Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-003223-53 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Amgen | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a randomized, double blind placebo controlled one-site proof-of-concept study in subjects with erosive osteoarthritis (OA) of interphalangeal (IP) finger joints.
A total of 100 subjects will be enrolled into the study: 48 weeks placebo controlled double-blind phase with denosumab 60mg every 12 weeks, followed by a 48-week open-label phase in which all subjects will receive denosumab.
Investigational therapy: denosumab 60mg subcutaneous injection every 12 weeks. All subjects will receive Calcium/vit D supplementation.
Efficacy objectives:
The primary objective is to assess the effect of denosumab on the reduction of radiographic erosive progression using the Ghent University Score System (GUSS).
The secondary objective is to assess the effect of denosumab on the reduction of radiographic erosive progression as defined by diminishing the appearance of new erosive IP finger joints.
The exploratory objective is mainly to assess the effect of denosumab on clinical variables, as well as ultrasonography and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry parameters.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: denosumab | Active Comparator | 50 patients will be enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks. Calcium and vit D supplementation will be installed at baseline. |
|
| Comparator | Placebo Comparator | 50 patients will be enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks placebo sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks. Calcium and vit D supplementation will be installed at baseline |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| denosumab | Drug | 60mg sc |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Total Ghent University Scoring System (GUSS) of Target Joints at Week 24 | The Ghent University Scoring System, GUSS, is quantitative radiographic scoring system and found to be a reliable method to score radiographic change over time in erosive IP OA. It includes assessment of proportions of normal subchondral bone, subchondral plate and joint space over time. Range of score: min: 0 max:300. Change scores are measured where positive changes corresponds with remodeling or repair (better outcome), and negative changes with erosive progression (worse outcome). | 24 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of New Erosive Joints by Verbruggen and Veys at Week 48 | These are the number of new erosive IP joints according to the Verbruggen and Veys anatomical scoring system amongst the pre-erosive joints (i.e., N, S, J joints) at 48 weeks. | 48 weeks |
| Total Ghent University Scoring System (GUSS) at Week 48 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of (Serious) Adverse Events | Number of patients who have experienced one or more (serious) adverse events throughout the study | 48 weeks |
Inclusion Criteria:
• Subjects with hand OA having suffered from transient inflammatory attacks of the interphalangeal finger joints characteristic for what has been termed 'inflammatory' or 'erosive' hand OA.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Dirk Elewaut, Prof. Dr. | UZ Ghent | Principal Investigator |
| August Verbruggen, Prof Dr. Em. | UZ Ghent | Principal Investigator |
| Ruth Wittoek, Prof. Dr. | UZ Ghent | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UZ Ghent | Ghent | 9000 | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Active Comparator: Experimental: Denosumab | 51 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks. |
| FG001 | Comparator - Placebo | 49 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks placebo sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Active Comparator: Experimental: Denosumab | 51 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks. |
| BG001 | Comparator - Placebo |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Total Ghent University Scoring System (GUSS) of Target Joints at Week 24 | The Ghent University Scoring System, GUSS, is quantitative radiographic scoring system and found to be a reliable method to score radiographic change over time in erosive IP OA. It includes assessment of proportions of normal subchondral bone, subchondral plate and joint space over time. Range of score: min: 0 max:300. Change scores are measured where positive changes corresponds with remodeling or repair (better outcome), and negative changes with erosive progression (worse outcome). | intention-to-treat (ITT) population (i.e., all participants randomly assigned to groups and who attended a baseline visit) | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | 24 weeks |
|
Adverse events were monitored/assessed during the placebo controlled phase from the first dose administration up to Week 48.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Active Comparator: Experimental: Denosumab | 51 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major cardiovascular event | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prof. dr. Ruth Wittoek | University Gent | +3293322522 | anuschka.vandenbogaert@uzgent.be |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Feb 16, 2016 | Apr 20, 2022 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 29, 2020 | Apr 20, 2022 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069448 | Denosumab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | identical syringe |
|
|
| Calcium/Vit D supplementation | Dietary Supplement | Daily dosage Calcium 1000mg / Vit D 880 IU |
|
|
The Ghent University Scoring System, GUSS, is quantitative radiographic scoring system and found to be a reliable method to score radiographic change over time in erosive IP OA. It includes assessment of proportions of normal subchondral bone, subchondral plate and joint space over time. Range of score: min: 0 max:300. Change scores are measured where positive changes corresponds with remodeling or repair, and negative changes with erosive progression. |
| 48 weeks |
49 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks placebo sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Body mass index | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m² |
|
| Number of radiographically affected joints | Any radiographically defined S, J, E, R joint, according to the Verbruggen and Veys score of 16 joints per patient | Mean | Standard Deviation | count |
|
| Ghent University scoring system (GUSS) of all joints | The Ghent University Scoring System, GUSS, is quantitative radiographic scoring system and found to be a reliable method to score radiographic change over time in erosive IP OA. It includes assessment of proportions of normal subchondral bone, subchondral plate and joint space over time. Range of score: min: 0 max:300. Change scores are measured where positive changes corresponds with remodeling or repair (better outcome), and negative changes with erosive progression (worse outcome). All joints refer to all proximal and distal IP joints (n = 16) (excluding 1st IP) in a patient. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Ghent University scoring system (GUSS) of target joints | The Ghent University Scoring System, GUSS, is quantitative radiographic scoring system and found to be a reliable method to score radiographic change over time in erosive IP OA. It includes assessment of proportions of normal subchondral bone, subchondral plate and joint space over time. Range of score: min: 0 max:300. Change scores are measured where positive changes corresponds with remodeling or repair (better outcome), and negative changes with erosive progression (worse outcome). Target joints are predefined at baseline according to the protocol. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Pain | on a numerical rating scale (0-10), with 0 corresponds to no pain and 10 to maximal pain | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Australian-Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis index, subscale pain | Sores of the Australian-Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN) subscale pain ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating more pain | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Australian-Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis index, subscale function | Scores of the Australian-Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN) subscale function range from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating more disability | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) | Scores of the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more disability | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| OG001 | Comparator - Placebo | 49 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks placebo sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of New Erosive Joints by Verbruggen and Veys at Week 48 | These are the number of new erosive IP joints according to the Verbruggen and Veys anatomical scoring system amongst the pre-erosive joints (i.e., N, S, J joints) at 48 weeks. | intention-to-treat (ITT) population (i.e., all participants randomly assigned to groups and who attended a baseline visit) | Posted | Number | joints | 48 weeks | joints | joints |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Total Ghent University Scoring System (GUSS) at Week 48 | The Ghent University Scoring System, GUSS, is quantitative radiographic scoring system and found to be a reliable method to score radiographic change over time in erosive IP OA. It includes assessment of proportions of normal subchondral bone, subchondral plate and joint space over time. Range of score: min: 0 max:300. Change scores are measured where positive changes corresponds with remodeling or repair, and negative changes with erosive progression. | intention-to-treat (ITT) population (i.e., all participants randomly assigned to groups and who attended a baseline visit) | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | 48 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Number of (Serious) Adverse Events | Number of patients who have experienced one or more (serious) adverse events throughout the study | Not Posted | 48 weeks | Participants |
| 0 |
| 51 |
| 6 |
| 51 |
| 41 |
| 51 |
| EG001 | Comparator - Placebo | 49 patients were enrolled in this group for a total treatment duration of 24 months (96 weeks): 48 weeks placebo sc every 12 weeks followed by a 48-weeks open label phase denosumab 60mg sc every 12 weeks. | 0 | 49 | 7 | 49 | 44 | 49 |
| Cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Surgical and medical procedures | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal complaints | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Infections | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrointestinal event | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Surgical and medical procedures | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal complaints | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nervous system disorders (incl. dizziness, vertigo, headache) | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pulmonary and respiratory complaintes (non-infectious) | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash and skin problmes | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Allergy (systemic and urticaria) | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Theet problems | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Other | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D007162 |
| Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |