Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To prospectively document the performance of a FCSEMS for treatment of pancreatic duct strictures in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.
This study is a prospective, single arm, pre-approval study. Treatment of up to 92 patients will take place at up to 15 clinical centers. Patient who meet all eligibility criteria will receive the WallFlex Pancreatic stent for up to 6 months stent indwell and 6 months follow-up after stent removal.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| WallFlex FCSEMS Recipients | Experimental | The WallFlex™ Pancreatic RX Fully Covered Soft Stent System consists of a flexible delivery system preloaded with a self-expanding pancreatic metal stent. Patients who meet all eligibility criteria will receive the WallFlex Pancreatic stent for up to 6 months stent indwell and 6 months follow-up after stent removal. A patient is considered "enrolled" after signing the study-specific Informed Consent Form (ICF). Patients who sign the ICF but subsequently do not meet one or more of the selection criteria will be considered screen failures and excluded from the study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pancreatic fully-covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) | Device | The WallFlex™ Pancreatic RX Fully Covered Soft Stent System consists of a flexible delivery system preloaded with a self-expanding pancreatic metal stent. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Reduction | The self-reported pain score (0-100) was the mean of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Izbicki Frequency of Pain subscore (sum treated as a continuous variable).The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who had complete (pain score ≤ 10) or partial (pain score ˃ 10 but reduced at least 50% compared to pain as baseline) pain relief by 6 months after FCSEMS removal or observation of CDM or partial stent migration. Primary efficacy endpoint failure included any of the following: 1) no pain relief, 2) complete or partial pain relief in the setting of a 50% higher average daily narcotic dose compared to the patient's daily average narcotic dose in the month prior to baseline and at 6 months post-stent removal/observation of CDM, 3) stent migration in setting of recurring pain (VAS Pain Score of ≥ 20), 4) restenting in the setting of recurring pain. | Baseline to 6 months post-stent removal or 6 months post-observation of complete or partial stent migration |
| Rate of Related SAEs From WallFlex Pancreatic Stent Placement to End of Study | The primary safety endpoint was the rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the FCSEMS or study procedures from FCSEMS placement to end of study follow-up. Pain thought to be caused by FCSEMS pancreatic stent expansion was reported but did not count towards the endpoint if all three of the following conditions applied:
| Baseline to 6 months post-stent removal or 6 months post-observation of complete or partial stent migration |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Stent Placement Success | Satisfactory position is defined as the stent being across the stricture, without visible occluding impaction at the genu of the pancreatic duct and with distal end of the stent visible in the duodenum. | Assessed upon study stent placement. This endpoint is assessed at the Study Stent Placement visit (Day 0). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18 or older
Willing and able to comply with study procedures and follow-up schedule and provide written informed consent to participate in study
Chronic pancreatitis induced stricture of Cremer Type IV, namely distal dominant stricture with upstream ductal dilation.
For patients with one prior plastic pancreatic stent: VAS Pain Score and Frequency of Pain sectors of the Izbicki pain scale at the time of placement of the plastic stent.
Availability of narcotic dosage for at least one month prior to baseline visit for patients who do not have a prior plastic stent or availability for one month prior to placement of prior plastic stent, where applicable.
VAS Pain Score of ≥ 20 before study stent placement for patients without a prior plastic pancreatic stent. VAS Pain Score of ≥ 20 before initial plastic pancreatic stent placement for patients with a prior plastic pancreatic stent indwelling for 90 days or less before study stent placement. VAS Pain Score is captured via Izbicki pain scale.
Pain occurring weekly or more frequently (assessed by Frequency of Pain sector of the Izbicki pain scale) as reported before study stent placement for patients without a prior plastic pancreatic stent, or before placement of initial plastic pancreatic stent for patients with a prior plastic pancreatic stent indwelling for 90 days or less before study stent placement.
Minimum 5 mm diameter of dilated duct immediately upstream of pancreatic duct stricture
Prior clearance of pancreatic stones where needed
Prior endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy (EPS), historically or to be provided at time of SEMS placement as applicable.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jacques Deviere, MD, PhD | ULB Erasme Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Colorado School of Medicine | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States | ||
| Indiana University Health Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36208796 | Derived | Sherman S, Kozarek RA, Costamagna G, Reddy DN, Tarnasky P, Shah RJ, Slivka A, Fogel E, Watkins J, Delhaye M, Irani SS, Tringali A, Lakhtakia S, Kedia P, Edmundowicz S, Peetermans JA, Rousseau MJ, Deviere J; Pancreatic SEMS in Chronic Pancreatitis Study Group. Soft self-expandable metal stent to treat painful pancreatic duct strictures secondary to chronic pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Mar;97(3):472-481.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.09.021. Epub 2022 Oct 5. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants were considered "enrolled" after providing written informed consent. Participants who provided written informed consent but subsequently did not meet one or more of the selection criteria were considered screen failures and excluded from the study. Only participants who met all eligibility criteria were counted toward the enrollment ceiling and considered the primary analysis cohort.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | WallFlex FCSEMS Recipients | The WallFlex™ Pancreatic RX Fully Covered Soft Stent System consists of a flexible delivery system preloaded with a self-expanding pancreatic metal stent. Patients who meet all eligibility criteria will receive the WallFlex Pancreatic stent for up to 6 months stent indwell and 6 months follow-up after stent removal. A patient is considered "enrolled" after signing the study-specific Informed Consent Form (ICF). Patients who sign the ICF but subsequently do not meet one or more of the selection criteria will be considered screen failures and excluded from the study. Pancreatic fully-covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS): The WallFlex™ Pancreatic RX Fully Covered Soft Stent System consists of a flexible delivery system preloaded with a self-expanding pancreatic metal stent. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | WallFlex FCSEMS Recipients | The WallFlex™ Pancreatic RX Fully Covered Soft Stent System consists of a flexible delivery system preloaded with a self-expanding pancreatic metal stent. Patients who meet all eligibility criteria will receive the WallFlex Pancreatic stent for up to 6 months stent indwell and 6 months follow-up after stent removal. A patient is considered "enrolled" after signing the study-specific Informed Consent Form (ICF). Patients who sign the ICF but subsequently do not meet one or more of the selection criteria will be considered screen failures and excluded from the study. Pancreatic fully-covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS): The WallFlex™ Pancreatic RX Fully Covered Soft Stent System consists of a flexible delivery system preloaded with a self-expanding pancreatic metal stent. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Pain Reduction | The self-reported pain score (0-100) was the mean of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Izbicki Frequency of Pain subscore (sum treated as a continuous variable).The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who had complete (pain score ≤ 10) or partial (pain score ˃ 10 but reduced at least 50% compared to pain as baseline) pain relief by 6 months after FCSEMS removal or observation of CDM or partial stent migration. Primary efficacy endpoint failure included any of the following: 1) no pain relief, 2) complete or partial pain relief in the setting of a 50% higher average daily narcotic dose compared to the patient's daily average narcotic dose in the month prior to baseline and at 6 months post-stent removal/observation of CDM, 3) stent migration in setting of recurring pain (VAS Pain Score of ≥ 20), 4) restenting in the setting of recurring pain. | There were 67 participants who enrolled in the study and had attempted FCSEMS placement. Of the 67 participants with attempted FCSEMS placement, 21 were excluded because they were not eligible for the primary efficacy endpoint analysis (i.e., 16 had insufficient pain, 2 died, and 3 were lost to follow-up). As a result, 46 participants were eligible for the primary efficacy endpoint analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline to 6 months post-stent removal or 6 months post-observation of complete or partial stent migration |
Adverse event information was collected from beginning of study participation until end of study, or approximately 12-15 months.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | WallFlex FCSEMS Recipients | The WallFlex™ Pancreatic RX Fully Covered Soft Stent System consists of a flexible delivery system preloaded with a self-expanding pancreatic metal stent. Patients who meet all eligibility criteria will receive the WallFlex Pancreatic stent for up to 6 months stent indwell and 6 months follow-up after stent removal. A patient is considered "enrolled" after signing the study-specific Informed Consent Form (ICF). Patients who sign the ICF but subsequently do not meet one or more of the selection criteria will be considered screen failures and excluded from the study. Pancreatic fully-covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS): The WallFlex™ Pancreatic RX Fully Covered Soft Stent System consists of a flexible delivery system preloaded with a self-expanding pancreatic metal stent. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Vatcher | Boston Scientific Corporation | +1-508-683-5274 | brian.vatcher@bsci.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 28, 2017 | Oct 13, 2022 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050500 | Pancreatitis, Chronic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010195 | Pancreatitis |
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Endoscopic Stent Removal Success |
Endoscopic stent removal success is defined as ability to remove stent endoscopically (forceps, snare) without serious stent removal-related adverse events. |
| Assessed at study stent removal or observation of complete or partial stent migration. This is endpoint is assessed through the Month 6 Study Stent Removal visit. |
| Stent Migration Rate | Stent migration is the change in location of a stent from its originally placed location. In this study, pancreatic stent migration was noted as partial or complete and either proximal (i.e., into the pancreas) or distal (i.e., out of the pancreas). | Study stent placement through 6 months post-stent removal or 6 months post-observation of complete or partial stent migration |
| Restenting Rate | Restenting is the placement of a non-study stent due to no improvement in clinical status and associated persistence of stricture following removal or complete distal migration of the study stent. | Study stent removal or observation of study stent migration through 6 months post-stent removal or 6 months post-observation of complete or partial stent migration |
| Secondary Stricture Rate | A secondary stricture is a ductal narrowing located at the intraductal edge of the study stent. | Study stent placement through 6 months post-stent removal or 6 months post-observation of complete or partial stent migration |
| Indianapolis |
| Indiana |
| 46202 |
| United States |
| University of Pittsburgh Medical Center | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| Methodist Dallas Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75208 | United States |
| Virginia Mason Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | 98101 | United States |
| ULB Erasme Hospital | Brussels | Belgium |
| Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal | Montreal | Quebec | H2X 3J4 | Canada |
| Asian Institute of Gastroenterology | Hyderabad | Andhra Pradesh | 500 082 | India |
| Policlinico A. Gemelli | Rome | 00168 | Italy |
| Erasmus Medical Center | Rotterdam | 3015 CE | Netherlands |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Time Since CP Diagnosed | The number of participants analyzed for time since CP diagnosis is lower than the number of baseline participants due to missing data or status unknown. | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kilograms |
|
| CP Etiology | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Current Alcohol Consumption | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| CP Calcific | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type of Calcification | Of the 67 baseline participants, 48 participants were reported to have calcific CP. As a result, only 48 participants were evaluated for type of calcification. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Surgical Candidate | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Smoking Status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Narcotic Dose | The number of participants analyzed for narcotic dose is lower than the number of baseline participants due to missing data or status unknown. | Mean | Standard Deviation | morphine milligram equivalents |
|
| Time Since First Narcotic Medication | The number of participants analyzed for time since first narcotic medication is lower than the number of baseline participants due to missing data or status unknown. | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Steatorrhea | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Diabetes Status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Pancreas Divisum | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Prior Pancreatic Sphincterotomy Performed | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Prior Biliary or Pancreatic Sphincterotomy Performed | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| History of Pancreatic Duct Stones | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Stone Clearance Procedures Performed | Of the 67 baseline participants, 31 participants were reported to have stone clearance procedures performed. As a result, only 31 participants were evaluated for type of stone clearance procedure(s) performed. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Current Pancreatic Stones | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Largest Stone | Of the 67 baseline participants, 42 participants were reported to have current pancreatic stones. Only 40 participants were evaluated for largest stone size. The number of participants analyzed for largest stone size is lower than the number of participants with current pancreatic stones due to missing data or status unknown. | Mean | Standard Deviation | millimeter |
|
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Rate of Related SAEs From WallFlex Pancreatic Stent Placement to End of Study | The primary safety endpoint was the rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the FCSEMS or study procedures from FCSEMS placement to end of study follow-up. Pain thought to be caused by FCSEMS pancreatic stent expansion was reported but did not count towards the endpoint if all three of the following conditions applied:
| Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline to 6 months post-stent removal or 6 months post-observation of complete or partial stent migration |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stent Placement Success | Satisfactory position is defined as the stent being across the stricture, without visible occluding impaction at the genu of the pancreatic duct and with distal end of the stent visible in the duodenum. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Assessed upon study stent placement. This endpoint is assessed at the Study Stent Placement visit (Day 0). |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Endoscopic Stent Removal Success | Endoscopic stent removal success is defined as ability to remove stent endoscopically (forceps, snare) without serious stent removal-related adverse events. | There were 67 participants who enrolled in the study and had attempted FCSEMS placement. Technical success (i.e., successful stent placement) was achieved in 65 of the 67 participants with attempted FCSEMS placement. As a result, 65 participants were evaluated for the endoscopic stent removal success endpoint. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Assessed at study stent removal or observation of complete or partial stent migration. This is endpoint is assessed through the Month 6 Study Stent Removal visit. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stent Migration Rate | Stent migration is the change in location of a stent from its originally placed location. In this study, pancreatic stent migration was noted as partial or complete and either proximal (i.e., into the pancreas) or distal (i.e., out of the pancreas). | There were 67 participants who enrolled in the study and had attempted FCSEMS placement. Technical success (i.e., successful stent placement) was achieved in 65 of the 67 participants with attempted FCSEMS placement. As a result, 65 participants were evaluated for the stent migration endpoint. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Study stent placement through 6 months post-stent removal or 6 months post-observation of complete or partial stent migration |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Restenting Rate | Restenting is the placement of a non-study stent due to no improvement in clinical status and associated persistence of stricture following removal or complete distal migration of the study stent. | There were 67 participants who enrolled in the study and had attempted FCSEMS placement. Technical success (i.e., successful stent placement) was achieved in 65 of the 67 participants with attempted FCSEMS placement. As a result, 65 participants were evaluated for the restenting rate endpoint. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Study stent removal or observation of study stent migration through 6 months post-stent removal or 6 months post-observation of complete or partial stent migration |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Secondary Stricture Rate | A secondary stricture is a ductal narrowing located at the intraductal edge of the study stent. | There were 67 participants who enrolled in the study and had attempted FCSEMS placement. Technical success (i.e., successful stent placement) was achieved in 65 of the 67 participants with attempted FCSEMS placement. As a result, 65 participants were evaluated for the secondary stricture rate endpoint. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Study stent placement through 6 months post-stent removal or 6 months post-observation of complete or partial stent migration |
|
|
|
| 2 |
| 67 |
| 21 |
| 67 |
| 20 |
| 67 |
| Post-ERCP pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chronic pancreatitis exacerbation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Duodenal ulceration | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Elevated liver function tests | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ampullary occlusion of the bile duct | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripancreatic fluid collection | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Portal vein and SMV thrombosis | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatal multiorgan failure from sepsis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholangitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Liver function test increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D020969 |
| Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |