Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the COVERA™ Vascular Covered Stent for the treatment of stenotic lesions in the upper extremity venous outflow of the Arteriovenous (AV) access circuit.
This study will compare the use of the COVERA™ Vascular Covered Stent (following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)) to safety and effectiveness performance goals (PGs) for the treatment of stenotic lesions in the upper extremity venous outflow of the arteriovenous (AV) access circuit of subjects dialyzing with an AV graft.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Covera(TM) Vascular Covered Stent | Experimental | Placement of the Covera Vascular Covered Stent following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covera(TM) Vascular Covered Stent | Device | Treatment of stenoses with primary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and placement of the Covera Vascular Covered Stent. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Freedom From AV Access Circuit Localized or Systemic Serious Adverse Events | Safety is defined as freedom from any adverse event(s) (AEs), localized or systemic, that reasonably suggests the involvement of the AV access circuit (not including stenosis or thrombosis) that require or result in any of the following alone or in combination: additional interventions (including surgery); in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization; or death. | 30 days post index procedure |
| Effectiveness Endpoint: Number of Participants With Target Lesion Primary Patency | Target Lesion Primary Patency (TLPP) is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next clinically driven reintervention at the original treatment site or until the extremity is abandoned for permanent access. Primary patency ends when any of the following occurs: a) clinically driven reintervention in the treatment area; b) thrombotic occlusion within the treatment area; c) surgical intervention that excludes the original treatment area from the AV circuit, and/or d) abandonment of the AV access graft due to inability to treat the original treatment area. The primary effectiveness endpoint is evaluated against a performance goal (PG) of 40%. | 6 months post index procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Target Lesion Primary Patency (TLPP) | TLPP is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next clinically driven reintervention at the original treatment site or until the extremity is abandoned for permanent access. Primary patency ends when any of the following occurs: a) clinically driven reintervention in the treatment area; b) thrombotic occlusion within the treatment area; c) surgical intervention that excludes the original treatment area from the AV circuit, and/or d) abandonment of the AV access graft due to inability to treat the original treatment area. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. |
Not provided
Clinical Inclusion Criteria:
Angiographic Inclusion Criteria
Clinical Exclusion Criteria:
Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bart Dolmatch, M.D. | The Palo Alto Medical Foundation | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona Kidney Disease and Hypertension Center | Phoenix | Arizona | 85012 | United States | ||
| Southwest Vascular Center |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study was conducted at 14 active sites in the US. Of 181 consented subjects,110 were treated with device and 71 were considered screen failures. No site treated more than 20% of the total number of subjects.The first subject was treated Aug, 3, 2016 and the last one Feb. 27, 2017. The last 24-month follow-up contact occurred Mar. 16, 2019.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Covera(TM) Vascular Covered Stent | Vascular Covered Stent for the treatment of stenotic lesions at the graft-vein anastomosis of hemodialysis patients dialyzing with an AV graft. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 3, 2016 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure |
| Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP) | ACPP is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next access thrombosis or repeated intervention. ACPP ends with a reintervention anywhere within the access circuit. Vessel rupture caused by PTA is not an ACPP failure unless achieving hemostasis also causes thrombosis. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure |
| Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Device and Procedure Related AEs Involving the AV Access Circuit | Number of Participants with device and procedure related Adverse Events involving the AV access circuit. The access circuit is the area from the arterial inflow to the SVC-right atrial junction. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure, |
| Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Total Number of Arteriovenous (AV) Access Circuit Reinterventions | Total Number of AV Access Circuit Reinterventions defined as the number of reinterventions to the AV access circuit until access abandonment or through study completion. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure. |
| Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Total Number of Target Lesion Reinterventions | Total Number of Target Lesion Reinterventions defined as the number of reinterventions to maintain target lesion patency. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure |
| Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of Patency Function (IPF) | IPF is defined as the time from the index study procedure to study completion or access abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed on the AV access circuit in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. The IPF is representative of the number of days between interventions to maintain access circuit patency. The minimum and maximum ranges for the Index of Patency Function are as follows: 1 month (6.3 - 30.0); 3 months (6.3 - 90.0); 6 months (6.3 - 180.0); 12 months (6.3 - 365.0); 18 months (6.3 - 545.0); and 24 months (6.3 - 730.0). Higher values represent a better outcome, that is, more time elapsed between the Index study procedure and reinterventions. | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure |
| Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of Patency Function - Target Lesion (IPF-T) | IPF-T (Index of Patency Function - Target Lesion) is defined as the time from the index study procedure to study completion or complete access abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed at the target lesion in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. The IPF for target lesion patency is representative of the approximate (mean) number of days between interventions to maintain target lesion patency. The minimum and maximum ranges for the Index of Patency Function are as follows: 1 month (6.3 - 30.0); 3 months (6.3 - 90.0); 6 months (6.3 - 180.0); 12 months (6.3 - 365.0); 18 months (6.3 - 545.0); and 24 months (6.3 - 730.0). Higher values represent a better outcome, that is, more time elapsed between the Index study procedure and reinterventions. | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure |
| Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Post-intervention Secondary Patency | Secondary Patency is defined as the interval after the index intervention until the access is abandoned. Multiple repetitive treatments can be included in post-intervention secondary patency. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure |
| Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Technical Success (for Stent Graft Placement) | Technical Success is defined as successful deployment, based on the operator's opinion, of the implant to the intended location assessed at the time of the index procedure. | At time of index procedure |
| Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Procedure Success | Procedure Success is defined as anatomic success and resolution of the pre-procedural clinical indicator(s) (clinical success) of a hemodynamically significant stenosis. | At time of index procedure |
| Tempe |
| Arizona |
| 85281 |
| United States |
| Arizona Kidney Disease and Hypertension Center Medical Research Services, LLC | Tucson | Arizona | 85712 | United States |
| St. Joseph Hospital | Orange | California | 92868 | United States |
| Capital Nephrology Access Center | Sacramento | California | 95815 | United States |
| Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research | Jacksonville | Florida | 32207 | United States |
| Ocala Kidney Group | Ocala | Florida | 34471 | United States |
| Chicago Access Care | Chicago | Illinois | 60521 | United States |
| Renal and Transplant Associates of New England, P.C. | West Springfield | Massachusetts | 01089 | United States |
| The Cardiovascular Care Group | Westfield | New Jersey | 07090 | United States |
| Surgical Specialists of Charlotte | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28207 | United States |
| NC Heart and Vascular Research | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27607 | United States |
| NC Nephrology | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27610 | United States |
| Providence Access Care | Providence | Rhode Island | 02906 | United States |
| Tarrant Vascular Clinic | Fort Worth | Texas | 76104 | United States |
| Clinical Advancement Center, PLLC | San Antonio | Texas | 78215 | United States |
| COMPLETED | The Milestone is all participants who completed the study (24-month Follow-Up). |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Eight (8) of the 110 enrolled participants have not completed the trial and may therefore not be accounted for in the different follow-up periods, resulting in a discrepancy between the N and n for each period.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Covera(TM) Vascular Covered Stent | Vascular Covered Stent for the treatment of stenotic lesions at the graft-vein anastomosis of hemodialysis patients dialyzing with an AV graft. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Hemodialysis - Baseline | The average number of months on dialysis prior to the index procedure. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Months on hemodialysis |
| ||||||||||||||||
| AV Access Circuit Description/ Target Limb | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| AV Access Circuit Description: Graft Location | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| AV Access Circuit Description: Arterial Anastomosis | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| AV Access Circuit Description: Venous Anastomosis | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| AV Access Circuit Description: Graft Configuration | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| AV Access Circuit Description: Graft Material | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| AV Access Circuit Description: Graft Tapered | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| AV Access Circuit Description: Graft Diameter (mm) | For three (3) subjects the diameter of the graft at the time of initial access creation on was unknown. | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Freedom From AV Access Circuit Localized or Systemic Serious Adverse Events | Safety is defined as freedom from any adverse event(s) (AEs), localized or systemic, that reasonably suggests the involvement of the AV access circuit (not including stenosis or thrombosis) that require or result in any of the following alone or in combination: additional interventions (including surgery); in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization; or death. | Number of Participants Free from Primary Safety Events (All Treated Subjects) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 30 days post index procedure |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Effectiveness Endpoint: Number of Participants With Target Lesion Primary Patency | Target Lesion Primary Patency (TLPP) is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next clinically driven reintervention at the original treatment site or until the extremity is abandoned for permanent access. Primary patency ends when any of the following occurs: a) clinically driven reintervention in the treatment area; b) thrombotic occlusion within the treatment area; c) surgical intervention that excludes the original treatment area from the AV circuit, and/or d) abandonment of the AV access graft due to inability to treat the original treatment area. The primary effectiveness endpoint is evaluated against a performance goal (PG) of 40%. | Number of participants with Target Lesion Primary Patency. In total, nine (9) subjects were excluded from the denominator (110) due to discontinuation or abandonment of their index AV access circuit for non effectiveness reasons prior to Day 150 of their follow-up. Therefore, the Overall Number of Participants analyzed is 101 for this measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 months post index procedure |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Target Lesion Primary Patency (TLPP) | TLPP is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next clinically driven reintervention at the original treatment site or until the extremity is abandoned for permanent access. Primary patency ends when any of the following occurs: a) clinically driven reintervention in the treatment area; b) thrombotic occlusion within the treatment area; c) surgical intervention that excludes the original treatment area from the AV circuit, and/or d) abandonment of the AV access graft due to inability to treat the original treatment area. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. | Number of Participants with Target Lesion Primary Patency. Number of participants (n) in each follow-up periods varies from overall enrollment (N) as some subjects discontinued participation before the 30 days, 3 months and 6 months follow-up or did not meet endpoint inclusion criteria. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP) | ACPP is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next access thrombosis or repeated intervention. ACPP ends with a reintervention anywhere within the access circuit. Vessel rupture caused by PTA is not an ACPP failure unless achieving hemostasis also causes thrombosis. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. | Number of Participants with Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP). Number of participants (n) in each follow-up periods varies from overall enrollment (N) as some subjects discontinued participation before the 30 days, 3 months and 6 months follow-up or did not meet endpoint inclusion criteria. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Device and Procedure Related AEs Involving the AV Access Circuit | Number of Participants with device and procedure related Adverse Events involving the AV access circuit. The access circuit is the area from the arterial inflow to the SVC-right atrial junction. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. | Number of Participants Free from Device/Procedure-Related Adverse Events. Number of participants (n) in each follow-up periods varies from overall enrollment (N) as some subjects discontinued participation before the 30 days, 3 months and 6 months follow-up or did not meet endpoint inclusion criteria. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure, |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Total Number of Arteriovenous (AV) Access Circuit Reinterventions | Total Number of AV Access Circuit Reinterventions defined as the number of reinterventions to the AV access circuit until access abandonment or through study completion. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. | Total number of AV Access Circuit Reinterventions by Follow-Up Period. The number for a specific period may be higher than the number of subjects with at least one AV access reintervention in that period. Number of participants (n) varies from overall enrollment (N) due to discontinued participation or not meeting endpoint inclusion criteria. | Posted | Number | AV Access Reinterventions | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure. |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Total Number of Target Lesion Reinterventions | Total Number of Target Lesion Reinterventions defined as the number of reinterventions to maintain target lesion patency. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. | The (n) in each follow-up periods vary from overall enrollment (N) as some subjects discontinued participation before each follow-up or did not meet endpoint inclusion criteria. The total number of Reinterventions by Follow-Up Period was analyzed as opposed to the number of subjects with at least one AV Target Lesion Reintervention. | Posted | Number | Target Lesion Reinterventions | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of Patency Function (IPF) | IPF is defined as the time from the index study procedure to study completion or access abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed on the AV access circuit in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. The IPF is representative of the number of days between interventions to maintain access circuit patency. The minimum and maximum ranges for the Index of Patency Function are as follows: 1 month (6.3 - 30.0); 3 months (6.3 - 90.0); 6 months (6.3 - 180.0); 12 months (6.3 - 365.0); 18 months (6.3 - 545.0); and 24 months (6.3 - 730.0). Higher values represent a better outcome, that is, more time elapsed between the Index study procedure and reinterventions. | Number of participants (n) in each follow-up periods varies from overall enrollment (N) as some subjects discontinued participation before the 30 days, 3 months and 6 months follow-up or did not meet endpoint inclusion criteria. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Index | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of Patency Function - Target Lesion (IPF-T) | IPF-T (Index of Patency Function - Target Lesion) is defined as the time from the index study procedure to study completion or complete access abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed at the target lesion in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. The IPF for target lesion patency is representative of the approximate (mean) number of days between interventions to maintain target lesion patency. The minimum and maximum ranges for the Index of Patency Function are as follows: 1 month (6.3 - 30.0); 3 months (6.3 - 90.0); 6 months (6.3 - 180.0); 12 months (6.3 - 365.0); 18 months (6.3 - 545.0); and 24 months (6.3 - 730.0). Higher values represent a better outcome, that is, more time elapsed between the Index study procedure and reinterventions. | Number of participants (n) in each follow-up periods varies from overall enrollment (N) as some subjects discontinued participation before the 30 days, 3 months and 6 months follow-up or did not meet endpoint inclusion criteria. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Index | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Post-intervention Secondary Patency | Secondary Patency is defined as the interval after the index intervention until the access is abandoned. Multiple repetitive treatments can be included in post-intervention secondary patency. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. | Post-Intervention Secondary Patency by Follow-Up Period (All Treated Subjects). (n) varies in relation to the number of failures (access abandonment) recorded at 30 days, 90 days and 6 months. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Technical Success (for Stent Graft Placement) | Technical Success is defined as successful deployment, based on the operator's opinion, of the implant to the intended location assessed at the time of the index procedure. | Number of Participants with Acute Technical Success (All Treated Subjects) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At time of index procedure |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Procedure Success | Procedure Success is defined as anatomic success and resolution of the pre-procedural clinical indicator(s) (clinical success) of a hemodynamically significant stenosis. | Procedure Success (All Treated Subjects) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At time of index procedure |
|
|
Adverse events experienced by subjects were collected during a 24-month follow-up period (from the index procedure through the final follow-up contact, or early termination).
Adverse events collection was limited to localized or systemic clinical manifestations that reasonably suggests involvement of the AV access circuit (related to graft to the SVC-right atrial junction).
Systematic assessment was achieved through scheduled phone calls (or in-office visits) at 30 days, 90 days, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months post procedure.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Covera(TM) Vascular Covered Stent | Vascular Covered Stent for the treatment of stenotic lesions at the graft-vein anastomosis of hemodialysis patients dialyzing with an AV graft. | 27 | 110 | 41 | 110 | 53 | 110 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arteriovenous Graft Site Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular Graft Complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous Fistula | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Steal Syndrome | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular Rupture | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vasospasm | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infusion Site Extravasation | General disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stent Malfunction | General disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infected Skin Ulcer | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous Graft Aneurysm | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous Graft Site Haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seroma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin Wound | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular Pseudoaneurysm | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular Dissection | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local Swelling | General disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous Graft Site Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous Graft Site Haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular Graft Complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous Fistula | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Steal Syndrome | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular Rupture | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vasospasm | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infusion Site Extravasation | General disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stent Malfunction | General disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infected Skin Ulcer | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous Graft Aneurysm | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous Graft Site Haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Excoriation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seroma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin Wound | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular Pseudoaneurysm | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular Dissection | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Prior to PI publication of site results, sponsor requires publication of multi-centers results.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talar Saber, Clinical Project Manager | C.R. Bard | 480-379-2839 | talar.saber@crbard.com |
| Dec 3, 2018 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003251 | Constriction, Pathologic |
| D007676 | Kidney Failure, Chronic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D051436 | Renal Insufficiency, Chronic |
| D051437 | Renal Insufficiency |
| D007674 | Kidney Diseases |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
|
| ≥ 75 years |
|
|
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|
|
| Radial |
|
| Ulnar |
|
|
| Brachial |
|
| Cephalic |
|
| Median Cubital |
|
|
|
| Other |
|
| Unknown |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|