Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB-PG-0712-28108 | Other Grant/Funding Number | RfPB | |
| 15-NW-0306 | Other Identifier | Research Ethics Committee |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The new device we are looking at is called the MarginProbe. It is a disposable probe which measures the margins of tissue removed to check they are clear of cancer cells, during breast conservation surgery. After specimen radiology, allows the Surgeon to remove further tissue if necessary, during the same operation if any involved margins are identified. This minimises the need for further repeat operations.
Previous studies carried out elsewhere in the world (USA and Israel) have identified that the probe reduces re-excision rate but there has never been a study in the UK.
The trial involves randomly allocating patients once they are in theatre, to either the MarginProbe procedure after breast conserving surgery and radiology has been completed, or not.
Almost 60% of all patients diagnosed with breast cancer (48000 annually in the UK) undergo breast conserving surgery (BCS. Surgical removal of the cancer aims to reduce the risk of local recurrence and patient mortality. In order to minimise the amount of tissue removed, excision up to the cancer-free area (margins) is undertaken. Further surgery, following initial breast cancer surgery, is required in 25% - 30% of patients because of disease found at the edges of the tissue removed.
Reducing the need for further operations benefits patients (by reducing the number of operations required, improving cosmetic outcome and minimising anxiety) and the NHS (by realising economic benefits).
MarginProbe, a disposable probe which measures the margins of tissue removed during breast cancer surgery, allows the surgeon to remove further tissue during the same surgical procedure to clear any involved margins, minimising subsequent re-operations. Four hundred and sixty patients in 6 specialist Breast Units will be randomly allocated after BCS (and specimen radiology), by telephone randomisation, to either:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Device Arm | Experimental | Randomized for MarginProbe device to be used during surgical procedure |
|
| Control Arm | No Intervention | Randomized for surgical procedure to happen as per standard care |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MarginProbe | Device | Surgery to take place as per standard care. When the surgery is nearly concluded, patient to be randomised. If randomised to device arm, the MarginProbe device will be used on the outer edge of the tumour and shavings. If the MarginProbe device indicates that cancer is detected, a further shaving is to be taken. Surgery then to be concluded as per standard care. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To determine if intraoperative margin assessment after excision of a cancer reduces second operations (reexcision or mastectomy), compared to standard surgical practice by 9 months after primary surgery. | To determine if the use of the MarginProbe device, after surgical tumour excision and tissue specimen radiography of a breast cancer reduces rates of further surgical re-excision operations (re-excision or mastectomy), when compared to control/standard practice(whereby the wound is closed after radiography showing clear margins). | 9 months post surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life | To determine the effect of checking for disease free tissue during the patients breast cancer surgery using the MarginProbe device (when compared to standard practice) on quality of life and Patient Related Outcome Measures. | 9 months post surgery |
| EQ5D |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria;
Exclusion Criteria;
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust | Manchester | England | M23 9LT | United Kingdom |
Peer Reviewed Scientific Journals Conference Presentation Publication on Website Access to raw data by Independent Steering Committee
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
To determine Quality of life and health related facility measures (EQ5D) between patient groups. |
| 9 months post surgery |
| To compare the number of patients in both groups presenting with disease free margins greater than 1mm (circumferentially) after breast cancer surgery, using a laboratory histopathological assessment. | To compare the number of patients in both groups presenting with disease free margins greater than 1mm (circumferentially) after breast cancer surgery, using a laboratory histopathological assessment. | 9 months post surgery |
| Total number of re-excisions | To compare the total number of re-excision procedures required in both groups (including mastectomy)following breast cancer surgery because of small (less than 1mm) disease free margins. | 9 months post surgery |
| Cosmetic Outcome | Comparing digital photography assessment [2 views; front and side] to assess cosmetic outcomes in both study arms. | 9 months post surgery |
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |