Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study is investigating the ability of UroGen's UGN-101 to treat urothelial carcinoma tumors from the upper urinary tract.
Trial TC-UT-03 is a prospective, open label, single-arm trial, designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of treatment with UGN-101 instilled in the upper urinary system of patients with non-invasive low-grade (LG), Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC).
Upon signing of informed consent, the patients will undergo a screening visit for eligibility evaluation. Eligible patients will be treated with UGN-101 once weekly for a total of 6 times; in a retrograde fashion. Patients who will demonstrate complete response (CR) will be treated with UGN-101 once monthly as a maintenance therapy for a total of 11 instillations or up to the first recurrence whichever comes first.
Five (5) weeks (± 1 w) following the last instillation, the Primary Disease Evaluation (PDE) Visit, during which safety and efficacy will be assessed, will take place. During this visit, the ablative effect of the UGN-101 will be assessed visually, by upper tract washed urine cytology, and if there are remaining tumors, by biopsy or brush biopsy if technically feasible.
Patient demonstrating CR at PDE will undergo monthly maintenance instillations of UGN-101 up to 11 months post PDE. Safety follow-up for these patients will be done until one month post last instillation or at the end of the follow-up period in FU visit 12, which is the earlier.
For patients who did not demonstrate Complete Response, to the extent that it is possible, all remaining tumors lesions will be biopsied. The patients shall undergo any additional surgical or other treatment the Principal Investigator (PI) decides deem necessary to remove remaining tumor.
An independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) was assigned to this trial. Accumulating safety, tolerability and efficacy data will be monitored periodically by the DMC according to a pre-specified process and frequency detailed in the DMC charter.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| UGN-101 instillations | Experimental | The Mitomycin C (MMC) concentration of UGN-101 to be used in this trial will be 4 mg MMC per 1 mL of TC-3 gel, maximum dose is 15ml. 6 once weekly intravesical instillations for the ablation treatment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UGN-101 instillations | Drug | Treatment with UGN-101 once weekly for a total of 6 times; in a retrograde fashion. Patients who will demonstrate complete response (CR) will be treated with UGN-101 once monthly as a maintenance therapy for a total of 11 instillations or up to the first recurrence whichever comes first. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Primary Efficacy Endpoint Was the Number of Patients Attaining Complete Response (CR) at the End of the Treatment Period (PDE Visit). | The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of patients attaining complete response (CR) at the end of the treatment period (Primary Disease Evaluation (PDE) visit). The CR was defined dichotomously as "Success" if CR was confirmed at PDE visit (or relevant follow-up), and "Failure" otherwise. | An average of 11 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Was Long-term Durability of Complete Response (CR): Number of Patients Who Maintained CR at 12 Month Post PDE Visit. This Endpoint Was Defined Only for Those Patients Who Achieved CR at the PDE Visit. | Continuously: Duration of CR or time-to-recurrence since the Primary Disease Evaluation (PDE) Visit (i.e., time in days from the visit at which CR was determined until recurrence or censoring). This endpoint served as the main long-term durability endpoint. Dichotomously: "Success" if CR was still present at the 12 month post-PDE Visit (at Follow-Up Visit 4), and "Failure" otherwise. This endpoint served as a supportive long-term durability endpoint. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Adverse Event Outcomes: Safety Was Monitored Throughout the Study by Reviewing Adverse Events (AEs). | Treatment-emergent AEs were most frequently reported from the Renal and urinary disorders system organ class (SOC), 59 (83.1%) patients, as expected, given the underlying indication of low grade (LG) Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in the study population, chemotherapeutic drug in a gel matrix instilled in the upper urinary tract (UUT), and the study procedure of treatment instillation via a ureteral catheter. The toxicity within the upper urinary tract was considered consistent with the disease under study and the mode of administration of UGN-101. Most events in the Renal and urinary disorders SOC were mild to moderate in severity and resolved. No new risks were identified and the overall safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of endoscopic administration of intravesical mitomycin and of mitomycin. Overall, based on the safety and efficacy results to date, the benefit-risk profile of UGN-101 is favorable for the treatment of LG-UTUC. |
Main Inclusion Criteria:
Main Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Seth Lerner, M.D. | Baylor College of Medicine | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic Hospital | Phoenix | Arizona | 85054 | United States | ||
| Loma Linda Cancer Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39561384 | Derived | Pierorazio PM, Kleinmann N, Shabsigh A, Hu B, Raman JD, Kaimakliotis H, Sankin A, Singla N, Meads A, Burger B, Raju S, Louie MJ, Chamie K, Weizer A, Schoenberg M. Long-Term Outcomes of Primary Chemoablation of Low-Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma With UGN-101, a Mitomycin Reverse Thermal Gel. J Urol. 2025 Mar;213(3):313-322. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004331. Epub 2024 Nov 19. | |
| 33677615 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | UGN-101 Mitomycin for Pyelocalyceal Solution | This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm, pivotal phase study, designed to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety UGN-101 treatment administered to the Upper Urinary Tract (UUT). Upon signing of informed consent, the patients underwent a Screening Visit for eligibility evaluation. Eligible patients with confirmed low grade (LG) noninvasive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) were treated with 6 once-weekly instillations of UGN-101. Tumor response was evaluated at the Primary Disease Evaluation (PDE) Visit, 5 weeks after the last treatment period instillation. Patients who demonstrated complete response (CR) could enter a maintenance period and receive up to 11 once-monthly instillations, per investigator modified treatment regimen. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Nov 18, 2018 | Sep 22, 2020 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| 12 months |
| Durability of Complete Response (CR) for Each Follow-up Time Point. | Durability of CR defined dichotomously as "Success" if CR was achieved at Primary Disease Evaluation (PDE) visit and remained at follow-up Visit 1, Visit 2 and Visit 3 (3, 6, 9 and 12 months post PDE visit), and "Failure" otherwise. | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months |
| Clinical Benefit for Patients With Partial Response (PR) at the Primary Disease Evaluation (PDE) Visit. Clinical Benefit Endpoint Was Analyzed Using the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set, Including Patients Who Achieved Partial Response at PDE Visit. | Clinical benefit for patients with partial response (PR) at the PDE visit. Clinical benefit endpoint was analyzed using the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set, including patients who achieved partial response at PDE Visit.Partial response at PDE visit will be defined dichotomously, similarly to the primary efficacy endpoint. For subjects with partial response at PDE visit, originally planned and actual treatments will be compared. | An average of 11 weeks |
| Pharmacokinetic: The PK Profiles of the First UGN-101 Instillation in the Blood Were to be Examined for the First 6 Patients. | Cmax: maximum plasma concentration Analysis of individual plasma concentration versus time profiles showed that at 6 hours post instillation, the plasma concentrations of all 6 patients were below 2 ng/mL, with the plasma concentration of one patient dropping below the LOQ (i.e., < 0.100 ng/mL). The mean Cmax was 6.24 ng/mL (range: 2.43 to 12.80 ng/mL). The highest individual observed Cmax value of 12.80 ng/mL was 187-fold and 40 fold lower than the observed Cmax level following an intravenous bolus dose of 30 mg or 10 mg mitomycin (2.4 μg/mL and 0.52 μg/mL, respectively) and is 31 fold lower than the threshold value of 400 ng/mL for myelosuppression observed with mitomycin. | Blood samples were collected at 0 minutes (pre-dose) and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours following the first instillation of UGN-101 |
| Pharmacokinetic: The PK Profiles of the First UGN-101 Instillation in the Blood Were to be Examined for the First 6 Patients. | Tmax: time to maximum plasma concentration Analysis of individual plasma concentration versus time profiles showed that at 6 hours post instillation, the plasma concentrations of all 6 patients were below 2 ng/mL, with the plasma concentration of one patient dropping below the LOQ (i.e., < 0.100 ng/mL). The mean Cmax was 6.24 ng/mL (range: 2.43 to 12.80 ng/mL), and the Tmax was 1.79 hours (range: 0.50 to 5.17 hours) after instillation. The highest individual observed Cmax value of 12.80 ng/mL was 187-fold and 40 fold lower than the observed Cmax level following an intravenous bolus dose of 30 mg or 10 mg mitomycin (2.4 μg/mL and 0.52 μg/mL, respectively) and is 31 fold lower than the threshold value of 400 ng/mL for myelosuppression observed with mitomycin. | Blood samples were collected at 0 minutes (pre-dose) and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours following the first instillation with UGN-101 |
| Pharmacokinetic: The PK Profiles of the First UGN-101 Instillation in the Blood Were to be Examined for the First 6 Patients. | Half-life (t½): terminal half-life The mean apparent t½ following instillation of mitomycin into the upper urinary tract (UUT) was 1.27 hours (76 minutes), which was longer than the true t½ of mitomycin following a 30 mg bolus injection (mean t½ value of approximately 17 minutes). The apparent t½ demonstrates that UGN-101 dissolved gradually, resulting in prolonged exposure of mitomycin following local instillation into the UUT. | Blood samples were collected at 0 minutes (pre-dose) and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours following the first instillation with UGN-101 |
| Through study completion, an average of 15 months |
| Loma Linda |
| California |
| 92354 |
| United States |
| University of California | Los Angeles | California | 90095 | United States |
| Providence Medical Institute | Santa Monica | California | 90404 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic Florida | Jacksonville | Florida | 32224 | United States |
| Loyola University Medical Center, Department of Urology | Maywood | Illinois | 60153 | United States |
| Indiana University School of Medicine | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| John Hopkins University | Baltimore | Maryland | 21218 | United States |
| University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55455 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic health system | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Urology Center Las Vegas | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89144 | United States |
| Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
| Weill Cornell Medical Center | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
| Montefiore Medical Center (Albert Einstein) | The Bronx | New York | 10467 | United States |
| University of north carolina - chapel hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27514 | United States |
| The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Penn State College of Medicine | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
| Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| MD Anderson | Houston | Texas | 77006 | United States |
| Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (University of Washington) | Seattle | Washington | 98109--1023 | United States |
| Hasharon Hospital (Rabin Medical Center) | Petah Tikva | 49372 | Israel |
| Sheba Medical Center | Ramat Gan | 52621 | Israel |
| Derived |
| Shabsigh A, Kleinmann N, Smith AB, Scherr D, Seltzer E, Schoenberg M, Lerner SP. Pharmacokinetics of UGN-101, a mitomycin-containing reverse thermal gel instilled via retrograde catheter for the treatment of low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 Jun;87(6):799-805. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04246-w. Epub 2021 Mar 7. |
| 32670424 | Derived | Kokorovic A, Matin SF. UGN-101 (mitomycin gel): a novel treatment for low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 Jul 3;12:1758835920937950. doi: 10.1177/1758835920937950. eCollection 2020. |
| 32631491 | Derived | Kleinmann N, Matin SF, Pierorazio PM, Gore JL, Shabsigh A, Hu B, Chamie K, Godoy G, Hubosky S, Rivera M, O'Donnell M, Quek M, Raman JD, Knoedler JJ, Scherr D, Stern J, Weight C, Weizer A, Woods M, Kaimakliotis H, Smith AB, Linehan J, Coleman J, Humphreys MR, Pak R, Lifshitz D, Verni M, Adibi M, Amin MB, Seltzer E, Klein I, Konorty M, Strauss-Ayali D, Hakim G, Schoenberg M, Lerner SP. Primary chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma using UGN-101, a mitomycin-containing reverse thermal gel (OLYMPUS): an open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):776-785. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30147-9. Epub 2020 Apr 29. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | UGN-101 Mitomycin for Pyelocalyceal Solution | This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm, pivotal phase study, designed to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety UGN-101 treatment administered to the UUT. Upon signing of informed consent, the patients underwent a Screening Visit for eligibility evaluation. Eligible patients with confirmed LG noninvasive UTUC were treated with 6 once-weekly instillations of UGN-101. Tumor response was evaluated at the PDE Visit, 5 weeks after the last treatment period instillation. Patients who demonstrated CR could enter a maintenance period and receive up to 11 once-monthly instillations, per investigator modified treatment regimen. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | The Primary Efficacy Endpoint Was the Number of Patients Attaining Complete Response (CR) at the End of the Treatment Period (PDE Visit). | The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of patients attaining complete response (CR) at the end of the treatment period (Primary Disease Evaluation (PDE) visit). The CR was defined dichotomously as "Success" if CR was confirmed at PDE visit (or relevant follow-up), and "Failure" otherwise. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | An average of 11 weeks |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Was Long-term Durability of Complete Response (CR): Number of Patients Who Maintained CR at 12 Month Post PDE Visit. This Endpoint Was Defined Only for Those Patients Who Achieved CR at the PDE Visit. | Continuously: Duration of CR or time-to-recurrence since the Primary Disease Evaluation (PDE) Visit (i.e., time in days from the visit at which CR was determined until recurrence or censoring). This endpoint served as the main long-term durability endpoint. Dichotomously: "Success" if CR was still present at the 12 month post-PDE Visit (at Follow-Up Visit 4), and "Failure" otherwise. This endpoint served as a supportive long-term durability endpoint. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Durability of Complete Response (CR) for Each Follow-up Time Point. | Durability of CR defined dichotomously as "Success" if CR was achieved at Primary Disease Evaluation (PDE) visit and remained at follow-up Visit 1, Visit 2 and Visit 3 (3, 6, 9 and 12 months post PDE visit), and "Failure" otherwise. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Benefit for Patients With Partial Response (PR) at the Primary Disease Evaluation (PDE) Visit. Clinical Benefit Endpoint Was Analyzed Using the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set, Including Patients Who Achieved Partial Response at PDE Visit. | Clinical benefit for patients with partial response (PR) at the PDE visit. Clinical benefit endpoint was analyzed using the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set, including patients who achieved partial response at PDE Visit.Partial response at PDE visit will be defined dichotomously, similarly to the primary efficacy endpoint. For subjects with partial response at PDE visit, originally planned and actual treatments will be compared. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | An average of 11 weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Pharmacokinetic: The PK Profiles of the First UGN-101 Instillation in the Blood Were to be Examined for the First 6 Patients. | Cmax: maximum plasma concentration Analysis of individual plasma concentration versus time profiles showed that at 6 hours post instillation, the plasma concentrations of all 6 patients were below 2 ng/mL, with the plasma concentration of one patient dropping below the LOQ (i.e., < 0.100 ng/mL). The mean Cmax was 6.24 ng/mL (range: 2.43 to 12.80 ng/mL). The highest individual observed Cmax value of 12.80 ng/mL was 187-fold and 40 fold lower than the observed Cmax level following an intravenous bolus dose of 30 mg or 10 mg mitomycin (2.4 μg/mL and 0.52 μg/mL, respectively) and is 31 fold lower than the threshold value of 400 ng/mL for myelosuppression observed with mitomycin. | PK Analysis Set: Consisted of patients who signed consent for PK and had sufficient PK data for the determination of PK parameters. | Posted | Mean | Inter-Quartile Range | ng/mL | Blood samples were collected at 0 minutes (pre-dose) and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours following the first instillation of UGN-101 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Safety Adverse Event Outcomes: Safety Was Monitored Throughout the Study by Reviewing Adverse Events (AEs). | Treatment-emergent AEs were most frequently reported from the Renal and urinary disorders system organ class (SOC), 59 (83.1%) patients, as expected, given the underlying indication of low grade (LG) Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in the study population, chemotherapeutic drug in a gel matrix instilled in the upper urinary tract (UUT), and the study procedure of treatment instillation via a ureteral catheter. The toxicity within the upper urinary tract was considered consistent with the disease under study and the mode of administration of UGN-101. Most events in the Renal and urinary disorders SOC were mild to moderate in severity and resolved. No new risks were identified and the overall safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of endoscopic administration of intravesical mitomycin and of mitomycin. Overall, based on the safety and efficacy results to date, the benefit-risk profile of UGN-101 is favorable for the treatment of LG-UTUC. | Safety: Consisted of all patients who enrolled in the study and received at least 1 instillation of UGN-101. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Through study completion, an average of 15 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Pharmacokinetic: The PK Profiles of the First UGN-101 Instillation in the Blood Were to be Examined for the First 6 Patients. | Tmax: time to maximum plasma concentration Analysis of individual plasma concentration versus time profiles showed that at 6 hours post instillation, the plasma concentrations of all 6 patients were below 2 ng/mL, with the plasma concentration of one patient dropping below the LOQ (i.e., < 0.100 ng/mL). The mean Cmax was 6.24 ng/mL (range: 2.43 to 12.80 ng/mL), and the Tmax was 1.79 hours (range: 0.50 to 5.17 hours) after instillation. The highest individual observed Cmax value of 12.80 ng/mL was 187-fold and 40 fold lower than the observed Cmax level following an intravenous bolus dose of 30 mg or 10 mg mitomycin (2.4 μg/mL and 0.52 μg/mL, respectively) and is 31 fold lower than the threshold value of 400 ng/mL for myelosuppression observed with mitomycin. | PK Analysis Set: Consisted of patients who signed consent for PK and had sufficient PK data for the determination of PK parameters. | Posted | Mean | Inter-Quartile Range | Hours | Blood samples were collected at 0 minutes (pre-dose) and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours following the first instillation with UGN-101 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Pharmacokinetic: The PK Profiles of the First UGN-101 Instillation in the Blood Were to be Examined for the First 6 Patients. | Half-life (t½): terminal half-life The mean apparent t½ following instillation of mitomycin into the upper urinary tract (UUT) was 1.27 hours (76 minutes), which was longer than the true t½ of mitomycin following a 30 mg bolus injection (mean t½ value of approximately 17 minutes). The apparent t½ demonstrates that UGN-101 dissolved gradually, resulting in prolonged exposure of mitomycin following local instillation into the UUT. | PK Analysis Set: Consisted of patients who signed consent for PK and had sufficient PK data for the determination of PK parameters. | Posted | Number | Hours | Blood samples were collected at 0 minutes (pre-dose) and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours following the first instillation with UGN-101 |
|
|
The study period for Adverse Events (AEs) collection was defined from the Informed Consent Form (ICF) signature and up to 30 days following the last administration of investigational product unless the AE was suspected to be related to the study treatment or was a Serious Adverse Event, in such case the AE should be reported regardless to the timelines of the reporting period. Through study completion, an average of 15 months.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | UGN-101 Mitomycin for Pyelocalyceal Solution | This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm, pivotal phase study, designed to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety UGN-101 treatment administered to the Upper Urinary Tract (UUT). Upon signing of informed consent, the patients underwent a Screening Visit for eligibility evaluation. Eligible patients with confirmed Low Grade (LG) noninvasive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) were treated with 6 once-weekly instillations of UGN-101. Tumor response was evaluated at the Primary Disease Evaluation (PDE) Visit, 5 weeks after the last treatment period instillation. Patients who demonstrated complete response (CR) could enter a maintenance period and receive up to11 once-monthly instillations, per investigator modified treatment regimen. | 5 | 71 | 28 | 71 | 67 | 71 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ureteric stenosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyrdornephrosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flank Pain | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urosepsis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Heamaturia | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pelvi-ureteric obstruction | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ureteric obstruction | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract obstruction | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure acute | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure chronic | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure congestive | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary oedema | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Failure to thrive | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatraemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aortic dissection | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subdural haematoma | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Iron deficiency anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Death | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gangrene | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Septic shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Burns third degree | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ankle fracture | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| groin pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transient global amnesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transitional cell cancer of renal pelvis and ureter metastatic | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ureteric stenosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flank Pain | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal impairment | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hydronephrosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pollakiuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bladder transitional cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain lower | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| urinary tract inflammation | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract obstruction | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pelvi-ureteric obstruction | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal Failure | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| urine abnormality | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight loss poor | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madlen Malinowski | UroGen Pharma Ltd. | 6467689533 | madlen.malinowski@urogen.com |
| ICF_001.pdf |
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jun 18, 2018 | Dec 1, 2020 | Prot_003.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 27, 2020 | Dec 1, 2020 | SAP_004.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002295 | Carcinoma, Transitional Cell |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016685 | Mitomycin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008937 | Mitomycins |
| D045563 | Indolequinones |
| D011809 | Quinones |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D001389 | Azirines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D007211 | Indoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
Not provided
Not provided
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|