Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Sports Surgery Clinic Research Foundation | UNKNOWN |
| Insight Centre for Data Analytics | OTHER |
| Science Foundation Ireland | OTHER |
| University of Roehampton |
Background
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are one of the most common sporting injuries of the knee. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has become one of the most common surgical procedures in an attempt to increase joint stability and facilitate athletes to return to sport (RTS). Although ACLR is considered a relatively successful procedure, dynamic control risk factors and strength and power deficits in the involved limb are still present after patients return to sport.
Dynamic multi-plane, multi-joint actions such as jumping, landing, change of direction cutting, have been shown to be common mechanisms of injury for the ACL in field sports . Returning to multidirectional sports requires a proficiency and efficiency of movement when carrying out these tasks. There is a lack of standardized, objective criteria to accurately assess an athlete's ability to safely RTS. Therefore, there is a need for research that simultaneously analyses sport specific dynamic tasks (3D motion analysis) and muscular strength/power deficits that may explain poor outcomes following ACLR. This study aims to further investigate movement patterns, limb asymmetry and muscle strength deficit in patients post-surgery to identify risk factors for re-injury and criteria for RTS.
The purpose of this study was to:
It is hypothesised that biomechanical analysis will identify clear risk factors for poor outcomes following ACLR. Analysis of ACLR athletes' biomechanics during sports specific tasks will aid in the identification of athletes who are not yet ready to return to sport and will inform the clinician of what must be targeted in specific rehabilitation protocols before return to sport is considered.
Brief protocol
Participants will be recruited from patients who are scheduled to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the Sports Surgery Clinic, Ireland. Healthy participants will be recruited from local multidirectional teams. Participation will be voluntary and after obtaining informed consent patients will be asked to complete pre-operative questionnaires to ascertain injury information, and the function of their knee. During surgery the surgeon will fill out an intra-operative questionnaire. Items recorded will include graft type, laxity, involvement of other ligamentous structures, type of femoral and tibial fixation, meniscal or chondral pathology.
Biomechanical assessment takes place at 6 and 9 months post surgery for the ACL group while the healthy participants will be tested on one occasion. The 3D testing session will include capturing of jumping, landing, hopping and cutting mechanics through the use of three dimensional motion capture technology and force plates. Here reflective markers are placed on the skin at anatomical landmarks. These markers are picked up by the infrared cameras and tracked at 200 frames per second. Participants will make contact with a force plate with their foot on undertaking the movements. Force and marker data will be combined to calculate joint angles and moments. Participants will also perform a muscle strength test using equipment called an isokinetic dynamometer. Both the operated and non-operated limbs will be tested.
Participants will also be asked to fill out validated questionnaires to monitor self reported knee function, their confidence in their knee and also collect data on any continuing adverse symptoms such as locking, giving way, swelling or pain. Participants will also be asked if and when they return to sport. Questionnaires will be administered to participants at pre-op, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 months, 5 and 10 years post operatively.
3D Biomechanical testing involves the following progressive neuromuscular challenge tests:
Patient Registry
Patient data will be inputted into the Sports Surgery Clinic medical data management software. Captured data will include:
Patient information - Date of Surgery, Surgeon, Side of ACLR, confirmative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pre-Operative data collection
Intra-Op data collection
- Operative notes are recorded in theatre using a standardised in theatre questionnaire. This form was developed under consensus with all surgeons who complete ACL reconstructive surgery at the Sports Surgery Clinic. Included are graft type, laxity, involvement of other ligamentous structures, type of femoral and tibial fixation, meniscal or chondral pathology.
6 Month and 9 months post op data collection
12 and 24 months post op data collection
Quality assurance plan
Registry standard operating procedures
Sample size
Plan for missing data
Statistical analysis plan
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Those who have undergone unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery in the Sports Surgery Clinic. |
| |
| Control | Healthy volunteers with no previous knee injury, no current lower limb injuries and take part in regular multidirectional team sports. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Procedure |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Return to Performance- change in status | The Sports Surgery Clinic return to performance questionnaire asks whether the participant has returned to sport. | 6,9,12 and 24 months post operatively |
| Injured operated knee- change in status | Participants are asked have they injured their operated knee. | 6,9,12 and 24 months post operatively |
| Injured their contralateral knee- change in status | Participants are asked have they injured their operated knee. | 6,9,12 and 24 months post operatively |
| Change in pain experienced | Participants will be asked to rate their pain on a numerical rating scale, 0-10. | 6,9,12 and 24 months post operatively |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Kinetic and kinematic composite score of the lower limb, pelvis and trunk | Associations can be made between post surgical change in biomechanical variables exhibited on sports specific tasks and poor outcomes following ACLR. | At 6 and 9 months post surgery |
| Change in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Those who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, and who meet the inclusion criteria, will be asked if they wish to participate in this study. Sports Surgery Clinic is a private hospital where over 750 ACL reconstructive surgeries take place each year. Many patients will travel from all over the country of Ireland to the clinic for the surgery, meaning there is a wide catchment area for participants.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neil B Welch, PhD | Contact | 00 353 1 526 2030 | welchn2@upmc.ie | |
| Thilina Vitherana, MSc | Contact | 00 353 1 526 2040 | vitheranat@upmc.ie |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ray Moran, MCh (Orth) FRCSI FFSEM | Sports Surgery Clinic | Study Director |
| Mark Jackson, MBBS BSc FRCS | Sports Surgery Clinic | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sports Surgery Clinic | Recruiting | Dublin | Leinster | Ireland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20086634 | Background | Boden BP, Griffin LY, Garrett WE Jr. Etiology and Prevention of Noncontact ACL Injury. Phys Sportsmed. 2000 Apr;28(4):53-60. doi: 10.3810/psm.2000.04.841. | |
| 20595545 | Background | Koga H, Nakamae A, Shima Y, Iwasa J, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Bahr R, Krosshaug T. Mechanisms for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: knee joint kinematics in 10 injury situations from female team handball and basketball. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2218-25. doi: 10.1177/0363546510373570. Epub 2010 Jul 1. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070598 | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries |
| D007718 | Knee Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059549 | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001178 | Arthroplasty |
| D019637 | Orthopedic Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D019651 | Plastic Surgery Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| University of Melbourne | OTHER |
| University College Cork | OTHER |
| University of Leeds | OTHER |
| Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The IKDC subjective form is a reliable and valid measure to monitor symptoms and function in daily living activities in those with knee disorders (Higgins et al. 2007). |
| 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months post surgery |
| 17888709 | Background | Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D, Ghodadra N, Marchant M, Pietrobon R, Cook C; International Knee Documentation Committee. Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Joint Bone Spine. 2007 Dec;74(6):594-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.01.036. Epub 2007 Aug 6. |
| 11292048 | Background | Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Mar-Apr;29(2):213-8. doi: 10.1177/03635465010290021601. |
| 19083699 | Background | Webster KE, Feller JA, Lambros C. Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Phys Ther Sport. 2008 Feb;9(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.003. Epub 2007 Nov 5. |
| 10424208 | Background | Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW. Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;27(4):402-16. doi: 10.1177/03635465990270040201. |
| 20702858 | Background | Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Rauh MJ, Myer GD, Huang B, Hewett TE. Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):1968-78. doi: 10.1177/0363546510376053. Epub 2010 Aug 11. |
| 39919304 | Derived | McAleese T, Welch N, King E, Roshan D, Keane N, Moran KA, Jackson M, Withers D, Moran R, Devitt BM. Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Level 1 Athletes: Factors Associated With Return to Play, Reinjury, and Knee Function at 5 Years of Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2025 Mar;53(4):777-790. doi: 10.1177/03635465241313386. Epub 2025 Feb 7. |
| 33617291 | Derived | King E, Richter C, Daniels KAJ, Franklyn-Miller A, Falvey E, Myer GD, Jackson M, Moran R, Strike S. Biomechanical but Not Strength or Performance Measures Differentiate Male Athletes Who Experience ACL Reinjury on Return to Level 1 Sports. Am J Sports Med. 2021 Mar;49(4):918-927. doi: 10.1177/0363546520988018. Epub 2021 Feb 22. |
| 33560866 | Derived | King E, Richter C, Daniels KAJ, Franklyn-Miller A, Falvey E, Myer GD, Jackson M, Moran R, Strike S. Can Biomechanical Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Identify Athletes at Risk for Subsequent ACL Injury to the Contralateral Uninjured Limb? Am J Sports Med. 2021 Mar;49(3):609-619. doi: 10.1177/0363546520985283. Epub 2021 Feb 9. |
| 32031870 | Derived | King E, Richter C, Jackson M, Franklyn-Miller A, Falvey E, Myer GD, Strike S, Withers D, Moran R. Factors Influencing Return to Play and Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Rates in Level 1 Athletes After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Follow-up on 1432 Reconstructions at a Single Center. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(4):812-824. doi: 10.1177/0363546519900170. Epub 2020 Feb 7. |
| 30943079 | Derived | King E, Richter C, Franklyn-Miller A, Wadey R, Moran R, Strike S. Back to Normal Symmetry? Biomechanical Variables Remain More Asymmetrical Than Normal During Jump and Change-of-Direction Testing 9 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Apr;47(5):1175-1185. doi: 10.1177/0363546519830656. |