Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Wellcome Trust | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study investigates a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system designed by GEHC for imaging viable neonate and infant populations. This MR system has a smaller size and design features that may make it more feasible to locate the system in close proximity to care areas for neonates (birth - 1 month) and infants (>1 month to two years), such as clinical neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and other infant and neonatal care departments.
This study investigates a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system designed by GEHC for imaging viable neonate and infant populations. This MR system has a smaller size and design features that may make it more feasible to locate the system in close proximity to care areas for neonates (birth - 1 month) and infants (>1 month to two years), such as clinical neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and other infant and neonatal care departments.
This is a two-phase prospective clinical study evaluating the performance and safety of the investigational MRI device for neonates and infants, including:
Investigator feedback on scanning conducted under each MR Procedure Document will be documented. Because the device is intended for use in viable neonate and infant populations, clinical data are required that cannot be conducted in any other populations or simulated on non-human models. Clinical images and associated data as well as assessments of image quality, workflow, and usability will be collected.
Images, associated image data, and subject data collected in both phases of this study may be used for future engineering development and activities that support MR product development, including Sponsor-authorized scientific and marketing activities. Summary evaluation of safety and performance from Phase 1 and Phase 2 may be used in support of regulatory submission, including filings for European CE mark.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner | Other | All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner | Device | eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Image Diagnostic Quality for Phase 1 | Number of subject whose images were rated as Evaluable. | 1 Day |
| Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event in Phase 1 | Safety will be assessed based on the number of Adverse Events in Phase 1. | 1 Day |
| Image Diagnostic Quality for Phase 2 | Number of subject whose images were rated as Evaluable. | 1 Day |
| Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event in Phase 2 | Safety will be assessed based on the number of Adverse Events in Phase 2. | 1 Day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Summary of Image Quality and Assessment for Phase 1 | Scores range from 1-Very Poor image quality to 5-Excellent image quality. | 1 Day |
| Summary of Image Quality and Assessments for Phase 2 | Scores range from 1-Very Poor image quality to 5-Excellent image quality. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Currently admitted for treatment or observation at the investigational site at the time of enrolment;
weight range less than 5.0 kg (<5.0 kg ) and more than 0.5 kg (>0.5 kg );
Viable neonates (birth to 1 month of age) or infants (>1 month to two years of age);
Able to safely undergo an MRI scan, as determined by medically qualified personnel;
Have parent(s), guardian(s), or legally authorized representative(s) willing and able to provide written informed consent for the subject's participation;
Are of appropriate size and shape to fit into the bore of the magnet, inclusive of all monitoring equipment, if any, necessary for the subject's routine clinical care based on standard of care measurement methods, in accordance with site policies :
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Paul Griffiths, MD, PhD | University of Sheffield | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital | Sheffield | S10 2JF | United Kingdom |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | 3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner | All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner. 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Initial Feasibility Assessment |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Phase2 Controlled Image &Data Collection |
|
There were 54 enrolled subjects, with 2 withdrawn, resulting in 52 completed subjects for Phases 1 and 2 together. Additionally, the data from these 2 withdrawn subjects were not included in any statistical analysis.
Viable neonates and/or infant subjects that met inclusion criteria and did not meet exclusion criteria were included in this study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | 3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner | All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner. 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Image Diagnostic Quality for Phase 1 | Number of subject whose images were rated as Evaluable. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1 Day |
|
|
1 day
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | 3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner | All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner. 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Celestial | GE Healthcare | +33 130709133 | MarieYvonne.CELESTIAL@ge.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 25, 2015 | Dec 7, 2018 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 1 Day |
| Per Subject Workflow and Transport Information | Summary of means and standard deviations. | 1 Day |
| Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary | User survey results on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. Question 1. I think that I would like to use this system frequently Question 2. I found the system unnecessarily complex Question 3. I thought the system was easy to use Question 4. I think that I would need support from a technician to be able to use this system Question 5. I found the various functions in this system were well integrated Question 6. I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system Question 7. I think that most people would learn to use this system very quickly Question 8. I found the system very cumbersome to use Question 9. I felt very confident using the system Question 10. I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system Question 11. I feel confident this system will meet my patient's needs Question 12. How likely is it that you would recommend this system to other professionals in your field? | 1 Day |
| Bi-polar Product Description Scale | A measure of bi-polar items (opposite items), rated on a scale from 1 to 7. Closer to 1 indicates a measure closer to the first item and closer to 7 indicates a measure closer to the second item. | 1 Day |
| Technical Issues and Malfunctions | Number and type of technical issues and device malfunctions | 1 Day |
| Subject Change in Temperature | 1 Day |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event in Phase 1 | Safety will be assessed based on the number of Adverse Events in Phase 1. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1 Day |
|
|
|
| Primary | Image Diagnostic Quality for Phase 2 | Number of subject whose images were rated as Evaluable. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1 Day |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event in Phase 2 | Safety will be assessed based on the number of Adverse Events in Phase 2. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1 Day |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Summary of Image Quality and Assessment for Phase 1 | Scores range from 1-Very Poor image quality to 5-Excellent image quality. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 Day |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Summary of Image Quality and Assessments for Phase 2 | Scores range from 1-Very Poor image quality to 5-Excellent image quality. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 Day |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Per Subject Workflow and Transport Information | Summary of means and standard deviations. | There were 54 enrolled subjects, with 2 withdrawn, resulting in 52 completed subjects for Phases 1 and 2 together. Additionally, the data from these 2 withdrawn subjects were not included in any statistical analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | minutes | 1 Day |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary | User survey results on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. Question 1. I think that I would like to use this system frequently Question 2. I found the system unnecessarily complex Question 3. I thought the system was easy to use Question 4. I think that I would need support from a technician to be able to use this system Question 5. I found the various functions in this system were well integrated Question 6. I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system Question 7. I think that most people would learn to use this system very quickly Question 8. I found the system very cumbersome to use Question 9. I felt very confident using the system Question 10. I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system Question 11. I feel confident this system will meet my patient's needs Question 12. How likely is it that you would recommend this system to other professionals in your field? | There were 54 enrolled subjects, with 2 withdrawn, resulting in 52 completed subjects for Phases 1 and 2 together. Additionally, the data from these 2 withdrawn subjects were not included in any statistical analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 Day |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Bi-polar Product Description Scale | A measure of bi-polar items (opposite items), rated on a scale from 1 to 7. Closer to 1 indicates a measure closer to the first item and closer to 7 indicates a measure closer to the second item. | There were 54 enrolled subjects, with 2 withdrawn, resulting in 52 completed subjects for Phases 1 and 2 together. Additionally, the data from these 2 withdrawn subjects were not included in any statistical analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 Day |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Technical Issues and Malfunctions | Number and type of technical issues and device malfunctions | There were 54 enrolled subjects, with 2 withdrawn, resulting in 52 completed subjects for Phases 1 and 2 together. Additionally, the data from these 2 withdrawn subjects were not included in any statistical analysis. | Posted | Number | number of occurrences | 1 Day |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subject Change in Temperature | There were 54 enrolled subjects, with 2 withdrawn, resulting in 52 completed subjects for Phases 1 and 2 together. Additionally, the data from these 2 withdrawn subjects were not included in any statistical analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Degrees Celsius | 1 Day |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 54 |
| 0 |
| 54 |
| 1 |
| 54 |
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Signal to noise ratio |
|
| Tissue Contrast |
|
| Fat/Water Homogeneity |
|
|
| Signal to noise ratio |
|
| Tissue Contrast |
|
| Fat/Water Homogeneity |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Question 4 |
|
| Question 5 |
|
| Question 6 |
|
| Question 7 |
|
| Question 8 |
|
| Question 9 |
|
| Question 10 |
|
| Question 11 |
|
| Question 12 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Annoying-Pleasing |
|
| Satisfying-Dissatisfying |
|
| Ineffective-Effective |
|
| Fast-Slow |
|
| Unfamiliar-Familiar |
|
| Routine-Unusual |
|
| Easy-Difficult |
|
| Useful-Useless |
|
| Bad-Good |
|