Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16-C-0121 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:
Advanced urothelial cancer has no cure. But only a few chemotherapy drugs have been tested for it. The Co-eXpression ExtrapolatioN (COXEN) model predicts if cells respond to treatment. It may also help determine which drugs fight urothelial cancer based on the characteristics of a tumor. Researchers want to test if this model can choose the best therapy for advanced urothelial cancer within 3 weeks and how tumors respond to the next best therapy.
Objective:
To test if the COXEN model can choose the best therapy for advanced urothelial cancer within 3 weeks.
Eligibility:
People ages 18 and older whose urothelial cancer has spread after at least 1 line of chemotherapy
Design:
Participants will be screened with medical history, physical exam, blood and urine tests, and tumor scans.
Participants will provide a tumor sample from a previous surgery and a new biopsy. A needle will remove a small piece of tumor.
Participants will repeat screening tests, plus have an electrocardiogram (EKG) and scan. For the scan, they will get an injection of radioactive drug. They will lie in a machine that takes pictures.
Participants will take the drugs assigned by the COXEN model. They will have visits every 2-3 weeks. These will include blood and urine tests.
Participants will have tumor scans every 8-9 weeks.
Participants may have another biopsy.
Participants will take the drugs until they can't tolerate the side effects or their cancer worsens. They may be assigned to a second COXEN therapy.
Participants will have a follow-up visit 4-5 weeks after their last drug dose.
Participants will be contacted by phone every few months until death.
Background:
Objectives:
- To determine the feasibility of using the Co-eXpression ExtrapolatioN (COXEN) model in making a real-time treatment decision (within 3 weeks) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Eligibility:
Patients must have a histologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic, progressive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, urethra, ureter, or renal pelvis.
Patients must have progressive metastatic disease defined as new or progressive lesions on cross-sectional imaging.
Patients must have at least:
Patients must have been previously treated, as defined by treatment with at least one prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen or agent. Patients may have received any number of prior cytotoxic agents.
Archival tumor tissue must be available for enrollment.
Tumor amenable to biopsy will be mandatory for this study.
18 years of age or older
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status <2 (Karnofsky >60%)
Design:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Regimen | Experimental | Treatment regimen selected by CO eXpression ExtrapolatioN (COXEN) model |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75 approved agents | Drug | One or combination of agents: Abiraterone, Arsenic Trioxide, Asparaginase Escherichia coli source, Axitinib, Azacitidine, Bendamustine, Bleomycin, Bortezomib, Busulfan, Carboplatin, Carfilzomib, Carmustine, Chlorambucil, Cisplatin, Cladribine, Clofarabine, Crizotinib, Cytarabine, Dacarbazine, Dactinomycin, Dasatinib, Daunorubicin, Decitabine, Docetaxel, Doxorubicin, Epirubicin, Eribulin, Erlotinib, Estramustine, Etoposide, Exemestane, Floxuridine, Fludarabine, Fluorouracil, Gefitinib, Gemcitabine, Hydroxyurea, Idarubicin, Ifosfamide, Imatinib, Irinotecan, Ixabepilone, Lapatinib, Lomustine, Mechlor, Melphalan, Mercapto, Methotrexate, Mitomycin, Mitotane, Mitoxantrone, Nilotinib, Oxaliplatin, Paclitaxel, Pazopanib, Pentostatin, Romidepsin, Ruxolitinib, Sorafenib, Streptozocin, Sunitinib, Tamoxifen, Temsirolimus, Teniposide, Thioguanine, Thiotepa, Topotecan, Toremifene, Tretinoin, Vandetanib, Vemurafenib, Vinblastine, Vincristine, Vismodegib, and/or Vorinostat |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Enrolled and Underwent a Biopsy Who Went on to Receive Treatment Within 21 Days | Participants were assigned a treatment combination by the co-expression extrapolation (COXEN) algorithm. The COXEN algorithm used a multi-step process that involved pathology, tissue processing, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) profiling and bioinformatics, etc. to select a treatment regimen. | time to treatment assignment, approximately 3 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival | Progression Free Survival is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first. Radiological assessment per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was done every 2 cycles to measure change in tumor size until tumors increased. Progression is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study; this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progressions. |
Not provided
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Patients must have a histologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic, progressive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, urethra, ureter, or renal pelvis.
Patients must have progressive metastatic disease defined as new or progressive lesions on cross-sectional imaging.
Patients must have at least:
Patients must have been previously treated with at least one prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen or agent. Patients may have received any number of prior cytotoxic agents.
Archival tumor tissue must be available for enrollment.
Tumor amenable to biopsy will be mandatory for this study.
Age more than or equal to 18 years. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to 2 (Karnofsky more than or equal to 60%,).
Patients must have normal organ and marrow function as defined below:
OR
--creatinine clearance more than or equal to 40 mL/min/1.73 m^2
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea B Apolo, M.D. | National Cancer Institute (NCI) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Institutes of Health Clinical Center | Bethesda | Maryland | 20892 | United States |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Doxorubicin 75mg/m^2 | All participants that received Doxorubicin 75mg/m^2. |
| FG001 | Paclitaxel 100 mg/m^2 and Erlotinib 150 mg | All participants that received Paclitaxel 100 mg/m^2 and Erlotinib 150 mg. |
| FG002 | Paclitaxel 135mg/m^2 and Doxorubicin 40mg/m^2 | All participants that received Paclitaxel 135mg/m^2 and Doxorubicin 40mg/m^2. |
| FG003 | Sunitinib 50mg | All participants that received Sunitinib 50mg. |
| FG004 | Vorinostat 500mg and Etoposide 100mg/m^2 and 60mg/m^2 | All participants that received Vorinostat 500mg and Etoposide 100mg/m^2 and 60mg/m^2. |
| FG005 | Participants Who Were Enrolled But Not Treated | 3 participants were enrolled and signed consent to this study but never started treatment. Treatment was assigned on course initiation. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Doxorubicin 75mg/m^2 | All participants that received Doxorubicin 75mg/m^2. |
| BG001 | Paclitaxel 100 mg/m^2 and Erlotinib 150 mg | All participants that received Paclitaxel 100 mg/m^2 and Erlotinib 150 mg. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Enrolled and Underwent a Biopsy Who Went on to Receive Treatment Within 21 Days | Participants were assigned a treatment combination by the co-expression extrapolation (COXEN) algorithm. The COXEN algorithm used a multi-step process that involved pathology, tissue processing, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) profiling and bioinformatics, etc. to select a treatment regimen. | This primary measure was to determine the feasibility of the COXEN algorithm. Data collected from participants receiving different treatments were combined and analyzed as a single group as pre-specified in the study protocol. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | time to treatment assignment, approximately 3 weeks |
|
Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 5 months and 6 days for the Doxorubicin 75mg/m^2 Arm/Group, 10 months and 16 days for the Paclitaxel 100 mg/m^2 and Erlotinib 150 mg Arm/Group, 8 months and 13 days for the Paclitaxel 135mg/m^2 and Doxorubicin 40mg/m^2 Arm/Group, 5 months and 16 days for the Sunitinib 50mg Arm/Group, 27 days for the Vorinostat 500mg and Etoposide 100mg/m^2 and 60mg/m^2 Arm/Group.
Serious and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events were not monitored for those participants who were enrolled but not treated. However, All-Cause Mortality was monitored for one participant in the Participants Who Were Enrolled But Not Treated Arm/Group.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Doxorubicin 75mg/m^2 | All participants that received Doxorubicin 75mg/m^2. | 1 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Febrile neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Andrea Apolo | National Cancer Institute | 301-480-0536 | apoloab@nih.gov |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 21, 2019 | Jun 17, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Feb 12, 2019 | Jun 17, 2020 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002295 | Carcinoma, Transitional Cell |
| D001749 | Urinary Bladder Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| COXEN | Other | The CO eXpression ExtrapolatioN (COXEN) algorithm will be used to determine the next best therapy from among 75 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved agents (single agent or combination) in patients that have progressed on at least one chemotherapy regimen. |
|
| Every 2 cycles until progression, approximately 4 months. |
| Proportion of Patients With an Objective Response | Objective Response is defined as a Complete Response and Partial Response and was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. | End of treatment, approximately 4 months. |
| Overall Survival | Amount of time subject survives without disease progression after treatment. Disease progression was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progressions. | From date of treatment content until the date of death from any cause or date off study, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 months and 16 days. |
| Number of Participants Who Had Adverse Events ≥ Grade 1 | Adverse events were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. Grade 1 is mild, Grade 2 is moderate, Grade 3 is severe, Grade 4 is life-threatening or disabling, and Grade 5 is death. | Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approx. 5 mos/ 6 dys for the 1st Grp; 10 mos/16 dys for the 2nd Grp; 8 mos/13 dys for the 3rd Grp; 5 mos/16 dys for the 4th Grp; and 27 dys for the 5th Grp. |
| Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0) | Here is the number of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. | Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approx. 5 mos/ 6 dys for the 1st Grp; 10 mos/16 dys for the 2nd Grp; 8 mos/13 dys for the 3rd Grp; 5 mos/16 dys for the 4th Grp; and 27 dys for the 5th Grp. |
| Ineligible |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| BG002 | Paclitaxel 135mg/m^2 and Doxorubicin 40mg/m^2 | All participants that received Paclitaxel 135mg/m^2 and Doxorubicin 40mg/m^2. |
| BG003 | Sunitinib 50mg | All participants that received Sunitinib 50mg. |
| BG004 | Vorinostat 500mg and Etoposide 100mg/m^2 and 60mg/m^2 | All participants that received Vorinostat 500mg and Etoposide 100mg/m^2 and 60mg/m^2. |
| BG005 | Participants Who Were Enrolled But Not Treated | 3 participants were enrolled and signed consent to this study but never started treatment. Treatment was assigned on course initiation. |
| BG006 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Progression Free Survival | Progression Free Survival is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first. Radiological assessment per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was done every 2 cycles to measure change in tumor size until tumors increased. Progression is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study; this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progressions. | Not all patients enrolled received a treatment from the treatment algorithm. Those that went on for treatment were evaluated for progression free survival within the 4-month times frame. Data collected from participants receiving different treatments were combined and analyzed as a single group as pre-specified in the study protocol. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Months | Every 2 cycles until progression, approximately 4 months. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients With an Objective Response | Objective Response is defined as a Complete Response and Partial Response and was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. | Not all patients enrolled received a treatment from the treatment algorithm. We included all patient who received treatment in this group. Data collected from participants receiving different treatments were combined and analyzed as a single group as pre-specified in the study protocol. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | End of treatment, approximately 4 months. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Survival | Amount of time subject survives without disease progression after treatment. Disease progression was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progressions. | Data collected from participants receiving different treatments were combined and analyzed as a single group as pre-specified in the study protocol. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Months | From date of treatment content until the date of death from any cause or date off study, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 months and 16 days. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Had Adverse Events ≥ Grade 1 | Adverse events were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. Grade 1 is mild, Grade 2 is moderate, Grade 3 is severe, Grade 4 is life-threatening or disabling, and Grade 5 is death. | Adverse Events were not monitored for those participants who were enrolled but not treated. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approx. 5 mos/ 6 dys for the 1st Grp; 10 mos/16 dys for the 2nd Grp; 8 mos/13 dys for the 3rd Grp; 5 mos/16 dys for the 4th Grp; and 27 dys for the 5th Grp. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0) | Here is the number of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. | Adverse Events were not monitored for those participants who were enrolled but not treated. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approx. 5 mos/ 6 dys for the 1st Grp; 10 mos/16 dys for the 2nd Grp; 8 mos/13 dys for the 3rd Grp; 5 mos/16 dys for the 4th Grp; and 27 dys for the 5th Grp. |
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| EG001 | Paclitaxel 100 mg/m^2 and Erlotinib 150 mg | All participants that received Paclitaxel 100 mg/m^2 and Erlotinib 150 mg. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| EG002 | Paclitaxel 135mg/m^2 and Doxorubicin 40mg/m^2 | All participants that received Paclitaxel 135mg/m^2 and Doxorubicin 40mg/m^2. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| EG003 | Sunitinib 50mg | All participants that received Sunitinib 50mg. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| EG004 | Vorinostat 500mg and Etoposide 100mg/m^2 and 60mg/m^2 | All participants that received Vorinostat 500mg and Etoposide 100mg/m^2 and 60mg/m^2. | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| EG005 | Participants Who Were Enrolled But Not Treated | 3 participants were enrolled and signed consent to this study but never started treatment. Treatment was assigned on course initiation. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Death NOS | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrointestinal disorders - Other, Hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thromboembolic event | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Generalized muscle weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infections and infestations - Other, Bacteremia | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| White blood cell decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypophosphatemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Febrile Neutropenia | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D014571 |
| Urologic Neoplasms |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D001745 | Urinary Bladder Diseases |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| Grade 3 Anemia |
|
| Grade 3 Fatigue |
|
| Grade 3 Febrile neutropenia |
|
| Grade 3 Gastrointestinal disorders - Other |
|
| Grade 3 Generalized muscle weakness |
|
| Grade 3 GI disorder-Other, hernia |
|
| Grade 3 Thromboembolic event |
|
| Grade 3 Hyponatremia |
|
| Grade 3 Hypophosphatemia |
|
| Grade 3 Infections & Infestations-Other, Bactremia |
|
| Grade 3 Platelet count decreased |
|
| Grade 3 Small intestinal obstruction |
|
| Grade 3 White blood cell count decreased |
|
| Grade 4 Neutrophil count decreased |
|
| Grade 4 Platelet count decreased |
|
| Grade 4 White blood cell count decreased |
|
| Grade 5 - Death NOS |
|