Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Cardiff Metropolitan University | OTHER |
| City Health Care Partnership CIC (Hull) | UNKNOWN |
| University of Hull | OTHER |
| Aneurin Bevan University Health Board |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the trial is to compare the effects of high intensity interval training (HIIT) with usual care - moderate intensity steady state training (MISS) - in UK cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes.
Current cardiac rehabilitation (CR) guidelines recommend moderate intensity, steady state exercise training (MISS). However, this guideline predates significant advances in interventional and medical treatment for coronary heart disease (CHD) and may not, therefore, be the most effective strategy for the 'modern' patient with CHD. Recent research has indicated that greater benefit may be attained by participating in high intensity interval training (HIIT) which involves repeated short bursts of harder exercise interspersed with short recovery periods. Studies suggest that this can be performed without any compromise in exercise adherence or patient safety. The benefit of this approach in 'real world' CR programmes in the UK cannot be confirmed, as studies have been predominantly conducted in the laboratory and exclusively outside the UK.
In patients attending CR programmes in the UK, the investigators hypothesise that HIIT will improve VO2 peak to a greater extent than MISS. The investigators also hypothesise that HIIT will: 1) be more palatable than MISS and demonstrate greater patient compliance and adherence; 2) improve cardiovascular health to a greater extent than MISS; 3) improve HR-QoL to a greater extent than MISS; 4) lead to more positive motivation and attitudes to exercise than MISS; 5) increase short and medium-term participation in lifestyle physical activity to a greater extent than MISS; 6) be a cost effective alternative to MISS; 7) be as safe as MISS.
The HIIT or MISS study is a pragmatic single-blind, multi-centre, longitudinal, randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomly allocated to 8 weeks of HIIT or MISS (usual care). Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months by assessors blinded to group allocation. Study interventions will be delivered by clinical (not research) staff.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usual care | No Intervention | Usual care cardiac rehabilitation with exercise training as per current guidelines Warm up: 15 mins, < 40% heart rate reserve (HRR) Cardiovascular component: progress towards 20 - 40 mins continuous cardiovascular exercise at 40-70% HRR. Muscular strength and endurance programme. Cool down: 10 mins, < 40% HRR. Initial duration based on participant's previous and current physical activity (PA) levels and cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPEX) performance. Duration and workload of cardiovascular component adjusted, as tolerated, within the above parameters, in response to exercising heart rate (HR), participant reported rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and symptoms. | |
| High intensity interval training | Experimental | High intensity interval training within a standard cardiac rehabilitation programme. Warm up: 15 mins total, 10 mins <40-70% HRR, 5 mins <70% HRR. Cardiovascular component: exercise bike interval training: 10 x high @ 85-90% peak power output (PPO) from CPEX, 10 x low @ 20-25% PPO (exercise intensity will not to be prescribed from gas exchange data i.e. %VO2 peak). Change in intensity from low to high achieved by altering cadence (rpm). Muscular strength and endurance programme. Cool down: 10 mins, <40% HRR. Duration of intervals and total programme duration increased in a standardised fashion. Workload increased bi-weekly in response to participant reported RPE (only after the full 10 x 1 protocol has been achieved). If RPE < 17 then workload will be increased. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High intensity interval training | Other | High intensity interval training within a standard cardiac rehabilitation programme |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) | Cardiopulmonary exercise test | Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance and adherence | Compliance and adherence will be determined by recording the number of training sessions attended and successfully completed in accordance with the exercise protocol. Drop-out from the programme will also be documented for both study groups in addition to reason for drop-out, where provided voluntarily by participants. | Every exercise session (8 week exercise programme duration) |
Not provided
General inclusion criteria:
General exclusion criteria:
Additional exclusion criteria:
Further to the analysis of cardiopulmonary exercise test and echocardiography at baseline, and prior to randomisation, patients will be prevented from continuing their involvement in the study if there is indication of:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Karianne Backx, PhD | Cardiff Metropolitan University | Principal Investigator |
| Simon Nichols, PhD | University of Hull | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital | Coventry | CV2 2DX | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22194152 | Background | West RR, Jones DA, Henderson AH. Rehabilitation after myocardial infarction trial (RAMIT): multi-centre randomised controlled trial of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in patients following acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 2012 Apr;98(8):637-44. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300302. Epub 2011 Dec 22. | |
| 26375499 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000072696 | High-Intensity Interval Training |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D064797 | Physical Conditioning, Human |
| D015444 | Exercise |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D009068 | Movement |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Wake Forest University Health Sciences | OTHER |
| Bangor University | OTHER |
| University of Warwick | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Psychological factors associated with compliance and adherence (1) | Quantitative psychology - questionnaires: 1) the Multidimensional Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (MSES) | Baseline, 8 weeks |
| Psychological factors associated with compliance and adherence (2) | Quantitative psychology - questionnaires: 2) the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2) | Baseline, 8 weeks |
| Psychological factors associated with compliance and adherence (3) | Quantitative psychology - questionnaires: 3) the Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale (PNSES) | Baseline, 8 weeks |
| Psychological factors associated with compliance and adherence (4) | Quantitative psychology - questionnaires: 4) Courneya and Bobick's 7-point bipolar adjectival rating scale; | Baseline, 8 weeks |
| HR-QOL | Questionnaire - EQ-5D-5L | Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months |
| Service and resource use | Questionnaire - client service receipt inventory (CSRI) | Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months |
| Lifestyle physical activity | Physical activity monitor (worn for 1 week) - total energy expenditure | Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months |
| Metabolic reserve | Cardiopulmonary exercise test - ventilatory threshold (VT) | Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months |
| Ventilatory efficiency | Cardiopulmonary exercise test - slope of ratio of ventilation to carbon dioxide (VE/VC02 slope) | Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months |
| Cardiac remodelling | Echocardiography - left ventricular volumes | Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months |
| Arterial remodelling | Arterial oscillometry - pulse wave velocity | Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months |
| Cardiovascular health | CHD risk factor assessment | Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months |
| Palatability | Qualitative psychology - thematic analysis of semi structured interviews | 8 weeks |
| Liou K, Ho S, Fildes J, Ooi SY. High Intensity Interval versus Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis of Physiological and Clinical Parameters. Heart Lung Circ. 2016 Feb;25(2):166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.06.828. Epub 2015 Jul 22. |
| 25306500 | Background | Elliott AD, Rajopadhyaya K, Bentley DJ, Beltrame JF, Aromataris EC. Interval training versus continuous exercise in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Heart Lung Circ. 2015 Feb;24(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 16. |
| 22879367 | Background | Rognmo O, Moholdt T, Bakken H, Hole T, Molstad P, Myhr NE, Grimsmo J, Wisloff U. Cardiovascular risk of high- versus moderate-intensity aerobic exercise in coronary heart disease patients. Circulation. 2012 Sep 18;126(12):1436-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.123117. Epub 2012 Aug 9. |
| 38493909 | Derived | Ingle L, Powell R, Begg B, Birkett ST, Nichols S, Ennis S, Banerjee P, Shave R, McGregor G. Effects of Exercise Training Response on Quality of Life and Cardiovascular Risk Factor Profiles in People With Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the HIIT or MISS UK Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Aug;105(8):1464-1470. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.03.002. Epub 2024 Mar 16. |
| 37730193 | Derived | Albustami M, Hartfiel N, Charles JM, Powell R, Begg B, Birkett ST, Nichols S, Ennis S, Hee SW, Banerjee P, Ingle L, Shave R, McGregor G, Edwards RT. Cost-effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) vs Moderate Intensity Steady-State (MISS) Training in UK Cardiac Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Apr;105(4):639-646. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Sep 18. |
| 36753063 | Derived | McGregor G, Powell R, Begg B, Birkett ST, Nichols S, Ennis S, McGuire S, Prosser J, Fiassam O, Hee SW, Hamborg T, Banerjee P, Hartfiel N, Charles JM, Edwards RT, Drane A, Ali D, Osman F, He H, Lachlan T, Haykowsky MJ, Ingle L, Shave R. High-intensity interval training in cardiac rehabilitation: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Jul 12;30(9):745-755. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad039. |
| 27852718 | Derived | McGregor G, Nichols S, Hamborg T, Bryning L, Tudor-Edwards R, Markland D, Mercer J, Birkett S, Ennis S, Powell R, Begg B, Haykowsky MJ, Banerjee P, Ingle L, Shave R, Backx K. High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity steady-state training in UK cardiac rehabilitation programmes (HIIT or MISS UK): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 16;6(11):e012843. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012843. |
| D009142 |
| Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |