Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of California, Davis | OTHER |
| University of Southern California | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine whether delivery of SpeakOut, a behavioral intervention to increase social communication about long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods among adolescents, is associated with increased uptake of LARC methods among the social contacts of SpeakOut recipients.
The investigators will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial of SpeakOut with adolescent LARC users and their female peers. Over three years, SpeakOut will be implemented in eight partner clinics. IUD and implant users aged 15 to 19 who attend appointments at participating clinics will be invited to enroll in the evaluation study as "primary" participants and receive either SpeakOut or a control intervention about alcohol use. The social contacts of primary participants will be asked to enroll in the study as "secondary" participants. The study's primary outcome will be the proportion of sexually-active secondary participants who initiate use of a LARC method within 9 months of study enrollment.
Teen pregnancy results from sexually active adolescents' under-use of effective contraception. The most effective reversible methods - intrauterine devices (IUDs) and subdermal contraceptive implants, collectively referred to as long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) - have low rates of use among adolescents. Social networks are important influences on teen contraceptive knowledge and use. Encouraging social communication to increase knowledge and acceptability of LARC among female adolescents can increase use of these methods.
The Share Health Study is a cluster randomized control trial, randomized at the primary participant level. Primary participants will be randomized to receive either SpeakOut or a control intervention about alcohol use immediately before intervention delivery on the day of their clinic appointment. A cluster consists of primary participants and the secondary participants recruited to the study via a specialized snowball sampling procedure carried out with the assistance of the primary participant, described below.
The design of SpeakOut was initially motivated by a qualitative study performed by Dr. Dehlendorf's team that found that adolescent IUD users report that a lack of social communication about this method is a barrier to IUD use. Dr. Dehlendorf's team then performed further qualitative work designed to understand the transmission of information about contraception within social networks, with the goal of informing a social-network-based intervention. The investigators confirmed that social communication is an influential factor in contraceptive decision making, and that it is considered particularly important to speak to individuals who have personal experience with specific methods. However, participants reported often hearing negative information about these methods, particularly IUDs, through their social network.
Primary participant procedures
In addition to the above procedures, research staff at UC Davis will seek to obtain publically available claims data related to primary participants' reproductive health care over the 9-month study period. If available, Family PACT (Family Planning Access, Care, and Treatment) and Medi-Cal data will be obtained on pregnancy and removal of IUD or implant over the 9-month study period. This data will validate primary participant self-report of pregnancy and method removal at follow-up, or substitute for missing follow-up data. The California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) has a standardized application process for the evaluation, review and potential approval of requests for protected data for research purposes. To obtain Family PACT and Medi-Cal administrative data from DHCS, researchers must submit an application for approval from the Data and Research Committee (DRC), which oversees DHCS' data request evaluation process, and from the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects under the California Health and Human Services Agency (CHHSA). The DRC assesses the appropriateness of requests for protected data, assigns a priority status to each request, and recommends potential approval/denial action to DHCS Executive management. As a part of accessing DHCS data, researchers are required to provide a presentation of their findings to DHCS staff. In addition, requests can only be approved if they have a clear and strong argument that the proposed research request will result in information that benefits the Medi-Cal program (Section 1902(a) of the federal Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(7)). Linkages to external data sources must be performed by DHCS staff, therefore SpeakOut will need to provide identifiable participant data to DHCS in order to obtain linked administrative data from participants' claims history.
Information about the above process is included in the primary participant consent form, and primary participants may verbally inform the consenting researcher that they opt out of having their data accessed.
Secondary participant procedures
Please note that our sample size of 2500 is based on an estimate of cluster sizes of 4 secondary participants per 1 primary participant. As per our initial grant application, "During the course of the study, the distribution of initial cluster sizes (i.e. enrolled eligible secondary participants per primary participant) will be monitored for gross departures from our planning assumptions. In case of discrepancies, the targeted enrollment will be adjusted to achieve the necessary effective sample size. To preserve the integrity of the trial, this monitoring will only concern enrollment information, not study outcomes."
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SpeakOut Intervention | Experimental | Primary participants will be randomized to this arm or the Alcohol Control Arm at the time of enrollment. Secondary participants will be assigned to this arm if the primary participant whom initially told them about the study is in this arm. Primary participants in this arm will receive the SpeakOut intervention on the day of enrollment, and will complete surveys on their contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and social communication at baseline, three months, and nine months. Secondary participants in this arm will complete similar surveys at baseline, three months, and nine months. Note: Secondary participants will not receive intervention, but will be assessed on outcomes that may have been affected as a result of social communication with primary participants. |
|
| Alcohol Control Intervention | Active Comparator | Primary participants will be randomized to this arm or the SpeakOut Intervention Arm at the time of enrollment. Secondary participants will be assigned to this arm if the primary participant whom initially told them about the study is in this arm. Primary participants in this arm will receive the Alcohol Control Intervention on the day of enrollment, and will complete surveys on their contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and social communication at baseline, three months, and nine months. Secondary participants in this arm will complete similar surveys at baseline, three months, and nine months. Note: Secondary participants will receive an intervention, but will be assessed on outcomes that may have been affected as a result of social communication with primary participants. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpeakOut | Behavioral | SpeakOut aims to increase social communication about IUDs and implants between adolescent IUD and implant users and their peers. SpeakOut has four components:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Initiation of a LARC method among secondary participants | Self-reported measure of current contraceptive use in secondary participants not using IUD or implant at baseline. Will be examined among sexually active secondary participants, as well as all secondary participants regardless of sexual activity. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Initiation of cluster primary participant's LARC method among secondary participants | Self-reported measure of current contraceptive use in secondary participants not using IUD or implant at baseline. Will be examined among sexually active secondary participants, as well as all secondary participants regardless of sexual activity. Outcome will also be examined separately by LARC method, i.e. implant initiation among all secondary participants not using an implant at baseline (even if they used an IUD at baseline) if the primary participant was an implant user, as well as IUD initiation among all secondary participants not using an IUD at baseline (even if they used an implant) if the primary participant was an IUD user. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Contraceptive attitudes | Participants' attitudes towards various contraceptive methods, reported in global attitudinal scales in surveys, scored from 0-10. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
Primary Participant Inclusion Criteria:
Primary Participant Exclusion Criteria:
Secondary Participant Inclusion Criteria:
Secondary Participant Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Christine Dehlendorf, MD MAS | University of California, San Francisco | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of California, San Francisco | Davis | California | 94110 | United States | ||
| University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003142 | Communication |
| D006266 | Health Education |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D000099060 | Adherence Interventions |
| D055118 | Medication Adherence |
| D010349 | Patient Compliance |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000431 | Ethanol |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000438 | Alcohols |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Alcohol Control Intervention | Behavioral | The active comparator intervention is an alcohol assessment and education intervention using an SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment) framework. SBIRT is an evidence-based practice model aimed at preventing problematic use and identifying potential abuse and dependency issues. Research staff will ask two screening questions developed by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) and the American Academy of Pediatrics to screen for adolescents potentially at risk. Using a script based on tenets of motivational interviewing to assess alcohol related consequences, the research staff will guide teens in identifying personally relevant motivators for healthier behaviors, assess readiness to change, and offer educational materials and referrals. |
|
|
| 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Positive social communication about LARC method between primary and secondary participants | Self-reported measures of discussion about contraceptive methods with primary participant, in secondary participant follow-up surveys, and 5-point likert scale measures of agreement/disagreement with statements of positive and negative content of discussion. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Knowledge of cluster primary participant's LARC method among secondary participants | Secondary participants' accurate knowledge of features of their cluster primary participant's LARC method. In baseline and follow-up surveys, secondary participants will be asked to report whether or not they have ever heard of the method. If they have heard of the method in follow-up surveys, they will be asked to report on a 4-point Likert scale their self-perceived knowledge of the method. They will also be asked to answer a set of true/false/don't know knowledge items on the method's features derived from the Guttmacher Institute's Survey of Young Adults ("Fogzone" survey) and National Survey of Reproductive and Contraceptive Knowledge, as well as an item on the relative effectiveness of the method in relation to birth control pills. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Positive attitudes towards cluster primary participant's LARC method among secondary participants | Self-reported global attitudinal scales of contraceptive methods in secondary participant baseline and follow-up surveys, scored from 0-10. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Diagnosis of sexually transmitted infection among secondary participants | Diagnosis of a sexually transmitted infection (chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis [or trich], or other). Measured via self-report in secondary participant follow-up surveys (binary yes/no measure of diagnosis, and measure regarding which STI they were diagnosed with). | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Condom use at last sexual intercourse among sexually active secondary participants | Self-reported in secondary participant baseline and follow-up surveys with standardized question from the Office of Adolescent Health in the Department of Health and Human Services. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Initiation of sexual activity among secondary participants | Self-reported measure of ever having had sexual intercourse (standardized OAH measure) in secondary participant baseline and follow-up surveys among those who had not had sexual intercourse prior to enrollment. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Pregnancy among secondary participants | Self-reported measure of interval pregnancy (standardized OAH measure) in secondary participant follow-up surveys. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Continuation of LARC method among primary participants | Self-reported measure of current contraceptive method use in primary participant follow-up surveys. Also assessed using claims data. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Initiation of social communication about LARC method among primary participants | Primary participants' report of social communication about their LARC method, as well as the number of social contacts they talked to about their LARC method. Self-reported in measures assessing discussion about contraceptive methods with people they know generally and social contacts they listed at baseline specifically in primary participant surveys. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Knowledge of LARC method among primary participants | Primary participants' accurate knowledge of their chosen LARC method. In follow-up surveys, they will be asked to report on a 4-point Likert scale their self-perceived knowledge of the method. They will also be asked to answer a set of true/false/don't know knowledge items on the method's features derived from the Guttmacher Institute's Survey of Young Adults ("Fogzone" survey) and National Survey of Reproductive and Contraceptive Knowledge, as well as an item on the relative effectiveness of the method in relation to birth control pills. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Positive attitudes towards LARC method among primary participants | Self-reported global attitudinal scales in primary participant baseline and follow-up surveys, scored from 0-10. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Pregnancy among primary participants | Self-reported measure of interval pregnancy (standardized OAH measure) in primary participant follow-up surveys. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Risk of unintended pregnancy | Participants' risky sexual activity, defined as reporting sex without a contraceptive method in the past 3 months. Self-reported in primary and secondary participants' baseline and follow-up surveys. Will include sub-analysis of both primary and secondary participants. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Alcohol use | Participants' days of alcohol use as reported in surveys, measured via self-report in measure derived from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Knowledge of binge-drinking behaviors | Participants' knowledge of what constitutes binge drinking, including sex differences in binge drinking. Knowledge measures on follow-up surveys will are derived from the youth Risk Behavior survey. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Diagnosis of an STI among primary participants | Diagnosis of a sexually transmitted infection (chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis [or trich], or other). Measured via self-report in primary participant follow-up surveys (binary yes/no measure of diagnosis, and measure regarding which STI they were diagnosed with). Also assessed via claims data. | 3 months and 9 months post-enrollment |
| Acceptability of SpeakOut | Measured using items developed by the researchers to understand participants' experience with and opinion of different intervention components of SpeakOut.. Will be examined among both primary and secondary participants. | 9 months |
| Acceptability of PartyWise [control intervention] | Measured using items developed by the researchers to understand participants' experience with and opinion of different intervention components of Party Wise. Will be examined among both primary and secondary participants. | 9 months |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90033 |
| United States |
| D010342 |
| Patient Acceptance of Health Care |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |