN, de Paiva Teixeira LE, Abrahao MI, Fernandes Moca Trevisani V. Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with exercises versus an exercise program on the pain and the function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:272018. doi: 10.1155/2013/272018. Epub 2013 Sep 14. |
| 29852286 | Derived | Rabe KG, Matsuse H, Jackson A, Segal NA. Evaluation of the Combined Application of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Volitional Contractions on Thigh Muscle Strength, Knee Pain, and Physical Performance in Women at Risk for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PM R. 2018 Dec;10(12):1301-1310. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 29. |
| FG001 | Low Intensity Exercise | 40% max isokinetic training in same repetitions/sets as experimental group. Isokinetic Training with Computer Sports Medicine Inc. (CSMi) HUMAC NORM: Low intensity exercises completed using CSMi HUMAC NORM in isokinetic mode at approximately 40%1 RM. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Hybrid Training | The hybrid training system combines the applications of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) with voluntary contractions (NMES-VC). Training will be performed in a seated position with feet not touching the ground, and will involve each knee flexing and extending alternately. The joint range of motion will be restricted to a 90º arc from approximately 10º to 100º of flexion. Each session will consist of 5 sets of 10 repetitions, 3-second knee flexion and extension contractions on each leg. Sets will be separated by 30-sec rest intervals. Electrodes will be placed on the anterior thigh over the motor points of the bilateral vastus medialis and lateralis, and over the medial and lateral hamstrings on the posterior thigh. Electrical stimulation intensity will be set to approximately 40% of 1 repetition maximum (RM). A joint motion sensor will trigger stimulation of the antagonist once it senses the initiation of volitional contraction of the agonist muscle group. |
| BG001 | Low Intensity Exercise | 40% max isokinetic training in same repetitions/sets as experimental group. Isokinetic Training with Computer Sports Medicine Inc. (CSMi) HUMAC NORM: Low intensity exercises completed using CSMi HUMAC NORM in isokinetic mode at approximately 40%1 RM. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | centimeters (cm) |
| |||||||||||||||
| Body Mass | Mean | Standard Deviation | kilograms (kg) |
| |||||||||||||||
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
| |||||||||||||||
| 20-Meter Walk Time | A timed 20-meter walk was completed as a measure of lower limb physical performance. Participants were instructed to walk along a 20-meters straight, uninterrupted course as quickly as they could. Timing started when the participant initiated foot movement and stopped when both feet crossed the 20-meter mark. Times for two trials were recorded and the averaged. | Mean | Standard Deviation | seconds |
| ||||||||||||||
| 5-Chair Stand Time | The chair stand test is a validated measure of physical performance in adults with knee osteoarthritis. Participants were instructed to stand from a chair (seat height 44.45 cm) 5 times as quickly as they could without using their arms. Two trials were timed and averaged. | Mean | Standard Deviation | seconds |
| ||||||||||||||
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain | The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subscale was used at baseline and follow-up to assess participant outcomes. The pain subscale is made up of 9 questions and was scored from zero to 100, with zero corresponding to extreme knee problems and 100 corresponding to no knee problems. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Extensor Torque | Mean | Standard Deviation | Newton-meters |
| |||||||||||||||
| Flexor Torque | Mean | Standard Deviation | Newton-meters |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Maximal Isokinetic Knee Extensor Torque by Body Mass Assessed by Isokinetic Dynamometer. | Participants will be familiarized with strength testing equipment and counseled on proper lifting technique. They will undergo testing to determine their peak isokinetic knee extensor torque at 60°/sec, using an isokinetic dynamometer. These testing procedures will then be repeated for the other side. | 4 participants in the hybrid training group discontinued the intervention due to unrelated pain, knee injections, car issues, and unrelated hospitalization. 3 participants in the low intensity exercise group discontinued the intervention due to unrelated pain, fatigue and the inability to gain strength due to radiation overdose (unrelated). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Newton-meters/kilogram | Baseline and 12-week follow-up |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Maximal Isokinetic Knee Flexor Torque by Body Mass Assessed by Isokinetic Dynamometer. | Participants will be familiarized with strength testing equipment and counseled on proper lifting technique. They will undergo testing to determine their peak isokinetic knee flexor torque, using an isokinetic dynamometer. | 4 participants in the hybrid training group discontinued the intervention due to unrelated pain, knee injections, car issues, and unrelated hospitalization. 3 participants in the low intensity exercise group discontinued the intervention due to unrelated pain, fatigue and the inability to gain strength due to radiation overdose (unrelated). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Newton-meters/kilogram | Baseline and 12-week follow-up |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Knee Pain Assessed by a Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score | The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subscale was used at baseline and follow-up to assess participant outcomes. The pain subscale is made up of 9 questions and was scored from zero to 100, with zero corresponding to extreme knee problems and 100 corresponding to no knee problems. | 4 participants in the hybrid training group discontinued the intervention due to unrelated pain, knee injections, car issues, and unrelated hospitalization. 3 participants in the low intensity exercise group discontinued the intervention due to unrelated pain, fatigue and the inability to gain strength due to radiation overdose (unrelated). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and 12-week follow-up |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in 20-meter Walk Time | A timed 20-meter walk was completed as a measure of lower limb physical performance. Participants were instructed to walk along a 20-meters straight, uninterrupted course as quickly as they could. Timing started when the participant initiated foot movement and stopped when both feet crossed the 20-meter mark. Times for two trials were recorded and the averaged. | 4 participants in the hybrid training group discontinued the intervention due to unrelated pain, knee injections, car issues, and unrelated hospitalization. 3 participants in the low intensity exercise group discontinued the intervention due to unrelated pain, fatigue and the inability to gain strength due to radiation overdose (unrelated). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | seconds | Baseline and 12-week follow-up |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in 5-chair Stand Time | The chair stand test is a validated measure of physical performance in adults with knee osteoarthritis. Participants were instructed to stand from a chair (seat height 44.45 cm) 5 times as quickly as they could without using their arms. Two trials were timed and averaged. | 4 participants in the hybrid training group discontinued the intervention due to unrelated pain, knee injections, car issues, and unrelated hospitalization. 3 participants in the low intensity exercise group discontinued the intervention due to unrelated pain, fatigue and the inability to gain strength due to radiation overdose (unrelated). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | seconds | Baseline and 12-week follow-up |
|
Adverse event data was collected over the duration of the study from baseline to 12-week follow-up.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Hybrid Training | The hybrid training system combines the applications of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) with voluntary contractions (NMES-VC). Training will be performed in a seated position with feet not touching the ground, and will involve each knee flexing and extending alternately. The joint range of motion will be restricted to a 90º arc from approximately 10º to 100º of flexion. Each session will consist of 5 sets of 10 repetitions, 3-second knee flexion and extension contractions on each leg. Sets will be separated by 30-sec rest intervals. Electrodes will be placed on the anterior thigh over the motor points of the bilateral vastus medialis and lateralis, and over the medial and lateral hamstrings on the posterior thigh. Electrical stimulation intensity will be set to approximately 40% of 1 repetition maximum (RM). A joint motion sensor will trigger stimulation of the antagonist once it senses the initiation of volitional contraction of the agonist muscle group. | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| EG001 | Low Intensity Exercise | 40% max isokinetic training in same repetitions/sets as experimental group. Isokinetic Training with Computer Sports Medicine Inc. (CSMi) HUMAC NORM: Low intensity exercises completed using CSMi HUMAC NORM in isokinetic mode at approximately 40%1 RM. | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Neil Segal | University of Kansas Medical Center | 913-945-8985 | segal-research@kumc.edu |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055070 | Resistance Training |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005081 | Exercise Therapy |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D064797 | Physical Conditioning, Human |
| D015444 | Exercise |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D009068 | Movement |
| D009142 | Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OG001 | Low Intensity Exercise | Isokinetic Training with isokinetic dynamometer. Low intensity exercises completed in isokinetic mode at approximately 40%1 RM in same repetitions/sets as experimental group. |
|
|
| OG001 | Low Intensity Exercise | Isokinetic Training with isokinetic dynamometer. Low intensity exercises completed in isokinetic mode at approximately 40%1 RM in same repetitions/sets as experimental group. |
|
|
| OG001 | Low Intensity Exercise | Isokinetic Training with isokinetic dynamometer. Low intensity exercises completed in isokinetic mode at approximately 40%1 RM in same repetitions/sets as experimental group. |
|
|
| OG001 | Low Intensity Exercise | Isokinetic Training with isokinetic dynamometer. Low intensity exercises completed in isokinetic mode at approximately 40%1 RM in same repetitions/sets as experimental group. |
|
|